Clune Arena · at Air Force
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | AF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AF 76–73 · win probability AF 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
DEN 3, AF 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
DEN hits 36.8% and allows 36.7%; AF hits 30.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 38.6% and 41.8% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DEN 27%, AF 100%. Transfers in: DEN 6, AF 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
DEN has played the 249th-hardest schedule, AF the 119th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DEN 14.2%, AF 21.9%. Forced: DEN 13.0%, AF 15.1%
Shooting
Effective FG%: DEN 53.6 and allows 56.0; AF 48.9 and allows 56.4
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DEN plays 69.4 a game (151st fastest), AF 67.4 (259th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
AF at home. This season: AF 0-0 at home, DEN 0-0 away
AF offense vs DEN defense
Offense 290th of 366 against a defense 337th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DEN 29.8%, AF 21.4%. Defensive: DEN 67.2%, AF 68.7%
Even
DEN offense vs AF defense
Offense 184th of 366 against a defense 149th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: DEN 34.1, AF 35.1. Allowed: DEN 36.8, AF 36.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AF -3.2 | — |
| Total | — | 148.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | DEN 72.5 · AF 75.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AF -1.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | DEN 33.8 · AF 35.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 0-10 0% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
DEN 0–1 AFAF leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · DEN 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2021-22 | DEN 65 @ AF 66 | AF -6.5 | DEN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Denver
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
18-11
62% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-9
69% overs · avg +6.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 73-84 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-84 | +27.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-84 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 83-81 | +18.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 73-103 | +32.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 59-101 | +9.5 | L −32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-89 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 79-93 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 86-105 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 86-79 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 85-90 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 87-74 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 88-92 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 79-87 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 169.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 98-87 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-93 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 69-61 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 82-84 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 78-71 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 98-79 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 79-61 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 76-83 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 90-70 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-80 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 80-102 | -2.5 | L −24.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 67-83 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+2.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+13.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+9.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
−9.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+20.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+2.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
−32.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+2.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
−5.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
−22.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+15.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+11.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+3.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+7.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+0.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−11.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+4.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−0.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
−12.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
+4.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
−3.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
+19.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+22.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
+20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−4.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
+14.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
+5.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
−24.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−18.5
covered 18didn’t cover 11avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+20.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+0.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+1.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
+14.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+14.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+21.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
+6.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+26.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
+29.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
+25.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+5.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+14.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+4.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+16.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+3.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−15.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+28.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−1.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
+16.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
−31.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
+7.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
−7.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+15.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
−20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−1.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
−3.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
−6.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
+25.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−10.5
over 20under 9avg +6.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Air Force
32 games played
Straight up
3-29
9% wins
Against the spread
10-22
31% covers · avg −4.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg 0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 63-79 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 54-74 | +1.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 72-76 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 61-76 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 66-64 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 77-63 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 130.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 98-85 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 175.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 53-71 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 63-80 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 65-80 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 56-61 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 58-81 | +24.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 56-68 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 39-67 | +14.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 62-99 | +22.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 49-91 | +16.5 | L −25.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 62-70 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 128.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-81 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 52-81 | +19.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 54-96 | +23.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-79 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 57-81 | +26.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 54-88 | +22.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 74-91 | +16.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-93 | +14.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 61-98 | +28.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-91 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 80-86 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-66 | +20.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 60-86 | +19.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 59-74 | +24.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 45-80 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BEL
L 63-79
−0.5
8
vs
APSU
L 54-74
−18.5
11
vs
LIU
L 72-76
+1.5
15
vs
M-OH
L 61-76
−4.5
19
vs
ALST
W 66-64
−0.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 77-63
+16.5
23
vs
IUIN
W 98-85
+9.5
26
vs
UNCO
L 53-71
−13.5
29
vs
SDAK
L 63-80
−13.5
3
vs
PAC
L 65-80
−9.5
7
@
NAVY
L 56-61
+4.5
17
@
SDSU
L 58-81
+1.5
30
vs
WYO
L 56-68
+2.5
3
@
UNLV
L 39-67
−13.5
6
vs
USU
L 62-99
−14.5
10
vs
UNM
L 49-91
−25.5
13
@
SJSU
L 62-70
−2.5
17
vs
NEV
L 66-81
−0.5
20
@
CSU
L 52-81
−9.5
24
@
BOIS
L 54-96
−18.5
31
vs
FRES
L 62-79
−7.5
3
@
GCU
L 57-81
+2.5
7
vs
SDSU
L 54-88
−11.5
10
vs
CSU
L 74-91
−0.5
14
@
FRES
L 63-93
−15.5
17
@
UNM
L 61-98
−8.5
21
vs
UNLV
L 66-91
−8.5
24
vs
SJSU
L 80-86
+0.5
28
@
WYO
L 62-66
+16.5
3
vs
GCU
L 60-86
−6.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-74
+9.5
11
vs
NEV
L 45-80
−15.5
covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BEL
L 63-79
−2.5
8
vs
APSU
L 54-74
−8.5
11
vs
LIU
L 72-76
+10.5
15
vs
M-OH
L 61-76
−6.5
19
vs
ALST
W 66-64
−8.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 77-63
+9.5
23
vs
IUIN
W 98-85
+7.5
26
vs
UNCO
L 53-71
−22.5
29
vs
SDAK
L 63-80
−4.5
3
vs
PAC
L 65-80
+10.5
7
@
NAVY
L 56-61
−16.5
17
@
SDSU
L 58-81
+3.5
30
vs
WYO
L 56-68
−22.5
3
@
UNLV
L 39-67
−36.5
6
vs
USU
L 62-99
+21.5
10
vs
UNM
L 49-91
+1.5
13
@
SJSU
L 62-70
+3.5
17
vs
NEV
L 66-81
+12.5
20
@
CSU
L 52-81
−0.5
24
@
BOIS
L 54-96
+12.5
31
vs
FRES
L 62-79
−0.5
3
@
GCU
L 57-81
+0.5
7
vs
SDSU
L 54-88
+2.5
10
vs
CSU
L 74-91
+27.5
14
@
FRES
L 63-93
+13.5
17
@
UNM
L 61-98
+10.5
21
vs
UNLV
L 66-91
+3.5
24
vs
SJSU
L 80-86
+20.5
28
@
WYO
L 62-66
−17.5
3
vs
GCU
L 60-86
+2.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-74
−11.5
11
vs
NEV
L 45-80
−15.5
over 18under 14avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Air Force has the better starters
Position by position: Denver 0, Air Force 1, even 4
DenverBetterAir Force
G C. Johnson19.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 73
=Even
G K. Sanders12.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 77
G K. Martin TR5.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 24
=Even
G E. Greenberg6.6 pts · 2.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 18
G C. Hyland TR5 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 20
=Even
F L. Hobin11.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 26
F J. Rogers TR5.7 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 27
=Even
F E. Robinson7.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 39
F S. Wysocki5.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 14
→AFBig
F C. Walker10.4 pts · 5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 82
DenverBetterAir Force
DEN offense184th of 366 · -5.7
=Even
AF defense149th of 366 · -3.3
DEN defense337th of 366 · -8.9
=Even
AF offense290th of 366 · -8.9
Backcourt-1.7 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players
→AFSmall
Frontcourt-1.3 · 3 players
Bench-2.4 · 3 players
←DENBig
Bench-7.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestDEN betterAF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Johnson36 minK. Martin16 min · TRC. Hyland15 min · TRT. Cady11 min · TRL. ThreattNewJ. NelsonNew
Forwards
J. Rogers27 min · TRS. Wysocki19 minS. Mahoney5 min · TRH. BatesNewC. DimmockNewO. Wickstrom StumerNew
Centers
B. Mbengue9 min · TR
Guards
K. Sanders30 minE. Greenberg27 minA. Patterson14 minJ. Hinds12 minE. Taite2 minT. KeeneNew
Forwards
L. Hobin29 minE. Robinson28 minC. Walker22 minR. Dering14 minK. Gilles13 minB. Martin5 min
Centers
W. Celichowski21 minM. CaslaruNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.3 #61 | Points per game | 61.5 #362 |
| 1.16 #53 | Points per possession | 0.91 #363 |
| 69.4 #151 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #259 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #79 | Effective FG% | 48.9 #292 |
| 36.8 #32 | 3-point % | 30.6 #332 |
| 38.6 #199 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.8 #139 |
| 34.1 #203 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #174 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #30 | Turnover rate | 21.9 #362 |
| 29.8 #213 | Offensive rebound rate | 21.4 #360 |
| 11.2 #327 | Assists per game | 12.2 #273 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.0 #357 | Points allowed | 79.9 #316 |
| 1.21 #360 | Points allowed per possession | 1.19 #352 |
| 56.0 #344 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.4 #350 |
| 36.7 #338 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #352 |
| 13.0 #355 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #280 |
| 67.2 #291 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #215 |
| 4.5 #356 | Steals per game | 5.6 #281 |
| 1.9 #348 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #316 |
Denver
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Dakota67–83
- L@ Oral Roberts80–102
- Wvs St Thomas82–80
- Wvs South Dakota90–70
- L@ Omaha76–83
A week or more of rest.
Air Force
3-29 in 2025-26 overall · 0-21 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nevada45–80
- L@ Nevada59–74
- Lvs Grand Canyon60–86
- L@ Wyoming62–66
- Lvs San José St80–86
A week or more of rest.