CU Events Center · at Colorado
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLO 84–66 · win probability COLO 95%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COLO has more of the edges
UTEP 0, COLO 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UTEP offense vs COLO defense
Offense 226th of 366 against a defense 80th, on the model’s ratings
COLO offense vs UTEP defense
Offense 54th of 366 against a defense 173rd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTEP 26.2%, COLO 29.0%. Defensive: UTEP 67.2%, COLO 70.4%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UTEP plays 66.6 a game (291st fastest), COLO 71.0 (76th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
UTEP has played the 163rd-hardest schedule, COLO the 58th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTEP 33.4, COLO 36.6. Allowed: UTEP 42.0, COLO 36.6
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTEP 0%, COLO 40%. Transfers in: UTEP 7, COLO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTEP 48.3 and allows 51.5; COLO 52.9 and allows 52.6
Home court
COLO at home. This season: COLO 0-0 at home, UTEP 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
UTEP hits 33.9% and allows 34.0%; COLO hits 35.1% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 40.3% and 35.2% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTEP 17.4%, COLO 14.7%. Forced: UTEP 18.0%, COLO 15.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLO -18.4 | — |
| Total | — | 150.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | UTEP 66 · COLO 84.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLO -10.8 | — |
| 1H total | 70.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UTEP 29.7 · COLO 40.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UTEP
28 games played
Straight up
8-20
29% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 58-71 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 51-75 | +16.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 63-74 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 59-75 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-66 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 71-72 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 76-66 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 63-75 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 55-79 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 131.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 64-76 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 83-80 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 56-68 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-80 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 83-77 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-62 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 59-69 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 66-70 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-88 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 69-64 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 64-73 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 67-77 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 65-97 | +9.5 | L −22.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 78-71 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 61-64 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
LMU
L 58-71
−14.5
15
@
USU
L 51-75
−7.5
24
vs
W&M
L 63-74
−8.5
25
vs
UAB
L 59-75
−7.5
7
@
SEA
L 68-75
+5.5
13
@
HAW
L 61-66
+7.5
21
vs
NORF
L 71-72
−11.5
22
vs
NDSU
W 76-66
+12.5
29
@
LT
L 63-75
−9.5
2
@
MOST
L 55-79
−20.5
4
@
FIU
L 64-76
−5.5
8
vs
MTSU
W 83-80
+6.5
10
vs
WKU
L 56-68
−8.5
15
@
DEL
W 70-69
+2.5
17
@
LIB
L 69-80
+2.5
22
vs
FIU
W 83-77
+7.5
24
vs
MOST
L 57-62
−3.5
28
vs
LT
L 59-69
−12.5
31
vs
DEL
W 70-55
+8.5
4
@
SHSU
L 66-70
+6.5
7
vs
NMSU
W 91-88
+4.5
11
@
JXST
W 69-64
+11.5
14
vs
LIB
L 64-73
−2.5
21
@
NMSU
L 63-67
+3.5
26
@
MTSU
L 67-77
−1.5
28
@
WKU
L 65-97
−22.5
5
vs
KENN
W 78-71
+10.5
7
vs
JXST
L 61-64
−1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
LMU
L 58-71
−15.5
15
@
USU
L 51-75
−23.5
24
vs
W&M
L 63-74
−22.5
25
vs
UAB
L 59-75
−12.5
7
@
SEA
L 68-75
+6.5
13
@
HAW
L 61-66
−11.5
21
vs
NORF
L 71-72
+6.5
22
vs
NDSU
W 76-66
+2.5
29
@
LT
L 63-75
+7.5
2
@
MOST
L 55-79
+2.5
4
@
FIU
L 64-76
−12.5
8
vs
MTSU
W 83-80
+25.5
10
vs
WKU
L 56-68
−20.5
15
@
DEL
W 70-69
+13.5
17
@
LIB
L 69-80
+11.5
22
vs
FIU
W 83-77
+8.5
24
vs
MOST
L 57-62
−20.5
28
vs
LT
L 59-69
−2.5
31
vs
DEL
W 70-55
−3.5
4
@
SHSU
L 66-70
−9.5
7
vs
NMSU
W 91-88
+40.5
11
@
JXST
W 69-64
−1.5
14
vs
LIB
L 64-73
−2.5
21
@
NMSU
L 63-67
−12.5
26
@
MTSU
L 67-77
+4.5
28
@
WKU
L 65-97
+16.5
5
vs
KENN
W 78-71
+0.5
7
vs
JXST
L 61-64
−14.5
over 13under 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Colorado
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 102-97 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-88 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 94-66 | -22.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 95-79 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-68 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 78-70 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 86-91 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 88-64 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 84-73 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 81-86 | -15.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 95-89 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 85-73 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-73 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-77 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 61-72 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-95 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 67-97 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 87-61 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-86 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-70 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 44-78 | +13.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 86-90 | +15.5 | W +11.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-69 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 79-70 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-102 | +20.5 | L −19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 92-78 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 79-89 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 83-92 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 86-90 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
−5.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
−11.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+7.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+5.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+1.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
+11.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
+15.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−5.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
−3.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
+1.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
−5.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−11.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
−20.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+7.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
+2.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
+3.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−4.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−1.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
−12.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
−12.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
+27.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−11.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
+4.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−20.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+11.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
+10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
+3.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
−19.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+12.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+3.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
−10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
+13.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
+46.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+21.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+3.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+21.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
−2.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
−2.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−2.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
+27.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
−2.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
+6.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
+8.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+27.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
−4.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
−17.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−8.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−11.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
+21.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
+11.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
−5.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−2.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
−10.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−33.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+14.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
−10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
−14.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
+24.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+21.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+11.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
+10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+13.5
over 17under 16avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Colorado has the better starters
Position by position: UTEP 1, Colorado 3, even 1
UTEPBetterColorado
G L. Moeller TR11.1 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 46
→COLOBig
G B. Hargress14.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 93
G J. Whiting TR10.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
→COLOBig
F J. Neely TR17.7 pts · 11.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 96
G R. Miller TR12.3 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 66
←UTEPSmall
F I. Niagu TR4.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 42
G R. Jackson TR6.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 53
=No call
F D. Gomez TR5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
F R. Cason TR3.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 43
→COLOSmall
C N. Feddersen TR9 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 59
UTEPBetterColorado
UTEP offense226th of 366 · -6.9
→COLOBig
COLO defense80th of 366 · +0.3
UTEP defense173rd of 366 · -3.9
→COLOSmall
COLO offense54th of 366 · +3.2
Backcourt-3.1 · 4 players
→COLOBig
Backcourt+3.6 · 1 player
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
→COLOBig
Frontcourt+5.3 · 4 players
Bench-1.1 · 2 players
←UTEPSmall
Bench-2.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestUTEP betterCOLO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Moeller33 min · TRJ. Whiting32 min · TRR. Miller25 min · TRR. Jackson18 min · TRC. McDanielsNewD. CrissNew
Forwards
R. Cason15 min · TRA. Cassia10 min · TRJ. Ratowski7 min · TRM. KelvinNewI. WardNewI. PerasovicNew
Centers
D. TarpleyNew
Guards
B. Hargress33 minJ. Sanders18 minJ. Holland18 minI. Inman10 minA. JonesNewR. PortelaNew
Forwards
J. Neely33 min · TRI. Niagu21 min · TRD. Gomez20 min · TRN. Randall1 minG. MalualNewC. HillNew
Centers
N. Feddersen21 min · TRE. JacobsenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.4 #340 | Points per game | 80.2 #63 |
| 1.00 #326 | Points per possession | 1.13 #80 |
| 66.6 #291 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #76 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.3 #309 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #108 |
| 33.9 #178 | 3-point % | 35.1 #104 |
| 40.3 #163 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #267 |
| 33.4 #227 | Free throw rate | 36.6 #139 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.4 #229 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #46 |
| 26.2 #319 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.0 #235 |
| 11.0 #338 | Assists per game | 15.4 #67 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.7 #125 | Points allowed | 79.8 #313 |
| 1.09 #196 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #272 |
| 51.5 #187 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #243 |
| 34.0 #182 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #319 |
| 18.0 #98 | Turnovers forced | 15.2 #267 |
| 67.2 #293 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.4 #144 |
| 7.1 #113 | Steals per game | 6.3 #196 |
| 3.5 #149 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #170 |
UTEP
8-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Jax State61–64
- Wvs Kennesaw St78–71
- L@ Western KY65–97
- L@ MTSU67–77
- L@ New Mexico St63–67
A week or more of rest.
Colorado
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma86–90
- Lvs Oklahoma St83–92
- Lvs Arizona79–89
- W@ Utah92–78
- L@ Houston62–102
A week or more of rest.