CU Events Center · at Colorado
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COLO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLO 78–72 · win probability COLO 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CSU has more of the edges
CSU 3, COLO 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: CSU plays 64.4 a game (355th fastest), COLO 71.0 (76th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CSU 18.5%, COLO 14.7%. Forced: CSU 15.4%, COLO 15.2%
Three-pointers
CSU hits 38.6% and allows 34.2%; COLO hits 35.1% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 49.1% and 35.2% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: CSU 39.4, COLO 36.6. Allowed: CSU 34.2, COLO 36.6
Home court
COLO at home. This season: COLO 0-0 at home, CSU 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CSU 67%, COLO 40%. Transfers in: CSU 1, COLO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CSU 57.5 and allows 52.9; COLO 52.9 and allows 52.6
Context
Schedule so far
CSU has played the 96th-hardest schedule, COLO the 58th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CSU 30.0%, COLO 29.0%. Defensive: CSU 70.8%, COLO 70.4%
Even
CSU offense vs COLO defense
Offense 103rd of 366 against a defense 80th, on the model’s ratings
Even
COLO offense vs CSU defense
Offense 54th of 366 against a defense 61st, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COLO -6.0 | — |
| Total | — | 150.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | CSU 72.4 · COLO 78.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COLO -3.4 | — |
| 1H total | 70.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | CSU 33.5 · COLO 37 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CSU 2–2 COLOSeries tied · 4 games since 2021-22 · CSU 2-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | COLO 86 @ CSU 91 | CSU -1.5 | CSU W |
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | CSU 55 @ COLO 72 | COLO -2.5 | COLO W |
| Nov 29, 2023-24 | COLO 83 @ CSU 88 | CSU -3.5 | CSU W |
| Dec 8, 2022-23 | CSU 65 @ COLO 93 | COLO -3.5 | COLO W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Colorado St
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1555%
4 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 98-64 | -10.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 97-74 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 93-79 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 80-67 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 81-83 | -18.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-66 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 76-70 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 83-68 | +2.5 | W +17.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 91-86 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 76-55 | -20.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 58-100 | +10.5 | L −31.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 62-75 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 70-60 | +6.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 70-80 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 70-62 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 69-79 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 73-79 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 81-52 | -19.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 61-65 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 50-73 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 57-68 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-57 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 91-74 | -16.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-68 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-86 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-74 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 74-70 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 85-73 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 82-74 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 67-78 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 67-63 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 62-71 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 64-69 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UIW
W 98-64
+23.5
9
vs
OMA
W 97-74
+8.5
12
vs
CP
W 93-79
−4.5
16
@
LUC
W 80-67
+9.5
21
vs
DEN
L 81-83
−20.5
26
vs
VT
L 64-66
+2.5
27
vs
WICH
W 76-70
+4.5
28
vs
USF
W 83-68
+17.5
6
vs
COLO
W 91-86
+3.5
9
vs
DART
W 76-55
+0.5
20
@
USU
L 58-100
−31.5
30
vs
NEV
L 62-75
−14.5
3
@
GCU
W 70-60
+16.5
6
vs
UNM
L 70-80
−8.5
9
vs
UNLV
W 70-62
+1.5
13
@
FRES
L 69-79
−13.5
16
@
BOIS
L 73-79
−0.5
20
vs
AF
W 81-52
+9.5
23
vs
USU
L 61-65
+1.5
28
@
SDSU
L 50-73
−13.5
31
@
WYO
L 57-68
−9.5
7
vs
SJSU
W 65-57
−7.5
10
@
AF
W 91-74
+0.5
14
vs
WYO
W 79-68
+7.5
18
@
UNLV
W 91-86
+7.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 83-74
+12.5
24
vs
FRES
W 74-70
−4.5
28
@
SJSU
W 85-73
+7.5
4
@
UNM
W 82-74
+16.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 67-78
−12.5
11
vs
FRES
W 67-63
−3.5
12
vs
SDSU
L 62-71
−2.5
18
vs
JOES
L 64-69
−10.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UIW
W 98-64
+14.5
9
vs
OMA
W 97-74
+17.5
12
vs
CP
W 93-79
+6.5
16
@
LUC
W 80-67
−4.5
21
vs
DEN
L 81-83
+14.5
26
vs
VT
L 64-66
−23.5
27
vs
WICH
W 76-70
+3.5
28
vs
USF
W 83-68
−4.5
6
vs
COLO
W 91-86
+27.5
9
vs
DART
W 76-55
−22.5
20
@
USU
L 58-100
+10.5
30
vs
NEV
L 62-75
−2.5
3
@
GCU
W 70-60
−13.5
6
vs
UNM
L 70-80
+6.5
9
vs
UNLV
W 70-62
−19.5
13
@
FRES
L 69-79
+8.5
16
@
BOIS
L 73-79
+11.5
20
vs
AF
W 81-52
−0.5
23
vs
USU
L 61-65
−23.5
28
@
SDSU
L 50-73
−16.5
31
@
WYO
L 57-68
−17.5
7
vs
SJSU
W 65-57
−16.5
10
@
AF
W 91-74
+27.5
14
vs
WYO
W 79-68
+6.5
18
@
UNLV
W 91-86
+29.5
21
vs
SDSU
W 83-74
+17.5
24
vs
FRES
W 74-70
−5.5
28
@
SJSU
W 85-73
+6.5
4
@
UNM
W 82-74
+5.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 67-78
+1.5
11
vs
FRES
W 67-63
−16.5
12
vs
SDSU
L 62-71
−9.5
18
vs
JOES
L 64-69
−11.5
over 17under 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Colorado
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 102-97 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-88 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 94-66 | -22.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 95-79 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-68 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 78-70 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 86-91 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 88-64 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 84-73 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 81-86 | -15.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 95-89 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 85-73 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-73 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-77 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 61-72 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-95 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 67-97 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 87-61 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-86 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-70 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 44-78 | +13.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 86-90 | +15.5 | W +11.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-69 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 79-70 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-102 | +20.5 | L −19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 92-78 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 79-89 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 83-92 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 86-90 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
−5.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
−11.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+7.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+5.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+1.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
+11.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
+15.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−5.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
−3.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
+1.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
−5.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−11.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
−20.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+7.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
+2.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
+3.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−4.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−1.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
−12.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
−12.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
+27.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−11.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
+4.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−20.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+11.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
+10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
+3.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
−19.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+12.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+3.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
−10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
+13.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
+46.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+21.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+3.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+21.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
−2.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
−2.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−2.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
+27.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
−2.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
+6.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
+8.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+27.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
−4.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
−17.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−8.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−11.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
+21.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
+11.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
−5.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−2.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
−10.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−33.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+14.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
−10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
−14.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
+24.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+21.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+11.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
+10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+13.5
over 17under 16avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Colorado St has the better starters
Position by position: Colorado St 2, Colorado 1, even 2
Colorado StBetterColorado
G J. Menard TR12.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 79
=Even
G B. Hargress14.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 93
G J. Pascarelli10.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 64
→COLOSmall
F J. Neely TR17.7 pts · 11.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 96
G J. Butler9.4 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 67
←CSUSmall
F I. Niagu TR4.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 42
F K. Jorgensen11.5 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 87
=No call
F D. Gomez TR5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
F C. Booth10.7 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 90
←CSUSmall
C N. Feddersen TR9 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 59
Colorado StBetterColorado
CSU offense103rd of 366 · -1.2
=Even
COLO defense80th of 366 · +0.3
CSU defense61st of 366 · +1.2
=Even
COLO offense54th of 366 · +3.2
Backcourt+1.8 · 3 players
→COLOSmall
Backcourt+3.6 · 1 player
Frontcourt+5.0 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt+5.3 · 4 players
Bench-0.7 · 3 players
←CSUSmall
Bench-2.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCSU betterCOLO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Menard29 min · TRJ. Pascarelli27 minJ. Butler26 minJ. McIver12 minR. SawyerNewP. DunsonNew
Forwards
K. Jorgensen26 minC. Booth25 minR. Mbemba18 minC. Dortch2 minA. MillerNewD. TedeschiNew
Centers
J. ClarkNew
Guards
B. Hargress33 minJ. Sanders18 minJ. Holland18 minI. Inman10 minA. JonesNewR. PortelaNew
Forwards
J. Neely33 min · TRI. Niagu21 min · TRD. Gomez20 min · TRN. Randall1 minG. MalualNewC. HillNew
Centers
N. Feddersen21 min · TRE. JacobsenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.8 #169 | Points per game | 80.2 #63 |
| 1.16 #44 | Points per possession | 1.13 #80 |
| 64.4 #355 | Pace (possessions) | 71.0 #76 |
| Shooting | ||
| 57.5 #12 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #108 |
| 38.6 #9 | 3-point % | 35.1 #104 |
| 49.1 #19 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #267 |
| 39.4 #69 | Free throw rate | 36.6 #139 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.5 #298 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #46 |
| 30.0 #198 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.0 #235 |
| 15.6 #62 | Assists per game | 15.4 #67 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.6 #95 | Points allowed | 79.8 #313 |
| 1.11 #241 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #272 |
| 52.9 #263 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #243 |
| 34.2 #196 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.3 #319 |
| 15.4 #255 | Turnovers forced | 15.2 #267 |
| 70.8 #123 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.4 #144 |
| 5.2 #320 | Steals per game | 6.3 #196 |
| 2.1 #338 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #170 |
Colorado St
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Saint Joseph's64–69
- Lvs San Diego St62–71
- Wvs Fresno St67–63
- Lvs Boise St67–78
- W@ New Mexico82–74
A week or more of rest.
Colorado
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma86–90
- Lvs Oklahoma St83–92
- Lvs Arizona79–89
- W@ Utah92–78
- L@ Houston62–102
A week or more of rest.