Don Haskins Center · at UTEP
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UTEP 79–68 · win probability UTEP 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UTEP has more of the edges
UND 3, UTEP 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UND 14.1%, UTEP 17.4%. Forced: UND 19.3%, UTEP 18.0%
UND offense vs UTEP defense
Offense 304th of 366 against a defense 173rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UND has played the 293rd-hardest schedule, UTEP the 163rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
UTEP offense vs UND defense
Offense 226th of 366 against a defense 353rd, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UND hits 32.7% and allows 37.1%; UTEP hits 33.9% and allows 34.0%. Threes are 40.6% and 40.3% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: UND plays 69.7 a game (133rd fastest), UTEP 66.6 (291st). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: UND 49.5 and allows 56.5; UTEP 48.3 and allows 51.5
Home court
UTEP at home. This season: UTEP 0-0 at home, UND 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: UND 37.9, UTEP 33.4. Allowed: UND 43.8, UTEP 42.0
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UND 24%, UTEP 0%. Transfers in: UND 2, UTEP 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UND 27.4%, UTEP 26.2%. Defensive: UND 67.6%, UTEP 67.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UTEP -10.3 | — |
| Total | — | 146.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UND 68.2 · UTEP 78.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UTEP -6.0 | — |
| 1H total | 68.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | UND 31.3 · UTEP 37.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
North Dakota
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
21-11
66% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-91 | +36.5 | W +7.5 | 170.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 70-74 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 85-93 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 76-74 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-75 | +29.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 58-75 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 78-69 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 55-92 | +18.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-90 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 75-79 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-69 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 90-88 | +12.5 | W +14.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 55-78 | +29.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 72-61 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 90-87 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 79-90 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-79 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 80-91 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 96-80 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 79-62 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-86 | +5.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-80 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-73 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 79-98 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 72-71 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-83 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 85-70 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-91 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-96 | +11.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 83-67 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 67-66 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 62-70 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ALA
L 62-91
+7.5
6
vs
UCR
L 70-74
−5.5
9
vs
CSUN
L 85-93
−1.5
15
@
UCR
W 76-74
+5.5
19
@
CREI
L 60-75
+14.5
22
vs
CCU
L 58-75
−13.5
23
@
WIU
W 78-69
+6.5
28
@
HAW
L 55-92
−18.5
3
@
IDHO
L 58-90
−20.5
6
vs
MONT
L 75-79
+1.5
13
vs
WIU
L 66-69
−10.5
18
vs
WIN
W 90-88
+14.5
21
@
NEB
L 55-78
+6.5
1
vs
ORU
W 72-61
+9.5
3
vs
SDST
W 90-87
+10.5
8
@
OMA
L 79-90
−5.5
10
@
KC
W 81-79
+3.5
15
vs
STMN
L 80-91
−0.5
17
vs
SDAK
W 96-80
+14.5
22
@
ORU
W 79-62
+18.5
24
@
DEN
W 93-86
+12.5
29
@
STMN
W 81-80
+12.5
5
vs
OMA
W 76-73
+1.5
7
vs
DEN
L 79-98
−22.5
11
@
SDAK
W 72-71
+3.5
14
vs
NDSU
L 66-83
−11.5
19
vs
KC
W 85-70
+5.5
21
@
SDST
L 83-91
+1.5
28
@
NDSU
L 63-96
−21.5
6
vs
DEN
W 83-67
+18.5
7
vs
STMN
W 67-66
+12.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 62-70
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 11avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ALA
L 62-91
−17.5
6
vs
UCR
L 70-74
−2.5
9
vs
CSUN
L 85-93
+19.5
15
@
UCR
W 76-74
+1.5
19
@
CREI
L 60-75
−20.5
22
vs
CCU
L 58-75
−14.5
23
@
WIU
W 78-69
+0.5
28
@
HAW
L 55-92
−2.5
3
@
IDHO
L 58-90
−3.5
6
vs
MONT
L 75-79
−0.5
13
vs
WIU
L 66-69
−10.5
18
vs
WIN
W 90-88
+20.5
21
@
NEB
L 55-78
−18.5
1
vs
ORU
W 72-61
−15.5
3
vs
SDST
W 90-87
+24.5
8
@
OMA
L 79-90
+22.5
10
@
KC
W 81-79
+13.5
15
vs
STMN
L 80-91
+19.5
17
vs
SDAK
W 96-80
+15.5
22
@
ORU
W 79-62
−8.5
24
@
DEN
W 93-86
+16.5
29
@
STMN
W 81-80
+8.5
5
vs
OMA
W 76-73
−1.5
7
vs
DEN
L 79-98
+15.5
11
@
SDAK
W 72-71
−13.5
14
vs
NDSU
L 66-83
−0.5
19
vs
KC
W 85-70
+4.5
21
@
SDST
L 83-91
+22.5
28
@
NDSU
L 63-96
+6.5
6
vs
DEN
W 83-67
−10.5
7
vs
STMN
W 67-66
−20.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 62-70
−15.5
over 15under 17avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
UTEP
28 games played
Straight up
8-20
29% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11 | vs | L 58-71 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 51-75 | +16.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 63-74 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 59-75 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-75 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-66 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 71-72 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 76-66 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 63-75 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 55-79 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 131.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 64-76 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 83-80 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 56-68 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-80 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 83-77 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-62 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 59-69 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 130.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 70-55 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 66-70 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-88 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 69-64 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 64-73 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 67-77 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 65-97 | +9.5 | L −22.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 78-71 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 61-64 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
11
vs
LMU
L 58-71
−14.5
15
@
USU
L 51-75
−7.5
24
vs
W&M
L 63-74
−8.5
25
vs
UAB
L 59-75
−7.5
7
@
SEA
L 68-75
+5.5
13
@
HAW
L 61-66
+7.5
21
vs
NORF
L 71-72
−11.5
22
vs
NDSU
W 76-66
+12.5
29
@
LT
L 63-75
−9.5
2
@
MOST
L 55-79
−20.5
4
@
FIU
L 64-76
−5.5
8
vs
MTSU
W 83-80
+6.5
10
vs
WKU
L 56-68
−8.5
15
@
DEL
W 70-69
+2.5
17
@
LIB
L 69-80
+2.5
22
vs
FIU
W 83-77
+7.5
24
vs
MOST
L 57-62
−3.5
28
vs
LT
L 59-69
−12.5
31
vs
DEL
W 70-55
+8.5
4
@
SHSU
L 66-70
+6.5
7
vs
NMSU
W 91-88
+4.5
11
@
JXST
W 69-64
+11.5
14
vs
LIB
L 64-73
−2.5
21
@
NMSU
L 63-67
+3.5
26
@
MTSU
L 67-77
−1.5
28
@
WKU
L 65-97
−22.5
5
vs
KENN
W 78-71
+10.5
7
vs
JXST
L 61-64
−1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
11
vs
LMU
L 58-71
−15.5
15
@
USU
L 51-75
−23.5
24
vs
W&M
L 63-74
−22.5
25
vs
UAB
L 59-75
−12.5
7
@
SEA
L 68-75
+6.5
13
@
HAW
L 61-66
−11.5
21
vs
NORF
L 71-72
+6.5
22
vs
NDSU
W 76-66
+2.5
29
@
LT
L 63-75
+7.5
2
@
MOST
L 55-79
+2.5
4
@
FIU
L 64-76
−12.5
8
vs
MTSU
W 83-80
+25.5
10
vs
WKU
L 56-68
−20.5
15
@
DEL
W 70-69
+13.5
17
@
LIB
L 69-80
+11.5
22
vs
FIU
W 83-77
+8.5
24
vs
MOST
L 57-62
−20.5
28
vs
LT
L 59-69
−2.5
31
vs
DEL
W 70-55
−3.5
4
@
SHSU
L 66-70
−9.5
7
vs
NMSU
W 91-88
+40.5
11
@
JXST
W 69-64
−1.5
14
vs
LIB
L 64-73
−2.5
21
@
NMSU
L 63-67
−12.5
26
@
MTSU
L 67-77
+4.5
28
@
WKU
L 65-97
+16.5
5
vs
KENN
W 78-71
+0.5
7
vs
JXST
L 61-64
−14.5
over 13under 15avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UTEP has the better starters
Position by position: North Dakota 0, UTEP 3, even 2
North DakotaBetterUTEP
G Z. Kraft7.7 pts · 2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 23
→UTEPSmall
G L. Moeller TR11.1 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 46
G S. Hincapie TR4.9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 11
→UTEPSmall
G J. Whiting TR10.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
G T. Wagner TR1.7 pts · 1.2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Miller TR12.3 pts · 2.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 66
F K. Ouse0.5 pts · 0.4 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Jackson TR6.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 53
C J. Jones2.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 1
→UTEPBig
F R. Cason TR3.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 43
North DakotaBetterUTEP
UND offense304th of 366 · -9.5
→UTEPBig
UTEP defense173rd of 366 · -3.9
UND defense353rd of 366 · -9.9
→UTEPBig
UTEP offense226th of 366 · -6.9
Backcourt-4.8 · 3 players
→UTEPSmall
Backcourt-3.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-4.5 · 2 players
→UTEPBig
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestUND betterUTEP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Z. Kraft25 minS. Hincapie16 min · TRT. Wagner7 min · TRL. WinkelNewZ. ParksNewJ. MooreNew
Forwards
K. Ouse6 minA. RadojevicNewJ. ThomasNewD. ElyNew
Centers
J. Jones19 min
Guards
L. Moeller33 min · TRJ. Whiting32 min · TRR. Miller25 min · TRR. Jackson18 min · TRC. McDanielsNewD. CrissNew
Forwards
R. Cason15 min · TRA. Cassia10 min · TRJ. Ratowski7 min · TRM. KelvinNewI. WardNewI. PerasovicNew
Centers
D. TarpleyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.2 #187 | Points per game | 66.4 #340 |
| 1.07 #214 | Points per possession | 1.00 #326 |
| 69.7 #133 | Pace (possessions) | 66.6 #291 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.5 #272 | Effective FG% | 48.3 #309 |
| 32.7 #246 | 3-point % | 33.9 #178 |
| 40.6 #155 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.3 #163 |
| 37.9 #106 | Free throw rate | 33.4 #227 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.1 #27 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #229 |
| 27.4 #284 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.2 #319 |
| 10.8 #343 | Assists per game | 11.0 #338 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.6 #310 | Points allowed | 72.7 #125 |
| 1.14 #306 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #196 |
| 56.5 #353 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #187 |
| 37.1 #345 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.0 #182 |
| 19.3 #36 | Turnovers forced | 18.0 #98 |
| 67.6 #276 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #293 |
| 7.9 #49 | Steals per game | 7.1 #113 |
| 2.5 #307 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #149 |
North Dakota
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-7 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs N Dakota St62–70
- Wvs St Thomas67–66
- Wvs Denver83–67
- L@ N Dakota St63–96
- L@ S Dakota St83–91
A week or more of rest.
UTEP
8-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Jax State61–64
- Wvs Kennesaw St78–71
- L@ Western KY65–97
- L@ MTSU67–77
- L@ New Mexico St63–67
A week or more of rest.