Swinney Center · at Kansas City
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEN 79–74 · win probability DEN 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DEN has more of the edges
DEN 6, KC 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
DEN hits 36.8% and allows 36.7%; KC hits 28.4% and allows 37.5%. Threes are 38.6% and 36.8% of their shots
DEN offense vs KC defense
Offense 184th of 366 against a defense 335th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: DEN 53.6 and allows 56.0; KC 45.8 and allows 56.3
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DEN 29.8%, KC 26.4%. Defensive: DEN 67.2%, KC 64.1%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: DEN plays 69.4 a game (151st fastest), KC 71.8 (45th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
KC at home. This season: KC 0-0 at home, DEN 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DEN 27%, KC 0%. Transfers in: DEN 6, KC 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DEN 14.2%, KC 18.2%. Forced: DEN 13.0%, KC 16.4%
Even
KC offense vs DEN defense
Offense 321st of 366 against a defense 337th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
DEN has played the 249th-hardest schedule, KC the 235th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: DEN 34.1, KC 29.2. Allowed: DEN 36.8, KC 31.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DEN -4.5 | — |
| Total | — | 153.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | DEN 78.8 · KC 74.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEN -2.8 | — |
| 1H total | 71.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | DEN 37.2 · KC 34.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 0-10 0% | 0-10 0% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
DEN 6–5 KCDEN leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · DEN has won the last 2 meetings · DEN 5-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2025-26 | DEN 69 @ KC 61 | KC +3.5 | DEN W |
| Dec 31, 2025-26 | KC 74 @ DEN 87 | DEN -9.5 | DEN W |
| Feb 27, 2024-25 | DEN 56 @ KC 64 | KC -7.5 | KC W |
| Jan 30, 2024-25 | KC 68 @ DEN 69 | DEN +3.5 | DEN W |
| Mar 9, 2023-24 | DEN 61 vs KC 60 | KC -5.5 | DEN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Denver
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
18-11
62% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-9
69% overs · avg +6.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 73-84 | +13.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-84 | +27.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-84 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 83-81 | +18.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 73-103 | +32.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 59-101 | +9.5 | L −32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-89 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 79-93 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 86-105 | -3.5 | L −22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 86-79 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 85-90 | +16.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 87-74 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 88-92 | +11.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 79-87 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 169.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 98-87 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-93 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 69-61 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 82-84 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 78-71 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 98-79 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 161.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 79-61 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 160.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 76-83 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 90-70 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-80 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 80-102 | -2.5 | L −24.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 67-83 | -2.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+2.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+13.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+9.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
−9.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+20.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+2.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
−32.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+2.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
−5.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
−22.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+15.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+11.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+3.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+7.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+0.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−11.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+4.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−0.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
−12.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
+4.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
−3.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
+19.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+22.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
+20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−4.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
+14.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
+5.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
−24.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−18.5
covered 18didn’t cover 11avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
SEA
L 73-84
+20.5
6
@
WASH
L 70-84
+0.5
9
@
MTST
W 75-73
+1.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-84
+14.5
21
@
CSU
W 83-81
+14.5
24
@
ARIZ
L 73-103
+21.5
26
@
WYO
L 59-101
+6.5
3
vs
EWU
W 93-89
+26.5
6
@
IDST
L 79-93
+29.5
13
vs
CSUF
L 86-105
+25.5
20
@
UNCO
W 86-79
+5.5
22
@
TLSA
L 85-90
+14.5
31
vs
KC
W 87-74
+4.5
4
@
STMN
L 88-92
+16.5
8
@
SDST
L 79-87
+3.5
10
@
SDAK
L 72-82
−15.5
14
vs
ORU
W 98-87
+28.5
22
vs
NDSU
L 77-82
−1.5
24
vs
UND
L 86-93
+16.5
28
@
KC
W 69-61
−31.5
31
vs
OMA
L 82-84
+7.5
5
@
NDSU
W 78-71
−7.5
7
@
UND
W 98-79
+15.5
12
vs
SDST
W 79-61
−20.5
15
@
OMA
L 76-83
−1.5
19
vs
SDAK
W 90-70
−3.5
21
vs
STMN
W 82-80
−6.5
26
@
ORU
L 80-102
+25.5
6
vs
UND
L 67-83
−10.5
over 20under 9avg +6.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas City
28 games played
Straight up
1-27
4% wins
Against the spread
5-23
18% covers · avg −6.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 78-101 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 91-105 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 196 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 55-71 | +31.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 45-81 | +23.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 67-80 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-82 | +10.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 59-68 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 66-90 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 60-64 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 67-89 | +30.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 79-91 | +27.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 74-87 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-66 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-97 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 79-81 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 83-99 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-90 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 60-77 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 61-69 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 64-99 | +17.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 75-82 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 60-69 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 64-104 | +12.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-85 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 59-95 | +19.5 | L −16.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 59-73 | +12.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 70-94 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 62-84 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
SIU
L 78-101
−10.5
11
vs
IONA
L 91-105
−9.5
15
@
TEX
L 55-71
+15.5
19
@
TCU
L 45-81
−12.5
24
@
LIN
L 67-80
−8.5
29
@
WEB
L 61-82
−10.5
3
vs
IDST
L 59-68
−3.5
6
@
EWU
L 66-90
−14.5
10
vs
WEB
L 60-64
+3.5
16
@
OU
L 67-89
+8.5
18
@
OKST
L 79-91
+15.5
31
@
DEN
L 74-87
−3.5
3
@
OMA
W 73-66
+15.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 73-97
−14.5
10
vs
UND
L 79-81
−3.5
15
@
SDAK
L 83-99
−8.5
17
@
SDST
L 62-90
−14.5
24
vs
OMA
L 60-77
−12.5
28
vs
DEN
L 61-69
−4.5
1
@
STMN
L 64-99
−17.5
4
vs
SDAK
L 75-82
−4.5
12
@
ORU
L 60-69
−2.5
14
vs
STMN
L 64-104
−27.5
19
@
UND
L 70-85
−5.5
21
@
NDSU
L 59-95
−16.5
26
vs
SDST
L 59-73
−1.5
28
vs
ORU
L 70-94
−20.5
4
vs
ORU
L 62-84
−13.5
covered 5didn’t cover 23avg −6.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
SIU
L 78-101
+37.5
11
vs
IONA
L 91-105
+39.5
15
@
TEX
L 55-71
−33.5
19
@
TCU
L 45-81
−24.5
24
@
LIN
L 67-80
−5.5
29
@
WEB
L 61-82
−12.5
3
vs
IDST
L 59-68
−10.5
6
@
EWU
L 66-90
+4.5
10
vs
WEB
L 60-64
−26.5
16
@
OU
L 67-89
+2.5
18
@
OKST
L 79-91
+8.5
31
@
DEN
L 74-87
+4.5
3
@
OMA
W 73-66
−9.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 73-97
+25.5
10
vs
UND
L 79-81
+13.5
15
@
SDAK
L 83-99
+25.5
17
@
SDST
L 62-90
+0.5
24
vs
OMA
L 60-77
−11.5
28
vs
DEN
L 61-69
−31.5
1
@
STMN
L 64-99
+11.5
4
vs
SDAK
L 75-82
+0.5
12
@
ORU
L 60-69
−21.5
14
vs
STMN
L 64-104
+13.5
19
@
UND
L 70-85
+4.5
21
@
NDSU
L 59-95
+5.5
26
vs
SDST
L 59-73
−20.5
28
vs
ORU
L 70-94
+14.5
4
vs
ORU
L 62-84
−3.5
over 16under 12avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas City has the better starters
Position by position: Denver 1, Kansas City 2, even 2
DenverBetterKansas City
G C. Johnson19.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 73
←DENSmall
G C. Daughtery TR10 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 45
G K. Martin TR5.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 24
→KCSmall
G J. Smith TR9.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 43
G C. Hyland TR5 pts · 1.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 20
=Even
G M. Samar TR4.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 28
F J. Rogers TR5.7 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 27
=No call
F S. Hartmann TR8.2 pts · 5 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
F S. Wysocki5.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 14
→KCSmall
F A. Diop TR5.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 29
DenverBetterKansas City
DEN offense184th of 366 · -5.7
←DENBig
KC defense335th of 366 · -8.8
DEN defense337th of 366 · -8.9
=Even
KC offense321st of 366 · -10.5
Backcourt-1.7 · 3 players
←DENSmall
Backcourt-3.0 · 3 players
Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players
→KCSmall
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 3 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestDEN betterKC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Johnson36 minK. Martin16 min · TRC. Hyland15 min · TRT. Cady11 min · TRL. ThreattNewJ. NelsonNew
Forwards
J. Rogers27 min · TRS. Wysocki19 minS. Mahoney5 min · TRH. BatesNewC. DimmockNewO. Wickstrom StumerNew
Centers
B. Mbengue9 min · TR
Guards
C. Daughtery27 min · TRJ. Smith25 min · TRM. Samar16 min · TRE. MoskowitzNewD. JacksonNewC. LoveNew
Forwards
S. Hartmann24 min · TRA. Diop19 min · TRR. ButirinsNewJ. SickingNewA. BakhtadzeNewM. Bruce-McCrommonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.3 #61 | Points per game | 67.0 #334 |
| 1.16 #53 | Points per possession | 0.93 #361 |
| 69.4 #151 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #45 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #79 | Effective FG% | 45.8 #352 |
| 36.8 #32 | 3-point % | 28.4 #360 |
| 38.6 #199 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.8 #235 |
| 34.1 #203 | Free throw rate | 29.2 #330 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.2 #30 | Turnover rate | 18.2 #282 |
| 29.8 #213 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.4 #314 |
| 11.2 #327 | Assists per game | 11.3 #324 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.0 #357 | Points allowed | 84.8 #359 |
| 1.21 #360 | Points allowed per possession | 1.18 #348 |
| 56.0 #344 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.3 #348 |
| 36.7 #338 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.5 #350 |
| 13.0 #355 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #193 |
| 67.2 #291 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.1 #353 |
| 4.5 #356 | Steals per game | 6.4 #192 |
| 1.9 #348 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #195 |
Denver
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Dakota67–83
- L@ Oral Roberts80–102
- Wvs St Thomas82–80
- Wvs South Dakota90–70
- L@ Omaha76–83
A week or more of rest.
Kansas City
1-27 in 2025-26 overall · 1-16 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oral Roberts62–84
- Lvs Oral Roberts70–94
- Lvs S Dakota St59–73
- L@ N Dakota St59–95
- L@ North Dakota70–85
A week or more of rest.