Clune Arena · at Air Force
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | AF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AF 70–68 · win probability AF 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NAVY has more of the edges
NAVY 6, AF 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
NAVY hits 35.9% and allows 30.0%; AF hits 30.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 33.1% and 41.8% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: NAVY 53.1 and allows 48.3; AF 48.9 and allows 56.4
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NAVY 31.9%, AF 21.4%. Defensive: NAVY 72.6%, AF 68.7%
Context
Schedule so far
NAVY has played the 311th-hardest schedule, AF the 119th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NAVY 16.8%, AF 21.9%. Forced: NAVY 18.3%, AF 15.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: NAVY 38.8, AF 35.1. Allowed: NAVY 26.0, AF 36.6
AF offense vs NAVY defense
Offense 290th of 366 against a defense 145th, on the model’s ratings
NAVY offense vs AF defense
Offense 270th of 366 against a defense 149th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NAVY 46%, AF 100%. Transfers in: NAVY 0, AF 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
AF at home. This season: AF 0-0 at home, NAVY 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: NAVY plays 66.0 a game (316th fastest), AF 67.4 (259th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AF -2.5 | — |
| Total | — | 138.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | NAVY 67.8 · AF 70.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AF -1.4 | — |
| 1H total | 64.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | NAVY 31.7 · AF 33 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | |
| 0-10 0% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NAVY 1–0 AFNAVY leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NAVY 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2025-26 | AF 56 @ NAVY 61 | NAVY -9.5 | AF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Navy
32 games played
Straight up
24-8
75% wins
Against the spread
21-11
66% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 76-55 | -3.5 | W +17.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 68-97 | +5.5 | L −23.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 71-80 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 61-73 | +26.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 86-70 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 84-51 | -10.5 | W +22.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 57-87 | +8.5 | L −21.5 | 138.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 65-69 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 66-59 | -15.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 61-56 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-55 | -20.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 65-58 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 76-55 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-50 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 51-65 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 82-79 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 85-68 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 84-56 | -10.5 | W +17.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 58-50 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 87-71 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 65-50 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-73 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 76-60 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 84-80 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 72-49 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-63 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 78-51 | -6.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 85-69 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 74-69 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 72-73 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 72-82 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
PRES
W 76-55
+17.5
7
vs
YALE
L 68-97
−23.5
11
@
PSU
L 71-80
+2.5
18
@
UNC
L 61-73
+14.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 86-70
−1.5
26
vs
GWEB
W 84-51
+22.5
28
@
UNCW
L 57-87
−21.5
29
vs
SELA
L 65-69
−7.5
3
@
DSU
W 66-59
−8.5
7
vs
AF
W 61-56
−4.5
19
vs
COPP
W 88-55
+12.5
31
vs
BU
W 82-77
+0.5
3
@
HC
W 65-58
+1.5
7
vs
BUCK
W 76-55
+12.5
10
vs
LAF
W 76-50
+17.5
12
@
AMER
L 51-65
−16.5
17
@
LEH
W 82-79
−0.5
21
vs
HC
W 85-68
+5.5
24
vs
ARMY
W 84-56
+17.5
28
@
BU
W 58-50
+6.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 87-71
+6.5
4
@
LAF
W 65-50
+11.5
7
vs
AMER
W 82-73
+4.5
9
@
BUCK
W 76-60
+9.5
14
@
COLG
W 84-80
+5.5
18
vs
LEH
W 72-49
+13.5
21
@
ARMY
W 81-63
+9.5
25
@
L-MD
W 78-51
+20.5
28
vs
COLG
W 85-69
+9.5
5
vs
BUCK
W 74-69
−10.5
8
vs
BU
L 72-73
−7.5
18
@
WAKE
L 72-82
−0.5
covered 21didn’t cover 11avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
PRES
W 76-55
−10.5
7
vs
YALE
L 68-97
+17.5
11
@
PSU
L 71-80
−4.5
18
@
UNC
L 61-73
−26.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 86-70
+15.5
26
vs
GWEB
W 84-51
−18.5
28
@
UNCW
L 57-87
+5.5
29
vs
SELA
L 65-69
−2.5
3
@
DSU
W 66-59
−7.5
7
vs
AF
W 61-56
−16.5
19
vs
COPP
W 88-55
−2.5
31
vs
BU
W 82-77
+21.5
3
@
HC
W 65-58
−14.5
7
vs
BUCK
W 76-55
−6.5
10
vs
LAF
W 76-50
−15.5
12
@
AMER
L 51-65
−23.5
17
@
LEH
W 82-79
+23.5
21
vs
HC
W 85-68
+18.5
24
vs
ARMY
W 84-56
−3.5
28
@
BU
W 58-50
−30.5
31
vs
L-MD
W 87-71
+14.5
4
@
LAF
W 65-50
−24.5
7
vs
AMER
W 82-73
+20.5
9
@
BUCK
W 76-60
+0.5
14
@
COLG
W 84-80
+24.5
18
vs
LEH
W 72-49
−18.5
21
@
ARMY
W 81-63
+4.5
25
@
L-MD
W 78-51
−18.5
28
vs
COLG
W 85-69
+12.5
5
vs
BUCK
W 74-69
+9.5
8
vs
BU
L 72-73
+8.5
18
@
WAKE
L 72-82
+5.5
over 15under 17avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Air Force
32 games played
Straight up
3-29
9% wins
Against the spread
10-22
31% covers · avg −4.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg 0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 63-79 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 54-74 | +1.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 72-76 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 61-76 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 66-64 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 77-63 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 130.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 98-85 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 175.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 53-71 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 63-80 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 65-80 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 56-61 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 58-81 | +24.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 56-68 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 39-67 | +14.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 62-99 | +22.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 49-91 | +16.5 | L −25.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 62-70 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 128.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-81 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 52-81 | +19.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 54-96 | +23.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-79 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 57-81 | +26.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 54-88 | +22.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 74-91 | +16.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-93 | +14.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 61-98 | +28.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-91 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 80-86 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-66 | +20.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 60-86 | +19.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 59-74 | +24.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 45-80 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BEL
L 63-79
−0.5
8
vs
APSU
L 54-74
−18.5
11
vs
LIU
L 72-76
+1.5
15
vs
M-OH
L 61-76
−4.5
19
vs
ALST
W 66-64
−0.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 77-63
+16.5
23
vs
IUIN
W 98-85
+9.5
26
vs
UNCO
L 53-71
−13.5
29
vs
SDAK
L 63-80
−13.5
3
vs
PAC
L 65-80
−9.5
7
@
NAVY
L 56-61
+4.5
17
@
SDSU
L 58-81
+1.5
30
vs
WYO
L 56-68
+2.5
3
@
UNLV
L 39-67
−13.5
6
vs
USU
L 62-99
−14.5
10
vs
UNM
L 49-91
−25.5
13
@
SJSU
L 62-70
−2.5
17
vs
NEV
L 66-81
−0.5
20
@
CSU
L 52-81
−9.5
24
@
BOIS
L 54-96
−18.5
31
vs
FRES
L 62-79
−7.5
3
@
GCU
L 57-81
+2.5
7
vs
SDSU
L 54-88
−11.5
10
vs
CSU
L 74-91
−0.5
14
@
FRES
L 63-93
−15.5
17
@
UNM
L 61-98
−8.5
21
vs
UNLV
L 66-91
−8.5
24
vs
SJSU
L 80-86
+0.5
28
@
WYO
L 62-66
+16.5
3
vs
GCU
L 60-86
−6.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-74
+9.5
11
vs
NEV
L 45-80
−15.5
covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BEL
L 63-79
−2.5
8
vs
APSU
L 54-74
−8.5
11
vs
LIU
L 72-76
+10.5
15
vs
M-OH
L 61-76
−6.5
19
vs
ALST
W 66-64
−8.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 77-63
+9.5
23
vs
IUIN
W 98-85
+7.5
26
vs
UNCO
L 53-71
−22.5
29
vs
SDAK
L 63-80
−4.5
3
vs
PAC
L 65-80
+10.5
7
@
NAVY
L 56-61
−16.5
17
@
SDSU
L 58-81
+3.5
30
vs
WYO
L 56-68
−22.5
3
@
UNLV
L 39-67
−36.5
6
vs
USU
L 62-99
+21.5
10
vs
UNM
L 49-91
+1.5
13
@
SJSU
L 62-70
+3.5
17
vs
NEV
L 66-81
+12.5
20
@
CSU
L 52-81
−0.5
24
@
BOIS
L 54-96
+12.5
31
vs
FRES
L 62-79
−0.5
3
@
GCU
L 57-81
+0.5
7
vs
SDSU
L 54-88
+2.5
10
vs
CSU
L 74-91
+27.5
14
@
FRES
L 63-93
+13.5
17
@
UNM
L 61-98
+10.5
21
vs
UNLV
L 66-91
+3.5
24
vs
SJSU
L 80-86
+20.5
28
@
WYO
L 62-66
−17.5
3
vs
GCU
L 60-86
+2.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-74
−11.5
11
vs
NEV
L 45-80
−15.5
over 18under 14avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Navy 1, Air Force 1, even 3
NavyBetterAir Force
G J. Kim10 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
→AFBig
G K. Sanders12.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 77
G J. Pennick7.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 12
=Even
G E. Greenberg6.6 pts · 2.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 18
G C. Cole6 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 41
←NAVYSmall
F L. Hobin11.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 26
G D. Burnett1.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F E. Robinson7.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 39
G N. Howard1.6 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Walker10.4 pts · 5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 82
NavyBetterAir Force
NAVY offense270th of 366 · -8.2
→AFSmall
AF defense149th of 366 · -3.3
NAVY defense145th of 366 · -3.1
←NAVYBig
AF offense290th of 366 · -8.9
Backcourt-5.8 · 5 players
→AFBig
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-1.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
←NAVYBig
Bench-7.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNAVY betterAF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Kim31 minJ. Pennick25 minC. Cole19 minD. Burnett6 minN. Howard3 minJ. Gabbidon1 min
Forwards
C. Jackson2 minJ. Ashley2 minO. Gray2 minT. RajiNewC. PollockNewS. GriffinNew
Centers
C. CraneNew
Guards
K. Sanders30 minE. Greenberg27 minA. Patterson14 minJ. Hinds12 minE. Taite2 minT. KeeneNew
Forwards
L. Hobin29 minE. Robinson28 minC. Walker22 minR. Dering14 minK. Gilles13 minB. Martin5 min
Centers
W. Celichowski21 minM. CaslaruNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.1 #194 | Points per game | 61.5 #362 |
| 1.12 #97 | Points per possession | 0.91 #363 |
| 66.0 #316 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #259 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #100 | Effective FG% | 48.9 #292 |
| 35.9 #64 | 3-point % | 30.6 #332 |
| 33.1 #314 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.8 #139 |
| 38.8 #82 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #174 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #190 | Turnover rate | 21.9 #362 |
| 31.9 #126 | Offensive rebound rate | 21.4 #360 |
| 15.8 #52 | Assists per game | 12.2 #273 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.6 #10 | Points allowed | 79.9 #316 |
| 1.00 #23 | Points allowed per possession | 1.19 #352 |
| 48.3 #42 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.4 #350 |
| 30.0 #7 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #352 |
| 18.3 #84 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #280 |
| 72.6 #49 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #215 |
| 7.5 #84 | Steals per game | 5.6 #281 |
| 3.3 #185 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #316 |
Navy
24-8 in 2025-26 overall · 18-2 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Wake Forest72–82
- Lvs Boston U72–73
- Wvs Bucknell74–69
- Wvs Colgate85–69
- W@ Loyola MD78–51
A week or more of rest.
Air Force
3-29 in 2025-26 overall · 0-21 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nevada45–80
- L@ Nevada59–74
- Lvs Grand Canyon60–86
- L@ Wyoming62–66
- Lvs San José St80–86
A week or more of rest.