Allen Fieldhouse · at Kansas
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-1 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 1-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KU 81–72 · win probability KU 79%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VILL has more of the edges
VILL 2, KU 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VILL 15.0%, KU 15.6%. Forced: VILL 18.6%, KU 13.8%
Home court
KU at home. This season: KU 0-0 at home, VILL 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VILL 33%, KU 9%. Transfers in: VILL 6, KU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: VILL plays 67.3 a game (270th fastest), KU 68.8 (193rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: VILL 53.8 and allows 51.4; KU 51.2 and allows 45.0
Context
Schedule so far
VILL has played the 35th-hardest schedule, KU the 2nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
VILL hits 35.7% and allows 33.4%; KU hits 34.6% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 45.7% and 35.2% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: VILL 30.9, KU 32.2. Allowed: VILL 30.0, KU 27.4
Even
VILL offense vs KU defense
Offense 39th of 366 against a defense 15th, on the model’s ratings
Even
KU offense vs VILL defense
Offense 17th of 366 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VILL 32.2%, KU 29.3%. Defensive: VILL 68.2%, KU 70.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KU -9.2 | — |
| Total | — | 152.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | VILL 71.5 · KU 80.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KU -5.3 | — |
| 1H total | 71.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | VILL 32.9 · KU 38.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
VILL 0–1 KUKU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · VILL 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2021-22 | VILL 65 vs KU 81 | KU -4 | KU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Villanova
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-13
61% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Against the spread
19-1458%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 66-71 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-74 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 94-60 | -19.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-77 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 70-55 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 74-56 | -14.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-63 | -18.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 61-89 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-61 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 76-66 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 23 | @ | W 64-56 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 85-67 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 72-76 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-73 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 88-82 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-86 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 66-51 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-75 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-73 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-60 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 77-74 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 80-69 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 92-89 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-89 | +7.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 76-57 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 64-78 | -7.5 | L −21.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 76-86 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
+4.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+2.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
+14.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
−0.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
+2.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
−8.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+8.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−10.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+7.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
+13.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
+9.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−7.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+20.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
−8.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
−0.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+3.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
−4.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
+6.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+3.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+5.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
+6.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+4.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
−6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+9.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
−1.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−6.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
−1.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−24.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
+17.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+1.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
−21.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
−8.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
−16.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+17.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
−6.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
+12.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
−19.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
+16.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
−16.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+2.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−6.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+1.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
−10.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
−15.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−2.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+2.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
+5.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
+2.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+13.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
+17.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
−25.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+4.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+2.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
−2.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+12.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
+6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+3.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
+28.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−5.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
+7.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−1.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
−2.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+15.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
+1.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
+15.5
over 20under 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kansas
35 games played
Straight up
24-11
69% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −4.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 94-51 | -30.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 74-87 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 77-46 | -25.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 76-57 | -22.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 71-61 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 71-60 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 81-76 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 56-61 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-60 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 77-76 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 73-49 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 90-61 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 75-81 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-86 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 84-63 | +3.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 75-69 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-62 | -4.5 | W +19.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 90-82 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 64-61 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 71-59 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 82-78 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-74 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 81-69 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -8.5 | L −24.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 23 | vs | W 69-56 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-84 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 60-70 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 104-85 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 189 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 47-69 | +5.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 68-60 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 65-67 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
+12.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
−10.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
+5.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−3.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−1.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
+4.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
+6.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+12.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−1.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
+14.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+2.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
+9.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+14.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−10.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
−2.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
−13.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
+24.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
+10.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
+1.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
+19.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+5.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
+6.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−6.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+9.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−10.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
+4.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
−24.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
+15.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−13.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−15.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+1.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+0.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−16.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−6.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
+1.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
GB
W 94-51
−7.5
7
@
UNC
L 74-87
+1.5
11
vs
AMCC
W 77-46
−22.5
15
vs
PRIN
W 76-57
−11.5
18
vs
DUKE
L 66-78
−5.5
24
vs
ND
W 71-61
−11.5
25
vs
SYR
W 71-60
−13.5
26
vs
TENN
W 81-76
+16.5
2
vs
CONN
L 56-61
−24.5
7
vs
MIZ
W 80-60
−10.5
13
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+4.5
16
vs
TOW
W 73-49
−15.5
22
vs
DAV
W 90-61
+11.5
3
@
UCF
L 75-81
−1.5
6
vs
TCU
W 104-100
+60.5
10
@
WVU
L 75-86
+21.5
13
vs
ISU
W 84-63
−5.5
16
vs
BAY
W 80-62
−14.5
20
@
COLO
W 75-69
−11.5
24
@
KSU
W 86-62
−10.5
31
vs
BYU
W 90-82
+12.5
2
@
TTU
W 64-61
−30.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 71-59
−20.5
9
vs
ARIZ
W 82-78
+7.5
14
@
ISU
L 56-74
−17.5
18
@
OKST
W 81-69
−8.5
21
vs
CIN
L 68-84
+12.5
23
vs
HOU
W 69-56
−13.5
28
@
ARIZ
L 61-84
−6.5
3
@
ASU
L 60-70
−21.5
7
vs
KSU
W 104-85
+31.5
12
vs
TCU
W 78-73
+4.5
13
vs
HOU
L 47-69
−23.5
20
vs
CBU
W 68-60
−14.5
22
vs
SJU
L 65-67
−12.5
over 11under 24avg −4.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas has the better starters
Position by position: Villanova 0, Kansas 1, even 4
VillanovaBetterKansas
G J. Fiegen TR11 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 82
=Even
G L. Blyden TR16.5 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 85
G D. Simmons TR16.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 63
→KUSmall
G D. Parker TR18.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
G T. Perkins18 pts · 4 reb · 3 ast
Score 100
=Even
F K. Dawes TR12.5 pts · 8.8 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 91
F D. Royal TR5 pts · 8 reb · 0 ast
Score 100
=Even
F T. Kaufman-Renn TR14.2 pts · 8.3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 98
F K. Evans TR13.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 95
=Even
C C. Reeves TR11 pts · 7.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 94
VillanovaBetterKansas
VILL offense39th of 366 · +5.0
=Even
KU defense15th of 366 · +6.3
VILL defense30th of 366 · +3.5
=Even
KU offense17th of 366 · +8.6
Backcourt+7.2 · 3 players
←VILLSmall
Backcourt+5.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt+6.1 · 2 players
→KUBig
Frontcourt+13.0 · 3 players
Bench+3.3 · 4 players
←VILLBig
Bench+0.1 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestVILL betterKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Fiegen38 min · TRD. Simmons36 min · TRT. Perkins35 minE. Crawford26 min · TRW. Chiddick3 minB. MullerNew
Forwards
D. Royal32 min · TRK. Evans31 min · TRM. Hodge28 minA. Samb6 min · TR
Centers
N. OnyekwereNewL. SuigoNew
Guards
L. Blyden34 min · TRD. Parker30 min · TRK. Rosario12 minW. Thengvall2 minT. StokesNewT. PerryNew
Forwards
K. Dawes31 min · TRT. Kaufman-Renn28 min · TRD. AdkinsNewA. RichmondNewG. MordiniNew
Centers
C. Reeves21 min · TRP. Mbiya5 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.1 #113 | Points per game | 75.1 #161 |
| 1.15 #64 | Points per possession | 1.09 #152 |
| 67.3 #270 | Pace (possessions) | 68.8 #193 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.8 #74 | Effective FG% | 51.2 #186 |
| 35.7 #77 | 3-point % | 34.6 #139 |
| 45.7 #52 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #268 |
| 30.9 #284 | Free throw rate | 32.2 #255 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #65 | Turnover rate | 15.6 #111 |
| 32.2 #118 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.3 #227 |
| 15.5 #66 | Assists per game | 13.9 #150 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.2 #82 | Points allowed | 69.1 #47 |
| 1.06 #105 | Points allowed per possession | 1.00 #28 |
| 51.4 #181 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.0 #2 |
| 33.4 #148 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #24 |
| 18.6 #70 | Turnovers forced | 13.8 #340 |
| 68.2 #246 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #152 |
| 7.4 #93 | Steals per game | 5.4 #310 |
| 2.1 #340 | Blocks per game | 5.8 #6 |
Villanova
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah State76–86
- Lvs Georgetown64–78
- Wvs Xavier91–78
- W@ DePaul76–57
- L@ St John's57–89
A week or more of rest.
Kansas
24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-7 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St John's65–67
- Wvs CA Baptist68–60
- Lvs Houston47–69
- Wvs TCU78–73
- Wvs Kansas St104–85
A week or more of rest.