Arena-Auditorium · at Wyoming
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WYO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WYO 80–72 · win probability WYO 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
SHSU 2, WYO 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
SHSU hits 37.2% and allows 32.5%; WYO hits 33.0% and allows 32.8%. Threes are 35.8% and 43.0% of their shots
WYO offense vs SHSU defense
Offense 124th of 366 against a defense 228th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SHSU plays 70.7 a game (88th fastest), WYO 67.6 (252nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
WYO at home. This season: WYO 0-0 at home, SHSU 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: SHSU 34.4, WYO 35.5. Allowed: SHSU 36.7, WYO 47.9
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SHSU 16.8%, WYO 16.3%. Forced: SHSU 16.1%, WYO 16.8%
Context
Schedule so far
SHSU has played the 138th-hardest schedule, WYO the 105th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SHSU 35.9%, WYO 34.0%. Defensive: SHSU 69.9%, WYO 72.0%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SHSU 29%, WYO 45%. Transfers in: SHSU 2, WYO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SHSU 52.5 and allows 51.4; WYO 51.8 and allows 52.0
Even
SHSU offense vs WYO defense
Offense 154th of 366 against a defense 130th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WYO -8.8 | — |
| Total | — | 151.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | SHSU 71.5 · WYO 80.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WYO -5.1 | — |
| 1H total | 71.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | SHSU 32.9 · WYO 38.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SHSU 1–0 WYOSHSU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SHSU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025-26 | WYO 70 @ SHSU 78 | SHSU -1.5 | SHSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Sam Houston
31 games played
Straight up
19-12
61% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg +3.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 77-98 | +31.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-85 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-70 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 84-81 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-68 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 83-93 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-70 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 85-75 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 78-87 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 91-102 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 168.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-68 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 72-60 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 77-62 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-63 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 168.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 93-87 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-58 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-71 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 83-67 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 70-66 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 78-87 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 83-79 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-70 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-78 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 100-67 | -6.5 | W +26.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-81 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 80-83 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-79 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 69-61 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 73-79 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 83-107 | +11.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 190 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
TTU
L 77-98
+10.5
15
@
UTAH
L 79-85
+6.5
19
vs
WYO
W 78-70
+6.5
26
vs
IDST
W 84-81
+1.5
28
vs
IDHO
W 94-68
+27.5
2
@
OKST
L 83-93
+3.5
6
@
TXSO
W 82-70
+4.5
17
@
ORST
W 85-75
+13.5
21
@
NMSU
L 78-87
−3.5
2
@
WKU
L 91-102
−5.5
4
@
MTSU
L 67-68
+3.5
8
vs
DEL
W 72-60
+0.5
10
vs
LIB
L 74-82
−6.5
14
@
JXST
W 77-62
+16.5
17
@
FIU
W 76-63
+15.5
21
vs
KENN
W 93-87
+0.5
24
vs
WKU
W 73-58
+9.5
28
@
MOST
W 80-71
+10.5
31
vs
LT
W 83-67
+8.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 70-66
−6.5
7
@
LT
L 78-87
−12.5
14
@
KENN
W 83-79
+5.5
18
vs
MTSU
W 78-70
+4.5
21
vs
JXST
W 82-78
−2.5
26
vs
FIU
W 100-67
+26.5
28
vs
MOST
W 86-81
−1.5
5
@
DEL
L 80-83
−10.5
7
@
LIB
L 72-79
−2.5
11
vs
NMSU
W 69-61
+3.5
13
vs
KENN
L 73-79
−8.5
18
@
UNM
L 83-107
−12.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
TTU
L 77-98
+18.5
15
@
UTAH
L 79-85
+4.5
19
vs
WYO
W 78-70
−8.5
26
vs
IDST
W 84-81
+22.5
28
vs
IDHO
W 94-68
+7.5
2
@
OKST
L 83-93
+6.5
6
@
TXSO
W 82-70
−6.5
17
@
ORST
W 85-75
+6.5
21
@
NMSU
L 78-87
+11.5
2
@
WKU
L 91-102
+24.5
4
@
MTSU
L 67-68
−21.5
8
vs
DEL
W 72-60
−12.5
10
vs
LIB
L 74-82
+1.5
14
@
JXST
W 77-62
−11.5
17
@
FIU
W 76-63
−29.5
21
vs
KENN
W 93-87
+12.5
24
vs
WKU
W 73-58
−25.5
28
@
MOST
W 80-71
+2.5
31
vs
LT
W 83-67
+8.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 70-66
−9.5
7
@
LT
L 78-87
+21.5
14
@
KENN
W 83-79
−0.5
18
vs
MTSU
W 78-70
−3.5
21
vs
JXST
W 82-78
+12.5
26
vs
FIU
W 100-67
+5.5
28
vs
MOST
W 86-81
+14.5
5
@
DEL
L 80-83
+15.5
7
@
LIB
L 72-79
−1.5
11
vs
NMSU
W 69-61
−24.5
13
vs
KENN
L 73-79
−7.5
18
@
UNM
L 83-107
+27.5
over 18under 13avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wyoming
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 92-82 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 79-65 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-56 | -11.5 | W +25.5 | 160.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 70-78 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-67 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 101-59 | -9.5 | W +32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 72-76 | +19.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-80 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 106-79 | -14.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 87-72 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-82 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 68-56 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 58-78 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 98-66 | -4.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 83-92 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 57-74 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 60-63 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-62 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 62-94 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 68-57 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 63-72 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 83-85 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 68-79 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 92-82 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 66-62 | -20.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 83-73 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-78 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-73 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 70-74 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
−5.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
+8.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
+25.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−6.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
−7.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+32.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
+15.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
−1.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+12.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+11.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
−14.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−2.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−12.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+27.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
−5.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−15.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−6.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
−14.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−9.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
−18.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
+9.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
+3.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+7.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
−7.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+0.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
+12.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−1.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−16.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+11.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+3.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−0.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
+19.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
−9.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
−11.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−8.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
+0.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+6.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
−4.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
+16.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+23.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+9.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
+4.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−22.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−15.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+9.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
+31.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−17.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−22.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
+0.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−13.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
+7.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
−17.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
−6.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+18.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
+6.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+25.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
−9.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−12.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−17.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+12.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+17.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−10.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
−4.5
over 16under 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Wyoming has the better starters
Position by position: Sam Houston 1, Wyoming 2, even 2
Sam HoustonBetterWyoming
G J. Begg10 pts · 2.6 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 17
→WYOSmall
G C. Jefferson TR12.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 48
G J. Coleman8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 41
→WYOBig
G K. Bennett10.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 76
F E. St. Bernard TR5.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 78
=Even
G N. Meyer12.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 83
F M. Dann2.8 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 58
←SHSUBig
F R. Sondors TR10.4 pts · 4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
F R. Greppi TR0 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F G. Gores7.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 65
Sam HoustonBetterWyoming
SHSU offense154th of 366 · -4.7
=Even
WYO defense130th of 366 · -2.4
SHSU defense228th of 366 · -6.1
→WYOSmall
WYO offense124th of 366 · -3.3
Backcourt-3.6 · 2 players
→WYOBig
Backcourt+1.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.0 · 3 players
←SHSUBig
Frontcourt-2.2 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestSHSU betterWYO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Begg27 minJ. Coleman22 minZ. PipkinNewA. McDowellNewN. NguyenNewK. PartainNew
Forwards
E. St. Bernard18 min · TRM. Dann9 minR. Greppi1 min · TRC. Sadibou NdiayeNewY. OkeNewA. LoustauNew
Guards
C. Jefferson31 min · TRK. Bennett28 minN. Meyer28 minU. Rojas17 minP. Gerrits10 min · TRM. De MartinNew
Forwards
R. Sondors29 min · TRG. Gores18 minM. Curtis9 min · TRM. MoraNewN. SummersNewC. PohlNew
Centers
L. RufNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.0 #67 | Points per game | 76.2 #137 |
| 1.13 #78 | Points per possession | 1.13 #92 |
| 70.7 #88 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #252 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.5 #128 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #154 |
| 37.2 #24 | 3-point % | 33.0 #234 |
| 35.8 #253 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #116 |
| 34.4 #199 | Free throw rate | 35.5 #166 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #186 | Turnover rate | 16.3 #155 |
| 35.9 #25 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.0 #66 |
| 14.9 #95 | Assists per game | 14.1 #141 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.9 #237 | Points allowed | 72.9 #131 |
| 1.09 #191 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #169 |
| 51.4 #180 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #211 |
| 32.5 #89 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.8 #108 |
| 16.1 #220 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #164 |
| 69.9 #168 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.0 #66 |
| 7.0 #128 | Steals per game | 6.6 #169 |
| 2.6 #288 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #318 |
Sam Houston
19-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico83–107
- Lvs Kennesaw St73–79
- Wvs New Mexico St69–61
- L@ Liberty72–79
- L@ Delaware80–83
A week or more of rest.
Wyoming
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Wichita St70–74
- Lvs UNLV70–73
- W@ San José St88–78
- Wvs Nevada83–73
- Wvs Air Force66–62
A week or more of rest.