Beasley Coliseum · at Washington St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WSU 80–74 · win probability WSU 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SHSU has more of the edges
SHSU 4, WSU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SHSU 16.8%, WSU 18.5%. Forced: SHSU 16.1%, WSU 14.5%
Three-pointers
SHSU hits 37.2% and allows 32.5%; WSU hits 36.5% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 35.8% and 44.8% of their shots
WSU offense vs SHSU defense
Offense 130th of 366 against a defense 228th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
WSU at home. This season: WSU 0-0 at home, SHSU 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SHSU 29%, WSU 1%. Transfers in: SHSU 2, WSU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SHSU 35.9%, WSU 29.5%. Defensive: SHSU 69.9%, WSU 71.8%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SHSU plays 70.7 a game (88th fastest), WSU 68.9 (183rd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
SHSU has played the 138th-hardest schedule, WSU the 100th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
SHSU offense vs WSU defense
Offense 154th of 366 against a defense 166th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SHSU 52.5 and allows 51.4; WSU 54.7 and allows 52.6
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SHSU 34.4, WSU 30.2. Allowed: SHSU 36.7, WSU 33.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WSU -6.0 | — |
| Total | — | 153.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | SHSU 73.7 · WSU 79.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WSU -3.5 | — |
| 1H total | 71.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | SHSU 34.1 · WSU 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Sam Houston
31 games played
Straight up
19-12
61% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg +3.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 77-98 | +31.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-85 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-70 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 84-81 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-68 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 83-93 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-70 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 85-75 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 78-87 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 91-102 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 168.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-68 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 72-60 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 77-62 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-63 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 168.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 93-87 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-58 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-71 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 83-67 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 70-66 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 78-87 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 83-79 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-70 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-78 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 100-67 | -6.5 | W +26.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-81 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 80-83 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-79 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 69-61 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 73-79 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 83-107 | +11.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 190 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
TTU
L 77-98
+10.5
15
@
UTAH
L 79-85
+6.5
19
vs
WYO
W 78-70
+6.5
26
vs
IDST
W 84-81
+1.5
28
vs
IDHO
W 94-68
+27.5
2
@
OKST
L 83-93
+3.5
6
@
TXSO
W 82-70
+4.5
17
@
ORST
W 85-75
+13.5
21
@
NMSU
L 78-87
−3.5
2
@
WKU
L 91-102
−5.5
4
@
MTSU
L 67-68
+3.5
8
vs
DEL
W 72-60
+0.5
10
vs
LIB
L 74-82
−6.5
14
@
JXST
W 77-62
+16.5
17
@
FIU
W 76-63
+15.5
21
vs
KENN
W 93-87
+0.5
24
vs
WKU
W 73-58
+9.5
28
@
MOST
W 80-71
+10.5
31
vs
LT
W 83-67
+8.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 70-66
−6.5
7
@
LT
L 78-87
−12.5
14
@
KENN
W 83-79
+5.5
18
vs
MTSU
W 78-70
+4.5
21
vs
JXST
W 82-78
−2.5
26
vs
FIU
W 100-67
+26.5
28
vs
MOST
W 86-81
−1.5
5
@
DEL
L 80-83
−10.5
7
@
LIB
L 72-79
−2.5
11
vs
NMSU
W 69-61
+3.5
13
vs
KENN
L 73-79
−8.5
18
@
UNM
L 83-107
−12.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
TTU
L 77-98
+18.5
15
@
UTAH
L 79-85
+4.5
19
vs
WYO
W 78-70
−8.5
26
vs
IDST
W 84-81
+22.5
28
vs
IDHO
W 94-68
+7.5
2
@
OKST
L 83-93
+6.5
6
@
TXSO
W 82-70
−6.5
17
@
ORST
W 85-75
+6.5
21
@
NMSU
L 78-87
+11.5
2
@
WKU
L 91-102
+24.5
4
@
MTSU
L 67-68
−21.5
8
vs
DEL
W 72-60
−12.5
10
vs
LIB
L 74-82
+1.5
14
@
JXST
W 77-62
−11.5
17
@
FIU
W 76-63
−29.5
21
vs
KENN
W 93-87
+12.5
24
vs
WKU
W 73-58
−25.5
28
@
MOST
W 80-71
+2.5
31
vs
LT
W 83-67
+8.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 70-66
−9.5
7
@
LT
L 78-87
+21.5
14
@
KENN
W 83-79
−0.5
18
vs
MTSU
W 78-70
−3.5
21
vs
JXST
W 82-78
+12.5
26
vs
FIU
W 100-67
+5.5
28
vs
MOST
W 86-81
+14.5
5
@
DEL
L 80-83
+15.5
7
@
LIB
L 72-79
−1.5
11
vs
NMSU
W 69-61
−24.5
13
vs
KENN
L 73-79
−7.5
18
@
UNM
L 83-107
+27.5
over 18under 13avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Washington St
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 81-83 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 69-85 | +4.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 81-71 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 69-81 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 98-74 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 94-100 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 61-75 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 60-64 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 64-78 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 61-68 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 78-63 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 84-78 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 67-62 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 55-69 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 81-67 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-88 | +15.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 65-86 | +16.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 80-85 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 92-96 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 95-79 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 70-58 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 104-74 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 64-74 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 92-96 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 53-83 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 87-70 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-83 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-67 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-88 | -7.5 | L −16.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 68-74 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
IDHO
L 81-83
−9.5
7
@
DAV
L 69-85
−11.5
10
vs
STMN
W 81-71
+7.5
14
vs
WASH
L 69-81
−3.5
19
vs
SUU
W 98-74
+11.5
25
vs
ASU
L 94-100
−1.5
26
vs
HALL
L 61-75
−5.5
2
@
BRAD
L 60-64
+1.5
7
vs
NEV
L 64-78
−16.5
14
@
USC
L 61-68
+5.5
17
vs
EWU
W 78-63
+8.5
20
vs
MER
W 84-78
−1.5
28
@
PORT
W 67-62
+1.5
30
@
SEA
L 55-69
−7.5
2
vs
LMU
W 78-76
−1.5
4
vs
ORST
W 81-67
+7.5
10
@
SMC
L 82-88
+9.5
15
vs
GONZ
L 65-86
−4.5
18
@
SF
L 80-85
+0.5
21
@
USD
L 92-96
−5.5
24
vs
PEPP
W 95-79
+4.5
28
vs
SEA
W 70-58
+10.5
31
vs
PORT
W 104-74
+21.5
4
@
ORST
L 64-74
−11.5
7
vs
SCU
L 92-96
+4.5
10
@
GONZ
L 53-83
−8.5
18
vs
PAC
W 87-70
+14.5
21
vs
SMC
L 67-83
−7.5
25
@
LMU
L 66-67
+0.5
28
@
PEPP
L 79-88
−16.5
6
vs
PORT
L 68-74
−11.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
IDHO
L 81-83
+9.5
7
@
DAV
L 69-85
+0.5
10
vs
STMN
W 81-71
−5.5
14
vs
WASH
L 69-81
−8.5
19
vs
SUU
W 98-74
+14.5
25
vs
ASU
L 94-100
+36.5
26
vs
HALL
L 61-75
−11.5
2
@
BRAD
L 60-64
−24.5
7
vs
NEV
L 64-78
−3.5
14
@
USC
L 61-68
−27.5
17
vs
EWU
W 78-63
−12.5
20
vs
MER
W 84-78
+10.5
28
@
PORT
W 67-62
−23.5
30
@
SEA
L 55-69
−20.5
2
vs
LMU
W 78-76
+11.5
4
vs
ORST
W 81-67
+7.5
10
@
SMC
L 82-88
+26.5
15
vs
GONZ
L 65-86
−4.5
18
@
SF
L 80-85
+18.5
21
@
USD
L 92-96
+35.5
24
vs
PEPP
W 95-79
+27.5
28
vs
SEA
W 70-58
−14.5
31
vs
PORT
W 104-74
+25.5
4
@
ORST
L 64-74
−9.5
7
vs
SCU
L 92-96
+27.5
10
@
GONZ
L 53-83
−20.5
18
vs
PAC
W 87-70
+12.5
21
vs
SMC
L 67-83
+0.5
25
@
LMU
L 66-67
−16.5
28
@
PEPP
L 79-88
+8.5
6
vs
PORT
L 68-74
−7.5
over 16under 15avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Sam Houston 1, Washington St 1, even 3
Sam HoustonBetterWashington St
G J. Begg10 pts · 2.6 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 17
→WSUBig
G S. Akins TR5.3 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 57
G J. Coleman8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 41
←SHSUSmall
F F. Roxburgh TR10.9 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 21
F E. St. Bernard TR5.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 78
=Even
F R. Harrison TR14.2 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 67
F M. Dann2.8 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 58
=No call
F L. Dembele TR5.2 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
F R. Greppi TR0 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F T. Kropp TR3.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 48
Sam HoustonBetterWashington St
SHSU offense154th of 366 · -4.7
=Even
WSU defense166th of 366 · -3.7
SHSU defense228th of 366 · -6.1
→WSUSmall
WSU offense130th of 366 · -3.5
Backcourt-3.6 · 2 players
→WSUBig
Backcourt-0.2 · 1 player
Frontcourt+1.0 · 3 players
←SHSUBig
Frontcourt-2.6 · 4 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestSHSU betterWSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Begg27 minJ. Coleman22 minZ. PipkinNewA. McDowellNewN. NguyenNewK. PartainNew
Forwards
E. St. Bernard18 min · TRM. Dann9 minR. Greppi1 min · TRC. Sadibou NdiayeNewY. OkeNewA. LoustauNew
Guards
S. Akins15 min · TRJ. Phillips11 min · TRJ. Harrell9 min · TRR. Jones7 min · TRD. Blakely1 minC. JonesNew
Forwards
F. Roxburgh31 min · TRR. Harrison31 min · TRL. Dembele20 min · TRT. Kropp12 min · TRM. SankheNewB. KymanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.0 #67 | Points per game | 75.7 #152 |
| 1.13 #78 | Points per possession | 1.10 #136 |
| 70.7 #88 | Pace (possessions) | 68.9 #183 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.5 #128 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #48 |
| 37.2 #24 | 3-point % | 36.5 #40 |
| 35.8 #253 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.8 #73 |
| 34.4 #199 | Free throw rate | 30.2 #305 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #186 | Turnover rate | 18.5 #295 |
| 35.9 #25 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.5 #221 |
| 14.9 #95 | Assists per game | 13.8 #163 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.9 #237 | Points allowed | 77.3 #245 |
| 1.09 #191 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #266 |
| 51.4 #180 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #248 |
| 32.5 #89 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #273 |
| 16.1 #220 | Turnovers forced | 14.5 #322 |
| 69.9 #168 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #71 |
| 7.0 #128 | Steals per game | 5.5 #299 |
| 2.6 #288 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #242 |
Sam Houston
19-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico83–107
- Lvs Kennesaw St73–79
- Wvs New Mexico St69–61
- L@ Liberty72–79
- L@ Delaware80–83
A week or more of rest.
Washington St
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Portland68–74
- L@ Pepperdine79–88
- L@ LMU66–67
- Lvs Saint Mary's67–83
- Wvs Pacific87–70
A week or more of rest.