Wintrust Arena · at DePaul
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DEP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEP 85–52 · win probability DEP 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 137.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DEP has more of the edges
UMES 0, DEP 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UMES offense vs DEP defense
Offense 364th of 366 against a defense 31st, on the model’s ratings
DEP offense vs UMES defense
Offense 92nd of 366 against a defense 350th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UMES has played the 240th-hardest schedule, DEP the 72nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: UMES 29.4, DEP 35.3. Allowed: UMES 43.0, DEP 37.8
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UMES 23.7%, DEP 17.7%. Forced: UMES 18.0%, DEP 18.7%
Shooting
Effective FG%: UMES 47.8 and allows 50.8; DEP 49.8 and allows 49.3
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UMES 9%, DEP 38%. Transfers in: UMES 1, DEP 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
DEP at home. This season: DEP 0-0 at home, UMES 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: UMES plays 65.8 a game (321st fastest), DEP 67.7 (240th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UMES 32.4%, DEP 30.1%. Defensive: UMES 66.4%, DEP 69.0%
Even
Three-pointers
UMES hits 29.0% and allows 33.5%; DEP hits 32.5% and allows 35.4%. Threes are 33.5% and 39.0% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DEP -32.4 | — |
| Total | — | 137.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | UMES 52.4 · DEP 84.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEP -19.1 | — |
| 1H total | 64.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UMES 22.6 · DEP 41.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
MD Eastern
30 games played
Straight up
7-23
23% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 52-56 | +28.5 | W +24.5 | 139.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 29-94 | +33.5 | L −31.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 50-69 | +35.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 45-84 | +33.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 83-82 | +17.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 57-60 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 128.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 63-52 | +5.5 | W +16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 68-74 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-68 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-78 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 60-84 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 79-82 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 130.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-82 | +27.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-78 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 71-94 | +33.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 66-49 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 69-57 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 74-70 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 70-67 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 57-65 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 128.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 63-65 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 54-63 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-79 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 66-70 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 65-71 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 128.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-57 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 73-77 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 56-57 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 124.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 131.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GT
L 52-56
+24.5
5
@
UGA
L 29-94
−31.5
11
@
NEB
L 50-69
+16.5
14
@
CREI
L 45-84
−5.5
18
@
LONG
W 83-82
+18.5
21
@
CAN
L 57-60
+0.5
22
vs
BING
W 63-52
+16.5
25
vs
HAMP
L 68-74
+0.5
2
@
ECU
L 56-68
+0.5
6
@
AMER
L 60-78
−7.5
9
@
UVA
L 60-84
+12.5
12
@
NCAT
L 79-82
+4.5
14
@
VT
L 53-82
−1.5
17
@
WAG
L 64-78
−9.5
22
@
TEX
L 71-94
+10.5
3
vs
MORG
W 66-49
+10.5
10
vs
HOW
W 69-57
+14.5
12
@
NORF
W 74-70
+9.5
17
vs
COPP
W 70-67
−7.5
31
@
DSU
L 57-65
−10.5
2
@
NCCU
L 63-65
+0.5
4
@
SCST
L 54-63
−12.5
7
@
MORG
L 71-79
−9.5
14
@
HOW
L 53-79
−15.5
16
vs
NORF
L 66-70
−2.5
21
@
COPP
L 65-71
−9.5
28
vs
SCST
W 69-57
+6.5
2
vs
NCCU
L 73-77
−6.5
5
vs
DSU
L 56-57
−6.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 76-83
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GT
L 52-56
−31.5
5
@
UGA
L 29-94
−19.5
11
@
NEB
L 50-69
−27.5
14
@
CREI
L 45-84
−6.5
18
@
LONG
W 83-82
+26.5
21
@
CAN
L 57-60
−11.5
22
vs
BING
W 63-52
−10.5
25
vs
HAMP
L 68-74
+17.5
2
@
ECU
L 56-68
−3.5
6
@
AMER
L 60-78
+7.5
9
@
UVA
L 60-84
+9.5
12
@
NCAT
L 79-82
+30.5
14
@
VT
L 53-82
−4.5
17
@
WAG
L 64-78
+10.5
22
@
TEX
L 71-94
+26.5
3
vs
MORG
W 66-49
−23.5
10
vs
HOW
W 69-57
−4.5
12
@
NORF
W 74-70
+11.5
17
vs
COPP
W 70-67
+3.5
31
@
DSU
L 57-65
−6.5
2
@
NCCU
L 63-65
−6.5
4
@
SCST
L 54-63
−16.5
7
@
MORG
L 71-79
+9.5
14
@
HOW
L 53-79
−0.5
16
vs
NORF
L 66-70
−0.5
21
@
COPP
L 65-71
+7.5
28
vs
SCST
W 69-57
−6.5
2
vs
NCCU
L 73-77
+16.5
5
vs
DSU
L 56-57
−11.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 76-83
+27.5
over 13under 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
DePaul
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
20-12
63% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-21
34% overs · avg −5.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-62 | -24.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 72-64 | -22.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 53-66 | -18.5 | L −31.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 79-81 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-62 | -21.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-75 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-61 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 63-96 | +5.5 | L −27.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 76-72 | -23.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 92-49 | -21.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 61-58 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 66-79 | +19.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 54-72 | +12.5 | L −5.5 | 133.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 66-71 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 56-50 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-72 | +19.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 80-75 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 80-87 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-60 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 61-70 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-68 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 56-68 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-90 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 72-71 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 69-57 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-71 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 72-71 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 62-51 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 57-76 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-81 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 56-63 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+5.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−14.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−31.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+3.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
+9.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+0.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
+12.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
−27.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−19.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
+21.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
+10.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
+6.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−5.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
+7.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+6.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
+3.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
+7.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+2.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+0.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
+9.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−5.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
+2.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−2.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
−13.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+2.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
+19.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−5.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+4.5
1
@
MARQ
W 62-51
+15.5
4
vs
VILL
L 57-76
−17.5
7
vs
BTLR
L 71-81
−14.5
11
vs
GTWN
L 56-63
−5.5
covered 20didn’t cover 12avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CHST
W 92-62
+10.5
7
vs
STO
W 72-64
−11.5
11
vs
BUF
L 53-66
−34.5
14
vs
NU
L 79-81
+14.5
18
vs
GWEB
W 93-62
−0.5
23
vs
DETM
W 95-75
+18.5
28
vs
GT
W 75-61
−11.5
29
vs
LSU
L 63-96
+6.5
6
vs
UAPB
W 76-72
−8.5
9
vs
MORG
W 92-49
−9.5
13
@
WICH
W 61-58
−26.5
16
@
SJU
L 66-79
−2.5
21
vs
CONN
L 54-72
−7.5
31
@
VILL
L 66-71
−2.5
3
vs
XAV
W 86-77
+13.5
6
vs
GTWN
W 56-50
−38.5
10
@
CONN
L 60-72
−5.5
16
vs
MARQ
W 80-75
+9.5
20
@
BTLR
L 80-87
+19.5
24
vs
HALL
W 67-60
−8.5
28
@
GTWN
L 61-70
−8.5
31
@
XAV
L 66-68
−16.5
3
vs
SJU
L 56-68
−21.5
7
@
PROV
L 72-90
+8.5
11
vs
CREI
W 72-71
+1.5
18
@
HALL
W 69-57
−3.5
21
vs
PROV
L 68-71
−13.5
25
@
CREI
W 72-71
+0.5
1
@
MARQ
W 62-51
−26.5
4
vs
VILL
L 57-76
−2.5
7
vs
BTLR
L 71-81
+9.5
11
vs
GTWN
L 56-63
−17.5
over 11under 21avg −5.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
DePaul has the better starters
Position by position: MD Eastern 0, DePaul 1, even 4
MD EasternBetterDePaul
G I. Hall NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Holmes TR19.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 96
F L. Beckwith1.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 1
→DEPBig
G A. Popoola TR10.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 57
F L. Gibson-Savadel TR2.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Blocker11.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 77
F E. Berhanu NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Cotton TR14.1 pts · 5.5 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 87
F G. Tokody NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
C W. Jacques TR8.9 pts · 8.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 52
MD EasternBetterDePaul
UMES offense364th of 366 · -15.3
→DEPBig
DEP defense31st of 366 · +3.5
UMES defense350th of 366 · -9.7
→DEPBig
DEP offense92nd of 366 · -0.3
BackcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Backcourt+7.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 4 players
→DEPBig
Frontcourt+0.5 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+0.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUMES betterDEP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. HallNewE. JohnsonNewI. GriffinNewS. MooreNewB. GardnerNewV. EzehNew
Forwards
L. Beckwith17 minL. Gibson-Savadel7 min · TRE. BerhanuNewG. TokodyNewA. ColeNewD. Hall-JohnsonNew
Centers
E. OgohNew
Guards
K. Holmes32 min · TRA. Popoola29 min · TRL. Blocker29 minK. Cotton28 min · TRN. Meeusen27 min · TRK. McClure19 min
Forwards
M. Gwath19 min · TRT. Pierre-Justin16 minJ. JohnsonNewA. JensenNew
Centers
W. Jacques28 min · TRF. Flores11 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.4 #360 | Points per game | 70.3 #279 |
| 0.94 #358 | Points per possession | 1.04 #280 |
| 65.8 #321 | Pace (possessions) | 67.7 #240 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.8 #319 | Effective FG% | 49.8 #243 |
| 29.0 #354 | 3-point % | 32.5 #253 |
| 33.5 #309 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.0 #191 |
| 29.4 #321 | Free throw rate | 35.3 #169 |
| Possessions | ||
| 23.7 #365 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #253 |
| 32.4 #112 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.1 #197 |
| 13.0 #213 | Assists per game | 15.0 #87 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.5 #91 | Points allowed | 69.6 #57 |
| 1.09 #207 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #55 |
| 50.8 #142 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.3 #77 |
| 33.5 #156 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.4 #274 |
| 18.0 #95 | Turnovers forced | 18.7 #64 |
| 66.4 #311 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.0 #205 |
| 5.7 #274 | Steals per game | 6.9 #134 |
| 2.5 #302 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #152 |
MD Eastern
7-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-10 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC Central76–83
- Lvs Delaware St56–57
- Lvs NC Central73–77
- Wvs SC State69–57
- L@ Coppin St65–71
A week or more of rest.
DePaul
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Georgetown56–63
- Lvs Butler71–81
- Lvs Villanova57–76
- W@ Marquette62–51
- W@ Creighton72–71
A week or more of rest.