Joan Perry Brock Center · at Longwood
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LONG | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LONG 80–64 · win probability LONG 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LONG has more of the edges
UMES 0, LONG 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
LONG offense vs UMES defense
Offense 182nd of 366 against a defense 350th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UMES 32.4%, LONG 34.6%. Defensive: UMES 66.4%, LONG 72.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UMES 29.4, LONG 41.4. Allowed: UMES 43.0, LONG 42.1
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UMES plays 65.8 a game (321st fastest), LONG 71.5 (54th). Faster games mean more points
UMES offense vs LONG defense
Offense 364th of 366 against a defense 242nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UMES has played the 240th-hardest schedule, LONG the 330th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
LONG at home. This season: LONG 0-0 at home, UMES 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UMES 23.7%, LONG 19.2%. Forced: UMES 18.0%, LONG 19.7%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UMES 47.8 and allows 50.8; LONG 49.7 and allows 53.8
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UMES 9%, LONG 28%. Transfers in: UMES 1, LONG 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
UMES hits 29.0% and allows 33.5%; LONG hits 31.4% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 33.5% and 34.8% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LONG -16.0 | — |
| Total | — | 144.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UMES 64.3 · LONG 80.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LONG -9.4 | — |
| 1H total | 67.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | UMES 29.1 · LONG 38.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UMES 1–2 LONGLONG leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · UMES 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2025-26 | UMES 83 @ LONG 82 | LONG -17.5 | UMES W |
| Dec 5, 2024-25 | UMES 76 @ LONG 80 | LONG -20.5 | UMES W |
| Nov 15, 2023-24 | LONG 80 @ UMES 61 | UMES +9.5 | LONG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
MD Eastern
30 games played
Straight up
7-23
23% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 52-56 | +28.5 | W +24.5 | 139.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 29-94 | +33.5 | L −31.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 50-69 | +35.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 45-84 | +33.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 83-82 | +17.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 57-60 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 128.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 63-52 | +5.5 | W +16.5 | 125.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 68-74 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-68 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-78 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 60-84 | +36.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 79-82 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 130.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 53-82 | +27.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-78 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 71-94 | +33.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 66-49 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 69-57 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 74-70 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 70-67 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 57-65 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 128.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 63-65 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 54-63 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 71-79 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 66-70 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 65-71 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 128.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 69-57 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 73-77 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 56-57 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 124.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 131.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GT
L 52-56
+24.5
5
@
UGA
L 29-94
−31.5
11
@
NEB
L 50-69
+16.5
14
@
CREI
L 45-84
−5.5
18
@
LONG
W 83-82
+18.5
21
@
CAN
L 57-60
+0.5
22
vs
BING
W 63-52
+16.5
25
vs
HAMP
L 68-74
+0.5
2
@
ECU
L 56-68
+0.5
6
@
AMER
L 60-78
−7.5
9
@
UVA
L 60-84
+12.5
12
@
NCAT
L 79-82
+4.5
14
@
VT
L 53-82
−1.5
17
@
WAG
L 64-78
−9.5
22
@
TEX
L 71-94
+10.5
3
vs
MORG
W 66-49
+10.5
10
vs
HOW
W 69-57
+14.5
12
@
NORF
W 74-70
+9.5
17
vs
COPP
W 70-67
−7.5
31
@
DSU
L 57-65
−10.5
2
@
NCCU
L 63-65
+0.5
4
@
SCST
L 54-63
−12.5
7
@
MORG
L 71-79
−9.5
14
@
HOW
L 53-79
−15.5
16
vs
NORF
L 66-70
−2.5
21
@
COPP
L 65-71
−9.5
28
vs
SCST
W 69-57
+6.5
2
vs
NCCU
L 73-77
−6.5
5
vs
DSU
L 56-57
−6.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 76-83
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GT
L 52-56
−31.5
5
@
UGA
L 29-94
−19.5
11
@
NEB
L 50-69
−27.5
14
@
CREI
L 45-84
−6.5
18
@
LONG
W 83-82
+26.5
21
@
CAN
L 57-60
−11.5
22
vs
BING
W 63-52
−10.5
25
vs
HAMP
L 68-74
+17.5
2
@
ECU
L 56-68
−3.5
6
@
AMER
L 60-78
+7.5
9
@
UVA
L 60-84
+9.5
12
@
NCAT
L 79-82
+30.5
14
@
VT
L 53-82
−4.5
17
@
WAG
L 64-78
+10.5
22
@
TEX
L 71-94
+26.5
3
vs
MORG
W 66-49
−23.5
10
vs
HOW
W 69-57
−4.5
12
@
NORF
W 74-70
+11.5
17
vs
COPP
W 70-67
+3.5
31
@
DSU
L 57-65
−6.5
2
@
NCCU
L 63-65
−6.5
4
@
SCST
L 54-63
−16.5
7
@
MORG
L 71-79
+9.5
14
@
HOW
L 53-79
−0.5
16
vs
NORF
L 66-70
−0.5
21
@
COPP
L 65-71
+7.5
28
vs
SCST
W 69-57
−6.5
2
vs
NCCU
L 73-77
+16.5
5
vs
DSU
L 56-57
−11.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 76-83
+27.5
over 13under 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Longwood
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-78 | +14.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-82 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 82-83 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-95 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-70 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 66-92 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-80 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-81 | -13.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 68-71 | +24.5 | W +21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 74-72 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 82-70 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-80 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-72 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-70 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-85 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-56 | -16.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 81-79 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-65 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-71 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | -12.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 74-79 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-75 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 65-72 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 107-96 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 203 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 82-85 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−3.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+11.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
−7.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
−18.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
−21.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−1.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−1.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
−20.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
−1.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
−18.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
+21.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−1.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
+19.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
+3.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−8.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+3.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+2.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
+18.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+0.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−6.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−2.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+7.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
+5.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
−7.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+0.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−4.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+13.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+14.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−7.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+4.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
+24.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
+26.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
+11.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−12.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−12.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
+9.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
+9.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
+17.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
−24.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−0.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
−9.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
−13.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−15.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+7.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+10.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
−8.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+3.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−22.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−26.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+4.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
−0.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
+11.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+9.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−2.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+48.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+9.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
+26.5
over 16under 13avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Longwood has the better starters
Position by position: MD Eastern 0, Longwood 1, even 4
MD EasternBetterLongwood
G I. Hall NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Williams TR9.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 65
F L. Beckwith1.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 1
→LONGBig
G A. Billups7.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 47
F L. Gibson-Savadel TR2.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Benard7.3 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 44
F E. Berhanu NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Robinson TR9.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 64
F G. Tokody NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G E. Kelly2.1 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
MD EasternBetterLongwood
UMES offense364th of 366 · -15.3
→LONGSmall
LONG defense242nd of 366 · -6.4
UMES defense350th of 366 · -9.7
→LONGBig
LONG offense182nd of 366 · -5.7
BackcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Backcourt-1.7 · 5 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 4 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUMES betterLONG betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. HallNewE. JohnsonNewI. GriffinNewS. MooreNewB. GardnerNewV. EzehNew
Forwards
L. Beckwith17 minL. Gibson-Savadel7 min · TRE. BerhanuNewG. TokodyNewA. ColeNewD. Hall-JohnsonNew
Centers
E. OgohNew
Guards
M. Williams24 min · TRA. Billups23 minJ. Benard20 minT. Robinson19 min · TRE. Kelly11 minB. Wesson2 min · TR
Forwards
D. Kauzonas10 min · TRL. Milosevic8 min · TRK. Musungay4 min · TRI. Kalala3 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.4 #360 | Points per game | 75.9 #143 |
| 0.94 #358 | Points per possession | 1.07 #215 |
| 65.8 #321 | Pace (possessions) | 71.5 #54 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.8 #319 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #254 |
| 29.0 #354 | 3-point % | 31.4 #309 |
| 33.5 #309 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.8 #279 |
| 29.4 #321 | Free throw rate | 41.4 #40 |
| Possessions | ||
| 23.7 #365 | Turnover rate | 19.2 #327 |
| 32.4 #112 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.6 #57 |
| 13.0 #213 | Assists per game | 12.2 #270 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.5 #91 | Points allowed | 76.2 #223 |
| 1.09 #207 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #113 |
| 50.8 #142 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.8 #293 |
| 33.5 #156 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #171 |
| 18.0 #95 | Turnovers forced | 19.7 #31 |
| 66.4 #311 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.3 #58 |
| 5.7 #274 | Steals per game | 8.3 #28 |
| 2.5 #302 | Blocks per game | 2.0 #347 |
MD Eastern
7-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-10 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC Central76–83
- Lvs Delaware St56–57
- Lvs NC Central73–77
- Wvs SC State69–57
- L@ Coppin St65–71
A week or more of rest.
Longwood
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Asheville82–85
- Wvs Radford90–74
- W@ Charleston So107–96
- L@ Presbyterian65–72
- Wvs SC Upstate82–75
A week or more of rest.