ExtraMile Arena · at Boise St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOIS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOIS 83–69 · win probability BOIS 89%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOIS has more of the edges
SHSU 2, BOIS 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: SHSU 34.4, BOIS 42.7. Allowed: SHSU 36.7, BOIS 32.1
BOIS offense vs SHSU defense
Offense 94th of 366 against a defense 228th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
SHSU hits 37.2% and allows 32.5%; BOIS hits 34.3% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 35.8% and 43.1% of their shots
SHSU offense vs BOIS defense
Offense 154th of 366 against a defense 74th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SHSU plays 70.7 a game (88th fastest), BOIS 68.3 (215th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
SHSU has played the 138th-hardest schedule, BOIS the 82nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SHSU 16.8%, BOIS 16.9%. Forced: SHSU 16.1%, BOIS 14.6%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SHSU 35.9%, BOIS 33.2%. Defensive: SHSU 69.9%, BOIS 76.4%
Home court
BOIS at home. This season: BOIS 0-0 at home, SHSU 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SHSU 52.5 and allows 51.4; BOIS 52.2 and allows 52.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SHSU 29%, BOIS 34%. Transfers in: SHSU 2, BOIS 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BOIS -14.1 | — |
| Total | — | 152.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | SHSU 69 · BOIS 83.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BOIS -8.3 | — |
| 1H total | 71.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | SHSU 31.4 · BOIS 39.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Sam Houston
31 games played
Straight up
19-12
61% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg +3.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-13
58% overs · avg +2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 77-98 | +31.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-85 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 78-70 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 84-81 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 94-68 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 83-93 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-70 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 85-75 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 78-87 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 91-102 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 168.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-68 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 72-60 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 74-82 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 77-62 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-63 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 168.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 93-87 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 73-58 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-71 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 83-67 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 70-66 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 78-87 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 83-79 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-70 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-78 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 100-67 | -6.5 | W +26.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-81 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 80-83 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 72-79 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 69-61 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 73-79 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 83-107 | +11.5 | L −12.5 | 162.5 | O 190 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
TTU
L 77-98
+10.5
15
@
UTAH
L 79-85
+6.5
19
vs
WYO
W 78-70
+6.5
26
vs
IDST
W 84-81
+1.5
28
vs
IDHO
W 94-68
+27.5
2
@
OKST
L 83-93
+3.5
6
@
TXSO
W 82-70
+4.5
17
@
ORST
W 85-75
+13.5
21
@
NMSU
L 78-87
−3.5
2
@
WKU
L 91-102
−5.5
4
@
MTSU
L 67-68
+3.5
8
vs
DEL
W 72-60
+0.5
10
vs
LIB
L 74-82
−6.5
14
@
JXST
W 77-62
+16.5
17
@
FIU
W 76-63
+15.5
21
vs
KENN
W 93-87
+0.5
24
vs
WKU
W 73-58
+9.5
28
@
MOST
W 80-71
+10.5
31
vs
LT
W 83-67
+8.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 70-66
−6.5
7
@
LT
L 78-87
−12.5
14
@
KENN
W 83-79
+5.5
18
vs
MTSU
W 78-70
+4.5
21
vs
JXST
W 82-78
−2.5
26
vs
FIU
W 100-67
+26.5
28
vs
MOST
W 86-81
−1.5
5
@
DEL
L 80-83
−10.5
7
@
LIB
L 72-79
−2.5
11
vs
NMSU
W 69-61
+3.5
13
vs
KENN
L 73-79
−8.5
18
@
UNM
L 83-107
−12.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
TTU
L 77-98
+18.5
15
@
UTAH
L 79-85
+4.5
19
vs
WYO
W 78-70
−8.5
26
vs
IDST
W 84-81
+22.5
28
vs
IDHO
W 94-68
+7.5
2
@
OKST
L 83-93
+6.5
6
@
TXSO
W 82-70
−6.5
17
@
ORST
W 85-75
+6.5
21
@
NMSU
L 78-87
+11.5
2
@
WKU
L 91-102
+24.5
4
@
MTSU
L 67-68
−21.5
8
vs
DEL
W 72-60
−12.5
10
vs
LIB
L 74-82
+1.5
14
@
JXST
W 77-62
−11.5
17
@
FIU
W 76-63
−29.5
21
vs
KENN
W 93-87
+12.5
24
vs
WKU
W 73-58
−25.5
28
@
MOST
W 80-71
+2.5
31
vs
LT
W 83-67
+8.5
4
vs
UTEP
W 70-66
−9.5
7
@
LT
L 78-87
+21.5
14
@
KENN
W 83-79
−0.5
18
vs
MTSU
W 78-70
−3.5
21
vs
JXST
W 82-78
+12.5
26
vs
FIU
W 100-67
+5.5
28
vs
MOST
W 86-81
+14.5
5
@
DEL
L 80-83
+15.5
7
@
LIB
L 72-79
−1.5
11
vs
NMSU
W 69-61
−24.5
13
vs
KENN
L 73-79
−7.5
18
@
UNM
L 83-107
+27.5
over 18under 13avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boise St
30 games played
Straight up
19-11
63% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 101-77 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-65 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 62-58 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 62-59 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 70-81 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-64 | -14.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 68-67 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 66-81 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 62-53 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 107-110 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | O 217 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-75 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-93 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 85-89 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 79-73 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-65 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 96-54 | -23.5 | W +18.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-58 | -12.5 | W +18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 69-86 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 91-87 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 91-90 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 83-86 | -10.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 56-75 | +9.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 84-69 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 72-62 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 69-53 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 78-67 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 74-84 | -14.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+11.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
+3.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−12.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−6.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
+0.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−4.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
+11.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
+7.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
+3.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
−18.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
+3.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+1.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−25.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
−23.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
−5.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+0.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+14.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+18.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+18.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
−15.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
−2.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+5.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
−13.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−9.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
−3.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
+1.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
+8.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+12.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+26.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
−11.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−27.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−29.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
−18.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−1.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
−3.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
−0.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
−4.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
+5.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
−31.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+78.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−7.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
+11.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
+23.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+11.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+0.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+12.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+5.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
+13.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
+36.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+28.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
+15.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−20.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
+6.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
−12.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
−27.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+19.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+1.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
+11.5
over 17under 13avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Boise St has the better starters
Position by position: Sam Houston 0, Boise St 2, even 3
Sam HoustonBetterBoise St
G J. Begg10 pts · 2.6 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 17
→BOISBig
G D. Wheeler-Thomas TR14.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 67
G J. Coleman8.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 41
→BOISBig
G L. Washington TR9.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 76
F E. St. Bernard TR5.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 78
=Even
F D. Butka TR13.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 66
F M. Dann2.8 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 58
=Even
F J. Stanback TR8.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 62
F R. Greppi TR0 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F P. Carmichael7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
Sam HoustonBetterBoise St
SHSU offense154th of 366 · -4.7
→BOISSmall
BOIS defense74th of 366 · +0.7
SHSU defense228th of 366 · -6.1
→BOISBig
BOIS offense94th of 366 · -0.5
Backcourt-3.6 · 2 players
→BOISBig
Backcourt+1.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt+1.0 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSHSU betterBOIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Begg27 minJ. Coleman22 minZ. PipkinNewA. McDowellNewN. NguyenNewK. PartainNew
Forwards
E. St. Bernard18 min · TRM. Dann9 minR. Greppi1 min · TRC. Sadibou NdiayeNewY. OkeNewA. LoustauNew
Guards
D. Wheeler-Thomas31 min · TRL. Washington29 min · TRA. Neto19 minJ. Bowie5 minR. Bergersen2 minB. Ramirez2 min
Forwards
D. Butka34 min · TRJ. Stanback25 min · TRP. Carmichael19 minS. Ahrens13 minB. Buom5 minE. Lathan2 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.0 #67 | Points per game | 77.4 #108 |
| 1.13 #78 | Points per possession | 1.13 #82 |
| 70.7 #88 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #215 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.5 #128 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #138 |
| 37.2 #24 | 3-point % | 34.3 #151 |
| 35.8 #253 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #114 |
| 34.4 #199 | Free throw rate | 42.7 #23 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #186 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #195 |
| 35.9 #25 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.2 #85 |
| 14.9 #95 | Assists per game | 12.4 #258 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.9 #237 | Points allowed | 73.2 #137 |
| 1.09 #191 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #145 |
| 51.4 #180 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #250 |
| 32.5 #89 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #213 |
| 16.1 #220 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #317 |
| 69.9 #168 | Defensive rebound rate | 76.4 #3 |
| 7.0 #128 | Steals per game | 4.6 #350 |
| 2.6 #288 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #339 |
Sam Houston
19-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico83–107
- Lvs Kennesaw St73–79
- Wvs New Mexico St69–61
- L@ Liberty72–79
- L@ Delaware80–83
A week or more of rest.
Boise St
19-11 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs San José St74–84
- W@ Colorado St78–67
- Wvs San Diego St86–77
- W@ Fresno St69–53
- Wvs Wyoming72–62
A week or more of rest.