Mountain America Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOIS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOIS 78–70 · win probability BOIS 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOIS has more of the edges
DRKE 1, BOIS 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DRKE 26.6%, BOIS 33.2%. Defensive: DRKE 70.1%, BOIS 76.4%
Free throws
Free throw rate: DRKE 33.5, BOIS 42.7. Allowed: DRKE 32.0, BOIS 32.1
DRKE offense vs BOIS defense
Offense 168th of 366 against a defense 74th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DRKE 15.0%, BOIS 16.9%. Forced: DRKE 14.6%, BOIS 14.6%
Three-pointers
DRKE hits 34.0% and allows 36.4%; BOIS hits 34.3% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 45.7% and 43.1% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
DRKE has played the 147th-hardest schedule, BOIS the 82nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
BOIS offense vs DRKE defense
Offense 94th of 366 against a defense 132nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DRKE 51%, BOIS 34%. Transfers in: DRKE 3, BOIS 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: DRKE 51.4 and allows 52.6; BOIS 52.2 and allows 52.6
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DRKE plays 68.4 a game (209th fastest), BOIS 68.3 (215th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BOIS -8.4 | — |
| Total | — | 147.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | DRKE 69.7 · BOIS 78.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BOIS -4.9 | — |
| 1H total | 69.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | DRKE 32.1 · BOIS 37 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Drake
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +3.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 79-81 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-61 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 71-62 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 62-71 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-74 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 108-57 | -17.5 | W +33.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 69-74 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 94-99 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 72-81 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 66-65 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 56-73 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-72 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 66-93 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 76-78 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 76-73 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 101-90 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-62 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 73-87 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 90-103 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 76-86 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 76-81 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-80 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 62-86 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-74 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 53-75 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 67-63 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 100-79 | +12.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
−2.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
−9.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−9.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
+16.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
+2.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+14.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+33.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−6.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
−10.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−1.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
+3.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−12.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−4.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
−20.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+2.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+8.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+15.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
+17.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
−4.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
−11.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
−3.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+0.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
−8.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
−8.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
−15.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−3.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−0.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−17.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
+9.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+33.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−16.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
+3.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
+8.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−22.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
−20.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
−18.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+20.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+26.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−5.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
+47.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−3.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
−10.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−16.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−3.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
+14.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+5.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+4.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
+1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+34.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
−13.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
+16.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
+9.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
+38.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+17.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
+12.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
+3.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
+9.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−22.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−1.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−9.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
−10.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+26.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−21.5
over 18under 14avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boise St
30 games played
Straight up
19-11
63% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 101-77 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-65 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 62-58 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 62-59 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 70-81 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-64 | -14.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 68-67 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 66-81 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 62-53 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 107-110 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | O 217 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-75 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-93 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 85-89 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 79-73 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-65 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 96-54 | -23.5 | W +18.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-58 | -12.5 | W +18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 69-86 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 91-87 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 91-90 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 83-86 | -10.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 56-75 | +9.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 84-69 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 72-62 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 69-53 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 78-67 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 74-84 | -14.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+11.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
+3.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−12.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−6.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
+0.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−4.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
+11.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
+7.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
+3.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
−18.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
+3.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+1.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−25.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
−23.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
−5.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+0.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+14.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+18.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+18.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
−15.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
−2.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+5.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
−13.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−9.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
−3.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
+1.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
+8.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+12.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+26.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
−11.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−27.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−29.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
−18.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−1.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
−3.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
−0.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
−4.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
+5.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
−31.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+78.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−7.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
+11.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
+23.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+11.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+0.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+12.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+5.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
+13.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
+36.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+28.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
+15.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−20.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
+6.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
−12.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
−27.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+19.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+1.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
+11.5
over 17under 13avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Boise St has the better starters
Position by position: Drake 1, Boise St 3, even 1
DrakeBetterBoise St
G A. Alia6.8 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 27
→BOISBig
G D. Wheeler-Thomas TR14.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 67
G O. Larson10 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 42
→BOISSmall
G L. Washington TR9.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 76
G E. Shetlar9 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 57
=Even
F D. Butka TR13.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 66
F G. Oldham TR5.5 pts · 7.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 21
→BOISBig
F J. Stanback TR8.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 62
F J. Carroll TR10.7 pts · 8.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
←DRKESmall
F P. Carmichael7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
DrakeBetterBoise St
DRKE offense168th of 366 · -5.1
→BOISSmall
BOIS defense74th of 366 · +0.7
DRKE defense132nd of 366 · -2.5
=Even
BOIS offense94th of 366 · -0.5
Backcourt-3.7 · 3 players
→BOISBig
Backcourt+1.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 2 players
→BOISSmall
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Bench+0.1 · 2 players
←DRKESmall
Bench-2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestDRKE betterBOIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Alia32 minO. Larson29 minE. Shetlar28 minD. Kindell17 min · TRD. IjadimbolaNewL. RushNew
Forwards
G. Oldham26 min · TRJ. Carroll25 min · TRG. Goodbary13 minJ. BurnsNewM. FlemonsNew
Guards
D. Wheeler-Thomas31 min · TRL. Washington29 min · TRA. Neto19 minJ. Bowie5 minR. Bergersen2 minB. Ramirez2 min
Forwards
D. Butka34 min · TRJ. Stanback25 min · TRP. Carmichael19 minS. Ahrens13 minB. Buom5 minE. Lathan2 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.9 #200 | Points per game | 77.4 #108 |
| 1.08 #182 | Points per possession | 1.13 #82 |
| 68.4 #209 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #215 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #179 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #138 |
| 34.0 #172 | 3-point % | 34.3 #151 |
| 45.7 #53 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #114 |
| 33.5 #223 | Free throw rate | 42.7 #23 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #64 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #195 |
| 26.6 #310 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.2 #85 |
| 13.1 #202 | Assists per game | 12.4 #258 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.3 #225 | Points allowed | 73.2 #137 |
| 1.12 #261 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #145 |
| 52.6 #246 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #250 |
| 36.4 #323 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #213 |
| 14.6 #315 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #317 |
| 70.1 #155 | Defensive rebound rate | 76.4 #3 |
| 5.2 #319 | Steals per game | 4.6 #350 |
| 2.9 #241 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #339 |
Drake
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UIC51–72
- Wvs Belmont100–79
- Wvs S Illinois67–63
- Lvs Northern Iowa53–75
- L@ Valparaiso71–74
A week or more of rest.
Boise St
19-11 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs San José St74–84
- W@ Colorado St78–67
- Wvs San Diego St86–77
- W@ Fresno St69–53
- Wvs Wyoming72–62
A week or more of rest.