Mountain America Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOIS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOIS 80–68 · win probability BOIS 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOIS has more of the edges
NDSU 2, BOIS 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
NDSU has played the 315th-hardest schedule, BOIS the 82nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NDSU 15.6%, BOIS 16.9%. Forced: NDSU 18.7%, BOIS 14.6%
NDSU offense vs BOIS defense
Offense 212th of 366 against a defense 74th, on the model’s ratings
BOIS offense vs NDSU defense
Offense 94th of 366 against a defense 209th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: NDSU 30.6, BOIS 42.7. Allowed: NDSU 29.2, BOIS 32.1
Three-pointers
NDSU hits 35.4% and allows 33.9%; BOIS hits 34.3% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 42.8% and 43.1% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NDSU 53.2 and allows 52.0; BOIS 52.2 and allows 52.6
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NDSU plays 69.2 a game (169th fastest), BOIS 68.3 (215th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NDSU 25%, BOIS 34%. Transfers in: NDSU 4, BOIS 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NDSU 32.9%, BOIS 33.2%. Defensive: NDSU 74.5%, BOIS 76.4%
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BOIS -11.5 | — |
| Total | — | 148.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | NDSU 68.3 · BOIS 79.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BOIS -6.7 | — |
| 1H total | 69.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | NDSU 31.3 · BOIS 38 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N Dakota St
32 games played
Straight up
24-8
75% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 65-67 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 68-80 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-68 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 92-85 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 56-43 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 99 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 80-85 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 81-72 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-68 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 11 | @ | W 80-69 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 99-94 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 73-74 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 66-76 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-61 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 79-77 | -13.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 97-73 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 78-76 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-65 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 68-65 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-58 | -10.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-84 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 71-78 | -12.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 92-84 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 83-66 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 74-66 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 95-59 | -19.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 62-84 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 96-63 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-50 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 70-62 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 67-92 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ORST
L 65-67
+7.5
5
@
UCD
L 68-80
−10.5
11
vs
CSUN
W 90-68
+17.5
17
vs
SIU
W 92-85
+5.5
26
vs
JXST
W 56-43
+9.5
28
@
ARST
L 80-85
−1.5
3
@
MONT
W 81-72
+12.5
6
vs
NAU
W 69-68
−11.5
11
@
CSUB
W 80-69
+3.5
13
@
DRKE
W 99-94
+10.5
21
vs
UCI
L 73-74
−2.5
22
@
UTEP
L 66-76
−12.5
31
vs
SDAK
W 84-61
+11.5
3
vs
ORU
W 79-77
−11.5
8
@
KC
W 97-73
+14.5
10
@
OMA
W 78-76
−3.5
14
vs
SDST
W 76-65
+5.5
17
vs
STMN
W 68-65
+0.5
22
@
DEN
W 82-77
+0.5
24
@
ORU
W 86-58
+17.5
31
@
SDAK
W 89-84
−3.5
5
vs
DEN
L 71-78
−19.5
7
vs
OMA
W 92-84
−1.5
14
@
UND
W 83-66
+11.5
18
@
SDST
W 74-66
+6.5
21
vs
KC
W 95-59
+16.5
26
@
STMN
L 62-84
−18.5
28
vs
UND
W 96-63
+21.5
5
vs
ORU
W 76-65
−1.5
7
vs
OMA
W 74-50
+15.5
8
vs
UND
W 70-62
−3.5
19
vs
MSU
L 67-92
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ORST
L 65-67
−12.5
5
@
UCD
L 68-80
+5.5
11
vs
CSUN
W 90-68
+1.5
17
vs
SIU
W 92-85
+23.5
26
vs
JXST
W 56-43
−43.5
28
@
ARST
L 80-85
+4.5
3
@
MONT
W 81-72
−0.5
6
vs
NAU
W 69-68
−10.5
11
@
CSUB
W 80-69
−0.5
13
@
DRKE
W 99-94
+47.5
21
vs
UCI
L 73-74
+0.5
22
@
UTEP
L 66-76
+2.5
31
vs
SDAK
W 84-61
−19.5
3
vs
ORU
W 79-77
+9.5
8
@
KC
W 97-73
+25.5
10
@
OMA
W 78-76
+6.5
14
vs
SDST
W 76-65
−10.5
17
vs
STMN
W 68-65
−18.5
22
@
DEN
W 82-77
−1.5
24
@
ORU
W 86-58
−7.5
31
@
SDAK
W 89-84
+18.5
5
vs
DEN
L 71-78
−7.5
7
vs
OMA
W 92-84
+29.5
14
@
UND
W 83-66
−0.5
18
@
SDST
W 74-66
−6.5
21
vs
KC
W 95-59
+5.5
26
@
STMN
L 62-84
−9.5
28
vs
UND
W 96-63
+6.5
5
vs
ORU
W 76-65
−6.5
7
vs
OMA
W 74-50
−22.5
8
vs
UND
W 70-62
−15.5
19
vs
MSU
L 67-92
+14.5
over 15under 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boise St
30 games played
Straight up
19-11
63% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 101-77 | -12.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-65 | -16.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 62-58 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 62-59 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 67-70 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 70-81 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 86-64 | -14.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 68-67 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 66-81 | -3.5 | L −18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 62-53 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 107-110 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | O 217 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-75 | -8.5 | L −25.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 68-93 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 85-89 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 79-73 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 81-65 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 96-54 | -23.5 | W +18.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-58 | -12.5 | W +18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 69-86 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 141.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 91-87 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 91-90 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 83-86 | -10.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 56-75 | +9.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 84-69 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 72-62 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 69-53 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 78-67 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 74-84 | -14.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+11.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
+3.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−12.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−6.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
+0.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−4.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
+11.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
+7.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
+3.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
−18.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
+3.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+1.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−25.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
−23.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
−5.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+0.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+14.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+18.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+18.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
−15.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
−2.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+5.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
−13.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−9.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
−3.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
+1.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
+8.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+12.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
−24.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
UVU
W 101-77
+26.5
11
vs
RGV
W 85-65
−11.5
15
vs
MTST
W 62-58
−27.5
18
vs
WICH
W 62-59
−29.5
24
vs
USC
L 67-70
−18.5
25
vs
NCSU
L 70-81
−1.5
6
@
BTLR
W 77-68
−3.5
10
vs
DUQ
W 86-64
−0.5
14
vs
SMC
W 68-67
−4.5
20
@
NEV
L 66-81
+5.5
30
vs
UNM
W 62-53
−31.5
3
@
SDSU
L 107-110
+78.5
7
vs
GCU
L 58-75
−7.5
10
vs
USU
L 68-93
+11.5
13
@
UNLV
L 85-89
+23.5
16
vs
CSU
W 79-73
+11.5
20
@
WYO
W 81-65
+0.5
24
vs
AF
W 96-54
+12.5
27
@
SJSU
W 89-58
+5.5
30
@
GCU
L 69-86
+13.5
3
vs
NEV
W 91-87
+36.5
7
@
UNM
W 91-90
+28.5
13
vs
UNLV
L 83-86
+15.5
18
@
USU
L 56-75
−20.5
21
vs
SJSU
W 84-69
+6.5
24
vs
WYO
W 72-62
−12.5
28
@
FRES
W 69-53
−27.5
3
vs
SDSU
W 86-77
+19.5
7
@
CSU
W 78-67
+1.5
11
vs
SJSU
L 74-84
+11.5
over 17under 13avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Boise St has the better starters
Position by position: N Dakota St 0, Boise St 3, even 2
N Dakota StBetterBoise St
G M. Bell TR8.8 pts · 4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 19
→BOISBig
G D. Wheeler-Thomas TR14.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 67
G A. Stefonowicz9.3 pts · 3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 42
→BOISSmall
G L. Washington TR9.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 76
G R. Diaz TR8.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
=Even
F D. Butka TR13.7 pts · 8.2 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 66
G C. Smith2.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Stanback TR8.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 62
F K. Poom TR8.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 31
→BOISSmall
F P. Carmichael7.8 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
N Dakota StBetterBoise St
NDSU offense212th of 366 · -6.5
→BOISBig
BOIS defense74th of 366 · +0.7
NDSU defense209th of 366 · -5.3
→BOISSmall
BOIS offense94th of 366 · -0.5
Backcourt-4.6 · 4 players
→BOISBig
Backcourt+1.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 1 player
→BOISSmall
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Bench-1.0 · 2 players
←NDSUSmall
Bench-2.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestNDSU betterBOIS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Bell34 min · TRA. Stefonowicz33 minR. Diaz22 min · TRC. Smith9 minR. Massey8 minJ. Robison2 min · TR
Forwards
K. Poom20 min · TRA. NagyNewK. TateNewC. SchoenfeldNewO. JunkerNewC. StackNew
Guards
D. Wheeler-Thomas31 min · TRL. Washington29 min · TRA. Neto19 minJ. Bowie5 minR. Bergersen2 minB. Ramirez2 min
Forwards
D. Butka34 min · TRJ. Stanback25 min · TRP. Carmichael19 minS. Ahrens13 minB. Buom5 minE. Lathan2 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.7 #87 | Points per game | 77.4 #108 |
| 1.14 #76 | Points per possession | 1.13 #82 |
| 69.2 #169 | Pace (possessions) | 68.3 #215 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.2 #92 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #138 |
| 35.4 #93 | 3-point % | 34.3 #151 |
| 42.8 #122 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #114 |
| 30.6 #289 | Free throw rate | 42.7 #23 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #108 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #195 |
| 32.9 #89 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.2 #85 |
| 14.8 #97 | Assists per game | 12.4 #258 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.4 #90 | Points allowed | 73.2 #137 |
| 1.03 #63 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #145 |
| 52.0 #215 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #250 |
| 33.9 #173 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #213 |
| 18.7 #62 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #317 |
| 74.5 #15 | Defensive rebound rate | 76.4 #3 |
| 7.7 #64 | Steals per game | 4.6 #350 |
| 2.8 #265 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #339 |
N Dakota St
24-8 in 2025-26 overall · 17-2 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan St67–92
- Wvs North Dakota70–62
- Wvs Omaha74–50
- Wvs Oral Roberts76–65
- Wvs North Dakota96–63
A week or more of rest.
Boise St
19-11 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs San José St74–84
- W@ Colorado St78–67
- Wvs San Diego St86–77
- W@ Fresno St69–53
- Wvs Wyoming72–62
A week or more of rest.