Scheels Center · at N Dakota St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NDSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NDSU 75–72 · win probability NDSU 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NDSU has more of the edges
UCD 1, NDSU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UCD 25.2%, NDSU 32.9%. Defensive: UCD 69.5%, NDSU 74.5%
Context
Schedule so far
UCD has played the 189th-hardest schedule, NDSU the 315th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: UCD plays 71.8 a game (39th fastest), NDSU 69.2 (169th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UCD 17.9%, NDSU 15.6%. Forced: UCD 19.8%, NDSU 18.7%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UCD 57%, NDSU 25%. Transfers in: UCD 4, NDSU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
NDSU at home. This season: NDSU 0-0 at home, UCD 0-0 away
Even
NDSU offense vs UCD defense
Offense 212th of 366 against a defense 171st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
UCD hits 34.4% and allows 33.8%; NDSU hits 35.4% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 43.5% and 42.8% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UCD 51.8 and allows 51.7; NDSU 53.2 and allows 52.0
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UCD 40.5, NDSU 30.6. Allowed: UCD 39.1, NDSU 29.2
Even
UCD offense vs NDSU defense
Offense 208th of 366 against a defense 209th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NDSU -2.5 | — |
| Total | — | 146.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | UCD 72 · NDSU 74.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NDSU -1.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | UCD 33.6 · NDSU 34.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UCD 2–0 NDSUUCD leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · UCD has won the last 2 meetings · UCD 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2025-26 | NDSU 68 @ UCD 80 | UCD -1.5 | UCD W |
| Nov 14, 2023-24 | NDSU 53 vs UCD 68 | UCD -4.5 | UCD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UC Davis
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 80-68 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 63-67 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 75-71 | +12.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 79-95 | +14.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 77-56 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 69-75 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 62-104 | +13.5 | L −28.5 | 146.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 78-79 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 93-83 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 143.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 89-80 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 79-81 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 93-86 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 168.5 | U 162 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 74-69 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 166.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 75-72 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 74-80 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 74-66 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 78-94 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 80-72 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 85-75 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 67-58 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 51-68 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 71-54 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 92-93 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 78-73 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 73-77 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 76-70 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 79-73 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-82 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
NDSU
W 80-68
+10.5
9
@
PORT
L 63-67
−2.5
14
vs
SAC
W 77-73
−0.5
18
@
NEV
W 75-71
+16.5
21
@
COLO
L 79-95
−1.5
24
vs
UL
W 77-56
+11.5
13
@
ORE
L 62-104
−28.5
17
vs
SEA
L 78-79
+1.5
21
@
IDST
W 93-83
+15.5
1
vs
CSUN
W 89-80
+5.5
3
vs
CSUB
L 79-81
−11.5
8
@
UCSB
W 93-86
+11.5
10
@
CP
L 78-84
−7.5
15
vs
CSUF
W 74-69
+1.5
17
vs
UCI
W 75-72
+6.5
22
vs
UCSD
L 74-80
−4.5
24
vs
UCR
W 74-66
−1.5
29
@
CSUN
L 78-94
−12.5
31
@
CSUB
W 80-72
+2.5
5
vs
UCSB
W 85-75
+13.5
7
vs
CP
W 67-58
+3.5
12
@
UCSD
L 51-68
−11.5
14
vs
LBSU
W 71-54
+12.5
19
@
CSUF
L 92-93
+0.5
21
@
UCR
W 78-73
+2.5
26
vs
HAW
L 73-77
−2.5
5
@
LBSU
W 76-70
+4.5
7
@
UCI
L 69-79
−2.5
11
vs
UCSB
W 79-73
+10.5
12
vs
CSUF
L 70-82
−10.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
NDSU
W 80-68
+5.5
9
@
PORT
L 63-67
−21.5
14
vs
SAC
W 77-73
−1.5
18
@
NEV
W 75-71
+2.5
21
@
COLO
L 79-95
+21.5
24
vs
UL
W 77-56
−3.5
13
@
ORE
L 62-104
+19.5
17
vs
SEA
L 78-79
+13.5
21
@
IDST
W 93-83
+32.5
1
vs
CSUN
W 89-80
+6.5
3
vs
CSUB
L 79-81
+8.5
8
@
UCSB
W 93-86
+31.5
10
@
CP
L 78-84
−6.5
15
vs
CSUF
W 74-69
−23.5
17
vs
UCI
W 75-72
−1.5
22
vs
UCSD
L 74-80
+1.5
24
vs
UCR
W 74-66
−9.5
29
@
CSUN
L 78-94
+8.5
31
@
CSUB
W 80-72
−0.5
5
vs
UCSB
W 85-75
+12.5
7
vs
CP
W 67-58
−44.5
12
@
UCSD
L 51-68
−31.5
14
vs
LBSU
W 71-54
−24.5
19
@
CSUF
L 92-93
+28.5
21
@
UCR
W 78-73
+1.5
26
vs
HAW
L 73-77
+3.5
5
@
LBSU
W 76-70
−3.5
7
@
UCI
L 69-79
+3.5
11
vs
UCSB
W 79-73
+12.5
12
vs
CSUF
L 70-82
−3.5
over 17under 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
N Dakota St
32 games played
Straight up
24-8
75% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 65-67 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 68-80 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-68 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 92-85 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 56-43 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 99 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 80-85 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 81-72 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-68 | -12.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 11 | @ | W 80-69 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 99-94 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 73-74 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 66-76 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 84-61 | -11.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 79-77 | -13.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 97-73 | -9.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 78-76 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-65 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 68-65 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-58 | -10.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-84 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 71-78 | -12.5 | L −19.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 92-84 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 83-66 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 74-66 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 95-59 | -19.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 62-84 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 96-63 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-50 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 70-62 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 67-92 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ORST
L 65-67
+7.5
5
@
UCD
L 68-80
−10.5
11
vs
CSUN
W 90-68
+17.5
17
vs
SIU
W 92-85
+5.5
26
vs
JXST
W 56-43
+9.5
28
@
ARST
L 80-85
−1.5
3
@
MONT
W 81-72
+12.5
6
vs
NAU
W 69-68
−11.5
11
@
CSUB
W 80-69
+3.5
13
@
DRKE
W 99-94
+10.5
21
vs
UCI
L 73-74
−2.5
22
@
UTEP
L 66-76
−12.5
31
vs
SDAK
W 84-61
+11.5
3
vs
ORU
W 79-77
−11.5
8
@
KC
W 97-73
+14.5
10
@
OMA
W 78-76
−3.5
14
vs
SDST
W 76-65
+5.5
17
vs
STMN
W 68-65
+0.5
22
@
DEN
W 82-77
+0.5
24
@
ORU
W 86-58
+17.5
31
@
SDAK
W 89-84
−3.5
5
vs
DEN
L 71-78
−19.5
7
vs
OMA
W 92-84
−1.5
14
@
UND
W 83-66
+11.5
18
@
SDST
W 74-66
+6.5
21
vs
KC
W 95-59
+16.5
26
@
STMN
L 62-84
−18.5
28
vs
UND
W 96-63
+21.5
5
vs
ORU
W 76-65
−1.5
7
vs
OMA
W 74-50
+15.5
8
vs
UND
W 70-62
−3.5
19
vs
MSU
L 67-92
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ORST
L 65-67
−12.5
5
@
UCD
L 68-80
+5.5
11
vs
CSUN
W 90-68
+1.5
17
vs
SIU
W 92-85
+23.5
26
vs
JXST
W 56-43
−43.5
28
@
ARST
L 80-85
+4.5
3
@
MONT
W 81-72
−0.5
6
vs
NAU
W 69-68
−10.5
11
@
CSUB
W 80-69
−0.5
13
@
DRKE
W 99-94
+47.5
21
vs
UCI
L 73-74
+0.5
22
@
UTEP
L 66-76
+2.5
31
vs
SDAK
W 84-61
−19.5
3
vs
ORU
W 79-77
+9.5
8
@
KC
W 97-73
+25.5
10
@
OMA
W 78-76
+6.5
14
vs
SDST
W 76-65
−10.5
17
vs
STMN
W 68-65
−18.5
22
@
DEN
W 82-77
−1.5
24
@
ORU
W 86-58
−7.5
31
@
SDAK
W 89-84
+18.5
5
vs
DEN
L 71-78
−7.5
7
vs
OMA
W 92-84
+29.5
14
@
UND
W 83-66
−0.5
18
@
SDST
W 74-66
−6.5
21
vs
KC
W 95-59
+5.5
26
@
STMN
L 62-84
−9.5
28
vs
UND
W 96-63
+6.5
5
vs
ORU
W 76-65
−6.5
7
vs
OMA
W 74-50
−22.5
8
vs
UND
W 70-62
−15.5
19
vs
MSU
L 67-92
+14.5
over 15under 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
N Dakota St has the better starters
Position by position: UC Davis 1, N Dakota St 2, even 2
UC DavisBetterN Dakota St
G C. Sevilla13.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 45
←UCDSmall
G M. Bell TR8.8 pts · 4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 19
G B. Fagbemi6.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 4.3 ast
Score 53
=Even
G A. Stefonowicz9.3 pts · 3 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 42
F I. Chappell8.4 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 26
→NDSUBig
G R. Diaz TR8.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 79
F V. Abosi TR4.8 pts · 4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 43
=No call
G C. Smith2.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
F O. Suljanovic5.3 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 12
→NDSUSmall
F K. Poom TR8.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 31
UC DavisBetterN Dakota St
UCD offense208th of 366 · -6.3
=Even
NDSU defense209th of 366 · -5.3
UCD defense171st of 366 · -3.9
=Even
NDSU offense212th of 366 · -6.5
Backcourt-1.5 · 2 players
←UCDBig
Backcourt-4.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 3 players
→NDSUSmall
Frontcourt-1.0 · 1 player
Bench-2.2 · 5 players
→NDSUSmall
Bench-1.0 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestUCD betterNDSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Sevilla32 minB. Fagbemi26 minJ. Stokes14 minC. Rawlins4 minC. Massamba4 min · TRY. Esso-EssisNew
Forwards
I. Chappell24 minV. Abosi17 min · TRO. Suljanovic14 minJ. Margrave10 min · TRN. NobleNewJ. DabrowskiNew
Centers
A. Szymczyk7 min · TR
Guards
M. Bell34 min · TRA. Stefonowicz33 minR. Diaz22 min · TRC. Smith9 minR. Massey8 minJ. Robison2 min · TR
Forwards
K. Poom20 min · TRA. NagyNewK. TateNewC. SchoenfeldNewO. JunkerNewC. StackNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.1 #139 | Points per game | 78.7 #87 |
| 1.06 #234 | Points per possession | 1.14 #76 |
| 71.8 #39 | Pace (possessions) | 69.2 #169 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.8 #157 | Effective FG% | 53.2 #92 |
| 34.4 #149 | 3-point % | 35.4 #93 |
| 43.5 #102 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.8 #122 |
| 40.5 #53 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #289 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.9 #267 | Turnover rate | 15.6 #108 |
| 25.2 #334 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.9 #89 |
| 15.1 #83 | Assists per game | 14.8 #97 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.0 #217 | Points allowed | 71.4 #90 |
| 1.06 #104 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #63 |
| 51.7 #197 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #215 |
| 33.8 #172 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #173 |
| 19.8 #29 | Turnovers forced | 18.7 #62 |
| 69.5 #182 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.5 #15 |
| 7.5 #81 | Steals per game | 7.7 #64 |
| 2.7 #276 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #265 |
UC Davis
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 12-10 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fullerton70–82
- Wvs Santa Barbara79–73
- L@ UC Irvine69–79
- W@ Long Beach St76–70
- Lvs Hawai'i73–77
A week or more of rest.
N Dakota St
24-8 in 2025-26 overall · 17-2 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan St67–92
- Wvs North Dakota70–62
- Wvs Omaha74–50
- Wvs Oral Roberts76–65
- Wvs North Dakota96–63
A week or more of rest.