John J. Lee Amphitheater · at Yale
Line
YALE -6.5moved 1 toward YALE
Total152.5up 1 from 151.5
| This season | YALE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects YALE 78–70 · win probability YALE 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
YALE -6.5
moved 1 toward YALE
Total
152.5
model 148.5 · Under by 4
Model edge
YALE by 2
model vs market
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: YALE has more of the edges
HOW 2, YALE 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
HOW has played the 348th-hardest schedule, YALE the 141st. A record against a soft schedule means less
YALE offense vs HOW defense
Offense 125th of 366 against a defense 206th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: HOW plays 69.5 a game (144th fastest), YALE 66.4 (301st). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
HOW hits 35.8% and allows 31.4%; YALE hits 39.4% and allows 35.0%. Threes are 34.7% and 36.1% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HOW 76%, YALE 42%. Transfers in: HOW 2, YALE 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
HOW offense vs YALE defense
Offense 196th of 366 against a defense 136th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HOW 19.3%, YALE 14.0%. Forced: HOW 20.7%, YALE 16.2%
Home court
YALE at home. This season: YALE 0-0 at home, HOW 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: HOW 43.5, YALE 35.1. Allowed: HOW 38.4, YALE 26.8
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HOW 35.8%, YALE 34.2%. Defensive: HOW 68.6%, YALE 70.3%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: HOW 50.9 and allows 48.7; YALE 55.6 and allows 51.6
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home favorites of 3 to 6.5 | 3171 | 66% | 50% | 50% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1736 | 67% | 50% | 49% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite | 6763 | 75% | 50% | 51% |
| Games with a total of 150 to 154.5 | 2755 | 75% | 51% | 50% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenYALE -5.5
1 → YALE
NowYALE -6.5
1 pt toward YALE
Total
Open151.5
▲ 1
Now152.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
HOW +220 · YALE -275
Line movement
Median of 6 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened YALE -5.5 · now YALE -6.5 · moved 1 toward YALEmodel YALE -8.5
model YALE -8.5
Opened 151.5 · now 152.5 · moved 1 upmodel 148.5
model 148.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Over 152.5TotalUnder 152.5
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Books
6 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOW | YALE | Over | Under | HOW | YALE | |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -6-110 | +6-110 | 152.5-115 | 152.5-105 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -6.5-115 | +6.5-110 | 151.5-112 | 151.5-114 | +225 | -295 |
| BovadaBovada | -6-110 | +6-110 | 152.5-115 | 152.5-105 | — | — |
| DraftKingsDK | -6.5-115 | +6.5-105 | 152.5-112 | 152.5-108 | +215 | -265 |
| FanDuelFD | -6.5-110 | +6.5-110 | 152.5-115 | 152.5-105 | +220 | -275 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -6-106 | +6-106 | 152.5-113 | 152.5-103 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | YALE -6.5 | YALE -8.3 | YALE +1.8 |
| Total | 152.5 | 148.5 | Under 4.0 |
| Projected score | — | HOW 70.1 · YALE 78.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | YALE -4.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | HOW 32.3 · YALE 37.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 9-1 90% | 6-4 60% | |
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
HOW 0–4 YALEYALE leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · YALE has won the last 4 meetings · HOW 1-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2025-26 | YALE 87 @ HOW 81 | HOW +6.5 | HOW W |
| Jan 1, 2024-25 | HOW 65 @ YALE 93 | YALE -14.5 | YALE W |
| Jan 3, 2023-24 | YALE 86 @ HOW 78 | HOW +7.5 | YALE W |
| Nov 30, 2022-23 | HOW 40 @ YALE 86 | YALE -13.5 | YALE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Howard
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
22-9
71% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 70-73 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 72-64 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-64 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 56-93 | +43.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 75-79 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-69 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 61-57 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 74-66 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 67-66 | +15.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-58 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 57-69 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-58 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 77-78 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-60 | -7.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-53 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-57 | -14.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 81-87 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 91-59 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 100-67 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-59 | -8.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-70 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 84-76 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-61 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-63 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 80-101 | +30.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−0.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−7.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
+1.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−5.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+5.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
+6.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
−1.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
+6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
+6.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+14.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
+16.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−0.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−9.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−14.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+17.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+11.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
−15.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+20.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
+4.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+13.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+0.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
+15.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+20.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+20.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
+16.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+0.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+1.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
+1.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−4.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+1.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+9.5
covered 22didn’t cover 9avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−9.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
−18.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−25.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+11.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
−5.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
+7.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
−7.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
−24.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+1.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
−8.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−8.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−29.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−4.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+12.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+10.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
+6.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+1.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
−21.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+0.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+20.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
−0.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+18.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+23.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
−15.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+19.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+10.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
−6.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−9.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+25.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+29.5
over 15under 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Yale
29 games played
Straight up
22-7
76% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +1.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 97-68 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 97-60 | -6.5 | W +30.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 86-79 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 77-86 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-67 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 74-63 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 97-94 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 77-74 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-66 | -12.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 93-82 | -17.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 78-102 | +15.5 | L −8.5 | 171.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 70-53 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-76 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 102-68 | -9.5 | W +24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 91-74 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-60 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 83-68 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-67 | -11.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 81-69 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 87-81 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 83-70 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-70 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 69-72 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 60-54 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 78-53 | -14.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 15 | vs | L 84-88 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 67-68 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+23.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+30.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
−13.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
−17.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−11.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
+4.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+4.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
−3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
+1.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
−6.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
−8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
+8.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−23.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
+24.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+7.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
+10.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−0.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−13.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
−3.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
−0.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+3.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
−3.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−5.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−7.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−0.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
+10.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+6.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
−13.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−5.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NAVY
W 97-68
+17.5
11
@
QUIN
W 97-60
+0.5
15
vs
STBK
W 86-79
+14.5
18
vs
URI
L 77-86
+9.5
21
vs
GB
W 73-67
−8.5
23
vs
COFC
W 74-63
−11.5
24
vs
AKR
W 97-94
+34.5
30
@
UVM
W 77-74
+3.5
7
vs
UIC
W 80-66
−2.5
10
vs
UALB
W 93-82
+29.5
29
@
ALA
L 78-102
+8.5
5
@
BRWN
W 70-53
−19.5
10
@
PRIN
L 60-76
−6.5
17
vs
COR
W 102-68
−4.5
19
vs
COLU
W 91-74
+14.5
24
@
PENN
W 77-60
−20.5
30
vs
DART
W 83-68
−4.5
31
vs
HARV
L 65-67
−9.5
6
vs
BRWN
W 81-69
+9.5
9
@
HOW
W 87-81
+20.5
13
@
DART
W 83-70
+1.5
14
@
HARV
W 76-75
+12.5
21
vs
PENN
W 74-70
−6.5
27
@
COR
L 69-72
−23.5
28
@
COLU
W 60-54
−33.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 78-53
−6.5
14
vs
COR
W 88-76
+0.5
15
vs
PENN
L 84-88
+27.5
17
vs
UNCW
L 67-68
−13.5
over 15under 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Howard 1, Yale 1, even 3
HowardBetterYale
G C. Gillus10.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 52
=Even
G T. Mullin11.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 63
G C. Taylor17.2 pts · 6.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 89
←HOWBig
G J. Brathwaite6.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 35
G A. Cotton8.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 15
=No call
G C. Wallace1.2 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
G O. Okojie10.3 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 61
→YALESmall
F R. Fox9.8 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 76
C G. Kocevar TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
=No call
F J. Sullivan1.3 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
HowardBetterYale
HOW offense196th of 366 · -6.1
→YALESmall
YALE defense136th of 366 · -2.8
HOW defense206th of 366 · -5.2
→YALESmall
YALE offense125th of 366 · -3.3
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→YALESmall
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
Bench-3.1 · 5 players
→YALESmall
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestHOW betterYALE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Gillus34 minC. Taylor32 minA. Cotton27 minO. Okojie26 minI. Brown10 minJ. Johnson6 min
Forwards
C. Robins6 minJ. Johnson3 minJ. LawsonNewD. HarrisNew
Centers
G. Kocevar13 min · TRJ. Brown6 min · TR
Guards
T. Mullin28 minJ. Brathwaite19 minC. Wallace4 minJ. Basima3 minA. Loving3 minJ. Tsai2 min
Forwards
R. Fox18 minJ. Sullivan5 minD. Ogunyemi3 minC. MayNewT. WinklerNewC. BolteNew
Centers
J. OwareNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.5 #155 | Points per game | 80.1 #64 |
| 1.09 #162 | Points per possession | 1.21 #10 |
| 69.5 #144 | Pace (possessions) | 66.4 #301 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.9 #198 | Effective FG% | 55.6 #26 |
| 35.8 #68 | 3-point % | 39.4 #3 |
| 34.7 #283 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.1 #247 |
| 43.5 #17 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #172 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.3 #331 | Turnover rate | 14.0 #22 |
| 35.8 #28 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.2 #62 |
| 15.2 #78 | Assists per game | 15.8 #53 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.3 #51 | Points allowed | 71.8 #102 |
| 1.00 #24 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #166 |
| 48.7 #53 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.6 #192 |
| 31.4 #41 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.0 #250 |
| 20.7 #13 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #207 |
| 68.6 #223 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.3 #147 |
| 8.3 #29 | Steals per game | 5.3 #314 |
| 3.7 #113 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #193 |
Howard
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-3 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan80–101
- Wvs UMBC86–83
- Wvs NC Central70–63
- Wvs SC State78–61
- W@ Norfolk St84–76
A week or more of rest.
Yale
22-7 in 2025-26 overall · 12-4 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Wilmington67–68
- Lvs Penn84–88
- Wvs Cornell88–76
- Wvs Princeton78–53
- W@ Columbia60–54
A week or more of rest.