Charlotte 49ers at Indiana State Sycamores: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:00 PM ETHulman Center · at Indiana St

LineCLT -4.5moved 1 toward CLT

Total152.5no move

Season records: Charlotte and Indiana St
CLT	This season	INST
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects CLT 75–74 · win probability CLT 53%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

CLT -4.5

moved 1 toward CLT

Total

152.5

model 149.1 · Under by 3.5

Model edge

INST by 3.5

model vs market

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: CLT has more of the edges

CLT 3, INST 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

CLTSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: CLT 33.9%, INST 26.2%. Defensive: CLT 67.5%, INST 68.2%

CLTSmall

CLT offense vs INST defense

Offense 164th of 366 against a defense 267th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: CLT plays 65.5 a game (331st fastest), INST 69.7 (131st). Faster games mean more points

INSTSmall

Home court

INST at home. This season: INST 0-0 at home, CLT 0-0 away

CLTSmall

Three-pointers

CLT hits 35.2% and allows 33.5%; INST hits 31.6% and allows 31.2%. Threes are 45.4% and 45.2% of their shots

Context

Schedule so far

CLT has played the 113th-hardest schedule, INST the 149th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

INST offense vs CLT defense

Offense 162nd of 366 against a defense 129th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: CLT 10%, INST 0%. Transfers in: CLT 7, INST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: CLT 36.4, INST 27.4. Allowed: CLT 36.2, INST 28.7

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: CLT 53.4 and allows 50.9; INST 52.8 and allows 50.2

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: CLT 18.1%, INST 19.5%. Forced: CLT 13.6%, INST 14.9%

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Road favorites of 3 to 6.5	1543	67%	51%	50%
Non-conference games at this spread	1736	67%	50%	49%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenCLT -3.5

1 → CLT

NowCLT -4.5

1 pt toward CLT

Total

Open152.5

no move

Now152.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

CLT -192 · INST +160

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened CLT -3.5 · now CLT -4.5 · moved 1 toward CLTmodel CLT -1

model CLT -1

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

Over 152.5TotalUnder 152.5

Bets

39%61%

Money

39%61%

CLTWinner

INST

Bets

91%9%

Money

97%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	CLT	INST	Over	Under	CLT	INST
BetMGMMGM	+4.5-110	-4.5-110	152.5-110	152.5-110	-190	+155
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	+4.5-115	-4.5-105	152.5-110	152.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	+2.5-155	-2.5+120	152.5-110	152.5-115	-215	+165
BetUSBetUS	+4.5-115	-4.5-105	152.5-110	152.5-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	+4.5-110	-4.5-110	152-115	152-105	-185	+160
DraftKingsDK	+4.5-108	-4.5-112	152.5-110	152.5-110	-192	+160
FanDuelFD	+4.5-110	-4.5-110	152.5-114	152.5-106	-194	+160
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	+4.5-111	-4.5-101	152.5-108	152.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	CLT -4.5	CLT -0.8	INST +3.7
Total	152.5	149.1	Under 3.4
Projected score	—	CLT 74.9 · INST 74.1

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	CLT -0.6	—
1H total	69.7	—
1H projected score	CLT 35.1 · INST 34.6	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
CLT LLWWL	18-15	55%	6-6	9-5
INST LLLWW	18-12	60%	7-6	14-8

Venue/role: CLT away, as favorite; INST home, as underdog. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
CLT OUUOU	19-14	58%	16-17
INST OOUUU	13-17	43%	9-21

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
CLT	4-6 40%	6-4 60%	6-4 60%
INST	2-8 20%	5-5 50%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Charlotte

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	vs GAST	W77–63WU
Nov 9	vs HALL	No recent meeting
Nov 13	vs APP	L63–65LU

Indiana St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	@ BALL	W70–52WU
Nov 11	vs MILW	W70–68WU
Nov 20	vs SFA	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

CLT 1–0 INSTCLT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · CLT 1-0 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 3, 2025-26	INST 76 @ CLT 92	CLT -4.5	CLT W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Charlotte

33 games played

Straight up

16-17

48% wins

Against the spread

18-15

55% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line

Over / Under

19-14

58% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total

Straight up

16-1748%

W W L L L L L W L L W W L W W W L W W W W L L L L W W L L L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

18-1555%

W L L W L L W W L L W W L W W L L W W W W L L L W W W W L L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

19-1458%

O U U O U O U U U O O O O O U O O O U O O U U O O U O O O U U O U

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsINST	W 92-76	-4.5	W +11.5	152.5	O 168
Nov 7	vsTNTC	W 70-65	-12.5	L −7.5	146.5	U 135
Nov 11	vsDAV	L 55-62	-1.5	L −8.5	143.5	U 117
Nov 16	@VT	L 76-84	+18.5	W +10.5	145.5	O 160
Nov 21	@APP	L 63-65	+1.5	L −0.5	132.5	U 128
Nov 27	vsILST	L 69-79	+5.5	L −4.5	139.5	O 148
Nov 28	vsRICH	L 66-71	+6.5	W +1.5	141.5	U 137
Dec 2	vsNCAT	W 74-57	-7.5	W +9.5	144.5	U 131
Dec 7	vsUSU	L 53-79	+10.5	L −15.5	139.5	U 132
Dec 14	@COFC	L 67-74	+5.5	L −1.5	140.5	O 141
Dec 18	vsLAF	W 81-67	-11.5	W +2.5	137.5	O 148
Dec 21	vsUIC	W 88-76	-1.5	W +10.5	137.5	O 164
Dec 30	vsTEM	L 73-76	-1.5	L −4.5	138.5	O 149
Jan 3	vsWICH	W 104-100	+5.5	W +9.5	140.5	O 204
Jan 7	@UTSA	W 74-58	-6.5	W +9.5	145.5	U 132
Jan 11	@RICE	W 74-73	-1.5	L −0.5	137.5	O 147
Jan 14	vsTLSA	L 74-86	+3.5	L −8.5	146.5	O 160
Jan 18	@ECU	W 73-70	+1.5	W +4.5	139.5	O 143
Jan 23	vsTULN	W 73-70	-2.5	W +0.5	143.5	U 143
Jan 28	@TEM	W 80-76	+4.5	W +8.5	139.5	O 156
Jan 30	vsRICE	W 80-70	-4.5	W +5.5	141.5	O 150
Feb 4	@WICH	L 64-74	+9.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 138
Feb 8	@MEM	L 54-77	+10.5	L −12.5	144.5	U 131
Feb 15	vsUTSA	L 79-88	-13.5	L −22.5	148.5	O 167
Feb 18	@TLSA	L 74-79	+12.5	W +7.5	151.5	O 153
Feb 21	vsECU	W 68-56	-4.5	W +7.5	145.5	U 124
Feb 25	vsUNT	W 80-79	+2.5	W +3.5	133.5	O 159
Mar 1	@FAU	L 76-77	+6.5	W +5.5	147.5	O 153
Mar 4	vsUAB	L 74-80	+2.5	L −3.5	146.5	O 154
Mar 8	@USF	L 60-83	+17.5	L −5.5	156.5	U 143
Mar 12	vsTULN	W 74-60	-1.5	W +12.5	144.5	U 134
Mar 13	vsUAB	W 83-78	+5.5	W +10.5	147.5	O 161
Mar 14	vsUSF	L 64-86	+15.5	L −6.5	153.5	U 150

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

INST

W 92-76

+11.5

TNTC

W 70-65

−7.5

DAV

L 55-62

−8.5

L 76-84

+10.5

APP

L 63-65

−0.5

ILST

L 69-79

−4.5

RICH

L 66-71

+1.5

NCAT

W 74-57

+9.5

USU

L 53-79

−15.5

COFC

L 67-74

−1.5

LAF

W 81-67

+2.5

UIC

W 88-76

+10.5

TEM

L 73-76

−4.5

WICH

W 104-100

+9.5

UTSA

W 74-58

+9.5

RICE

W 74-73

−0.5

TLSA

L 74-86

−8.5

ECU

W 73-70

+4.5

TULN

W 73-70

+0.5

TEM

W 80-76

+8.5

RICE

W 80-70

+5.5

WICH

L 64-74

−0.5

MEM

L 54-77

−12.5

UTSA

L 79-88

−22.5

TLSA

L 74-79

+7.5

ECU

W 68-56

+7.5

UNT

W 80-79

+3.5

FAU

L 76-77

+5.5

UAB

L 74-80

−3.5

USF

L 60-83

−5.5

TULN

W 74-60

+12.5

UAB

W 83-78

+10.5

USF

L 64-86

−6.5

covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

INST

W 92-76

+15.5

TNTC

W 70-65

−11.5

DAV

L 55-62

−26.5

L 76-84

+14.5

APP

L 63-65

−4.5

ILST

L 69-79

+8.5

RICH

L 66-71

−4.5

NCAT

W 74-57

−13.5

USU

L 53-79

−7.5

COFC

L 67-74

+0.5

LAF

W 81-67

+10.5

UIC

W 88-76

+26.5

TEM

L 73-76

+10.5

WICH

W 104-100

+63.5

UTSA

W 74-58

−13.5

RICE

W 74-73

+9.5

TLSA

L 74-86

+13.5

ECU

W 73-70

+3.5

TULN

W 73-70

−0.5

TEM

W 80-76

+16.5

RICE

W 80-70

+8.5

WICH

L 64-74

−5.5

MEM

L 54-77

−13.5

UTSA

L 79-88

+18.5

TLSA

L 74-79

+1.5

ECU

W 68-56

−21.5

UNT

W 80-79

+25.5

FAU

L 76-77

+5.5

UAB

L 74-80

+7.5

USF

L 60-83

−13.5

TULN

W 74-60

−10.5

UAB

W 83-78

+13.5

USF

L 64-86

−3.5

over 19under 14avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Indiana St

30 games played

Straight up

9-21

30% wins

Against the spread

18-12

60% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line

Over / Under

13-17

43% overs · avg −4 pts vs the total

Straight up

9-2130%

L W L W W L L W W L L W L L L W L L L L L W L L L L L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

18-1260%

L W L W W W L W W L L W W W L W W W L W L W L W W L L L W W

2 straight covers2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

13-1743%

O U U U U O O U U O U O O U U O U U U O O O U U O O O U U U

3 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@CLT	L 76-92	+4.5	L −11.5	152.5	O 168
Nov 10	@SIUE	W 64-55	+2.5	W +11.5	159.5	U 119
Nov 14	@DUKE	L 62-100	+37.5	L −0.5	163.5	U 162
Nov 19	vsLT	W 60-51	-3.5	W +5.5	147.5	U 111
Nov 22	vsBALL	W 70-52	-7.5	W +10.5	154.5	U 122
Nov 26	@LT	L 73-75	+2.5	W +0.5	141.5	O 148
Nov 28	vsALCN	L 74-81	-12.5	L −19.5	152.5	O 155
Dec 7	vsUSI	W 77-55	-11.5	W +10.5	158.5	U 132
Dec 14	@MILW	W 70-68	+2.5	W +4.5	159.5	U 138
Dec 18	vsBRAD	L 99-108	+5.5	L −3.5	150.5	O 207
Dec 21	@ILST	L 65-85	+13.5	L −6.5	152.5	U 150
Dec 29	vsBEL	W 81-80	+7.5	W +8.5	159.5	O 161
Jan 1	@UNI	L 66-75	+10.5	W +1.5	135.5	O 141
Jan 4	@DRKE	L 72-74	+6.5	W +4.5	149.5	U 146
Jan 10	vsEVAN	L 69-72	-7.5	L −10.5	145.5	U 141
Jan 14	vsILST	W 94-89	+6.5	W +11.5	148.5	O 183
Jan 17	@MUR	L 81-85	+11.5	W +7.5	167.5	U 166
Jan 21	@BRAD	L 68-75	+8.5	W +1.5	155.5	U 143
Jan 24	vsDRKE	L 62-76	-3.5	L −17.5	151.5	U 138
Jan 27	@UIC	L 74-76	+5.5	W +3.5	147.5	O 150
Jan 31	vsVAL	L 72-76	-2.5	L −6.5	145.5	O 148
Feb 3	@EVAN	W 84-63	-1.5	W +19.5	145.5	O 147
Feb 9	vsSIU	L 65-80	+1.5	L −13.5	146.5	U 145
Feb 12	vsMUR	L 72-74	+3.5	W +1.5	163.5	U 146
Feb 15	@VAL	L 75-76	+4.5	W +3.5	145.5	O 151
Feb 18	vsUNI	L 60-81	+5.5	L −15.5	136.5	O 141
Feb 21	@BEL	L 70-87	+12.5	L −4.5	156.5	O 157
Feb 25	@SIU	L 55-66	+8.5	L −2.5	147.5	U 121
Mar 1	vsUIC	W 79-63	+3.5	W +19.5	144.5	U 142
Mar 5	vsVAL	L 62-63	+2.5	W +1.5	140.5	U 125

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

CLT

L 76-92

−11.5

SIUE

W 64-55

+11.5

DUKE

L 62-100

−0.5

W 60-51

+5.5

BALL

W 70-52

+10.5

L 73-75

+0.5

ALCN

L 74-81

−19.5

USI

W 77-55

+10.5

MILW

W 70-68

+4.5

BRAD

L 99-108

−3.5

ILST

L 65-85

−6.5

BEL

W 81-80

+8.5

UNI

L 66-75

+1.5

DRKE

L 72-74

+4.5

EVAN

L 69-72

−10.5

ILST

W 94-89

+11.5

MUR

L 81-85

+7.5

BRAD

L 68-75

+1.5

DRKE

L 62-76

−17.5

UIC

L 74-76

+3.5

VAL

L 72-76

−6.5

EVAN

W 84-63

+19.5

SIU

L 65-80

−13.5

MUR

L 72-74

+1.5

VAL

L 75-76

+3.5

UNI

L 60-81

−15.5

BEL

L 70-87

−4.5

SIU

L 55-66

−2.5

UIC

W 79-63

+19.5

VAL

L 62-63

+1.5

covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

CLT

L 76-92

+15.5

SIUE

W 64-55

−40.5

DUKE

L 62-100

−1.5

W 60-51

−36.5

BALL

W 70-52

−32.5

L 73-75

+6.5

ALCN

L 74-81

+2.5

USI

W 77-55

−26.5

MILW

W 70-68

−21.5

BRAD

L 99-108

+56.5

ILST

L 65-85

−2.5

BEL

W 81-80

+1.5

UNI

L 66-75

+5.5

DRKE

L 72-74

−3.5

EVAN

L 69-72

−4.5

ILST

W 94-89

+34.5

MUR

L 81-85

−1.5

BRAD

L 68-75

−12.5

DRKE

L 62-76

−13.5

UIC

L 74-76

+2.5

VAL

L 72-76

+2.5

EVAN

W 84-63

+1.5

SIU

L 65-80

−1.5

MUR

L 72-74

−17.5

VAL

L 75-76

+5.5

UNI

L 60-81

+4.5

BEL

L 70-87

+0.5

SIU

L 55-66

−26.5

UIC

W 79-63

−2.5

VAL

L 62-63

−15.5

over 13under 17avg −4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Charlotte has the better starters

Position by position: Charlotte 2, Indiana St 0, even 3

CharlotteBetterIndiana St

G D. Finister TR14.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.9 ast Score 84

Even

G K. Gregory TR16.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.9 ast Score 70

G K. Tillery TR3.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 1.8 ast Score 63

Even

G M. White TR10.6 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.9 ast Score 58

F D. Grant TR9.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.5 ast Score 71

CLTBig

G M. Mitchell TR11.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 1 ast Score 28

F A. Conyers7.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast Score 37

CLTSmall

G D. Paschal TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast Score 16

F J. Fort TR3.3 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.5 ast Score 49

No call

G C. Puryear TR0.4 pts · 0.5 reb · 0 ast Not ranked

CharlotteBetterIndiana St

CLT offense164th of 366 · -5.0

CLTSmall

INST defense267th of 366 · -6.8

CLT defense129th of 366 · -2.3

Even

INST offense162nd of 366 · -4.8

Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players

CLTBig

Backcourt-3.1 · 5 players

Frontcourt-0.1 · 3 players

No call

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

Bench-0.8 · 3 players

Even

Bench-0.1 · 1 player

Score, worst to bestCLT betterINST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Charlotte

Guards

D. Finister33 min · TRK. Tillery12 min · TRJ. Rodriguez-Stegemeijer8 min · TRR. EvansNewF. OgucheNewL. BarnesNew

Forwards

D. Grant24 min · TRA. Conyers20 minJ. Fort14 min · TRT. McKinley12 min · TRM. AllenNew

Centers

P. Marshall11 min · TR

Indiana St

Guards

K. Gregory32 min · TRM. White31 min · TRM. Mitchell27 min · TRD. Paschal12 min · TRC. Puryear3 min · TRE. McQuillanNew

Forwards

A. Vlajic1 min · TRJ. CooperNewA. CalamitaNewK. LandNewK. SpeckmanNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

CLT73.0 #225

INST71.7 #254

Points per possession

CLT1.12 #105

INST1.03 #295

Pace (possessions)

CLT65.5 #331

INST69.7 #131

Shooting

Effective FG%

CLT53.4 #86

INST52.8 #110

3-point %

CLT35.2 #101

INST31.6 #305

3-point attempt rate

CLT45.4 #58

INST45.2 #62

Free throw rate

CLT36.4 #140

INST27.4 #349

Possessions

Turnover rate

CLT18.1 #278

INST19.5 #338

Offensive rebound rate

CLT33.9 #71

INST26.2 #317

Assists per game

CLT12.9 #217

INST17.1 #22

Defense

Points allowed

CLT74.3 #164

INST75.1 #193

Points allowed per possession

CLT1.13 #291

INST1.08 #161

Opponent effective FG%

CLT50.9 #152

INST50.2 #110

Opponent 3-point %

CLT33.5 #153

INST31.2 #37

Turnovers forced

CLT13.6 #345

INST14.9 #299

Defensive rebound rate

CLT67.5 #283

INST68.2 #245

Steals per game

CLT4.5 #353

INST6.0 #242

Blocks per game

CLT3.5 #150

INST3.3 #176

CLT		INST
Scoring
73.0 #225	Points per game	71.7 #254
1.12 #105	Points per possession	1.03 #295
65.5 #331	Pace (possessions)	69.7 #131
Shooting
53.4 #86	Effective FG%	52.8 #110
35.2 #101	3-point %	31.6 #305
45.4 #58	3-point attempt rate	45.2 #62
36.4 #140	Free throw rate	27.4 #349
Possessions
18.1 #278	Turnover rate	19.5 #338
33.9 #71	Offensive rebound rate	26.2 #317
12.9 #217	Assists per game	17.1 #22
Defense
74.3 #164	Points allowed	75.1 #193
1.13 #291	Points allowed per possession	1.08 #161
50.9 #152	Opponent effective FG%	50.2 #110
33.5 #153	Opponent 3-point %	31.2 #37
13.6 #345	Turnovers forced	14.9 #299
67.5 #283	Defensive rebound rate	68.2 #245
4.5 #353	Steals per game	6.0 #242
3.5 #150	Blocks per game	3.3 #176

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Charlotte

16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · American Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs South Florida64–86
Wvs UAB83–78
Wvs Tulane74–60
L@ South Florida60–83
Lvs UAB74–80

A week or more of rest.

Indiana St

9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 4-17 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Valparaiso62–63
Wvs UIC79–63
L@ S Illinois55–66
L@ Belmont70–87
Lvs Northern Iowa60–81

A week or more of rest.