The Palestra · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CLT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HALL 76–65 · win probability HALL 83%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CLT has more of the edges
HALL 2, CLT 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HALL 16.6%, CLT 18.1%. Forced: HALL 21.5%, CLT 13.6%
CLT offense vs HALL defense
Offense 164th of 366 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
HALL hits 30.5% and allows 32.4%; CLT hits 35.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 26.8% and 45.4% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: HALL 35.3, CLT 36.4. Allowed: HALL 42.1, CLT 36.2
Context
Schedule so far
HALL has played the 55th-hardest schedule, CLT the 113th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: HALL 47.6 and allows 47.3; CLT 53.4 and allows 50.9
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HALL 35.6%, CLT 33.9%. Defensive: HALL 68.1%, CLT 67.5%
Even
HALL offense vs CLT defense
Offense 97th of 366 against a defense 129th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: HALL plays 66.5 a game (296th fastest), CLT 65.5 (331st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HALL 18%, CLT 10%. Transfers in: HALL 9, CLT 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HALL -11.0 | — |
| Total | — | 141.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | HALL 76.2 · CLT 65.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HALL -6.7 | — |
| 1H total | 66.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | HALL 36.4 · CLT 29.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Seton Hall
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-50 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 68-61 | -21.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 82-59 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 70-58 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-45 | -25.5 | L −2.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-74 | +7.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 81-83 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-61 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-61 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 128.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 78-67 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 81-59 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | @ | W 72-67 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 23 | vs | L 56-64 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 79-73 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 56-54 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-77 | -6.5 | L −17.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 60-65 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 60-67 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 86-68 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 60-72 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-69 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 87-80 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 63-56 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 57-69 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 51-47 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | U 98 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-71 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 77-68 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 65-72 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 13 | @ | L 68-78 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SPU
W 77-50
+13.5
7
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−14.5
10
vs
FAIR
W 82-59
+8.5
13
vs
MONM
W 70-58
−3.5
18
vs
NHVN
W 68-45
−2.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 85-74
+18.5
25
vs
USC
L 81-83
+4.5
26
vs
WSU
W 75-61
+5.5
3
vs
CCSU
W 77-61
−2.5
6
@
KSU
W 78-67
+13.5
13
vs
RUTG
W 81-59
+8.5
19
@
PROV
W 72-67
+6.5
23
vs
VILL
L 56-64
−9.5
30
@
MARQ
W 79-73
+7.5
4
vs
CREI
W 56-54
−1.5
10
@
GTWN
W 76-67
+7.5
13
vs
CONN
L 64-69
+1.5
17
vs
BTLR
L 66-77
−17.5
20
@
SJU
L 60-65
+6.5
24
@
DEP
L 60-67
−9.5
28
vs
XAV
W 86-68
+12.5
31
vs
MARQ
W 69-64
−1.5
4
@
VILL
L 60-72
−6.5
7
@
CREI
L 68-69
+0.5
11
vs
PROV
W 87-80
+2.5
15
@
BTLR
W 63-56
+1.5
18
vs
DEP
L 57-69
−19.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 51-47
−2.5
28
@
CONN
L 67-71
+8.5
3
@
XAV
W 77-68
+7.5
6
vs
SJU
L 65-72
−1.5
12
vs
CREI
W 72-61
+8.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-78
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SPU
W 77-50
−2.5
7
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−5.5
10
vs
FAIR
W 82-59
+3.5
13
vs
MONM
W 70-58
−7.5
18
vs
NHVN
W 68-45
−16.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 85-74
+15.5
25
vs
USC
L 81-83
+18.5
26
vs
WSU
W 75-61
−11.5
3
vs
CCSU
W 77-61
+9.5
6
@
KSU
W 78-67
−3.5
13
vs
RUTG
W 81-59
+3.5
19
@
PROV
W 72-67
−13.5
23
vs
VILL
L 56-64
−15.5
30
@
MARQ
W 79-73
+6.5
4
vs
CREI
W 56-54
−33.5
10
@
GTWN
W 76-67
+5.5
13
vs
CONN
L 64-69
+0.5
17
vs
BTLR
L 66-77
−1.5
20
@
SJU
L 60-65
−20.5
24
@
DEP
L 60-67
−8.5
28
vs
XAV
W 86-68
+8.5
31
vs
MARQ
W 69-64
−10.5
4
@
VILL
L 60-72
−2.5
7
@
CREI
L 68-69
−3.5
11
vs
PROV
W 87-80
+16.5
15
@
BTLR
W 63-56
−19.5
18
vs
DEP
L 57-69
−3.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 51-47
−38.5
28
@
CONN
L 67-71
+7.5
3
@
XAV
W 77-68
+0.5
6
vs
SJU
L 65-72
−1.5
12
vs
CREI
W 72-61
−3.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-78
+10.5
over 13under 20avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Charlotte
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-76 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 70-65 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 55-62 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 76-84 | +18.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-65 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 69-79 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 74-57 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 81-67 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 73-76 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 104-100 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-58 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 74-73 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 74-86 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 73-70 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 73-70 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-76 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 64-74 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 54-77 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 79-88 | -13.5 | L −22.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 74-79 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 68-56 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 80-79 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 76-77 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 74-80 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 60-83 | +17.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 74-60 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 83-78 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-86 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
INST
W 92-76
+11.5
7
vs
TNTC
W 70-65
−7.5
11
vs
DAV
L 55-62
−8.5
16
@
VT
L 76-84
+10.5
21
@
APP
L 63-65
−0.5
27
vs
ILST
L 69-79
−4.5
28
vs
RICH
L 66-71
+1.5
2
vs
NCAT
W 74-57
+9.5
7
vs
USU
L 53-79
−15.5
14
@
COFC
L 67-74
−1.5
18
vs
LAF
W 81-67
+2.5
21
vs
UIC
W 88-76
+10.5
30
vs
TEM
L 73-76
−4.5
3
vs
WICH
W 104-100
+9.5
7
@
UTSA
W 74-58
+9.5
11
@
RICE
W 74-73
−0.5
14
vs
TLSA
L 74-86
−8.5
18
@
ECU
W 73-70
+4.5
23
vs
TULN
W 73-70
+0.5
28
@
TEM
W 80-76
+8.5
30
vs
RICE
W 80-70
+5.5
4
@
WICH
L 64-74
−0.5
8
@
MEM
L 54-77
−12.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-88
−22.5
18
@
TLSA
L 74-79
+7.5
21
vs
ECU
W 68-56
+7.5
25
vs
UNT
W 80-79
+3.5
1
@
FAU
L 76-77
+5.5
4
vs
UAB
L 74-80
−3.5
8
@
USF
L 60-83
−5.5
12
vs
TULN
W 74-60
+12.5
13
vs
UAB
W 83-78
+10.5
14
vs
USF
L 64-86
−6.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
INST
W 92-76
+15.5
7
vs
TNTC
W 70-65
−11.5
11
vs
DAV
L 55-62
−26.5
16
@
VT
L 76-84
+14.5
21
@
APP
L 63-65
−4.5
27
vs
ILST
L 69-79
+8.5
28
vs
RICH
L 66-71
−4.5
2
vs
NCAT
W 74-57
−13.5
7
vs
USU
L 53-79
−7.5
14
@
COFC
L 67-74
+0.5
18
vs
LAF
W 81-67
+10.5
21
vs
UIC
W 88-76
+26.5
30
vs
TEM
L 73-76
+10.5
3
vs
WICH
W 104-100
+63.5
7
@
UTSA
W 74-58
−13.5
11
@
RICE
W 74-73
+9.5
14
vs
TLSA
L 74-86
+13.5
18
@
ECU
W 73-70
+3.5
23
vs
TULN
W 73-70
−0.5
28
@
TEM
W 80-76
+16.5
30
vs
RICE
W 80-70
+8.5
4
@
WICH
L 64-74
−5.5
8
@
MEM
L 54-77
−13.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-88
+18.5
18
@
TLSA
L 74-79
+1.5
21
vs
ECU
W 68-56
−21.5
25
vs
UNT
W 80-79
+25.5
1
@
FAU
L 76-77
+5.5
4
vs
UAB
L 74-80
+7.5
8
@
USF
L 60-83
−13.5
12
vs
TULN
W 74-60
−10.5
13
vs
UAB
W 83-78
+13.5
14
vs
USF
L 64-86
−3.5
over 19under 14avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Seton Hall has the better starters
Position by position: Seton Hall 2, Charlotte 1, even 2
Seton HallBetterCharlotte
G R. Brown TR13.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 59
→CLTSmall
G D. Finister TR14.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 84
G D. Jones TR17.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 74
=Even
G K. Tillery TR3.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
G K. Thomas TR15.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 71
=Even
F D. Grant TR9.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 71
G R. Anderson TR10.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 81
←HALLBig
F A. Conyers7.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 37
F D. Williams TR7.5 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 71
←HALLSmall
F J. Fort TR3.3 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 49
Seton HallBetterCharlotte
HALL offense97th of 366 · -0.8
=Even
CLT defense129th of 366 · -2.3
HALL defense28th of 366 · +3.7
←HALLBig
CLT offense164th of 366 · -5.0
Backcourt+2.6 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.9 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.1 · 3 players
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestHALL betterCLT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Brown33 min · TRD. Jones33 min · TRK. Thomas30 min · TRR. Anderson24 min · TRE. Fisher21 minS. Wilcher19 min · TR
Forwards
D. Williams24 min · TRM. Wol20 min · TRT. CopelandNewT. AirhienbuwaNewI. DolinskiNew
Centers
A. Fanta Kabba17 min · TR
Guards
D. Finister33 min · TRK. Tillery12 min · TRJ. Rodriguez-Stegemeijer8 min · TRR. EvansNewF. OgucheNewL. BarnesNew
Forwards
D. Grant24 min · TRA. Conyers20 minJ. Fort14 min · TRT. McKinley12 min · TRM. AllenNew
Centers
P. Marshall11 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 #278 | Points per game | 73.0 #225 |
| 1.06 #238 | Points per possession | 1.12 #105 |
| 66.5 #296 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #331 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.6 #321 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #86 |
| 30.5 #334 | 3-point % | 35.2 #101 |
| 26.8 #362 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.4 #58 |
| 35.3 #168 | Free throw rate | 36.4 #140 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #173 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #278 |
| 35.6 #33 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #71 |
| 13.1 #206 | Assists per game | 12.9 #217 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.3 #8 | Points allowed | 74.3 #164 |
| 0.98 #16 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #291 |
| 47.3 #25 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #152 |
| 32.4 #87 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #153 |
| 21.5 #5 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #345 |
| 68.1 #251 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.5 #283 |
| 9.2 #7 | Steals per game | 4.5 #353 |
| 5.7 #7 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #150 |
Seton Hall
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-11 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's68–78
- Wvs Creighton72–61
- Lvs St John's65–72
- W@ Xavier77–68
- L@ UConn67–71
A week or more of rest.
Charlotte
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs South Florida64–86
- Wvs UAB83–78
- Wvs Tulane74–60
- L@ South Florida60–83
- Lvs UAB74–80
A week or more of rest.