Prudential Center · at Seton Hall
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HALL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HALL 83–59 · win probability HALL 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HALL has more of the edges
UNH 1, HALL 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UNH offense vs HALL defense
Offense 300th of 366 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UNH has played the 237th-hardest schedule, HALL the 55th. A record against a soft schedule means less
HALL offense vs UNH defense
Offense 97th of 366 against a defense 255th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNH 46.7 and allows 53.5; HALL 47.6 and allows 47.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNH 16.5%, HALL 16.6%. Forced: UNH 15.8%, HALL 21.5%
Three-pointers
UNH hits 30.5% and allows 34.3%; HALL hits 30.5% and allows 32.4%. Threes are 43.1% and 26.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: UNH plays 68.9 a game (186th fastest), HALL 66.5 (296th). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNH 47%, HALL 18%. Transfers in: UNH 3, HALL 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
HALL at home. This season: HALL 0-0 at home, UNH 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNH 25.7%, HALL 35.6%. Defensive: UNH 73.1%, HALL 68.1%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNH 28.5, HALL 35.3. Allowed: UNH 35.8, HALL 42.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HALL -23.9 | — |
| Total | — | 141.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNH 58.8 · HALL 82.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HALL -14.1 | — |
| 1H total | 66.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNH 26.1 · HALL 40.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 1-9 10% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Hampshire
28 games played
Straight up
7-21
25% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −2.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 38-88 | +29.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 75-86 | +15.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 44-61 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-98 | +29.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 47-59 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 68-72 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-69 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-82 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 59-58 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 79-93 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 55-86 | +31.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-80 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 74-75 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 65-48 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-82 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-72 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 66-61 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 84-92 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-80 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 63-85 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 56-78 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 58-61 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 63-65 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-84 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 88-83 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 69-84 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+4.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
+7.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
−2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−6.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
+5.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
+7.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+11.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−2.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+20.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
+0.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
−11.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
−6.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
+18.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
−3.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+5.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
+1.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
−6.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−13.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
−8.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
−19.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−18.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−6.5
26
@
BING
L 63-65
−4.5
28
@
UALB
L 61-84
−19.5
3
vs
BRY
W 88-83
+2.5
7
@
UMBC
L 69-84
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+13.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
−39.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
+2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−30.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
−7.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
−10.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+35.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−21.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+14.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
−5.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
+1.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
+18.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
−16.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
+34.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+14.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
−19.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
+44.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−1.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
+0.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
+1.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−17.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−16.5
26
@
BING
L 63-65
−13.5
28
@
UALB
L 61-84
+6.5
3
vs
BRY
W 88-83
+35.5
7
@
UMBC
L 69-84
+10.5
over 15under 13avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Seton Hall
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-50 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 68-61 | -21.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 82-59 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 70-58 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-45 | -25.5 | L −2.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-74 | +7.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 81-83 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-61 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-61 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 128.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 78-67 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 81-59 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | @ | W 72-67 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 23 | vs | L 56-64 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 79-73 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 56-54 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-77 | -6.5 | L −17.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 60-65 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 60-67 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 86-68 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 60-72 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-69 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 87-80 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 63-56 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 57-69 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 51-47 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | U 98 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-71 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 77-68 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 65-72 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 13 | @ | L 68-78 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SPU
W 77-50
+13.5
7
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−14.5
10
vs
FAIR
W 82-59
+8.5
13
vs
MONM
W 70-58
−3.5
18
vs
NHVN
W 68-45
−2.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 85-74
+18.5
25
vs
USC
L 81-83
+4.5
26
vs
WSU
W 75-61
+5.5
3
vs
CCSU
W 77-61
−2.5
6
@
KSU
W 78-67
+13.5
13
vs
RUTG
W 81-59
+8.5
19
@
PROV
W 72-67
+6.5
23
vs
VILL
L 56-64
−9.5
30
@
MARQ
W 79-73
+7.5
4
vs
CREI
W 56-54
−1.5
10
@
GTWN
W 76-67
+7.5
13
vs
CONN
L 64-69
+1.5
17
vs
BTLR
L 66-77
−17.5
20
@
SJU
L 60-65
+6.5
24
@
DEP
L 60-67
−9.5
28
vs
XAV
W 86-68
+12.5
31
vs
MARQ
W 69-64
−1.5
4
@
VILL
L 60-72
−6.5
7
@
CREI
L 68-69
+0.5
11
vs
PROV
W 87-80
+2.5
15
@
BTLR
W 63-56
+1.5
18
vs
DEP
L 57-69
−19.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 51-47
−2.5
28
@
CONN
L 67-71
+8.5
3
@
XAV
W 77-68
+7.5
6
vs
SJU
L 65-72
−1.5
12
vs
CREI
W 72-61
+8.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-78
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SPU
W 77-50
−2.5
7
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−5.5
10
vs
FAIR
W 82-59
+3.5
13
vs
MONM
W 70-58
−7.5
18
vs
NHVN
W 68-45
−16.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 85-74
+15.5
25
vs
USC
L 81-83
+18.5
26
vs
WSU
W 75-61
−11.5
3
vs
CCSU
W 77-61
+9.5
6
@
KSU
W 78-67
−3.5
13
vs
RUTG
W 81-59
+3.5
19
@
PROV
W 72-67
−13.5
23
vs
VILL
L 56-64
−15.5
30
@
MARQ
W 79-73
+6.5
4
vs
CREI
W 56-54
−33.5
10
@
GTWN
W 76-67
+5.5
13
vs
CONN
L 64-69
+0.5
17
vs
BTLR
L 66-77
−1.5
20
@
SJU
L 60-65
−20.5
24
@
DEP
L 60-67
−8.5
28
vs
XAV
W 86-68
+8.5
31
vs
MARQ
W 69-64
−10.5
4
@
VILL
L 60-72
−2.5
7
@
CREI
L 68-69
−3.5
11
vs
PROV
W 87-80
+16.5
15
@
BTLR
W 63-56
−19.5
18
vs
DEP
L 57-69
−3.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 51-47
−38.5
28
@
CONN
L 67-71
+7.5
3
@
XAV
W 77-68
+0.5
6
vs
SJU
L 65-72
−1.5
12
vs
CREI
W 72-61
−3.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-78
+10.5
over 13under 20avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Seton Hall has the better starters
Position by position: New Hampshire 0, Seton Hall 5, even 0
New HampshireBetterSeton Hall
G T. Bike7.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 34
→HALLSmall
G R. Brown TR13.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 59
G E. Oliver-Bush TR3.2 pts · 2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 7
→HALLBig
G D. Jones TR17.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 74
F D. Poser6.9 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
→HALLBig
G K. Thomas TR15.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 71
F J. Squire5.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 34
→HALLBig
G R. Anderson TR10.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 81
F D. McKenna TR3.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 47
→HALLSmall
F D. Williams TR7.5 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 71
New HampshireBetterSeton Hall
UNH offense300th of 366 · -9.3
→HALLBig
HALL defense28th of 366 · +3.7
UNH defense255th of 366 · -6.7
→HALLBig
HALL offense97th of 366 · -0.8
Backcourt-3.5 · 2 players
→HALLBig
Backcourt+2.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-4.5 · 3 players
→HALLBig
Frontcourt+0.9 · 1 player
Bench-2.3 · 4 players
→HALLSmall
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUNH betterHALL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Bike24 minE. Oliver-Bush16 min · TRM. Blackley2 minA. SquireNewJ. ColemanNewJ. FaumuinaNew
Forwards
D. Poser29 minJ. Squire27 minD. McKenna11 min · TRR. Zan8 min · TRJ. O'Neill6 minK. MyersNew
Centers
G. Xanthopoulos6 min
Guards
R. Brown33 min · TRD. Jones33 min · TRK. Thomas30 min · TRR. Anderson24 min · TRE. Fisher21 minS. Wilcher19 min · TR
Forwards
D. Williams24 min · TRM. Wol20 min · TRT. CopelandNewT. AirhienbuwaNewI. DolinskiNew
Centers
A. Fanta Kabba17 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.6 #339 | Points per game | 70.3 #278 |
| 0.96 #347 | Points per possession | 1.06 #238 |
| 68.9 #186 | Pace (possessions) | 66.5 #296 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.7 #344 | Effective FG% | 47.6 #321 |
| 30.5 #333 | 3-point % | 30.5 #334 |
| 43.1 #110 | 3-point attempt rate | 26.8 #362 |
| 28.5 #338 | Free throw rate | 35.3 #168 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.5 #166 | Turnover rate | 16.6 #173 |
| 25.7 #329 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.6 #33 |
| 10.6 #348 | Assists per game | 13.1 #206 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.4 #227 | Points allowed | 65.3 #8 |
| 1.11 #247 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #16 |
| 53.5 #282 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.3 #25 |
| 34.3 #204 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.4 #87 |
| 15.8 #227 | Turnovers forced | 21.5 #5 |
| 73.1 #32 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.1 #251 |
| 6.1 #222 | Steals per game | 9.2 #7 |
| 2.0 #345 | Blocks per game | 5.7 #7 |
New Hampshire
7-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMBC69–84
- Wvs Bryant88–83
- L@ UAlbany61–84
- L@ Binghamton63–65
- Lvs Maine58–61
A week or more of rest.
Seton Hall
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-11 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's68–78
- Wvs Creighton72–61
- Lvs St John's65–72
- W@ Xavier77–68
- L@ UConn67–71
A week or more of rest.