Hill Field House · at Morgan St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MORG | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MSM 75–72 · win probability MSM 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
MSM 3, MORG 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: MSM 50.6 and allows 47.2; MORG 45.8 and allows 51.7
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MSM 32.3%, MORG 30.7%. Defensive: MSM 70.9%, MORG 64.8%
MORG offense vs MSM defense
Offense 293rd of 366 against a defense 199th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MSM 22.4%, MORG 17.8%. Forced: MSM 15.3%, MORG 16.5%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: MSM plays 68.0 a game (231st fastest), MORG 71.1 (73rd). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
MSM has played the 291st-hardest schedule, MORG the 360th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
MORG at home. This season: MORG 0-0 at home, MSM 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: MSM 33.3, MORG 42.7. Allowed: MSM 37.3, MORG 50.9
Even
MSM offense vs MORG defense
Offense 319th of 366 against a defense 360th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MSM 42%, MORG 36%. Transfers in: MSM 3, MORG 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
MSM hits 32.7% and allows 32.3%; MORG hits 31.7% and allows 31.5%. Threes are 42.6% and 35.2% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MSM -3.3 | — |
| Total | — | 147.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | MSM 75.4 · MORG 72.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MSM -2.1 | — |
| 1H total | 69.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | MSM 35.5 · MORG 33.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MSM 1–0 MORGMSM leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · MSM 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2021-22 | MORG 60 @ MSM 74 | MSM -4 | MSM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mount St Marys
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg −0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-21
32% overs · avg −3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 54-70 | +19.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 62-73 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 74-66 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 55-72 | +25.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 90-95 | +17.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 60-83 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 60-113 | +30.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 79-75 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 80-87 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 56-64 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 81-73 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 67-75 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 66-59 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 65-75 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 69-80 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 50-67 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 78-68 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 68-58 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 62-77 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-61 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 58-66 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 70-87 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-76 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 65-55 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 76-63 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 68-47 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 69-77 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 69-47 | +4.5 | W +26.5 | 145.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 58-63 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WVU
L 54-70
+3.5
7
vs
BUCK
L 62-73
−12.5
11
@
SFPA
W 74-66
+1.5
16
@
CIN
L 55-72
+8.5
19
@
MD
L 90-95
+12.5
23
@
WMU
L 60-83
−21.5
25
@
OSU
L 60-113
−22.5
29
vs
HOW
W 79-75
+1.5
3
vs
SHU
L 80-87
−5.5
5
@
MRST
L 56-64
+0.5
13
@
L-MD
W 81-73
+5.5
19
@
DREX
L 67-75
−3.5
29
vs
IONA
W 66-59
+9.5
2
@
MRMK
L 65-75
−6.5
4
@
QUIN
L 69-80
−3.5
9
vs
SPU
W 70-65
+6.5
11
vs
SIE
L 50-67
−14.5
17
@
CAN
W 78-68
+6.5
19
@
NIA
W 68-58
+6.5
22
vs
QUIN
L 62-77
−10.5
24
vs
RID
W 71-61
+0.5
30
@
SPU
L 58-66
−2.5
1
vs
MAN
W 72-65
+0.5
5
vs
MRMK
L 70-87
−14.5
7
@
IONA
W 83-76
+10.5
13
@
RID
W 65-55
+4.5
20
vs
NIA
W 76-63
+5.5
22
vs
CAN
W 68-47
+13.5
27
@
SHU
L 69-77
−5.5
1
@
FAIR
W 69-47
+26.5
7
vs
SIE
L 58-63
−2.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg −0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WVU
L 54-70
−12.5
7
vs
BUCK
L 62-73
−8.5
11
@
SFPA
W 74-66
−9.5
16
@
CIN
L 55-72
−18.5
19
@
MD
L 90-95
+39.5
23
@
WMU
L 60-83
−7.5
25
@
OSU
L 60-113
+21.5
29
vs
HOW
W 79-75
+7.5
3
vs
SHU
L 80-87
+14.5
5
@
MRST
L 56-64
−16.5
13
@
L-MD
W 81-73
+2.5
19
@
DREX
L 67-75
+4.5
29
vs
IONA
W 66-59
−28.5
2
@
MRMK
L 65-75
−1.5
4
@
QUIN
L 69-80
−1.5
9
vs
SPU
W 70-65
−6.5
11
vs
SIE
L 50-67
−22.5
17
@
CAN
W 78-68
+10.5
19
@
NIA
W 68-58
−5.5
22
vs
QUIN
L 62-77
−9.5
24
vs
RID
W 71-61
−7.5
30
@
SPU
L 58-66
−14.5
1
vs
MAN
W 72-65
−10.5
5
vs
MRMK
L 70-87
+22.5
7
@
IONA
W 83-76
+17.5
13
@
RID
W 65-55
−17.5
20
vs
NIA
W 76-63
+8.5
22
vs
CAN
W 68-47
−22.5
27
@
SHU
L 69-77
−4.5
1
@
FAIR
W 69-47
−29.5
7
vs
SIE
L 58-63
−14.5
over 10under 21avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Morgan St
27 games played
Straight up
11-16
41% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg −1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-11
59% overs · avg +2.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-87 | +27.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 73-79 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 56-88 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 66-71 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 80-84 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 49-92 | +21.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 50-97 | +26.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 64-94 | +25.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 56-83 | +23.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 49-66 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 78-89 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 80-79 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 78-77 | +14.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 79-78 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-80 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-71 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 76-80 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 90-83 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 59-84 | +8.5 | L −16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-84 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 70-66 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+10.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
+2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
−7.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−3.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−20.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
+0.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+1.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−21.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+6.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−20.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
−4.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−3.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−10.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
+0.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
−7.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+4.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+15.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+8.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+5.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+1.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+8.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+5.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−16.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+9.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−1.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GTWN
L 70-87
+2.5
11
vs
UMBC
L 79-81
−2.5
15
@
MERC
L 72-86
+11.5
18
vs
NCAT
L 73-79
−9.5
21
@
ODU
L 56-88
−12.5
25
vs
DREX
L 66-71
−6.5
6
vs
LONG
L 80-84
+9.5
9
@
DEP
L 49-92
−9.5
13
vs
NIA
W 81-73
+13.5
19
@
CAL
L 50-97
−4.5
21
@
SF
L 64-94
+12.5
23
@
LMU
L 56-83
−5.5
3
@
UMES
L 49-66
−23.5
10
vs
SCST
W 72-67
−8.5
12
vs
NCCU
L 78-89
+25.5
17
@
DSU
W 80-79
+22.5
24
@
HOW
W 78-77
+6.5
26
@
NORF
W 79-78
+4.5
31
@
COPP
W 89-80
+13.5
7
vs
UMES
W 79-71
+9.5
16
@
NCCU
L 76-80
+9.5
21
vs
DSU
W 82-68
+6.5
25
@
SCST
W 90-83
+19.5
28
vs
HOW
L 59-84
−15.5
2
vs
NORF
W 90-84
+17.5
5
vs
COPP
W 70-66
−13.5
11
vs
DSU
L 70-75
+2.5
over 16under 11avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Mount St Marys 1, Morgan St 1, even 3
Mount St MarysBetterMorgan St
G A. Khadre Kebe7.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 55
→MORGSmall
G A. Worrell16.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 70
G R. Thompson TR10.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 49
←MSMBig
G J. Awoke TR6.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 12
G A. Arrington5.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 2
=No call
G D. Bumpass2.7 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
G M. So3.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 13
=Even
F K. Horton TR7.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
F W. Jr. Exacte TR7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 43
=No call
F T. Edwards3.5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
Mount St MarysBetterMorgan St
MSM offense319th of 366 · -10.5
=Even
MORG defense360th of 366 · -11.0
MSM defense199th of 366 · -4.8
←MSMSmall
MORG offense293rd of 366 · -9.1
Backcourt-5.9 · 4 players
→MORGSmall
Backcourt-3.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
←MSMSmall
Frontcourt-2.7 · 2 players
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestMSM betterMORG betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Khadre Kebe22 minR. Thompson22 min · TRA. Arrington19 minM. So18 minA. Rozakeas14 minC. Orness3 min · TR
Forwards
W. Jr. Exacte19 min · TRY. Diop9 minL. JoyceNewR. BrzezanskiNewN. LimolNewC. GardNew
Guards
A. Worrell30 minJ. Awoke25 min · TRD. Bumpass9 minB. Barnett2 minJ. KwartengNewK. RichardNew
Forwards
K. Horton20 min · TRT. Edwards17 minM. Wade8 minM. Lual7 minI. Traore6 min · TRT. PettigrewNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.9 #315 | Points per game | 71.7 #252 |
| 1.00 #327 | Points per possession | 1.01 #316 |
| 68.0 #231 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #73 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #208 | Effective FG% | 45.8 #351 |
| 32.7 #244 | 3-point % | 31.7 #295 |
| 42.6 #125 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #274 |
| 33.3 #230 | Free throw rate | 42.7 #22 |
| Possessions | ||
| 22.4 #364 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #262 |
| 32.3 #115 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.7 #172 |
| 13.2 #196 | Assists per game | 12.2 #269 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.0 #74 | Points allowed | 80.1 #321 |
| 1.05 #84 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #288 |
| 47.2 #23 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.7 #194 |
| 32.3 #81 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.5 #43 |
| 15.3 #262 | Turnovers forced | 16.5 #186 |
| 70.9 #114 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.8 #341 |
| 5.8 #261 | Steals per game | 4.3 #359 |
| 2.9 #248 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #172 |
Mount St Marys
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Siena58–63
- W@ Fairfield69–47
- L@ Sacred Heart69–77
- Wvs Canisius68–47
- Wvs Niagara76–63
A week or more of rest.
Morgan St
11-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-5 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Delaware St70–75
- Wvs Coppin St70–66
- Wvs Norfolk St90–84
- Lvs Howard59–84
- W@ SC State90–83
A week or more of rest.