McKenzie Arena · at Chattanooga
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UTC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UTC 78–65 · win probability UTC 87%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UTC has more of the edges
DSU 1, UTC 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: DSU 42.9 and allows 52.9; UTC 54.2 and allows 51.7
UTC offense vs DSU defense
Offense 193rd of 366 against a defense 307th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
DSU hits 28.4% and allows 33.0%; UTC hits 35.0% and allows 34.2%. Threes are 28.9% and 49.2% of their shots
DSU offense vs UTC defense
Offense 354th of 366 against a defense 270th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: DSU 34.1, UTC 29.7. Allowed: DSU 40.5, UTC 42.6
Home court
UTC at home. This season: UTC 0-0 at home, DSU 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
DSU has played the 354th-hardest schedule, UTC the 306th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DSU 27.7%, UTC 21.8%. Defensive: DSU 68.0%, UTC 68.3%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: DSU plays 66.7 a game (290th fastest), UTC 67.6 (249th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DSU 41%, UTC 32%. Transfers in: DSU 1, UTC 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DSU 19.8%, UTC 14.5%. Forced: DSU 19.6%, UTC 13.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UTC -12.9 | — |
| Total | — | 143.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | DSU 65.2 · UTC 78.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UTC -7.6 | — |
| 1H total | 67.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | DSU 29.8 · UTC 37.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Delaware St
27 games played
Straight up
5-22
19% wins
Against the spread
9-18
33% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-19
30% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 65-83 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 43-83 | +26.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 57-68 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 52-65 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 130.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 41-97 | +34.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-71 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 59-66 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-72 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 81-76 | +13.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 51-67 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 50-65 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 51-53 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 64-66 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 58-84 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-80 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 64-70 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 65-57 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 128.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-65 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 58-75 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 59-91 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 68-82 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 60-74 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 59-61 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 57-56 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 53-59 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 131.5 | U 112 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
TEM
L 65-83
−1.5
8
@
SYR
L 43-83
−13.5
10
@
NIA
L 57-68
−5.5
15
@
NHVN
L 52-65
−11.5
23
@
MIA
L 41-97
−21.5
29
@
UMBC
L 57-71
−0.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 59-66
+8.5
6
vs
DEL
W 75-72
+10.5
13
@
LONG
W 81-76
+18.5
18
@
JOES
L 51-67
+1.5
29
@
RUTG
L 50-65
+5.5
3
vs
COPP
L 51-53
−10.5
10
vs
NORF
L 64-66
+2.5
12
@
HOW
L 58-84
−17.5
17
vs
MORG
L 79-80
−4.5
26
@
SCST
L 64-70
−4.5
31
vs
UMES
W 65-57
+10.5
7
@
COPP
L 47-65
−19.5
9
@
NCCU
L 63-72
−1.5
14
@
NORF
L 58-75
−7.5
16
vs
HOW
L 59-91
−20.5
21
@
MORG
L 68-82
−8.5
28
vs
NCCU
L 60-74
−11.5
2
vs
SCST
L 59-61
−5.5
5
@
UMES
W 57-56
+6.5
11
vs
MORG
W 75-70
+8.5
13
vs
NCCU
L 53-59
−2.5
covered 9didn’t cover 18avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
TEM
L 65-83
−6.5
8
@
SYR
L 43-83
−31.5
10
@
NIA
L 57-68
−12.5
15
@
NHVN
L 52-65
−13.5
23
@
MIA
L 41-97
−13.5
29
@
UMBC
L 57-71
−10.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 59-66
−7.5
6
vs
DEL
W 75-72
+17.5
13
@
LONG
W 81-76
+17.5
18
@
JOES
L 51-67
−19.5
29
@
RUTG
L 50-65
−20.5
3
vs
COPP
L 51-53
−35.5
10
vs
NORF
L 64-66
−2.5
12
@
HOW
L 58-84
+12.5
17
vs
MORG
L 79-80
+22.5
26
@
SCST
L 64-70
−1.5
31
vs
UMES
W 65-57
−6.5
7
@
COPP
L 47-65
−20.5
9
@
NCCU
L 63-72
+0.5
14
@
NORF
L 58-75
−1.5
16
vs
HOW
L 59-91
+18.5
21
@
MORG
L 68-82
+6.5
28
vs
NCCU
L 60-74
−1.5
2
vs
SCST
L 59-61
−14.5
5
@
UMES
W 57-56
−11.5
11
vs
MORG
W 75-70
+2.5
13
vs
NCCU
L 53-59
−19.5
over 8under 19avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Chattanooga
29 games played
Straight up
10-19
34% wins
Against the spread
12-17
41% covers · avg −3.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 66-87 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 69-101 | +7.5 | L −24.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 73-91 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 78-66 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 71-57 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 64-70 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 70-74 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 78-92 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 64-79 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 73-66 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 72-77 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-79 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 67-78 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-79 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 76-67 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 90-82 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 66-67 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 64-75 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 55-81 | -1.5 | L −27.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 70-75 | +7.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 79-75 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 71-78 | -9.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 61-73 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 76-81 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 94-90 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 93-72 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 80-85 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-79 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 85-88 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
SMC
L 66-87
−5.5
8
@
UNLV
L 69-101
−24.5
15
@
FGCU
L 73-91
−19.5
19
@
SCST
W 78-66
+0.5
22
vs
UNA
W 71-57
+4.5
30
vs
TNST
L 64-70
−14.5
6
vs
SEMO
L 70-74
−7.5
13
vs
AUB
L 78-92
+5.5
17
@
BELL
L 64-79
−16.5
21
@
AAMU
W 73-66
+4.5
1
@
UNCG
L 72-77
−7.5
3
@
VMI
L 71-79
−14.5
7
vs
FUR
L 67-78
−8.5
10
vs
SAM
W 88-79
+7.5
14
@
WOF
W 76-67
+14.5
17
@
WCU
W 90-82
+9.5
21
vs
ETSU
L 66-67
+3.5
24
@
SAM
L 64-75
−6.5
29
vs
WOF
L 55-81
−27.5
1
@
FUR
L 70-75
+2.5
5
vs
MER
W 79-75
+8.5
7
vs
CIT
L 71-78
−16.5
11
@
ETSU
L 61-73
−1.5
14
vs
WCU
L 76-81
−6.5
19
@
MER
W 94-90
+14.5
21
@
CIT
W 93-72
+16.5
26
vs
UNCG
L 80-85
−9.5
28
vs
VMI
W 86-79
−4.5
6
vs
CIT
L 85-88
−10.5
covered 12didn’t cover 17avg −3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
SMC
L 66-87
+7.5
8
@
UNLV
L 69-101
+14.5
15
@
FGCU
L 73-91
+11.5
19
@
SCST
W 78-66
−10.5
22
vs
UNA
W 71-57
−21.5
30
vs
TNST
L 64-70
−21.5
6
vs
SEMO
L 70-74
−5.5
13
vs
AUB
L 78-92
+19.5
17
@
BELL
L 64-79
−3.5
21
@
AAMU
W 73-66
+0.5
1
@
UNCG
L 72-77
+1.5
3
@
VMI
L 71-79
+0.5
7
vs
FUR
L 67-78
−1.5
10
vs
SAM
W 88-79
+18.5
14
@
WOF
W 76-67
−11.5
17
@
WCU
W 90-82
+21.5
21
vs
ETSU
L 66-67
−10.5
24
@
SAM
L 64-75
−13.5
29
vs
WOF
L 55-81
−14.5
1
@
FUR
L 70-75
−1.5
5
vs
MER
W 79-75
−1.5
7
vs
CIT
L 71-78
+6.5
11
@
ETSU
L 61-73
−11.5
14
vs
WCU
L 76-81
+5.5
19
@
MER
W 94-90
+32.5
21
@
CIT
W 93-72
+20.5
26
vs
UNCG
L 80-85
+7.5
28
vs
VMI
W 86-79
+10.5
6
vs
CIT
L 85-88
+24.5
over 16under 13avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Chattanooga has the better starters
Position by position: Delaware St 1, Chattanooga 2, even 2
Delaware StBetterChattanooga
G R. Moore6.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 33
→UTCSmall
G T. Darner9.8 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 49
G N. Muhammad TR7.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
=No call
G S. Cusano2.5 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
G J. St Clair3.7 pts · 0.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 14
→UTCBig
F T. Houser TR14.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 68
G D. Shepherd4.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 58
←DSUBig
F Y. Levy TR5 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 18
F A. Santos6.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
=Even
F J. Bowman3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 22
Delaware StBetterChattanooga
DSU offense354th of 366 · -13.2
→UTCSmall
UTC defense270th of 366 · -6.8
DSU defense307th of 366 · -7.9
→UTCSmall
UTC offense193rd of 366 · -5.9
Backcourt-4.0 · 4 players
→UTCSmall
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-1.6 · 3 players
Bench-2.0 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-1.1 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestDSU betterUTC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Moore22 minN. Muhammad18 min · TRJ. St Clair15 minD. Shepherd13 minN. ReedusNewI. SullivanNew
Forwards
A. Santos20 minM. Adamu13 minT. HawkinsNewG. EkukwaiNewJ. ObioraNewF. MuntariNew
Guards
T. Darner29 minS. Cusano13 minH. Holland11 minL. VittersNewM. HamptonNewT. PowellNew
Forwards
T. Houser33 min · TRY. Levy21 min · TRJ. Bowman12 minA. SwiftNewC. HardawayNew
Centers
J. FleemanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.7 #365 | Points per game | 74.1 #192 |
| 0.89 #365 | Points per possession | 1.10 #132 |
| 66.7 #290 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #249 |
| Shooting | ||
| 42.9 #364 | Effective FG% | 54.2 #60 |
| 28.4 #361 | 3-point % | 35.0 #116 |
| 28.9 #357 | 3-point attempt rate | 49.2 #18 |
| 34.1 #204 | Free throw rate | 29.7 #319 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.8 #346 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #40 |
| 27.7 #277 | Offensive rebound rate | 21.8 #358 |
| 9.7 #361 | Assists per game | 14.3 #127 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.4 #89 | Points allowed | 78.1 #269 |
| 1.07 #143 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #325 |
| 52.9 #265 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.7 #195 |
| 33.0 #123 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.2 #195 |
| 19.6 #32 | Turnovers forced | 13.1 #351 |
| 68.0 #257 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.3 #240 |
| 7.6 #73 | Steals per game | 5.0 #336 |
| 1.8 #353 | Blocks per game | 2.5 #305 |
Delaware St
5-22 in 2025-26 overall · 3-13 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC Central53–59
- Wvs Morgan St75–70
- W@ MD Eastern57–56
- Lvs SC State59–61
- Lvs NC Central60–74
A week or more of rest.
Chattanooga
10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs The Citadel85–88
- Wvs VMI86–79
- Lvs UNC Greensboro80–85
- W@ The Citadel93–72
- W@ Mercer94–90
A week or more of rest.