Memorial Hall (DE) · at Delaware St
LineNo line yet
Total—
 NHVN | This season | DSU |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DSU 67–66 · win probability DSU 51%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 133.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NHVN has more of the edges
NHVN 4, DSU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NHVNBigFree throws
Free throw rate: NHVN 31.7, DSU 34.1. Allowed: NHVN 27.7, DSU 40.5
NHVNSmallRebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NHVN 21.5%, DSU 27.7%. Defensive: NHVN 73.2%, DSU 68.0%
NHVNSmallDSU offense vs NHVN defense
Offense 354th of 366 against a defense 285th, on the model’s ratings
NHVNSmallShooting
Effective FG%: NHVN 48.7 and allows 51.8; DSU 42.9 and allows 52.9
DSUSmallNHVN offense vs DSU defense
Offense 362nd of 366 against a defense 307th, on the model’s ratings
DSUSmallHome court
DSU at home. This season: DSU 0-0 at home, NHVN 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
NHVN has played the 307th-hardest schedule, DSU the 354th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: NHVN plays 63.5 a game (363rd fastest), DSU 66.7 (290th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
NHVN hits 30.2% and allows 34.3%; DSU hits 28.4% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 39.9% and 28.9% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NHVN 27%, DSU 41%. Transfers in: NHVN 0, DSU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NHVN 17.8%, DSU 19.8%. Forced: NHVN 17.1%, DSU 19.6%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DSU -0.2 | — |
| Total | — | 133.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | NHVN 66.4 · DSU 66.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DSU -0.0 | — |
| 1H total | 62.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | NHVN 31.2 · DSU 31.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NHVN | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
| DSU | 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NHVN 1–0 DSUNHVN leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NHVN 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2025-26 | DSU 52 @ NHVN 65 | NHVN -1.5 | NHVN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Haven
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-20
29% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ CONN | L 55-79 | +42.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 7 | vs COLU | L 53-71 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 8 | vs PSU | L 43-87 | +18.5 | L −25.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ UML | W 73-67 | +10.5 | W +16.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 15 | vsDSU | W 65-52 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 130.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 18 | @ HALL | L 45-68 | +25.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 6 | @ BC | L 63-67 | +17.5 | W +13.5 | 126.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 10 | @ NJIT | L 64-70 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
| Dec 22 | @ FOR | L 47-65 | +13.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 29 | @ VAN | L 53-96 | +39.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 2 | @ STO | W 70-55 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 4 | @ CCSU | L 61-72 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 8 | @ LEM | L 47-73 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 10 | vs FDU | W 65-55 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs WAG | W 80-74 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | @ CHST | W 62-56 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 23 | vs MERC | L 57-61 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 122.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 29 | @MERC | L 51-70 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 122.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 31 | @ SFPA | W 81-69 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 5 | @ LIU | L 55-60 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | vsCHST | L 57-63 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 127.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vsCCSU | L 76-81 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 128.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vsLIU | W 55-52 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 129.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 19 | vsSTO | W 64-51 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 121.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 21 | @FDU | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 123.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 24 | vsSFPA | L 67-73 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 26 | @WAG | L 62-65 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | vsLEM | W 66-59 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@CONN
CONNL 55-79
+18.5
7
vsCOLU
COLUL 53-71
−10.5
8
vsPSU
PSUL 43-87
−25.5
10
@UML
UMLW 73-67
+16.5
15
vsDSU
DSUW 65-52
+11.5
18
@HALL
HALLL 45-68
+2.5
6
@BC
BCL 63-67
+13.5
10
@NJIT
NJITL 64-70
−8.5
22
@FOR
FORL 47-65
−4.5
29
@VAN
VANL 53-96
−3.5
2
@STO
STOW 70-55
+16.5
4
@CCSU
CCSUL 61-72
−3.5
8
@LEM
LEML 47-73
−20.5
10
vsFDU
FDUW 65-55
+8.5
17
vsWAG
WAGW 80-74
+4.5
19
@CHST
CHSTW 62-56
+7.5
23
vsMERC
MERCL 57-61
−2.5
29
@MERC
MERCL 51-70
−13.5
31
@SFPA
SFPAW 81-69
+13.5
5
@LIU
LIUL 55-60
+4.5
7
vsCHST
CHSTL 57-63
−11.5
12
vsCCSU
CCSUL 76-81
−1.5
14
vsLIU
LIUW 55-52
+9.5
19
vsSTO
STOW 64-51
+10.5
21
@FDU
FDUW 84-77
+9.5
24
vsSFPA
SFPAL 67-73
−12.5
26
@WAG
WAGL 62-65
−0.5
28
vsLEM
LEMW 66-59
+8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@CONN
CONNL 55-79
−11.5
7
vsCOLU
COLUL 53-71
−24.5
8
vsPSU
PSUL 43-87
−13.5
10
@UML
UMLW 73-67
−2.5
15
vsDSU
DSUW 65-52
−13.5
18
@HALL
HALLL 45-68
−16.5
6
@BC
BCL 63-67
+3.5
10
@NJIT
NJITL 64-70
+3.5
22
@FOR
FORL 47-65
−15.5
29
@VAN
VANL 53-96
+3.5
2
@STO
STOW 70-55
−3.5
4
@CCSU
CCSUL 61-72
+2.5
8
@LEM
LEML 47-73
−17.5
10
vsFDU
FDUW 65-55
−10.5
17
vsWAG
WAGW 80-74
+24.5
19
@CHST
CHSTW 62-56
−11.5
23
vsMERC
MERCL 57-61
−4.5
29
@MERC
MERCL 51-70
−1.5
31
@SFPA
SFPAW 81-69
+18.5
5
@LIU
LIUL 55-60
−20.5
7
vsCHST
CHSTL 57-63
−7.5
12
vsCCSU
CCSUL 76-81
+28.5
14
vsLIU
LIUW 55-52
−22.5
19
vsSTO
STOW 64-51
−6.5
21
@FDU
FDUW 84-77
+37.5
24
vsSFPA
SFPAL 67-73
−1.5
26
@WAG
WAGL 62-65
−4.5
28
vsLEM
LEMW 66-59
−12.5
over 8under 20avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Delaware St
27 games played
Straight up
5-22
19% wins
Against the spread
9-18
33% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-19
30% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ TEM | L 65-83 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 8 | @ SYR | L 43-83 | +26.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 10 | @ NIA | L 57-68 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 15 | @NHVN | L 52-65 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 130.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 23 | @ MIA | L 41-97 | +34.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 29 | @ UMBC | L 57-71 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | vs NAVY | L 59-66 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 6 | vs DEL | W 75-72 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | @ LONG | W 81-76 | +13.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 18 | @ JOES | L 51-67 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 29 | @ RUTG | L 50-65 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | vs COPP | L 51-53 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs NORF | L 64-66 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | @ HOW | L 58-84 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | vs MORG | L 79-80 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 26 | @ SCST | L 64-70 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 31 | vs UMES | W 65-57 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 128.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | @COPP | L 47-65 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 9 | @ NCCU | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 14 | @NORF | L 58-75 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vsHOW | L 59-91 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | @MORG | L 68-82 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vsNCCU | L 60-74 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 2 | vsSCST | L 59-61 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @UMES | W 57-56 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 11 | vsMORG | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 13 | vsNCCU | L 53-59 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 131.5 | U 112 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@TEM
TEML 65-83
−1.5
8
@SYR
SYRL 43-83
−13.5
10
@NIA
NIAL 57-68
−5.5
15
@NHVN
NHVNL 52-65
−11.5
23
@MIA
MIAL 41-97
−21.5
29
@UMBC
UMBCL 57-71
−0.5
3
vsNAVY
NAVYL 59-66
+8.5
6
vsDEL
DELW 75-72
+10.5
13
@LONG
LONGW 81-76
+18.5
18
@JOES
JOESL 51-67
+1.5
29
@RUTG
RUTGL 50-65
+5.5
3
vsCOPP
COPPL 51-53
−10.5
10
vsNORF
NORFL 64-66
+2.5
12
@HOW
HOWL 58-84
−17.5
17
vsMORG
MORGL 79-80
−4.5
26
@SCST
SCSTL 64-70
−4.5
31
vsUMES
UMESW 65-57
+10.5
7
@COPP
COPPL 47-65
−19.5
9
@NCCU
NCCUL 63-72
−1.5
14
@NORF
NORFL 58-75
−7.5
16
vsHOW
HOWL 59-91
−20.5
21
@MORG
MORGL 68-82
−8.5
28
vsNCCU
NCCUL 60-74
−11.5
2
vsSCST
SCSTL 59-61
−5.5
5
@UMES
UMESW 57-56
+6.5
11
vsMORG
MORGW 75-70
+8.5
13
vsNCCU
NCCUL 53-59
−2.5
covered 9didn’t cover 18avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@TEM
TEML 65-83
−6.5
8
@SYR
SYRL 43-83
−31.5
10
@NIA
NIAL 57-68
−12.5
15
@NHVN
NHVNL 52-65
−13.5
23
@MIA
MIAL 41-97
−13.5
29
@UMBC
UMBCL 57-71
−10.5
3
vsNAVY
NAVYL 59-66
−7.5
6
vsDEL
DELW 75-72
+17.5
13
@LONG
LONGW 81-76
+17.5
18
@JOES
JOESL 51-67
−19.5
29
@RUTG
RUTGL 50-65
−20.5
3
vsCOPP
COPPL 51-53
−35.5
10
vsNORF
NORFL 64-66
−2.5
12
@HOW
HOWL 58-84
+12.5
17
vsMORG
MORGL 79-80
+22.5
26
@SCST
SCSTL 64-70
−1.5
31
vsUMES
UMESW 65-57
−6.5
7
@COPP
COPPL 47-65
−20.5
9
@NCCU
NCCUL 63-72
+0.5
14
@NORF
NORFL 58-75
−1.5
16
vsHOW
HOWL 59-91
+18.5
21
@MORG
MORGL 68-82
+6.5
28
vsNCCU
NCCUL 60-74
−1.5
2
vsSCST
SCSTL 59-61
−14.5
5
@UMES
UMESW 57-56
−11.5
11
vsMORG
MORGW 75-70
+2.5
13
vsNCCU
NCCUL 53-59
−19.5
over 8under 19avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: New Haven 0, Delaware St 0, even 5
New HavenBetterDelaware St
G K. Briggs6.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 38
=Even
G R. Moore6.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 33
G A. Losiewicz2.6 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G N. Muhammad TR7.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
F T. Steele3.2 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 27
=Even
G J. St Clair3.7 pts · 0.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 14
F Z. Traore1.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Shepherd4.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 58
C T. Burth0.9 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Santos6.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
New HavenBetterDelaware St
NHVN offense362nd of 366 · -14.4
→DSUSmall
DSU defense307th of 366 · -7.9
NHVN defense285th of 366 · -7.1
←NHVNSmall
DSU offense354th of 366 · -13.2
Backcourt-1.3 · 2 players
←NHVNSmall
Backcourt-4.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.5 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestNHVN betterDSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
New HavenGuards
K. Briggs19 minA. Losiewicz7 minD. YoungNewF. MosleyNewD. LaDucaNewJ. HannaNew
Forwards
T. Steele15 minZ. Traore7 minN. NarcisseNewA. RamirezNewJ. BascombeNewM. OgleNew
Centers
T. Burth6 minT. ColemanNewM. CamaraNew
Delaware StGuards
R. Moore22 minN. Muhammad18 min · TRJ. St Clair15 minD. Shepherd13 minN. ReedusNewI. SullivanNew
Forwards
A. Santos20 minM. Adamu13 minT. HawkinsNewG. EkukwaiNewJ. ObioraNewF. MuntariNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
NHVN61.5 #363DSU59.7 #365Points per possession
NHVN0.97 #345DSU0.89 #365Pace (possessions)
NHVN63.5 #363DSU66.7 #290Shooting
Effective FG%
NHVN48.7 #296DSU42.9 #3643-point %
NHVN30.2 #340DSU28.4 #3613-point attempt rate
NHVN39.9 #172DSU28.9 #357Free throw rate
NHVN31.7 #261DSU34.1 #204Possessions
Turnover rate
NHVN17.8 #259DSU19.8 #346Offensive rebound rate
NHVN21.5 #359DSU27.7 #277Assists per game
NHVN10.9 #339DSU9.7 #361Defense
Points allowed
NHVN67.4 #24DSU71.4 #89Points allowed per possession
NHVN1.06 #107DSU1.07 #143Opponent effective FG%
NHVN51.8 #203DSU52.9 #265Opponent 3-point %
NHVN34.3 #199DSU33.0 #123Turnovers forced
NHVN17.1 #146DSU19.6 #32Defensive rebound rate
NHVN73.2 #30DSU68.0 #257Steals per game
NHVN6.0 #232DSU7.6 #73Blocks per game
NHVN2.0 #342DSU1.8 #353| NHVN | DSU | |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| 61.5 #363 | Points per game | 59.7 #365 |
| 0.97 #345 | Points per possession | 0.89 #365 |
| 63.5 #363 | Pace (possessions) | 66.7 #290 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.7 #296 | Effective FG% | 42.9 #364 |
| 30.2 #340 | 3-point % | 28.4 #361 |
| 39.9 #172 | 3-point attempt rate | 28.9 #357 |
| 31.7 #261 | Free throw rate | 34.1 #204 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.8 #259 | Turnover rate | 19.8 #346 |
| 21.5 #359 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.7 #277 |
| 10.9 #339 | Assists per game | 9.7 #361 |
| Defense | ||
| 67.4 #24 | Points allowed | 71.4 #89 |
| 1.06 #107 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #143 |
| 51.8 #203 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #265 |
| 34.3 #199 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #123 |
| 17.1 #146 | Turnovers forced | 19.6 #32 |
| 73.2 #30 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #257 |
| 6.0 #232 | Steals per game | 7.6 #73 |
| 2.0 #342 | Blocks per game | 1.8 #353 |
New Haven
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Le Moyne66–59
- L@ Wagner62–65
- Lvs Saint Francis Red Wolves67–73
- W@ FDU84–77
- Wvs Stonehill64–51
A week or more of rest.
Delaware St
5-22 in 2025-26 overall · 3-13 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC Central53–59
- Wvs Morgan St75–70
- W@ MD Eastern57–56
- Lvs SC State59–61
- Lvs NC Central60–74
A week or more of rest.