John Glaser Arena · at La Salle
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LAS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAS 78–68 · win probability LAS 83%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LAS has more of the edges
WOF 3, LAS 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
WOF has played the 283rd-hardest schedule, LAS the 92nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: WOF 52.5 and allows 53.8; LAS 45.4 and allows 55.0
WOF offense vs LAS defense
Offense 241st of 366 against a defense 111th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
WOF hits 35.0% and allows 36.4%; LAS hits 30.0% and allows 36.5%. Threes are 43.1% and 31.5% of their shots
LAS offense vs WOF defense
Offense 157th of 366 against a defense 258th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: WOF 36.2, LAS 37.5. Allowed: WOF 36.9, LAS 31.5
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WOF 13.4%, LAS 18.2%. Forced: WOF 15.0%, LAS 17.2%
Home court
LAS at home. This season: LAS 0-0 at home, WOF 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: WOF plays 68.7 a game (198th fastest), LAS 66.4 (300th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WOF 43%, LAS 56%. Transfers in: WOF 1, LAS 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WOF 29.8%, LAS 33.7%. Defensive: WOF 71.0%, LAS 67.7%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | LAS -10.7 | — |
| Total | — | 146.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | WOF 67.7 · LAS 78.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | LAS -6.2 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | WOF 31.1 · LAS 37.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wofford
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 46-70 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 86-76 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-93 | +27.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 94-86 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 86-78 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 83-93 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 83-77 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 63-56 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 52-73 | -4.5 | L −25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 15 | @ | W 83-57 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 73-84 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 79-74 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 95-86 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 97-85 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 97-109 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 206 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 67-76 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-70 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-78 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-77 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-55 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 72-86 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 81-67 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-66 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 80-97 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 89-99 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 82-76 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 90-93 | -11.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 72-75 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GMU
L 46-70
−9.5
8
vs
MILW
W 86-76
+13.5
11
@
AUB
L 62-93
−3.5
15
@
BELL
W 94-86
+4.5
19
vs
UNF
W 86-78
−2.5
26
@
NKU
L 83-93
−6.5
29
@
EKU
W 83-77
+4.5
3
vs
PRES
W 63-56
+2.5
6
vs
ELON
L 52-73
−25.5
15
@
GWEB
W 83-57
+15.5
17
@
WICH
L 73-84
+1.5
31
@
WCU
W 79-74
+2.5
3
@
CIT
W 95-86
−0.5
7
vs
UNCG
W 97-85
+4.5
10
@
MER
L 97-109
−8.5
14
vs
UTC
L 67-76
−14.5
17
@
FUR
W 74-70
+8.5
21
vs
SAM
W 88-78
+6.5
24
vs
MER
W 80-77
+5.5
29
@
UTC
W 81-55
+27.5
1
vs
ETSU
L 72-86
−12.5
4
@
VMI
W 81-67
+5.5
7
vs
WCU
W 77-66
+7.5
11
@
SAM
L 80-97
−10.5
14
@
UNCG
L 89-99
−12.5
18
vs
VMI
W 82-76
−7.5
21
vs
FUR
L 67-76
−7.5
25
@
ETSU
W 72-69
+9.5
28
vs
CIT
L 90-93
−14.5
7
vs
UNCG
L 72-75
−7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GMU
L 46-70
−24.5
8
vs
MILW
W 86-76
+11.5
11
@
AUB
L 62-93
+2.5
15
@
BELL
W 94-86
+23.5
19
vs
UNF
W 86-78
+2.5
26
@
NKU
L 83-93
+26.5
29
@
EKU
W 83-77
+6.5
3
vs
PRES
W 63-56
−19.5
6
vs
ELON
L 52-73
−36.5
15
@
GWEB
W 83-57
−15.5
17
@
WICH
L 73-84
+12.5
31
@
WCU
W 79-74
−1.5
3
@
CIT
W 95-86
+36.5
7
vs
UNCG
W 97-85
+28.5
10
@
MER
L 97-109
+49.5
14
vs
UTC
L 67-76
−11.5
17
@
FUR
W 74-70
−5.5
21
vs
SAM
W 88-78
+11.5
24
vs
MER
W 80-77
−0.5
29
@
UTC
W 81-55
−14.5
1
vs
ETSU
L 72-86
+11.5
4
@
VMI
W 81-67
−1.5
7
vs
WCU
W 77-66
−11.5
11
@
SAM
L 80-97
+26.5
14
@
UNCG
L 89-99
+33.5
18
vs
VMI
W 82-76
−0.5
21
vs
FUR
L 67-76
−10.5
25
@
ETSU
W 72-69
−8.5
28
vs
CIT
L 90-93
+34.5
7
vs
UNCG
L 72-75
−8.5
over 15under 15avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
La Salle
31 games played
Straight up
8-23
26% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 87-59 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 73-60 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-90 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 55-70 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 58-63 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 71-73 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-66 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-64 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 60-70 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 72-84 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-102 | +40.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 75-80 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 55-77 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-72 | +11.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-84 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 53-74 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-74 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 67-64 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-64 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-67 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 61-71 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-82 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 68-77 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-62 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 59-46 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 77-104 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-84 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-88 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 80-99 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+10.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
+8.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
−20.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
−5.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−2.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−1.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−0.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−8.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+6.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−7.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+1.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−11.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+3.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−5.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+18.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+5.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−12.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+9.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
+12.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−0.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−6.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−7.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−1.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
+3.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
+10.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
+16.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
−18.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+3.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+6.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
−0.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+6.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
−10.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
+4.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
+6.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−19.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−17.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−5.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−6.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+3.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−13.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+6.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−3.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+20.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−18.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+15.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+3.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−20.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+10.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
−6.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−14.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−17.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−8.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−13.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
−2.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
−22.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
−30.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
+34.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+1.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+39.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
+21.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
+32.5
over 14under 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
La Salle has the better starters
Position by position: Wofford 0, La Salle 3, even 2
WoffordBetterLa Salle
G L. Flynn5.6 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
→LASSmall
G J. Johnson6.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 29
G C. Watley9.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
→LASBig
G R. Dockery12.5 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 91
G C. Arias TR6.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 44
→LASSmall
F J. Brewer11.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
F B. Sumpter6.6 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 34
=Even
F V. Zanki TR8.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 46
F C. Richards3 pts · 2 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Finkley TR5.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 19
WoffordBetterLa Salle
WOF offense241st of 366 · -7.3
→LASBig
LAS defense111th of 366 · -1.3
WOF defense258th of 366 · -6.7
→LASSmall
LAS offense157th of 366 · -4.7
Backcourt-5.7 · 3 players
→LASBig
Backcourt+0.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
←WOFBig
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWOF betterLAS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Flynn27 minC. Watley25 minC. Arias18 min · TRD. Miller2 minG. Collins2 minC. LoweNew
Forwards
B. Sumpter23 minC. Richards8 minC. SiskNew
Centers
E. RamseyNew
Guards
J. Johnson30 minR. Dockery27 minK. Burton19 min · TRD. Booker8 min · TRA. Masharaliyev1 minT. MossNew
Forwards
J. Brewer27 minV. Zanki21 min · TRA. Finkley19 min · TRN. Collier14 minE. Rink12 min · TRB. Beatty10 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.4 #90 | Points per game | 66.8 #336 |
| 1.14 #74 | Points per possession | 1.00 #322 |
| 68.7 #198 | Pace (possessions) | 66.4 #300 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.5 #127 | Effective FG% | 45.4 #357 |
| 35.0 #119 | 3-point % | 30.0 #342 |
| 43.1 #112 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.5 #333 |
| 36.2 #144 | Free throw rate | 37.5 #113 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.4 #12 | Turnover rate | 18.2 #281 |
| 29.8 #212 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.7 #75 |
| 13.8 #161 | Assists per game | 12.9 #221 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.6 #282 | Points allowed | 75.0 #186 |
| 1.15 #317 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #293 |
| 53.8 #294 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.0 #329 |
| 36.4 #322 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.5 #324 |
| 15.0 #291 | Turnovers forced | 17.2 #136 |
| 71.0 #101 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.7 #274 |
| 5.6 #283 | Steals per game | 6.7 #155 |
| 3.1 #201 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #295 |
Wofford
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Greensboro72–75
- Lvs The Citadel90–93
- W@ ETSU72–69
- Lvs Furman67–76
- Wvs VMI82–76
A week or more of rest.
La Salle
8-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Bonaventure80–99
- L@ Saint Joseph's76–88
- Wvs Fordham87–84
- L@ Davidson64–71
- Lvs G Washington77–104
A week or more of rest.