OceanFirst Bank Center · at Monmouth
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MONM | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MONM 72–71 · win probability MONM 54%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MONM has more of the edges
LAS 3, MONM 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
LAS hits 30.0% and allows 36.5%; MONM hits 34.2% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 31.5% and 34.4% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: LAS 45.4 and allows 55.0; MONM 49.6 and allows 50.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LAS 18.2%, MONM 16.7%. Forced: LAS 17.2%, MONM 19.8%
Context
Schedule so far
LAS has played the 92nd-hardest schedule, MONM the 190th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: LAS 37.5, MONM 32.7. Allowed: LAS 31.5, MONM 32.2
MONM offense vs LAS defense
Offense 173rd of 366 against a defense 111th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MONM at home. This season: MONM 0-0 at home, LAS 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LAS 33.7%, MONM 31.2%. Defensive: LAS 67.7%, MONM 67.2%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LAS 56%, MONM 37%. Transfers in: LAS 5, MONM 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: LAS plays 66.4 a game (300th fastest), MONM 67.9 (234th). Faster games mean more points
Even
LAS offense vs MONM defense
Offense 157th of 366 against a defense 144th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MONM -1.0 | — |
| Total | — | 143.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | LAS 71.2 · MONM 72.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MONM -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 67.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | LAS 33.3 · MONM 33.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LAS 1–0 MONMLAS leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · LAS 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2025-26 | MONM 60 @ LAS 73 | LAS -4.5 | LAS W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
La Salle
31 games played
Straight up
8-23
26% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 87-59 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 73-60 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-90 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 55-70 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 58-63 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 71-73 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-66 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-64 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 60-70 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 72-84 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-102 | +40.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 75-80 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 55-77 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-72 | +11.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-84 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 53-74 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-74 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 67-64 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-64 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-67 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 61-71 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-82 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 68-77 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-62 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 59-46 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 77-104 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-84 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-88 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 80-99 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+10.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
+8.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
−20.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
−5.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−2.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−1.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−0.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−8.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+6.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−7.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+1.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−11.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+3.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−5.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+18.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+5.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−12.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+9.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
+12.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−0.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−6.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−7.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−1.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
+3.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
+10.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
+16.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
−18.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+3.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+6.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
−0.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+6.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
−10.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
+4.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
+6.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−19.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−17.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−5.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−6.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+3.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−13.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+6.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−3.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+20.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−18.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+15.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+3.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−20.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+10.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
−6.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−14.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−17.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−8.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−13.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
−2.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
−22.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
−30.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
+34.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+1.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+39.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
+21.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
+32.5
over 14under 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Monmouth
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-73 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 58-70 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-78 | +21.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 79-83 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 63-58 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-79 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 65-73 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 75-85 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 65-68 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-48 | +8.5 | W +22.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 81-70 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 64-67 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 51-73 | -5.5 | L −27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 81-68 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 63-65 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-73 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 83-81 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 57-73 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 76-75 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 93-73 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 72-71 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 82-69 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 73-57 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 89-83 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 65-57 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 74-64 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−8.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
+3.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+16.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−1.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+4.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
−10.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+12.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−0.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
−1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−10.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
−11.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
+4.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−4.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
+22.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
+13.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
+4.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−27.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+9.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−0.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+19.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
−7.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−14.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+2.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+21.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
−0.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
−2.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−6.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+9.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
+12.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+2.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
+4.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
+8.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
−1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−10.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
−7.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+5.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−7.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+16.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
+16.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+20.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−18.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
+1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−5.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
+14.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
−5.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−19.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
−26.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
−5.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
−8.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−3.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+5.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−7.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+12.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
+19.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−10.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+13.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+32.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
+4.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
+3.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−12.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+5.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
−20.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+23.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
−14.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
−13.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
+10.5
over 16under 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: La Salle 1, Monmouth 1, even 3
La SalleBetterMonmouth
G J. Johnson6.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 29
=Even
G J. Collins6.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 18
G R. Dockery12.5 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 91
←LASBig
G J. Sanders TR10.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 39
F J. Brewer11.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
=No call
G L. Walker TR14.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
F V. Zanki TR8.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 46
=Even
G A. Walker TR7.8 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 47
F A. Finkley TR5.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 19
→MONMBig
F S. Spartalis10.5 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 54
La SalleBetterMonmouth
LAS offense157th of 366 · -4.7
=Even
MONM defense144th of 366 · -3.1
LAS defense111th of 366 · -1.3
←LASSmall
MONM offense173rd of 366 · -5.3
Backcourt+0.4 · 2 players
←LASBig
Backcourt-5.3 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
→MONMBig
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestLAS betterMONM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Johnson30 minR. Dockery27 minK. Burton19 min · TRD. Booker8 min · TRA. Masharaliyev1 minT. MossNew
Forwards
J. Brewer27 minV. Zanki21 min · TRA. Finkley19 min · TRN. Collier14 minE. Rink12 min · TRB. Beatty10 min
Guards
J. Collins35 minJ. Sanders30 min · TRL. Walker28 min · TRA. Walker28 min · TRM. Durr21 min · TRJ. Dobuol6 min
Forwards
S. Spartalis24 minO. Harvey3 minS. Osei3 min · TRQ. Peters2 minD. PerryNewS. MarjanovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.8 #336 | Points per game | 72.0 #241 |
| 1.00 #322 | Points per possession | 1.07 #212 |
| 66.4 #300 | Pace (possessions) | 67.9 #234 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.4 #357 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #259 |
| 30.0 #342 | 3-point % | 34.2 #156 |
| 31.5 #333 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.4 #288 |
| 37.5 #113 | Free throw rate | 32.7 #244 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #281 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #176 |
| 33.7 #75 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #157 |
| 12.9 #221 | Assists per game | 13.7 #167 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.0 #186 | Points allowed | 70.9 #73 |
| 1.13 #293 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #74 |
| 55.0 #329 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.0 #103 |
| 36.5 #324 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #174 |
| 17.2 #136 | Turnovers forced | 19.8 #28 |
| 67.7 #274 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.2 #287 |
| 6.7 #155 | Steals per game | 7.6 #69 |
| 2.6 #295 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #57 |
La Salle
8-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Bonaventure80–99
- L@ Saint Joseph's76–88
- Wvs Fordham87–84
- L@ Davidson64–71
- Lvs G Washington77–104
A week or more of rest.
Monmouth
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra69–75
- Wvs Campbell74–64
- Wvs Drexel65–57
- W@ Northeastern89–83
- Wvs Elon73–57
A week or more of rest.