Hawkins Arena · at Mercer · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MER | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MER 78–74 · win probability MER 65%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MER has more of the edges
WOF 1, MER 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: WOF 36.2, MER 39.2. Allowed: WOF 36.9, MER 29.7
Context
Schedule so far
WOF has played the 283rd-hardest schedule, MER the 193rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
MER at home. This season: MER 0-0 at home, WOF 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WOF 29.8%, MER 32.6%. Defensive: WOF 71.0%, MER 66.8%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: WOF 52.5 and allows 53.8; MER 53.1 and allows 52.5
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WOF 13.4%, MER 15.0%. Forced: WOF 15.0%, MER 17.0%
Even
MER offense vs WOF defense
Offense 223rd of 366 against a defense 258th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WOF 43%, MER 28%. Transfers in: WOF 1, MER 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
WOF offense vs MER defense
Offense 241st of 366 against a defense 268th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: WOF plays 68.7 a game (198th fastest), MER 69.5 (148th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
WOF hits 35.0% and allows 36.4%; MER hits 35.6% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 43.1% and 39.2% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MER -4.3 | — |
| Total | — | 151.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | WOF 73.7 · MER 78 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MER -2.5 | — |
| 1H total | 71.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | WOF 34.2 · MER 36.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
WOF 8–2 MERWOF leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · WOF 6-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2025-26 | MER 77 @ WOF 80 | WOF +2.5 | WOF W |
| Jan 10, 2025-26 | WOF 97 @ MER 109 | MER -3.5 | MER W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | WOF 77 @ MER 66 | MER +1.5 | WOF W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | MER 49 @ WOF 69 | WOF -7.5 | WOF W |
| Feb 14, 2023-24 | WOF 73 @ MER 60 | MER -1.5 | WOF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wofford
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 46-70 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 86-76 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-93 | +27.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 94-86 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 86-78 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 83-93 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 83-77 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 63-56 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 52-73 | -4.5 | L −25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 15 | @ | W 83-57 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 73-84 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 79-74 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 95-86 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 97-85 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 97-109 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 206 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 67-76 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-70 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-78 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-77 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-55 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 150.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 72-86 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 81-67 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-66 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 80-97 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 89-99 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 82-76 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 90-93 | -11.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 72-75 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GMU
L 46-70
−9.5
8
vs
MILW
W 86-76
+13.5
11
@
AUB
L 62-93
−3.5
15
@
BELL
W 94-86
+4.5
19
vs
UNF
W 86-78
−2.5
26
@
NKU
L 83-93
−6.5
29
@
EKU
W 83-77
+4.5
3
vs
PRES
W 63-56
+2.5
6
vs
ELON
L 52-73
−25.5
15
@
GWEB
W 83-57
+15.5
17
@
WICH
L 73-84
+1.5
31
@
WCU
W 79-74
+2.5
3
@
CIT
W 95-86
−0.5
7
vs
UNCG
W 97-85
+4.5
10
@
MER
L 97-109
−8.5
14
vs
UTC
L 67-76
−14.5
17
@
FUR
W 74-70
+8.5
21
vs
SAM
W 88-78
+6.5
24
vs
MER
W 80-77
+5.5
29
@
UTC
W 81-55
+27.5
1
vs
ETSU
L 72-86
−12.5
4
@
VMI
W 81-67
+5.5
7
vs
WCU
W 77-66
+7.5
11
@
SAM
L 80-97
−10.5
14
@
UNCG
L 89-99
−12.5
18
vs
VMI
W 82-76
−7.5
21
vs
FUR
L 67-76
−7.5
25
@
ETSU
W 72-69
+9.5
28
vs
CIT
L 90-93
−14.5
7
vs
UNCG
L 72-75
−7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GMU
L 46-70
−24.5
8
vs
MILW
W 86-76
+11.5
11
@
AUB
L 62-93
+2.5
15
@
BELL
W 94-86
+23.5
19
vs
UNF
W 86-78
+2.5
26
@
NKU
L 83-93
+26.5
29
@
EKU
W 83-77
+6.5
3
vs
PRES
W 63-56
−19.5
6
vs
ELON
L 52-73
−36.5
15
@
GWEB
W 83-57
−15.5
17
@
WICH
L 73-84
+12.5
31
@
WCU
W 79-74
−1.5
3
@
CIT
W 95-86
+36.5
7
vs
UNCG
W 97-85
+28.5
10
@
MER
L 97-109
+49.5
14
vs
UTC
L 67-76
−11.5
17
@
FUR
W 74-70
−5.5
21
vs
SAM
W 88-78
+11.5
24
vs
MER
W 80-77
−0.5
29
@
UTC
W 81-55
−14.5
1
vs
ETSU
L 72-86
+11.5
4
@
VMI
W 81-67
−1.5
7
vs
WCU
W 77-66
−11.5
11
@
SAM
L 80-97
+26.5
14
@
UNCG
L 89-99
+33.5
18
vs
VMI
W 82-76
−0.5
21
vs
FUR
L 67-76
−10.5
25
@
ETSU
W 72-69
−8.5
28
vs
CIT
L 90-93
+34.5
7
vs
UNCG
L 72-75
−8.5
over 15under 15avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Mercer
29 games played
Straight up
16-13
55% wins
Against the spread
19-10
66% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 61-76 | +28.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 92-77 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 69-105 | +2.5 | L −33.5 | 162.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 95-83 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-67 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 91-84 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 78-67 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 63-70 | +22.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 63-81 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 78-84 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 72-74 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 71-77 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 101-63 | -16.5 | W +21.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 109-97 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 206 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 77-67 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 102-92 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 77-80 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 95-77 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 95-81 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 75-79 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 49-69 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | U 118 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 70-54 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 90-94 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 89-86 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 74-78 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-76 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 73-77 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
+13.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
−33.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+16.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
+1.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+9.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
+0.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
+15.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−1.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+1.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
+0.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
+1.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+21.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+8.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
+1.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+4.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+3.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−5.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+7.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
−4.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−8.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−21.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
+1.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
+4.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
−14.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
−0.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−5.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+4.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−5.5
covered 19didn’t cover 10avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TENN
L 61-76
−6.5
9
vs
LIP
W 92-77
+11.5
15
@
WIN
L 69-105
+11.5
22
@
EKU
W 95-83
+14.5
26
vs
APP
W 75-67
−0.5
29
@
ELON
W 91-84
+15.5
2
vs
GAST
W 78-67
−10.5
13
@
CLEM
L 63-70
−19.5
17
@
UCF
L 63-81
−16.5
20
@
WSU
L 78-84
+10.5
31
@
FUR
L 72-74
−8.5
3
@
ETSU
L 71-77
−0.5
7
vs
CIT
W 101-63
+16.5
10
vs
WOF
W 109-97
+49.5
15
@
VMI
W 77-67
−9.5
17
@
UNCG
W 102-92
+38.5
21
vs
WCU
W 88-76
+5.5
24
@
WOF
L 77-80
−0.5
29
vs
UNCG
W 95-77
+13.5
31
vs
VMI
W 95-81
+22.5
5
@
UTC
L 75-79
−1.5
7
@
SAM
L 49-69
−42.5
11
vs
FUR
W 69-64
−18.5
14
@
CIT
W 70-54
−23.5
19
vs
UTC
L 90-94
+32.5
21
vs
SAM
W 89-86
+18.5
25
@
WCU
L 74-78
−4.5
28
vs
ETSU
W 82-76
+8.5
7
vs
WCU
L 73-77
−4.5
over 14under 15avg +3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Mercer has the better starters
Position by position: Wofford 1, Mercer 2, even 2
WoffordBetterMercer
G L. Flynn5.6 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
→MERSmall
G B. Shoulders9.5 pts · 6.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 41
G C. Watley9.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 28
=Even
G Q. Perkins8.7 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 22
G C. Arias TR6.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 44
→MERSmall
F K. Steele TR8 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 62
F B. Sumpter6.6 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 34
←WOFSmall
F M. Mabor Makoi TR1.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 10
F C. Richards3 pts · 2 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F P. Padegimas NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
WoffordBetterMercer
WOF offense241st of 366 · -7.3
=Even
MER defense268th of 366 · -6.8
WOF defense258th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
MER offense223rd of 366 · -6.8
Backcourt-5.7 · 3 players
→MERSmall
Backcourt-3.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.4 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestWOF betterMER betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Flynn27 minC. Watley25 minC. Arias18 min · TRD. Miller2 minG. Collins2 minC. LoweNew
Forwards
B. Sumpter23 minC. Richards8 minC. SiskNew
Centers
E. RamseyNew
Guards
B. Shoulders32 minQ. Perkins24 minM. KoveosNewD. BarrNewH. LyttleNewK. LamonteNew
Forwards
K. Steele21 min · TRM. Mabor Makoi8 min · TRP. PadegimasNewS. MayhughNewD. KovacevicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.4 #90 | Points per game | 80.1 #65 |
| 1.14 #74 | Points per possession | 1.15 #55 |
| 68.7 #198 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #148 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.5 #127 | Effective FG% | 53.1 #98 |
| 35.0 #119 | 3-point % | 35.6 #87 |
| 43.1 #112 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.2 #188 |
| 36.2 #144 | Free throw rate | 39.2 #74 |
| Possessions | ||
| 13.4 #12 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #67 |
| 29.8 #212 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.6 #102 |
| 13.8 #161 | Assists per game | 12.7 #240 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.6 #282 | Points allowed | 77.8 #263 |
| 1.15 #317 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #273 |
| 53.8 #294 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.5 #242 |
| 36.4 #322 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #311 |
| 15.0 #291 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #155 |
| 71.0 #101 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.8 #303 |
| 5.6 #283 | Steals per game | 7.1 #115 |
| 3.1 #201 | Blocks per game | 3.2 #186 |
Wofford
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Greensboro72–75
- Lvs The Citadel90–93
- W@ ETSU72–69
- Lvs Furman67–76
- Wvs VMI82–76
A week or more of rest.
Mercer
16-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs W Carolina73–77
- Wvs ETSU82–76
- L@ W Carolina74–78
- Wvs Samford89–86
- Lvs Chattanooga90–94
A week or more of rest.