Cameron Hall · at VMI · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VMI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ETSU 77–70 · win probability ETSU 73%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ETSU has more of the edges
ETSU 6, VMI 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: ETSU 55.3 and allows 51.0; VMI 47.5 and allows 57.0
Three-pointers
ETSU hits 34.7% and allows 32.9%; VMI hits 31.5% and allows 36.5%. Threes are 37.8% and 53.6% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ETSU 28.3%, VMI 25.6%. Defensive: ETSU 72.1%, VMI 62.8%
VMI offense vs ETSU defense
Offense 288th of 366 against a defense 140th, on the model’s ratings
ETSU offense vs VMI defense
Offense 224th of 366 against a defense 342nd, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ETSU 15.2%, VMI 15.3%. Forced: ETSU 18.4%, VMI 15.7%
Context
Schedule so far
ETSU has played the 309th-hardest schedule, VMI the 253rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ETSU 29%, VMI 59%. Transfers in: ETSU 5, VMI 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
VMI at home. This season: VMI 0-0 at home, ETSU 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ETSU 35.0, VMI 30.6. Allowed: ETSU 36.4, VMI 34.6
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: ETSU plays 67.0 a game (279th fastest), VMI 67.6 (251st). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ETSU -6.8 | — |
| Total | — | 146.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | ETSU 76.7 · VMI 69.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ETSU -4.2 | — |
| 1H total | 68.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | ETSU 36.4 · VMI 32.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 0-10 0% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
ETSU 10–1 VMIETSU leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · ETSU has won the last 9 meetings · ETSU 4-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025-26 | ETSU 87 @ VMI 70 | VMI +14.5 | ETSU W |
| Jan 7, 2025-26 | VMI 67 @ ETSU 81 | ETSU -16.5 | VMI W |
| Feb 5, 2024-25 | ETSU 62 @ VMI 55 | VMI +6.5 | ETSU W |
| Jan 1, 2024-25 | VMI 69 @ ETSU 84 | ETSU -15.5 | VMI W |
| Mar 8, 2023-24 | VMI 66 vs ETSU 98 | ETSU -17.5 | ETSU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
ETSU
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 64-68 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 75-63 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 78-74 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 77-62 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-55 | -19.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-57 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-88 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 91-65 | -7.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 75-76 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 58-77 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 75-81 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 74-49 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-67 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-60 | -11.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-72 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-75 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 84-55 | -17.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 88-90 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 86-72 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 75-71 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 87-70 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 73-61 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 72-82 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 78-69 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 87-75 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-82 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 83-76 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 69-67 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-76 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−10.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
+5.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+5.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
+4.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+22.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
+10.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
−5.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+18.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
−4.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−1.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
−15.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
+12.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−1.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
−2.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
+14.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−10.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
−2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−3.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
+11.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
−11.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+12.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
−1.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+2.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
−17.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+10.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+5.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−9.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
−4.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
−7.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−0.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−16.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−9.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
−4.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+6.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
−5.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+5.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
−7.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
+18.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+12.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
+7.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−15.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
+21.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
−17.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−0.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
+1.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
−2.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−7.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
+2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−10.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
−2.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
+32.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+11.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
+4.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+13.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
−11.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
+8.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+6.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+13.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−8.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
+8.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
+19.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−9.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−2.5
over 17under 15avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
VMI
29 games played
Straight up
3-26
10% wins
Against the spread
9-20
31% covers · avg −5.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-16
45% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 78-74 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 68-106 | +23.5 | L −14.5 | 161.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 67-69 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 54-87 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 80-99 | -2.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 70-78 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 48-81 | +11.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-82 | +25.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 86-70 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 90-97 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 58-78 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 79-71 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 67-81 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 48-69 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 67-77 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-82 | -6.5 | L −20.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 78-85 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-88 | +8.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 56-80 | +2.5 | L −21.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 81-95 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 67-81 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 70-87 | +14.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 71-92 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 72-90 | +11.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 76-82 | +13.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 62-81 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 61-80 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-86 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 70-84 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
USI
W 78-74
+1.5
9
@
MIZ
L 68-106
−14.5
15
vs
JAX
L 67-69
−0.5
19
@
RICH
L 54-87
−18.5
22
@
STET
L 80-99
−21.5
24
vs
BUF
L 70-78
−2.5
26
vs
BGSU
L 48-81
−21.5
29
@
UCF
L 57-82
+0.5
9
vs
L-MD
W 86-70
+18.5
21
@
RAD
L 90-97
+4.5
1
vs
SAM
L 58-78
−13.5
3
vs
UTC
W 79-71
+14.5
7
@
ETSU
L 67-81
+2.5
10
@
FUR
L 48-69
−8.5
15
vs
MER
L 67-77
−1.5
17
vs
CIT
L 68-82
−20.5
21
vs
UNCG
L 78-85
−4.5
24
@
WCU
L 58-88
−21.5
29
@
CIT
L 56-80
−21.5
31
@
MER
L 81-95
+4.5
4
vs
WOF
L 67-81
−5.5
7
vs
ETSU
L 70-87
−2.5
11
@
UNCG
L 71-92
−12.5
14
vs
FUR
L 72-90
−6.5
18
@
WOF
L 76-82
+7.5
21
vs
WCU
L 62-81
−10.5
26
@
SAM
L 61-80
−1.5
28
@
UTC
L 79-86
+4.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 70-84
−6.5
covered 9didn’t cover 20avg −5.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
USI
W 78-74
−1.5
9
@
MIZ
L 68-106
+12.5
15
vs
JAX
L 67-69
−15.5
19
@
RICH
L 54-87
−11.5
22
@
STET
L 80-99
+30.5
24
vs
BUF
L 70-78
−2.5
26
vs
BGSU
L 48-81
−19.5
29
@
UCF
L 57-82
−20.5
9
vs
L-MD
W 86-70
+4.5
21
@
RAD
L 90-97
+28.5
1
vs
SAM
L 58-78
−18.5
3
vs
UTC
W 79-71
+0.5
7
@
ETSU
L 67-81
+1.5
10
@
FUR
L 48-69
−32.5
15
vs
MER
L 67-77
−9.5
17
vs
CIT
L 68-82
+6.5
21
vs
UNCG
L 78-85
+11.5
24
@
WCU
L 58-88
−6.5
29
@
CIT
L 56-80
−6.5
31
@
MER
L 81-95
+22.5
4
vs
WOF
L 67-81
−1.5
7
vs
ETSU
L 70-87
+13.5
11
@
UNCG
L 71-92
+12.5
14
vs
FUR
L 72-90
+13.5
18
@
WOF
L 76-82
−0.5
21
vs
WCU
L 62-81
−11.5
26
@
SAM
L 61-80
−14.5
28
@
UTC
L 79-86
+10.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 70-84
−0.5
over 13under 16avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: ETSU 1, VMI 1, even 3
ETSUBetterVMI
G B. Ward TR11.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 29
=Even
G A. Clark6.6 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 35
G J. Cooper TR11.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 34
=Even
G W. Andrews3.9 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
G T. Hennig TR9.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 24
→VMIBig
F T. Johnson18.1 pts · 7 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 75
G M. Johnson5.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 28
←ETSUSmall
F C. Liston4.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 2
F J. McCullum7.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 49
=No call
F A. Daushvili6.8 pts · 4.2 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
ETSUBetterVMI
ETSU offense224th of 366 · -6.9
←ETSUSmall
VMI defense342nd of 366 · -9.1
ETSU defense140th of 366 · -2.9
←ETSUBig
VMI offense288th of 366 · -8.9
Backcourt-7.6 · 4 players
→VMIBig
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
←ETSUSmall
Frontcourt-1.5 · 3 players
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestETSU betterVMI betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Ward31 min · TRJ. Cooper31 min · TRT. Hennig25 min · TRM. Johnson22 minT. Mason17 min · TRD. PayneNew
Forwards
J. McCullum22 minB. Crump15 minM. Marion12 min · TRK. CampbellNewE. SmithNew
Guards
A. Clark27 minW. Andrews12 minT. Johnson9 min · TRB. Edmonds2 minM. Lawson2 minR. BradleyNew
Forwards
T. Johnson37 minC. Liston22 minA. Daushvili17 minR. PetersNewP. NarvilasNewJ. PanzoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #121 | Points per game | 68.5 #306 |
| 1.15 #59 | Points per possession | 1.01 #311 |
| 67.0 #279 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #251 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.3 #33 | Effective FG% | 47.5 #325 |
| 34.7 #132 | 3-point % | 31.5 #306 |
| 37.8 #216 | 3-point attempt rate | 53.6 #2 |
| 35.0 #180 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #293 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.2 #79 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #88 |
| 28.3 #252 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.6 #330 |
| 13.9 #154 | Assists per game | 11.6 #309 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.1 #61 | Points allowed | 83.2 #348 |
| 1.04 #77 | Points allowed per possession | 1.23 #362 |
| 51.0 #161 | Opponent effective FG% | 57.0 #357 |
| 32.9 #110 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.5 #327 |
| 18.4 #79 | Turnovers forced | 15.7 #239 |
| 72.1 #64 | Defensive rebound rate | 62.8 #360 |
| 8.6 #16 | Steals per game | 6.6 #160 |
| 3.3 #180 | Blocks per game | 2.0 #343 |
ETSU
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Furman61–76
- Wvs W Carolina69–67
- Wvs The Citadel83–76
- L@ Mercer76–82
- Lvs Wofford69–72
A week or more of rest.
VMI
3-26 in 2025-26 overall · 1-18 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Greensboro70–84
- L@ Chattanooga79–86
- L@ Samford61–80
- Lvs W Carolina62–81
- L@ Wofford76–82
A week or more of rest.