Jeffery P. Hazell Athletics Center · at New Haven
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NHVN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects NHVN 68–68 · win probability NHVN 53%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 135.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: NHVN has more of the edges
NJIT 2, NHVN 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NHVN offense vs NJIT defense
Offense 362nd of 366 against a defense 250th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: NJIT 33.2, NHVN 31.7. Allowed: NJIT 37.9, NHVN 27.7
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NJIT 26.2%, NHVN 21.5%. Defensive: NJIT 67.9%, NHVN 73.2%
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: NJIT plays 67.9 a game (235th fastest), NHVN 63.5 (363rd). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
NJIT hits 30.4% and allows 32.3%; NHVN hits 30.2% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 40.1% and 39.9% of their shots
NJIT offense vs NHVN defense
Offense 338th of 366 against a defense 285th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
NHVN at home. This season: NHVN 0-0 at home, NJIT 0-0 away
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: NJIT 46.7 and allows 50.0; NHVN 48.7 and allows 51.8
Context
Schedule so far
NJIT has played the 282nd-hardest schedule, NHVN the 307th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NJIT 39%, NHVN 27%. Transfers in: NJIT 4, NHVN 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NJIT 17.1%, NHVN 17.8%. Forced: NJIT 16.1%, NHVN 17.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | NHVN -1.0 | — |
| Total | — | 135.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | NJIT 67.5 · NHVN 68.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | NHVN -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 63.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | NJIT 31.6 · NHVN 32.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 2-8 20% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 13 | vs DREX | L43–75LU |
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NJIT 1–0 NHVNNJIT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · NJIT 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2025-26 | NHVN 64 @ NJIT 70 | NJIT +2.5 | NJIT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
NJIT
32 games played
Straight up
15-17
47% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | W 72-61 | +14.5 | W +25.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 53-74 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 66-64 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 139.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-81 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 43-75 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 70-86 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 67-94 | +34.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 47-104 | +44.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 55-73 | +14.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 72-89 | +28.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 70-64 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 49-65 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 52-101 | +32.5 | L −16.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 61-80 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-65 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 80-76 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 70-74 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 73-64 | +8.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 79-55 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 74-87 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 77-68 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-77 | +13.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-56 | -1.5 | W +23.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-64 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 76-70 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 67-58 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 63-81 | -3.5 | L −21.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 64-70 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 52-69 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 52-91 | +4.5 | L −34.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 60-58 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 10 | @ | L 54-63 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 117 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
FOR
W 72-61
+25.5
8
vs
FAIR
L 53-74
−14.5
11
@
L-MD
W 66-64
+12.5
15
vs
FDU
W 93-81
+9.5
18
@
DREX
L 43-75
−18.5
22
@
NAVY
L 70-86
+1.5
24
@
CIN
L 67-94
+7.5
26
@
LOU
L 47-104
−12.5
28
@
EMU
L 55-73
−3.5
5
@
HPU
L 72-89
+11.5
10
vs
NHVN
W 70-64
+8.5
13
vs
SHU
L 49-65
−9.5
22
@
BTLR
L 52-101
−16.5
31
@
PENN
L 61-80
−4.5
3
@
BING
W 73-65
+11.5
8
vs
UNH
W 80-76
+6.5
10
vs
ME
L 70-74
−5.5
15
@
UML
W 73-64
+17.5
19
vs
BRY
W 79-55
+22.5
22
@
UMBC
L 74-87
−6.5
29
@
UALB
W 77-68
+14.5
31
@
UVM
W 79-77
+15.5
5
vs
UML
W 81-56
+23.5
7
vs
BING
W 73-64
+0.5
12
@
UNH
W 76-70
+8.5
14
@
ME
W 67-58
+7.5
19
vs
UALB
L 63-81
−21.5
21
vs
UVM
L 64-70
+0.5
28
@
BRY
L 52-69
−18.5
3
vs
UMBC
L 52-91
−34.5
7
vs
ME
W 60-58
−1.5
10
@
UVM
L 54-63
+1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
FOR
W 72-61
−14.5
8
vs
FAIR
L 53-74
−18.5
11
@
L-MD
W 66-64
−9.5
15
vs
FDU
W 93-81
+27.5
18
@
DREX
L 43-75
−20.5
22
@
NAVY
L 70-86
+15.5
24
@
CIN
L 67-94
+19.5
26
@
LOU
L 47-104
−7.5
28
@
EMU
L 55-73
−13.5
5
@
HPU
L 72-89
+5.5
10
vs
NHVN
W 70-64
+3.5
13
vs
SHU
L 49-65
−37.5
22
@
BTLR
L 52-101
+3.5
31
@
PENN
L 61-80
−10.5
3
@
BING
W 73-65
−2.5
8
vs
UNH
W 80-76
+18.5
10
vs
ME
L 70-74
+13.5
15
@
UML
W 73-64
−8.5
19
vs
BRY
W 79-55
+1.5
22
@
UMBC
L 74-87
+17.5
29
@
UALB
W 77-68
+5.5
31
@
UVM
W 79-77
+16.5
5
vs
UML
W 81-56
−12.5
7
vs
BING
W 73-64
−3.5
12
@
UNH
W 76-70
+0.5
14
@
ME
W 67-58
−12.5
19
vs
UALB
L 63-81
+1.5
21
vs
UVM
L 64-70
−8.5
28
@
BRY
L 52-69
−17.5
3
vs
UMBC
L 52-91
−0.5
7
vs
ME
W 60-58
−16.5
10
@
UVM
L 54-63
−17.5
over 14under 18avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
New Haven
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
15-13
54% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-20
29% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 55-79 | +42.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 53-71 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 43-87 | +18.5 | L −25.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 73-67 | +10.5 | W +16.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 65-52 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 130.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 45-68 | +25.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-67 | +17.5 | W +13.5 | 126.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 64-70 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | O 134 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 47-65 | +13.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 53-96 | +39.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 70-55 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 61-72 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 47-73 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 65-55 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 80-74 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 62-56 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 57-61 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 122.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 51-70 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 122.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-69 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 55-60 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 57-63 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 127.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 76-81 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 128.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 55-52 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 129.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 64-51 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 121.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 84-77 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 123.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 67-73 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 62-65 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 66-59 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CONN
L 55-79
+18.5
7
vs
COLU
L 53-71
−10.5
8
vs
PSU
L 43-87
−25.5
10
@
UML
W 73-67
+16.5
15
vs
DSU
W 65-52
+11.5
18
@
HALL
L 45-68
+2.5
6
@
BC
L 63-67
+13.5
10
@
NJIT
L 64-70
−8.5
22
@
FOR
L 47-65
−4.5
29
@
VAN
L 53-96
−3.5
2
@
STO
W 70-55
+16.5
4
@
CCSU
L 61-72
−3.5
8
@
LEM
L 47-73
−20.5
10
vs
FDU
W 65-55
+8.5
17
vs
WAG
W 80-74
+4.5
19
@
CHST
W 62-56
+7.5
23
vs
MERC
L 57-61
−2.5
29
@
MERC
L 51-70
−13.5
31
@
SFPA
W 81-69
+13.5
5
@
LIU
L 55-60
+4.5
7
vs
CHST
L 57-63
−11.5
12
vs
CCSU
L 76-81
−1.5
14
vs
LIU
W 55-52
+9.5
19
vs
STO
W 64-51
+10.5
21
@
FDU
W 84-77
+9.5
24
vs
SFPA
L 67-73
−12.5
26
@
WAG
L 62-65
−0.5
28
vs
LEM
W 66-59
+8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CONN
L 55-79
−11.5
7
vs
COLU
L 53-71
−24.5
8
vs
PSU
L 43-87
−13.5
10
@
UML
W 73-67
−2.5
15
vs
DSU
W 65-52
−13.5
18
@
HALL
L 45-68
−16.5
6
@
BC
L 63-67
+3.5
10
@
NJIT
L 64-70
+3.5
22
@
FOR
L 47-65
−15.5
29
@
VAN
L 53-96
+3.5
2
@
STO
W 70-55
−3.5
4
@
CCSU
L 61-72
+2.5
8
@
LEM
L 47-73
−17.5
10
vs
FDU
W 65-55
−10.5
17
vs
WAG
W 80-74
+24.5
19
@
CHST
W 62-56
−11.5
23
vs
MERC
L 57-61
−4.5
29
@
MERC
L 51-70
−1.5
31
@
SFPA
W 81-69
+18.5
5
@
LIU
L 55-60
−20.5
7
vs
CHST
L 57-63
−7.5
12
vs
CCSU
L 76-81
+28.5
14
vs
LIU
W 55-52
−22.5
19
vs
STO
W 64-51
−6.5
21
@
FDU
W 84-77
+37.5
24
vs
SFPA
L 67-73
−1.5
26
@
WAG
L 62-65
−4.5
28
vs
LEM
W 66-59
−12.5
over 8under 20avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: NJIT 0, New Haven 0, even 5
NJITBetterNew Haven
G D. Bolden12 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 47
=Even
G K. Briggs6.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 38
G M. Tatum TR8.1 pts · 2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 13
=No call
G A. Losiewicz2.6 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
G Q. Duncan4.4 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 31
=Even
F T. Steele3.2 pts · 3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 27
F M. Coffi TR3.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 28
=No call
F Z. Traore1.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F J. Kelly4.4 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 20
=No call
C T. Burth0.9 pts · 1 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
NJITBetterNew Haven
NJIT offense338th of 366 · -11.1
=Even
NHVN defense285th of 366 · -7.1
NJIT defense250th of 366 · -6.6
←NJITSmall
NHVN offense362nd of 366 · -14.4
Backcourt-4.6 · 3 players
→NHVNBig
Backcourt-1.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.4 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.5 · 3 players
Bench-3.4 · 4 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestNJIT betterNHVN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Bolden30 minM. Tatum26 min · TRQ. Duncan14 minR. Awad13 minB. Stores4 min · TRA. AltobelliNew
Forwards
M. Coffi19 min · TRJ. Kelly16 minB. Oliver10 min · TRZ. Scherler7 minV. VanderstraetenNew
Centers
S. Jimenez-VojnicNew
Guards
K. Briggs19 minA. Losiewicz7 minD. YoungNewF. MosleyNewD. LaDucaNewJ. HannaNew
Forwards
T. Steele15 minZ. Traore7 minN. NarcisseNewA. RamirezNewJ. BascombeNewM. OgleNew
Centers
T. Burth6 minT. ColemanNewM. CamaraNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.2 #344 | Points per game | 61.5 #363 |
| 0.98 #343 | Points per possession | 0.97 #345 |
| 67.9 #235 | Pace (possessions) | 63.5 #363 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.7 #342 | Effective FG% | 48.7 #296 |
| 30.4 #336 | 3-point % | 30.2 #340 |
| 40.1 #168 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.9 #172 |
| 33.2 #233 | Free throw rate | 31.7 #261 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #215 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #259 |
| 26.2 #316 | Offensive rebound rate | 21.5 #359 |
| 10.5 #350 | Assists per game | 10.9 #339 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.7 #147 | Points allowed | 67.4 #24 |
| 1.08 #167 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #107 |
| 50.0 #99 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #203 |
| 32.3 #79 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #199 |
| 16.1 #214 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #146 |
| 67.9 #264 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.2 #30 |
| 6.3 #204 | Steals per game | 6.0 #232 |
| 3.1 #197 | Blocks per game | 2.0 #342 |
NJIT
15-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-7 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Vermont54–63
- Wvs Maine60–58
- Lvs UMBC52–91
- L@ Bryant52–69
- Lvs Vermont64–70
A week or more of rest.
New Haven
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Le Moyne66–59
- L@ Wagner62–65
- Lvs Saint Francis Red Wolves67–73
- W@ FDU84–77
- Wvs Stonehill64–51
A week or more of rest.