Corbett Sports Center · at NC A&T
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NCAT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects JMU 76–73 · win probability JMU 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JMU has more of the edges
JMU 4, NCAT 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
JMU hits 35.4% and allows 32.7%; NCAT hits 31.6% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 42.5% and 32.6% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: JMU 53.1 and allows 49.0; NCAT 50.7 and allows 52.9
JMU offense vs NCAT defense
Offense 181st of 366 against a defense 311th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: JMU 35.9, NCAT 42.3. Allowed: JMU 40.8, NCAT 37.5
NCAT offense vs JMU defense
Offense 234th of 366 against a defense 154th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: JMU plays 67.5 a game (253rd fastest), NCAT 69.4 (150th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
NCAT at home. This season: NCAT 0-0 at home, JMU 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JMU 30.6%, NCAT 31.7%. Defensive: JMU 70.5%, NCAT 71.4%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JMU 17.3%, NCAT 18.6%. Forced: JMU 12.8%, NCAT 14.1%
Context
Schedule so far
JMU has played the 257th-hardest schedule, NCAT the 238th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JMU 17%, NCAT 16%. Transfers in: JMU 8, NCAT 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | JMU -2.4 | — |
| Total | — | 149.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | JMU 75.8 · NCAT 73.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | JMU -1.6 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | JMU 35.7 · NCAT 34.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 12 | @ FUR | No recent meeting |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
James Madison
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-85 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 84-70 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-88 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-75 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 80-72 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 88-77 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 66-82 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 67-62 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 68-67 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 92-96 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 74-103 | +23.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 78-74 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 64-66 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-69 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 65-80 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-77 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 83-90 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-57 | -5.5 | W +19.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 73-64 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-73 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 61-64 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-71 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 81-79 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 69-58 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 67-65 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 80-65 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 82-66 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 68-69 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-72 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
AKR
L 71-85
−5.5
9
vs
COPP
W 84-70
−4.5
12
@
LONG
L 72-82
−11.5
15
@
LIU
L 79-88
−5.5
18
vs
TOW
W 81-75
+9.5
24
@
FIU
W 80-72
+10.5
25
vs
OMA
W 88-77
+9.5
29
@
GMU
L 66-82
−3.5
3
vs
NCCU
W 67-62
−9.5
6
vs
NORF
W 68-67
−9.5
17
@
ODU
L 68-77
−11.5
20
@
GASO
L 92-96
−1.5
29
@
ARK
L 74-103
−5.5
3
@
ARST
W 78-74
+14.5
7
vs
MRSH
L 64-66
−3.5
10
vs
ODU
W 70-69
−5.5
15
@
APP
L 65-80
−12.5
17
@
MRSH
L 72-77
+1.5
22
vs
USA
L 83-90
−11.5
24
vs
TXST
W 82-57
+19.5
29
@
TROY
W 73-64
+18.5
31
@
USM
L 65-73
−6.5
4
vs
UL
L 61-64
−12.5
7
vs
TOL
W 73-71
+3.5
12
vs
GAST
W 81-79
−3.5
14
vs
APP
W 69-58
+12.5
18
@
CCU
W 67-65
+0.5
21
@
GAST
W 80-65
+12.5
25
vs
GASO
W 82-66
+10.5
27
vs
CCU
L 68-69
−7.5
4
vs
UL
W 87-72
+8.5
5
vs
USM
L 80-86
−8.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
AKR
L 71-85
+2.5
9
vs
COPP
W 84-70
+12.5
12
@
LONG
L 72-82
+4.5
15
@
LIU
L 79-88
+19.5
18
vs
TOW
W 81-75
+15.5
24
@
FIU
W 80-72
−3.5
25
vs
OMA
W 88-77
+12.5
29
@
GMU
L 66-82
+6.5
3
vs
NCCU
W 67-62
−14.5
6
vs
NORF
W 68-67
−3.5
17
@
ODU
L 68-77
−3.5
20
@
GASO
L 92-96
+34.5
29
@
ARK
L 74-103
+17.5
3
@
ARST
W 78-74
−6.5
7
vs
MRSH
L 64-66
−22.5
10
vs
ODU
W 70-69
−8.5
15
@
APP
L 65-80
+11.5
17
@
MRSH
L 72-77
−0.5
22
vs
USA
L 83-90
+34.5
24
vs
TXST
W 82-57
−4.5
29
@
TROY
W 73-64
−10.5
31
@
USM
L 65-73
−5.5
4
vs
UL
L 61-64
−7.5
7
vs
TOL
W 73-71
−9.5
12
vs
GAST
W 81-79
+15.5
14
vs
APP
W 69-58
−7.5
18
@
CCU
W 67-65
−8.5
21
@
GAST
W 80-65
+2.5
25
vs
GASO
W 82-66
−5.5
27
vs
CCU
L 68-69
−4.5
4
vs
UL
W 87-72
+24.5
5
vs
USM
L 80-86
+22.5
over 15under 17avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
NC A&T
28 games played
Straight up
9-19
32% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg +1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 72-91 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 85-62 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 79-73 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 74-90 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 57-74 | +7.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 69-54 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 69-73 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 82-79 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 130.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 71-65 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 78-87 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 74-85 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 80-81 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 89-97 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-82 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 79-78 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-73 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-83 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-61 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 62-78 | +11.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 71-79 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 71-70 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-74 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 102-82 | +7.5 | W +27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 65-88 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 88-91 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 72-90 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 72-88 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
SC
L 72-91
+3.5
10
vs
SCST
W 85-62
+20.5
18
@
MORG
W 79-73
+3.5
28
@
DAV
L 74-90
−2.5
2
@
CLT
L 57-74
−9.5
6
@
NCCU
W 69-54
+12.5
9
vs
HOW
L 69-73
−6.5
12
vs
UMES
W 82-79
−4.5
16
@
UNCG
W 71-65
+12.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+1.5
31
vs
NE
L 74-85
−7.5
3
@
STBK
L 80-81
+3.5
8
vs
ELON
L 64-69
+1.5
15
@
W&M
L 89-97
+5.5
19
@
HAMP
L 61-82
−14.5
22
vs
HOF
W 79-78
+10.5
24
vs
TOW
W 80-73
+14.5
29
@
MONM
L 81-83
+7.5
31
@
DREX
L 60-61
+6.5
5
@
COFC
L 62-78
−4.5
7
vs
CAM
L 71-79
−4.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 71-70
+4.5
19
vs
COFC
L 61-74
−8.5
21
@
ELON
W 102-82
+27.5
26
@
UNCW
L 65-88
−9.5
28
vs
W&M
L 88-91
+5.5
3
@
CAM
L 72-90
−9.5
6
vs
NE
L 72-88
−13.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg +1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
SC
L 72-91
+19.5
10
vs
SCST
W 85-62
−12.5
18
@
MORG
W 79-73
−9.5
28
@
DAV
L 74-90
+18.5
2
@
CLT
L 57-74
−13.5
6
@
NCCU
W 69-54
−19.5
9
vs
HOW
L 69-73
−7.5
12
vs
UMES
W 82-79
+30.5
16
@
UNCG
W 71-65
−11.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 78-87
+18.5
31
vs
NE
L 74-85
+7.5
3
@
STBK
L 80-81
+19.5
8
vs
ELON
L 64-69
−25.5
15
@
W&M
L 89-97
+23.5
19
@
HAMP
L 61-82
−0.5
22
vs
HOF
W 79-78
+10.5
24
vs
TOW
W 80-73
+13.5
29
@
MONM
L 81-83
+19.5
31
@
DREX
L 60-61
−17.5
5
@
COFC
L 62-78
−15.5
7
vs
CAM
L 71-79
−6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 71-70
+3.5
19
vs
COFC
L 61-74
−12.5
21
@
ELON
W 102-82
+32.5
26
@
UNCW
L 65-88
+6.5
28
vs
W&M
L 88-91
+15.5
3
@
CAM
L 72-90
+7.5
6
vs
NE
L 72-88
+8.5
over 16under 12avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
NC A&T has the better starters
Position by position: James Madison 1, NC A&T 2, even 2
James MadisonBetterNC A&T
G G. Lattimore TR15.5 pts · 4.4 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 48
→NCATSmall
G P. James TR13.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.1 ast
Score 66
G A. Myers TR11.1 pts · 4.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 73
←JMUSmall
G S. Lancaster TR10.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 50
G C. Reilly TR3 pts · 1 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Burton5.2 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 13
F J. Hogarth TR10.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
=No call
F M. Webster NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
F P. Fowler6.3 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 25
→NCATBig
C W. Felton6.7 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 65
James MadisonBetterNC A&T
JMU offense181st of 366 · -5.7
←JMUBig
NCAT defense311th of 366 · -8.1
JMU defense154th of 366 · -3.4
←JMUSmall
NCAT offense234th of 366 · -7.2
Backcourt-2.0 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.3 · 2 players
→NCATSmall
Frontcourt+0.8 · 2 players
Bench-3.8 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestJMU betterNCAT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
G. Lattimore37 min · TRA. Myers29 min · TRC. Reilly23 min · TRK. Windham13 min · TRP. Jones11 minB. Lee5 min · TR
Forwards
J. Hogarth25 min · TRP. Fowler23 minG. Sundra18 min · TRM. Curtis16 min · TRJ. BrownNewA. EvansNew
Guards
P. James33 min · TRS. Lancaster29 min · TRM. Burton17 minJ. McKieNewU. Kellman-NicholesNewB. IveryNew
Forwards
M. WebsterNewS. SimleyNew
Centers
W. Felton16 minE. KalliontzisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.7 #172 | Points per game | 73.9 #205 |
| 1.10 #128 | Points per possession | 1.07 #213 |
| 67.5 #253 | Pace (possessions) | 69.4 #150 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #97 | Effective FG% | 50.7 #201 |
| 35.4 #94 | 3-point % | 31.6 #304 |
| 42.5 #128 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.6 #322 |
| 35.9 #153 | Free throw rate | 42.3 #26 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.3 #225 | Turnover rate | 18.6 #304 |
| 30.6 #175 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.7 #136 |
| 12.5 #252 | Assists per game | 11.5 #311 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.4 #170 | Points allowed | 78.5 #278 |
| 1.10 #226 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #285 |
| 49.0 #66 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #266 |
| 32.7 #101 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.6 #331 |
| 12.8 #359 | Turnovers forced | 14.1 #332 |
| 70.5 #134 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.4 #89 |
| 5.1 #327 | Steals per game | 5.1 #323 |
| 4.1 #68 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #107 |
James Madison
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss80–86
- Wvs Louisiana87–72
- Lvs Coastal68–69
- Wvs GA Southern82–66
- W@ Georgia St80–65
A week or more of rest.
NC A&T
9-19 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Northeastern72–88
- L@ Campbell72–90
- Lvs William & Mary88–91
- L@ UNC Wilmington65–88
- W@ Elon102–82
A week or more of rest.