Memorial Hall (DE) · at Delaware St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UMBC 73–67 · win probability UMBC 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UMBC has more of the edges
UMBC 6, DSU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: UMBC 54.1 and allows 49.4; DSU 42.9 and allows 52.9
Three-pointers
UMBC hits 36.1% and allows 32.7%; DSU hits 28.4% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 38.8% and 28.9% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: UMBC 34.1, DSU 34.1. Allowed: UMBC 25.7, DSU 40.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UMBC 24.9%, DSU 27.7%. Defensive: UMBC 74.2%, DSU 68.0%
DSU offense vs UMBC defense
Offense 354th of 366 against a defense 279th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UMBC 11%, DSU 41%. Transfers in: UMBC 2, DSU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
UMBC offense vs DSU defense
Offense 255th of 366 against a defense 307th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
DSU at home. This season: DSU 0-0 at home, UMBC 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UMBC 14.1%, DSU 19.8%. Forced: UMBC 15.1%, DSU 19.6%
Context
Schedule so far
UMBC has played the 342nd-hardest schedule, DSU the 354th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: UMBC plays 67.0 a game (278th fastest), DSU 66.7 (290th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UMBC -5.9 | — |
| Total | — | 140.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | UMBC 73.4 · DSU 67.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UMBC -3.6 | — |
| 1H total | 65.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | UMBC 34.8 · DSU 31.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | |
| 2-8 20% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UMBC 1–0 DSUUMBC leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UMBC 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025-26 | DSU 57 @ UMBC 71 | UMBC -13.5 | UMBC W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UMBC
31 games played
Straight up
22-9
71% wins
Against the spread
19-12
61% covers · avg +6.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-77 | +25.5 | W +19.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 81-79 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 71-70 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 52-89 | +22.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 71-57 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 81-90 | +19.5 | W +10.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 73-66 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 79-83 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 12 | vs | L 60-63 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 69-94 | +22.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 93-59 | -10.5 | W +23.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 69-62 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 75-74 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 78-60 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 87-74 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 79-56 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 55-64 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-65 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 79-62 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 78-62 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 85-63 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 75-62 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 66-62 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 70-58 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-60 | -2.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 91-52 | -4.5 | W +34.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 84-69 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 91-69 | -7.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 74-59 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 83-86 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
DAY
L 71-77
+19.5
11
@
MORG
W 81-79
−2.5
16
vs
WAG
W 71-70
−5.5
19
@
GW
L 52-89
−14.5
29
vs
DSU
W 71-57
+0.5
3
@
GTWN
L 81-90
+10.5
6
@
BUCK
W 73-66
+8.5
9
vs
BUF
L 79-83
−0.5
12
vs
ARMY
L 60-63
−10.5
21
@
USF
L 69-94
−2.5
29
@
COPP
W 93-59
+23.5
8
vs
ME
W 69-62
−0.5
10
vs
UNH
W 75-74
−5.5
15
@
BRY
L 74-79
−6.5
19
@
BING
W 78-60
+13.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 87-74
+6.5
24
vs
UML
W 79-56
+20.5
29
@
UVM
L 55-64
−0.5
31
@
UALB
W 68-65
+1.5
5
vs
BING
W 79-62
+5.5
12
@
ME
W 78-62
+12.5
14
@
UNH
W 85-63
+19.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-62
+14.5
21
vs
UALB
W 66-62
−3.5
26
vs
BRY
W 70-58
+0.5
28
@
UML
W 84-60
+21.5
3
@
NJIT
W 91-52
+34.5
7
vs
UNH
W 84-69
+2.5
10
vs
UML
W 91-69
+14.5
14
vs
UVM
W 74-59
+13.5
17
vs
HOW
L 83-86
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 12avg +6.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
DAY
L 71-77
−6.5
11
@
MORG
W 81-79
−2.5
16
vs
WAG
W 71-70
+0.5
19
@
GW
L 52-89
−19.5
29
vs
DSU
W 71-57
−10.5
3
@
GTWN
L 81-90
+21.5
6
@
BUCK
W 73-66
−4.5
9
vs
BUF
L 79-83
+16.5
12
vs
ARMY
L 60-63
−23.5
21
@
USF
L 69-94
+2.5
29
@
COPP
W 93-59
+3.5
8
vs
ME
W 69-62
−2.5
10
vs
UNH
W 75-74
+5.5
15
@
BRY
L 74-79
+17.5
19
@
BING
W 78-60
−2.5
22
vs
NJIT
W 87-74
+17.5
24
vs
UML
W 79-56
−16.5
29
@
UVM
L 55-64
−22.5
31
@
UALB
W 68-65
−8.5
5
vs
BING
W 79-62
+2.5
12
@
ME
W 78-62
+4.5
14
@
UNH
W 85-63
+1.5
19
vs
UVM
W 75-62
−5.5
21
vs
UALB
W 66-62
−16.5
26
vs
BRY
W 70-58
−10.5
28
@
UML
W 84-60
−6.5
3
@
NJIT
W 91-52
−0.5
7
vs
UNH
W 84-69
+10.5
10
vs
UML
W 91-69
+12.5
14
vs
UVM
W 74-59
−1.5
17
vs
HOW
L 83-86
+25.5
over 14under 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Delaware St
27 games played
Straight up
5-22
19% wins
Against the spread
9-18
33% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-19
30% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | @ | L 65-83 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 43-83 | +26.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 57-68 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 52-65 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 130.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 41-97 | +34.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 57-71 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 59-66 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-72 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 81-76 | +13.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 51-67 | +17.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 50-65 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 51-53 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 64-66 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 58-84 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-80 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 64-70 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 65-57 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 128.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 47-65 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | O 135 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 58-75 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 59-91 | +11.5 | L −20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 68-82 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 60-74 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 135.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 59-61 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 57-56 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 53-59 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 131.5 | U 112 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
@
TEM
L 65-83
−1.5
8
@
SYR
L 43-83
−13.5
10
@
NIA
L 57-68
−5.5
15
@
NHVN
L 52-65
−11.5
23
@
MIA
L 41-97
−21.5
29
@
UMBC
L 57-71
−0.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 59-66
+8.5
6
vs
DEL
W 75-72
+10.5
13
@
LONG
W 81-76
+18.5
18
@
JOES
L 51-67
+1.5
29
@
RUTG
L 50-65
+5.5
3
vs
COPP
L 51-53
−10.5
10
vs
NORF
L 64-66
+2.5
12
@
HOW
L 58-84
−17.5
17
vs
MORG
L 79-80
−4.5
26
@
SCST
L 64-70
−4.5
31
vs
UMES
W 65-57
+10.5
7
@
COPP
L 47-65
−19.5
9
@
NCCU
L 63-72
−1.5
14
@
NORF
L 58-75
−7.5
16
vs
HOW
L 59-91
−20.5
21
@
MORG
L 68-82
−8.5
28
vs
NCCU
L 60-74
−11.5
2
vs
SCST
L 59-61
−5.5
5
@
UMES
W 57-56
+6.5
11
vs
MORG
W 75-70
+8.5
13
vs
NCCU
L 53-59
−2.5
covered 9didn’t cover 18avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
@
TEM
L 65-83
−6.5
8
@
SYR
L 43-83
−31.5
10
@
NIA
L 57-68
−12.5
15
@
NHVN
L 52-65
−13.5
23
@
MIA
L 41-97
−13.5
29
@
UMBC
L 57-71
−10.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 59-66
−7.5
6
vs
DEL
W 75-72
+17.5
13
@
LONG
W 81-76
+17.5
18
@
JOES
L 51-67
−19.5
29
@
RUTG
L 50-65
−20.5
3
vs
COPP
L 51-53
−35.5
10
vs
NORF
L 64-66
−2.5
12
@
HOW
L 58-84
+12.5
17
vs
MORG
L 79-80
+22.5
26
@
SCST
L 64-70
−1.5
31
vs
UMES
W 65-57
−6.5
7
@
COPP
L 47-65
−20.5
9
@
NCCU
L 63-72
+0.5
14
@
NORF
L 58-75
−1.5
16
vs
HOW
L 59-91
+18.5
21
@
MORG
L 68-82
+6.5
28
vs
NCCU
L 60-74
−1.5
2
vs
SCST
L 59-61
−14.5
5
@
UMES
W 57-56
−11.5
11
vs
MORG
W 75-70
+2.5
13
vs
NCCU
L 53-59
−19.5
over 8under 19avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Delaware St has the better starters
Position by position: UMBC 1, Delaware St 2, even 2
UMBCBetterDelaware St
G F. Burton TR14.9 pts · 3.1 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 63
←UMBCSmall
G R. Moore6.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 33
G A. Cross TR3.2 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 1
→DSUSmall
G N. Muhammad TR7.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
G D. Ceaser4.3 pts · 1 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. St Clair3.7 pts · 0.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 14
F R. Jacobs4.2 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 24
→DSUSmall
G D. Shepherd4.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 58
F R. Ciunys NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Santos6.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 20
UMBCBetterDelaware St
UMBC offense255th of 366 · -7.8
=Even
DSU defense307th of 366 · -7.9
UMBC defense279th of 366 · -7.0
←UMBCSmall
DSU offense354th of 366 · -13.2
Backcourt-2.9 · 3 players
←UMBCSmall
Backcourt-4.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-2.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestUMBC betterDSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
F. Burton32 min · TRA. Cross16 min · TRD. Ceaser8 minJ. RisticNewJ. ReynoldsNewT. SlatingNew
Forwards
R. Jacobs15 minR. CiunysNewA. BarryNewJ. NdongNewS. HuanNew
Guards
R. Moore22 minN. Muhammad18 min · TRJ. St Clair15 minD. Shepherd13 minN. ReedusNewI. SullivanNew
Forwards
A. Santos20 minM. Adamu13 minT. HawkinsNewG. EkukwaiNewJ. ObioraNewF. MuntariNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.7 #149 | Points per game | 59.7 #365 |
| 1.13 #85 | Points per possession | 0.89 #365 |
| 67.0 #278 | Pace (possessions) | 66.7 #290 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.1 #64 | Effective FG% | 42.9 #364 |
| 36.1 #55 | 3-point % | 28.4 #361 |
| 38.8 #195 | 3-point attempt rate | 28.9 #357 |
| 34.1 #205 | Free throw rate | 34.1 #204 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.1 #25 | Turnover rate | 19.8 #346 |
| 24.9 #342 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.7 #277 |
| 11.9 #291 | Assists per game | 9.7 #361 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.5 #41 | Points allowed | 71.4 #89 |
| 1.02 #46 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #143 |
| 49.4 #79 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #265 |
| 32.7 #98 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #123 |
| 15.1 #283 | Turnovers forced | 19.6 #32 |
| 74.2 #18 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #257 |
| 4.9 #338 | Steals per game | 7.6 #73 |
| 2.4 #314 | Blocks per game | 1.8 #353 |
UMBC
22-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-2 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Howard83–86
- Wvs Vermont74–59
- Wvs UMass Lowell91–69
- Wvs New Hampshire84–69
- W@ NJIT91–52
A week or more of rest.
Delaware St
5-22 in 2025-26 overall · 3-13 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs NC Central53–59
- Wvs Morgan St75–70
- W@ MD Eastern57–56
- Lvs SC State59–61
- Lvs NC Central60–74
A week or more of rest.