Finneran Pavilion · at Villanova
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VILL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-1 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-1 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 1-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VILL 90–56 · win probability VILL 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VILL has more of the edges
COPP 1, VILL 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
COPP offense vs VILL defense
Offense 351st of 366 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
VILL offense vs COPP defense
Offense 39th of 366 against a defense 324th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
COPP has played the 313th-hardest schedule, VILL the 35th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
COPP hits 30.7% and allows 38.3%; VILL hits 35.7% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 35.2% and 45.7% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: COPP 45.9 and allows 55.4; VILL 53.8 and allows 51.4
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COPP 22.3%, VILL 15.0%. Forced: COPP 17.6%, VILL 18.6%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COPP 30.4%, VILL 32.2%. Defensive: COPP 65.3%, VILL 68.2%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COPP 68%, VILL 33%. Transfers in: COPP 3, VILL 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: COPP plays 69.3 a game (159th fastest), VILL 67.3 (270th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
VILL at home. This season: VILL 0-0 at home, COPP 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: COPP 38.5, VILL 30.9. Allowed: COPP 42.9, VILL 30.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VILL -34.3 | — |
| Total | — | 146.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | COPP 55.9 · VILL 90.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VILL -20.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | COPP 24 · VILL 44.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Coppin St
30 games played
Straight up
6-24
20% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-11
63% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 61-83 | +28.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 59-87 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 70-84 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 50-100 | +34.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-82 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 62-72 | +18.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 134 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 58-101 | +32.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 68-65 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 84-95 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 49-91 | +31.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 50-92 | +30.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 65-87 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 77-107 | +20.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 55-88 | +20.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 67-97 | +33.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 59-93 | +10.5 | L −23.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 53-51 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-88 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 72-74 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-70 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-103 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 53-72 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-47 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-56 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 59-57 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-65 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 128.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-75 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 70-90 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 66-70 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+6.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
−10.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+4.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−15.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−12.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+8.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
−10.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
+11.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
−1.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
−10.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−11.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+0.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
−9.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−12.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+3.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
−23.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
+10.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
−4.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
−3.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+7.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
−13.5
31
vs
MORG
L 80-89
−5.5
2
vs
HOW
L 53-72
−4.5
7
vs
DSU
W 65-47
+19.5
14
@
NCCU
W 58-56
+12.5
16
@
SCST
W 59-57
+6.5
21
vs
UMES
W 71-65
+9.5
28
vs
NORF
L 69-75
−0.5
2
@
HOW
L 70-90
−0.5
5
@
MORG
L 66-70
+1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+4.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
+6.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+12.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−17.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−1.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+0.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
+7.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
−6.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
+35.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
+5.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−1.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+5.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
+29.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−2.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+13.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
+3.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
−35.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
+21.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
+5.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+3.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
+35.5
31
vs
MORG
L 80-89
+13.5
2
vs
HOW
L 53-72
−21.5
7
vs
DSU
W 65-47
−20.5
14
@
NCCU
W 58-56
−29.5
16
@
SCST
W 59-57
−22.5
21
vs
UMES
W 71-65
+7.5
28
vs
NORF
L 69-75
+3.5
2
@
HOW
L 70-90
+19.5
5
@
MORG
L 66-70
−13.5
over 19under 11avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Villanova
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-13
61% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Against the spread
19-1458%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 66-71 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-74 | -17.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 94-60 | -19.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-77 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 70-55 | -12.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 89-75 | -22.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 74-56 | -14.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-63 | -18.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 61-89 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-61 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 76-66 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 23 | @ | W 64-56 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 71-66 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 85-67 | +2.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 72-76 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-73 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 88-82 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-86 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 66-51 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-75 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-73 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-60 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 77-74 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 80-69 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 92-89 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-73 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 82-73 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-89 | +7.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 76-57 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 64-78 | -7.5 | L −21.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 76-86 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
+4.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+2.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
+14.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
−0.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
+2.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
−8.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+8.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−10.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+7.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
+13.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
+9.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−7.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+20.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
−8.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
−0.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+3.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
−4.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
+6.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+3.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+5.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
+6.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+4.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
−6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+9.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
−1.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−6.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
−1.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−24.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
+17.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+1.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
−21.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
−8.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BYU
L 66-71
−16.5
8
vs
QUC
W 94-74
+17.5
11
vs
SHU
W 94-60
−6.5
15
vs
DUQ
W 87-77
+12.5
19
@
LAS
W 70-55
−19.5
25
vs
ODU
W 89-75
+16.5
1
vs
TEM
W 74-56
−16.5
6
vs
PENN
W 90-63
+2.5
9
@
MICH
L 61-89
−6.5
13
vs
PITT
W 79-61
+1.5
19
vs
WIS
W 76-66
−10.5
23
@
HALL
W 64-56
−15.5
31
vs
DEP
W 71-66
−2.5
3
@
BTLR
W 85-67
+2.5
7
vs
CREI
L 72-76
+5.5
10
@
MARQ
W 76-73
+2.5
13
@
PROV
W 88-82
+13.5
17
vs
SJU
L 79-86
+17.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 66-51
−25.5
24
@
CONN
L 67-75
+4.5
30
vs
PROV
W 87-73
+2.5
4
vs
HALL
W 72-60
−2.5
7
@
GTWN
W 80-73
+12.5
10
vs
MARQ
W 77-74
+6.5
14
@
CREI
W 80-69
+3.5
17
@
XAV
W 92-89
+28.5
21
vs
CONN
L 63-73
−5.5
25
vs
BTLR
W 82-73
+7.5
28
@
SJU
L 57-89
−1.5
4
@
DEP
W 76-57
−2.5
7
vs
XAV
W 91-78
+15.5
12
vs
GTWN
L 64-78
+1.5
20
vs
USU
L 76-86
+15.5
over 20under 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Villanova has the better starters
Position by position: Coppin St 0, Villanova 5, even 0
Coppin StBetterVillanova
G H. Williams7.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
→VILLBig
G J. Fiegen TR11 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 82
G C. Sparrow5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 40
→VILLSmall
G D. Simmons TR16.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 63
G J. Piercy6.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 23
→VILLBig
G T. Perkins18 pts · 4 reb · 3 ast
Score 100
F N. Lamizana6.6 pts · 3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 18
→VILLBig
F D. Royal TR5 pts · 8 reb · 0 ast
Score 100
F T. Koenig5.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 28
→VILLBig
F K. Evans TR13.3 pts · 7.4 reb · 2 ast
Score 95
Coppin StBetterVillanova
COPP offense351st of 366 · -12.8
→VILLBig
VILL defense30th of 366 · +3.5
COPP defense324th of 366 · -8.4
→VILLBig
VILL offense39th of 366 · +5.0
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
→VILLBig
Backcourt+7.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.6 · 2 players
→VILLBig
Frontcourt+6.1 · 2 players
Bench-6.3 · 5 players
→VILLBig
Bench+3.3 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCOPP betterVILL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
H. Williams20 minC. Sparrow19 minJ. Piercy18 minB. Saunders16 minD. Lydner12 minJ. Brown5 min
Forwards
N. Lamizana19 minT. Koenig17 minT. Gapare16 min · TRE. TaylorNewL. LawalNewA. MyersNew
Centers
F. Aire9 min
Guards
J. Fiegen38 min · TRD. Simmons36 min · TRT. Perkins35 minE. Crawford26 min · TRW. Chiddick3 minB. MullerNew
Forwards
D. Royal32 min · TRK. Evans31 min · TRM. Hodge28 minA. Samb6 min · TR
Centers
N. OnyekwereNewL. SuigoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.3 #352 | Points per game | 77.1 #113 |
| 0.93 #362 | Points per possession | 1.15 #64 |
| 69.3 #159 | Pace (possessions) | 67.3 #270 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.9 #350 | Effective FG% | 53.8 #74 |
| 30.7 #326 | 3-point % | 35.7 #77 |
| 35.2 #273 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #52 |
| 38.5 #90 | Free throw rate | 30.9 #284 |
| Possessions | ||
| 22.3 #363 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #65 |
| 30.4 #183 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.2 #118 |
| 11.4 #317 | Assists per game | 15.5 #66 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.0 #334 | Points allowed | 71.2 #82 |
| 1.17 #342 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #105 |
| 55.4 #339 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.4 #181 |
| 38.3 #360 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #148 |
| 17.6 #118 | Turnovers forced | 18.6 #70 |
| 65.3 #333 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.2 #246 |
| 6.0 #233 | Steals per game | 7.4 #93 |
| 3.5 #143 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #340 |
Coppin St
6-24 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Morgan St66–70
- L@ Howard70–90
- Lvs Norfolk St69–75
- Wvs MD Eastern71–65
- W@ SC State59–57
A week or more of rest.
Villanova
24-9 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah State76–86
- Lvs Georgetown64–78
- Wvs Xavier91–78
- W@ DePaul76–57
- L@ St John's57–89
A week or more of rest.