Siegel Center · at VCU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | VCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VCU 89–58 · win probability VCU 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VCU has more of the edges
COPP 0, VCU 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
COPP offense vs VCU defense
Offense 351st of 366 against a defense 50th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: COPP 45.9 and allows 55.4; VCU 53.6 and allows 49.0
VCU offense vs COPP defense
Offense 65th of 366 against a defense 324th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
COPP hits 30.7% and allows 38.3%; VCU hits 36.3% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 35.2% and 43.8% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
COPP has played the 313th-hardest schedule, VCU the 88th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: COPP 38.5, VCU 42.0. Allowed: COPP 42.9, VCU 32.8
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COPP 22.3%, VCU 15.1%. Forced: COPP 17.6%, VCU 17.0%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COPP 30.4%, VCU 31.6%. Defensive: COPP 65.3%, VCU 70.0%
Home court
VCU at home. This season: VCU 0-0 at home, COPP 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: COPP plays 69.3 a game (159th fastest), VCU 69.5 (147th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COPP 68%, VCU 65%. Transfers in: COPP 3, VCU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VCU -31.1 | — |
| Total | — | 147.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | COPP 57.9 · VCU 89 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VCU -18.4 | — |
| 1H total | 68.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | COPP 25.2 · VCU 43.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COPP 0–1 VCUVCU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · COPP 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2025-26 | COPP 58 @ VCU 101 | VCU -32.5 | VCU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Coppin St
30 games played
Straight up
6-24
20% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-11
63% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 61-83 | +28.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 59-87 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 70-84 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 50-100 | +34.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-82 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 62-72 | +18.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 134 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 58-101 | +32.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 68-65 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 84-95 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 49-91 | +31.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 50-92 | +30.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 65-87 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 77-107 | +20.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 55-88 | +20.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 67-97 | +33.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 59-93 | +10.5 | L −23.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 53-51 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-88 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 72-74 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-70 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-103 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 53-72 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-47 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-56 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 59-57 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-65 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 128.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-75 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 70-90 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 66-70 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+6.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
−10.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+4.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−15.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−12.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+8.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
−10.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
+11.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
−1.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
−10.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−11.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+0.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
−9.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−12.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+3.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
−23.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
+10.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
−4.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
−3.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+7.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
−13.5
31
vs
MORG
L 80-89
−5.5
2
vs
HOW
L 53-72
−4.5
7
vs
DSU
W 65-47
+19.5
14
@
NCCU
W 58-56
+12.5
16
@
SCST
W 59-57
+6.5
21
vs
UMES
W 71-65
+9.5
28
vs
NORF
L 69-75
−0.5
2
@
HOW
L 70-90
−0.5
5
@
MORG
L 66-70
+1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+4.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
+6.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+12.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−17.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−1.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+0.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
+7.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
−6.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
+35.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
+5.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−1.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+5.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
+29.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−2.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+13.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
+3.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
−35.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
+21.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
+5.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+3.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
+35.5
31
vs
MORG
L 80-89
+13.5
2
vs
HOW
L 53-72
−21.5
7
vs
DSU
W 65-47
−20.5
14
@
NCCU
W 58-56
−29.5
16
@
SCST
W 59-57
−22.5
21
vs
UMES
W 71-65
+7.5
28
vs
NORF
L 69-75
+3.5
2
@
HOW
L 70-90
+19.5
5
@
MORG
L 66-70
−13.5
over 19under 11avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
VCU
36 games played
Straight up
28-8
78% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-20
44% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 103-74 | -25.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 77-80 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 78-61 | -20.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 79-85 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 101-58 | -32.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 78-66 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 74-89 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-68 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-57 | -19.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 78-81 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 84-58 | -30.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 105-83 | -19.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 100-79 | -30.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 89-82 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-80 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 62-71 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 80-86 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-75 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 79-72 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 77-69 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 89-75 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 63-59 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 99-73 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 77-68 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-67 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 89-75 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 75-88 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-63 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 70-65 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 68-62 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 77-64 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-62 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 82-78 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 55-76 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WAG
W 103-74
+3.5
7
vs
USU
L 77-80
−0.5
12
vs
SPU
W 78-61
−3.5
17
@
NCSU
L 79-85
+5.5
22
vs
COPP
W 101-58
+10.5
26
vs
USF
W 78-66
+10.5
27
vs
VAN
L 74-89
−8.5
28
vs
VT
W 86-68
+15.5
5
vs
SAM
W 83-57
+6.5
10
vs
UNM
L 78-81
−11.5
15
vs
NIA
W 84-58
−4.5
18
vs
AMER
W 105-83
+2.5
22
vs
RID
W 100-79
−9.5
31
vs
SBU
W 89-82
−2.5
3
@
DUQ
W 93-80
+7.5
7
vs
SLU
L 62-71
−10.5
10
@
GMU
L 80-86
−7.5
14
@
URI
W 84-75
+5.5
19
vs
JOES
W 79-72
−7.5
24
@
DAV
W 75-69
+0.5
27
vs
RICH
W 77-69
−4.5
30
vs
LUC
W 89-75
−4.5
3
@
FOR
W 63-59
−3.5
6
vs
DAY
W 99-73
+17.5
11
@
LAS
W 77-68
−3.5
14
@
RICH
W 78-67
+3.5
17
vs
GW
W 89-75
+7.5
20
@
SLU
L 75-88
−5.5
28
vs
FOR
W 82-63
+6.5
3
vs
GMU
W 70-65
−4.5
6
@
DAY
W 68-62
+7.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 71-66
−1.5
14
vs
JOES
W 77-64
+6.5
15
vs
DAY
W 70-62
+4.5
19
vs
UNC
W 82-78
+6.5
21
vs
ILL
L 55-76
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WAG
W 103-74
+43.5
7
vs
USU
L 77-80
−6.5
12
vs
SPU
W 78-61
−8.5
17
@
NCSU
L 79-85
−0.5
22
vs
COPP
W 101-58
+7.5
26
vs
USF
W 78-66
−28.5
27
vs
VAN
L 74-89
+1.5
28
vs
VT
W 86-68
+0.5
5
vs
SAM
W 83-57
−14.5
10
vs
UNM
L 78-81
+1.5
15
vs
NIA
W 84-58
−1.5
18
vs
AMER
W 105-83
+33.5
22
vs
RID
W 100-79
+33.5
31
vs
SBU
W 89-82
+13.5
3
@
DUQ
W 93-80
+7.5
7
vs
SLU
L 62-71
−38.5
10
@
GMU
L 80-86
+21.5
14
@
URI
W 84-75
+11.5
19
vs
JOES
W 79-72
−0.5
24
@
DAV
W 75-69
−4.5
27
vs
RICH
W 77-69
−9.5
30
vs
LUC
W 89-75
+13.5
3
@
FOR
W 63-59
−24.5
6
vs
DAY
W 99-73
+24.5
11
@
LAS
W 77-68
−2.5
14
@
RICH
W 78-67
−9.5
17
vs
GW
W 89-75
+2.5
20
@
SLU
L 75-88
−1.5
28
vs
FOR
W 82-63
+0.5
3
vs
GMU
W 70-65
−12.5
6
@
DAY
W 68-62
−16.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 71-66
−16.5
14
vs
JOES
W 77-64
−4.5
15
vs
DAY
W 70-62
−7.5
19
vs
UNC
W 82-78
+9.5
21
vs
ILL
L 55-76
−20.5
over 16under 20avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
VCU has the better starters
Position by position: Coppin St 0, VCU 5, even 0
Coppin StBetterVCU
G H. Williams7.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
→VCUSmall
G N. Ralph-Beyer TR14.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 61
G C. Sparrow5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 40
→VCUBig
G B. Jennings8.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 79
G J. Piercy6.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 23
→VCUBig
G N. Lewis8.7 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 79
F N. Lamizana6.6 pts · 3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 18
→VCUBig
F T. Alston TR13.3 pts · 8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 85
F T. Koenig5.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 28
→VCUBig
F L. Djokovic13.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
Coppin StBetterVCU
COPP offense351st of 366 · -12.8
→VCUBig
VCU defense50th of 366 · +2.0
COPP defense324th of 366 · -8.4
→VCUBig
VCU offense65th of 366 · +2.0
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
→VCUBig
Backcourt+2.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.6 · 2 players
→VCUBig
Frontcourt+5.5 · 2 players
Bench-6.3 · 5 players
→VCUBig
Bench+3.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCOPP betterVCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
H. Williams20 minC. Sparrow19 minJ. Piercy18 minB. Saunders16 minD. Lydner12 minJ. Brown5 min
Forwards
N. Lamizana19 minT. Koenig17 minT. Gapare16 min · TRE. TaylorNewL. LawalNewA. MyersNew
Centers
F. Aire9 min
Guards
N. Ralph-Beyer31 min · TRB. Jennings25 minN. Lewis24 minB. Harper18 min · TRT. Ward14 minA. Nowell11 min
Forwards
T. Alston30 min · TRL. Djokovic28 minM. Belle22 minJ. Wyche7 min · TRC. RossNewS. PlisnicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.3 #352 | Points per game | 80.8 #50 |
| 0.93 #362 | Points per possession | 1.16 #47 |
| 69.3 #159 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #147 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.9 #350 | Effective FG% | 53.6 #78 |
| 30.7 #326 | 3-point % | 36.3 #46 |
| 35.2 #273 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #91 |
| 38.5 #90 | Free throw rate | 42.0 #30 |
| Possessions | ||
| 22.3 #363 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #70 |
| 30.4 #183 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.6 #139 |
| 11.4 #317 | Assists per game | 13.9 #158 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.0 #334 | Points allowed | 71.8 #100 |
| 1.17 #342 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #66 |
| 55.4 #339 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.0 #69 |
| 38.3 #360 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #125 |
| 17.6 #118 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #151 |
| 65.3 #333 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #162 |
| 6.0 #233 | Steals per game | 7.3 #99 |
| 3.5 #143 | Blocks per game | 4.3 #50 |
Coppin St
6-24 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Morgan St66–70
- L@ Howard70–90
- Lvs Norfolk St69–75
- Wvs MD Eastern71–65
- W@ SC State59–57
A week or more of rest.
VCU
28-8 in 2025-26 overall · 18-3 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois55–76
- Wvs North Carolina82–78
- Wvs Dayton70–62
- Wvs Saint Joseph's77–64
- Wvs Duquesne71–66
A week or more of rest.