Kia Center · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects VCU 82–74 · win probability VCU 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: VCU has more of the edges
VCU 5, FAU 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: VCU 42.0, FAU 33.3. Allowed: VCU 32.8, FAU 36.2
Turnovers
Turnover rate: VCU 15.1%, FAU 17.6%. Forced: VCU 17.0%, FAU 15.5%
VCU offense vs FAU defense
Offense 65th of 366 against a defense 174th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
VCU hits 36.3% and allows 33.0%; FAU hits 33.3% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 43.8% and 38.2% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: VCU 65%, FAU 17%. Transfers in: VCU 4, FAU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: VCU 31.6%, FAU 31.6%. Defensive: VCU 70.0%, FAU 71.7%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: VCU plays 69.5 a game (147th fastest), FAU 71.1 (71st). Faster games mean more points
Even
FAU offense vs VCU defense
Offense 85th of 366 against a defense 50th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: VCU 53.6 and allows 49.0; FAU 52.2 and allows 49.5
Context
Schedule so far
VCU has played the 88th-hardest schedule, FAU the 101st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | VCU -8.4 | — |
| Total | — | 156.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | VCU 82.3 · FAU 73.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | VCU -5.1 | — |
| 1H total | 73.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | VCU 39 · FAU 33.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
| Date | Game | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 15 | vs CCSU | No recent meeting |
No more games listed yet.
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
VCU 1–0 FAUVCU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · VCU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2021-22 | FAU 46 @ VCU 66 | VCU -10.5 | VCU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
VCU
36 games played
Straight up
28-8
78% wins
Against the spread
18-18
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-20
44% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 103-74 | -25.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 77-80 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 78-61 | -20.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 79-85 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 101-58 | -32.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 78-66 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 74-89 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-68 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-57 | -19.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 78-81 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 84-58 | -30.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 105-83 | -19.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 100-79 | -30.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 89-82 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-80 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 62-71 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 171.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 80-86 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-75 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 79-72 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 77-69 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 89-75 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 63-59 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 99-73 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 77-68 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-67 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 89-75 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 75-88 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-63 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 70-65 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 68-62 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 71-66 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 77-64 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 70-62 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 19 | vs | W 82-78 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 55-76 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WAG
W 103-74
+3.5
7
vs
USU
L 77-80
−0.5
12
vs
SPU
W 78-61
−3.5
17
@
NCSU
L 79-85
+5.5
22
vs
COPP
W 101-58
+10.5
26
vs
USF
W 78-66
+10.5
27
vs
VAN
L 74-89
−8.5
28
vs
VT
W 86-68
+15.5
5
vs
SAM
W 83-57
+6.5
10
vs
UNM
L 78-81
−11.5
15
vs
NIA
W 84-58
−4.5
18
vs
AMER
W 105-83
+2.5
22
vs
RID
W 100-79
−9.5
31
vs
SBU
W 89-82
−2.5
3
@
DUQ
W 93-80
+7.5
7
vs
SLU
L 62-71
−10.5
10
@
GMU
L 80-86
−7.5
14
@
URI
W 84-75
+5.5
19
vs
JOES
W 79-72
−7.5
24
@
DAV
W 75-69
+0.5
27
vs
RICH
W 77-69
−4.5
30
vs
LUC
W 89-75
−4.5
3
@
FOR
W 63-59
−3.5
6
vs
DAY
W 99-73
+17.5
11
@
LAS
W 77-68
−3.5
14
@
RICH
W 78-67
+3.5
17
vs
GW
W 89-75
+7.5
20
@
SLU
L 75-88
−5.5
28
vs
FOR
W 82-63
+6.5
3
vs
GMU
W 70-65
−4.5
6
@
DAY
W 68-62
+7.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 71-66
−1.5
14
vs
JOES
W 77-64
+6.5
15
vs
DAY
W 70-62
+4.5
19
vs
UNC
W 82-78
+6.5
21
vs
ILL
L 55-76
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 18avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WAG
W 103-74
+43.5
7
vs
USU
L 77-80
−6.5
12
vs
SPU
W 78-61
−8.5
17
@
NCSU
L 79-85
−0.5
22
vs
COPP
W 101-58
+7.5
26
vs
USF
W 78-66
−28.5
27
vs
VAN
L 74-89
+1.5
28
vs
VT
W 86-68
+0.5
5
vs
SAM
W 83-57
−14.5
10
vs
UNM
L 78-81
+1.5
15
vs
NIA
W 84-58
−1.5
18
vs
AMER
W 105-83
+33.5
22
vs
RID
W 100-79
+33.5
31
vs
SBU
W 89-82
+13.5
3
@
DUQ
W 93-80
+7.5
7
vs
SLU
L 62-71
−38.5
10
@
GMU
L 80-86
+21.5
14
@
URI
W 84-75
+11.5
19
vs
JOES
W 79-72
−0.5
24
@
DAV
W 75-69
−4.5
27
vs
RICH
W 77-69
−9.5
30
vs
LUC
W 89-75
+13.5
3
@
FOR
W 63-59
−24.5
6
vs
DAY
W 99-73
+24.5
11
@
LAS
W 77-68
−2.5
14
@
RICH
W 78-67
−9.5
17
vs
GW
W 89-75
+2.5
20
@
SLU
L 75-88
−1.5
28
vs
FOR
W 82-63
+0.5
3
vs
GMU
W 70-65
−12.5
6
@
DAY
W 68-62
−16.5
13
vs
DUQ
W 71-66
−16.5
14
vs
JOES
W 77-64
−4.5
15
vs
DAY
W 70-62
−7.5
19
vs
UNC
W 82-78
+9.5
21
vs
ILL
L 55-76
−20.5
over 16under 20avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
FAU
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-78 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-77 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 68-88 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 82-59 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 65-74 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 81-76 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 105-79 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 75-88 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 80-85 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 110-70 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-69 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 89-78 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 85-67 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 79-73 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-92 | +3.5 | L −23.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 75-76 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 73-81 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 81-83 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 60-52 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 72-73 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 77-76 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 70-88 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-74 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+3.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+11.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
−12.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
+15.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
+7.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−6.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+2.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+7.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+0.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+3.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+23.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−6.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
+8.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+9.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
+14.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−5.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−8.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
−23.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−11.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
+1.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
−11.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
+2.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−3.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+1.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
−0.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
−5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
−9.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
+5.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
−2.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+12.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+14.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
+3.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
−13.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
−3.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−11.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+6.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+36.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+17.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+2.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+21.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−23.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
−15.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+14.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
−3.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−2.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−2.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
+4.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−2.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
−8.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
+2.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
−1.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−45.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+4.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
+4.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
+5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
+7.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
−22.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
+7.5
over 17under 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
VCU has the better starters
Position by position: VCU 2, FAU 1, even 2
VCUBetterFAU
G N. Ralph-Beyer TR14.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 61
→FAUSmall
G B. Speed TR15.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 82
G B. Jennings8.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 79
=Even
G J. Hamilton TR17.8 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 93
G N. Lewis8.7 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 79
=Even
G K. Carlyle14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 73
F T. Alston TR13.3 pts · 8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 85
←VCUBig
G M. Charles TR10.5 pts · 4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 32
F L. Djokovic13.2 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 90
←VCUBig
F M. Porter-Brown TR7.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 42
VCUBetterFAU
VCU offense65th of 366 · +2.0
←VCUSmall
FAU defense174th of 366 · -3.9
VCU defense50th of 366 · +2.0
=Even
FAU offense85th of 366 · +0.4
Backcourt+2.2 · 3 players
→FAUSmall
Backcourt+4.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt+5.5 · 2 players
←VCUBig
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench+3.2 · 5 players
←VCUBig
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestVCU betterFAU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Ralph-Beyer31 min · TRB. Jennings25 minN. Lewis24 minB. Harper18 min · TRT. Ward14 minA. Nowell11 min
Forwards
T. Alston30 min · TRL. Djokovic28 minM. Belle22 minJ. Wyche7 min · TRC. RossNewS. PlisnicNew
Guards
B. Speed34 min · TRJ. Hamilton32 min · TRK. Carlyle31 minM. Charles30 min · TRL. Dayco-Green2 minL. Smith1 min
Forwards
M. Porter-Brown20 min · TRJ. HarrisNewM. PuodziukaitisNewD. MusisNew
Centers
K. Mullen6 min · TRT. IfaolaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.8 #50 | Points per game | 77.2 #111 |
| 1.16 #47 | Points per possession | 1.09 #170 |
| 69.5 #147 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #71 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #78 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #135 |
| 36.3 #46 | 3-point % | 33.3 #210 |
| 43.8 #91 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.2 #208 |
| 42.0 #30 | Free throw rate | 33.3 #231 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.1 #70 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #246 |
| 31.6 #139 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.6 #140 |
| 13.9 #158 | Assists per game | 13.0 #210 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.8 #100 | Points allowed | 75.3 #198 |
| 1.04 #66 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #108 |
| 49.0 #69 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #81 |
| 33.0 #125 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #169 |
| 17.0 #151 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #252 |
| 70.0 #162 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.7 #78 |
| 7.3 #99 | Steals per game | 5.7 #272 |
| 4.3 #50 | Blocks per game | 5.3 #11 |
VCU
28-8 in 2025-26 overall · 18-3 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois55–76
- Wvs North Carolina82–78
- Wvs Dayton70–62
- Wvs Saint Joseph's77–64
- Wvs Duquesne71–66
A week or more of rest.
FAU
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Texas70–74
- Wvs Temple63–59
- L@ Wichita St70–88
- Wvs Charlotte77–76
- Wvs Temple77–73
A week or more of rest.