1. NCAAB
  2. Thu, Dec 3
  3. BING @ LEM
NCAAB · Thu, Dec 3

Binghamton Bearcats at Le Moyne Dolphins

Ted Grant Court · at Le Moyne
#272BINGBinghamton
@
#332LEMLe Moyne
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
BINGThis seasonLEM
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects LEM 74–72 · win probability LEM 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: LEM has more of the edges

BING 2, LEM 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
LEMBig
Shooting
Effective FG%: BING 50.0 and allows 54.3; LEM 52.6 and allows 49.3
BINGSmall
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BING 65%, LEM 24%. Transfers in: BING 4, LEM 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: BING plays 66.5 a game (294th fastest), LEM 69.2 (168th). Faster games mean more points
BINGSmall
LEM offense vs BING defense
Offense 333rd of 366 against a defense 273rd, on the model’s ratings
LEMSmall
Home court
LEM at home. This season: LEM 0-0 at home, BING 0-0 away
LEMSmall
Three-pointers
BING hits 32.5% and allows 35.8%; LEM hits 34.3% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 30.9% and 40.8% of their shots
Even
BING offense vs LEM defense
Offense 274th of 366 against a defense 308th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BING 20.9%, LEM 25.2%. Defensive: BING 70.6%, LEM 71.0%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BING 18.7%, LEM 19.1%. Forced: BING 13.3%, LEM 15.0%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BING 41.5, LEM 39.5. Allowed: BING 34.6, LEM 32.7
Context
Schedule so far
BING has played the 350th-hardest schedule, LEM the 344th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—LEM -2.6—
Total—146.0—
Projected score—BING 71.7 · LEM 74.3

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›
ModelActual
1H spreadLEM -1.4—
1H total68.3—
1H projected scoreBING 33.4 · LEM 34.9—
The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Binghamton has the better starters

Position by position: Binghamton 2, Le Moyne 0, even 3
BinghamtonBetterLe Moyne
G J. Quigley14.6 pts · 4.9 reb · 6.3 ast Score 68
No call
G A. Moss10 pts · 7 reb · 5 ast Not ranked
G K. Robinson TR10.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.2 ast Score 40
BINGSmall
G J. Clayville TR6.6 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.3 ast Score 11
G J. Kelsey0 pts · 1 reb · 2 ast Not ranked
No call
G D. King TR4.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.1 ast Score 59
F S. Snagg3.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.3 ast Score 4
Even
F K. Stuckey TR4.4 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.5 ast Score 5
C D. Lilley14.5 pts · 9.2 reb · 0.7 ast Score 51
BINGSmall
F T. Francis TR4.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast Score 27
BinghamtonBetterLe Moyne
BING offense274th of 366 · -8.3
Even
LEM defense308th of 366 · -8.0
BING defense273rd of 366 · -6.9
BINGSmall
LEM offense333rd of 366 · -10.8
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
BINGSmall
Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
BINGSmall
Frontcourt-3.3 · 2 players
Bench-2.8 · 5 players
BINGBig
Bench-6.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBING betterLEM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Binghamton
Guards
J. Quigley37 minK. Robinson26 min · TRJ. Kelsey21 minJ. Blackburn16 minB. Montgomery4 min · TRN. Ibroci3 min
Forwards
S. Snagg20 minD. Godfrey9 min · TRS. SenghoreNew
Centers
D. Lilley33 minJ. Karram4 min · TR
Le Moyne
Guards
A. Moss37 minJ. Clayville20 min · TRD. King14 min · TRJ. Teat14 min · TRK. Williams12 min · TRJ. Lee4 min
Forwards
K. Stuckey19 min · TRT. Francis15 min · TRT. Roe7 minI. BrownNewC. SchreinerNewC. JohnsonNew
Centers
P. Hartman9 min · TR
In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
BINGLEM
Scoring
66.8 #338Points per game72.3 #234
1.00 #328Points per possession1.04 #265
66.5 #294Pace (possessions)69.2 #168
Shooting
50.0 #235Effective FG%52.6 #118
32.5 #2543-point %34.3 #152
30.9 #3403-point attempt rate40.8 #151
41.5 #37Free throw rate39.5 #68
Possessions
18.7 #308Turnover rate19.1 #323
20.9 #361Offensive rebound rate25.2 #337
11.1 #331Assists per game14.0 #149
Defense
76.6 #233Points allowed73.9 #154
1.16 #333Points allowed per possession1.07 #132
54.3 #309Opponent effective FG%49.3 #75
35.8 #294Opponent 3-point %36.0 #303
13.3 #349Turnovers forced15.0 #289
70.6 #128Defensive rebound rate71.0 #107
5.0 #333Steals per game5.5 #300
2.8 #256Blocks per game3.3 #177
From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Binghamton

5-23 in 2025-26 overall · 4-12 in conference · America East Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Wvs Maine74–67
  • Wvs New Hampshire65–63
  • L@ UMass Lowell79–92
  • W@ Bryant79–67
  • Lvs UAlbany74–77

A week or more of rest.

Le Moyne

14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Northeast Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Stonehill71–81
  • L@ New Haven59–66
  • Wvs FDU76–59
  • L@ Stonehill68–77
  • L@ C Connecticut77–78

A week or more of rest.