Merkert Gymnasium · at Stonehill · Conference game
Closing line
LEM -1.5✓ STO covered by 10.5
Closing total137.5Over by 7.5
| This season | STO | |
|---|---|---|
| 13-14 | Record | 7-19 |
| 15-12 | ATS | 13-13 |
| 10-17 | O/U | 7-19 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: LEM 69–68 STO · ✗ LEM (55%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEM | 24 | 44 | 68 |
| STO | 32 | 45 | 77 |
1st half: LEM 24, STO 32 (STO by 8). The model had LEM by 0.9 and a total of 64.2 (actual 56).
Team stats
| LEM | STO | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-54 41% | Field goals | 27-62 44% |
| 8-27 30% | 3-pointers | 6-24 25% |
| 16-24 67% | Free throws | 17-24 71% |
| 33 8 off | Rebounds | 36 10 off |
| 10 | Assists | 13 |
| 3 | Steals | 8 |
| 5 | Blocks | 3 |
| 14 | Turnovers | 6 |
| 19 | Fouls | 20 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 38 |
| 3 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| LEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shilo Jackson F | 40 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 6-12 | 0-0 |
| Deng Garang G | 38 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 7-12 | 3-7 |
| Tennessee Rainwater F | 34 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-3 |
| Trent Mosquera G | 24 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-5 |
| Jakob Blakley G | 17 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-4 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Trevor Roe F | 18 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Eli Greenberg G | 16 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-3 |
| Jakai Sanders G | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
Did not play: Isaac Nyakundi, Josiah Lee, Sam Donnelly, Nate Fouts, Samuel Hincapie, Kaelin Thomas, Ametri Moss
| STO | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chas Stinson G | 37 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-2 |
| Davante Hackett G | 36 | 30 | 6 | 2 | 9-18 | 1-7 |
| Hermann Koffi G | 30 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 4-11 | 2-7 |
| Rex Sunderland G | 27 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Ethan Meuser F | 14 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ridvan Tutic F | 17 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| Raymond Espinal-Guzman F | 15 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Trenton Ruth G | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-2 |
| Anthony Holden G | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
Did not play: Eino Montin, Pearse McGuinn, Charlie Diamantis, Norbu Jenpa, Cory Lovell, Colin Byrne, Will Batchelder
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketLEM -1.5
ModelLEM -1.3
Model edgeSTO +0.2
W STO covered
Total
Market137.5
Model137.0
Model edgeUnder 0.5
L Over
Projected score
LEM 69.2 · STO 67.8
LEM 68 · STO 77
Win probability
LEM 55%
1st half
Spread
LEM -0.9
STO -8.0
Total
64.2
56 points
Projected score
LEM 32.6 · STO 31.6
LEM 24 · STO 32
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLEM -2.5
1 → STO
CloseLEM -1.5
1 pt toward STO
Total
Open136.5
▲ 1
Close137.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
LEM -135 · STO +114
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LEM -2.5 · closed LEM -1.5 · moved 1 toward STOmodel LEM -1.5 matches the line
model LEM -1.5 = line ✓
Opened 136.5 · closed 137.5 · moved 1 upmodel 137
model 137
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 1-9 10% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
LEM 3–2 STOLEM leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · STO has won the last 2 meetings · LEM 2-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2025-26 | STO 65 @ LEM 54 | LEM -2.5 | STO W |
| Mar 1, 2024-25 | LEM 79 @ STO 85 | STO -5.5 | STO W |
| Jan 20, 2024-25 | STO 72 @ LEM 73 | LEM +1.5 | LEM W |
| Feb 17, 2023-24 | STO 67 @ LEM 75 | LEM -9.5 | STO W |
| Feb 8, 2023-24 | LEM 88 @ STO 57 | STO +2.5 | LEM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Le Moyne
27 games played
Straight up
13-14
48% wins
Against the spread
15-12
56% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-17
37% overs · avg +0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 69-74 | +24.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 60-83 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 80-94 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 74-68 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-97 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 76-63 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-79 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 85-96 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 78-63 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 53-95 | +29.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-92 | +21.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 64-72 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 84-58 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 60-74 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 73-47 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 59-69 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 72-57 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 83-77 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 69-67 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 87-74 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 61-83 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 54-65 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 78-79 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 86-84 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 58-57 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 81-63 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 77-78 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
XAV
L 69-74
+19.5
9
@
BGSU
L 60-83
−11.5
13
@
MASS
L 80-94
+2.5
17
vs
NIA
W 74-68
+3.5
22
vs
FAIR
L 83-97
−12.5
28
@
LAF
W 76-63
+17.5
29
vs
MONM
W 83-79
+10.5
30
vs
BALL
L 85-96
−12.5
6
@
BING
W 78-63
+12.5
16
@
TEX
L 53-95
−12.5
20
@
SBU
L 81-92
+10.5
28
@
BC
L 64-72
+4.5
2
@
SFPA
W 84-58
+20.5
4
@
MERC
L 60-74
−11.5
8
vs
NHVN
W 73-47
+20.5
10
vs
CCSU
L 59-69
−11.5
17
@
CHST
W 72-57
+8.5
19
vs
LIU
W 83-77
+7.5
23
vs
WAG
W 69-67
−5.5
26
@
FDU
W 87-74
+14.5
29
@
LIU
L 61-83
−13.5
31
vs
STO
L 54-65
−13.5
5
@
WAG
L 78-79
−2.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 86-84
−5.5
12
vs
MERC
W 58-57
−1.5
14
vs
CHST
W 81-63
+11.5
19
@
CCSU
L 77-78
+7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 12avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
XAV
L 69-74
−13.5
9
@
BGSU
L 60-83
−11.5
13
@
MASS
L 80-94
+20.5
17
vs
NIA
W 74-68
+3.5
22
vs
FAIR
L 83-97
+34.5
28
@
LAF
W 76-63
−12.5
29
vs
MONM
W 83-79
+16.5
30
vs
BALL
L 85-96
+40.5
6
@
BING
W 78-63
−3.5
16
@
TEX
L 53-95
−4.5
20
@
SBU
L 81-92
+21.5
28
@
BC
L 64-72
−10.5
2
@
SFPA
W 84-58
−9.5
4
@
MERC
L 60-74
−7.5
8
vs
NHVN
W 73-47
−17.5
10
vs
CCSU
L 59-69
−18.5
17
@
CHST
W 72-57
−17.5
19
vs
LIU
W 83-77
+9.5
23
vs
WAG
W 69-67
−7.5
26
@
FDU
W 87-74
+21.5
29
@
LIU
L 61-83
−3.5
31
vs
STO
L 54-65
−21.5
5
@
WAG
L 78-79
+18.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 86-84
+16.5
12
vs
MERC
W 58-57
−23.5
14
vs
CHST
W 81-63
−0.5
19
@
CCSU
L 77-78
−10.5
over 10under 17avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Stonehill
26 games played
Straight up
7-19
27% wins
Against the spread
13-13
50% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-19
27% overs · avg −6.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 64-72 | +22.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 57-80 | +16.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 71-73 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 63-74 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 57-96 | +40.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 74-70 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-75 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 62-76 | +15.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 65-77 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 58-59 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 48-77 | +22.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 55-70 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 69-60 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 69-76 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 85-82 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 62-57 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 128.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 61-63 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 63-66 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 61-59 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 58-57 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 65-54 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 58-74 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 54-61 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 55-68 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 131.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-68 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 51-64 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 121.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
DEP
L 64-72
+14.5
11
@
URI
L 57-80
−6.5
14
@
FAIR
L 71-73
+4.5
15
vs
L-MD
L 63-74
−4.5
17
@
ISU
L 57-96
+1.5
21
vs
LAF
W 74-70
+5.5
26
vs
UML
L 64-75
−13.5
30
@
QUIN
L 62-76
+1.5
2
@
BRY
L 65-77
−5.5
17
@
UNH
L 58-59
+2.5
22
@
SYR
L 48-77
−6.5
2
vs
NHVN
L 55-70
−16.5
4
@
WAG
W 69-60
+16.5
8
@
CCSU
L 69-76
+0.5
10
vs
CHST
W 85-82
−1.5
17
@
MERC
W 62-57
+9.5
19
@
SFPA
L 61-63
−0.5
23
vs
LIU
L 63-66
+2.5
26
vs
CCSU
W 61-59
+3.5
29
vs
FDU
W 58-57
−1.5
31
@
LEM
W 65-54
+13.5
5
@
FDU
L 58-74
−14.5
7
@
LIU
L 54-61
+3.5
12
@
CHST
L 55-68
−15.5
14
vs
WAG
L 57-68
−14.5
19
@
NHVN
L 51-64
−10.5
covered 13didn’t cover 13avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
DEP
L 64-72
−11.5
11
@
URI
L 57-80
−14.5
14
@
FAIR
L 71-73
+0.5
15
vs
L-MD
L 63-74
−1.5
17
@
ISU
L 57-96
+6.5
21
vs
LAF
W 74-70
+2.5
26
vs
UML
L 64-75
−9.5
30
@
QUIN
L 62-76
−10.5
2
@
BRY
L 65-77
+7.5
17
@
UNH
L 58-59
−21.5
22
@
SYR
L 48-77
−15.5
2
vs
NHVN
L 55-70
−3.5
4
@
WAG
W 69-60
−10.5
8
@
CCSU
L 69-76
+10.5
10
vs
CHST
W 85-82
+31.5
17
@
MERC
W 62-57
−9.5
19
@
SFPA
L 61-63
−17.5
23
vs
LIU
L 63-66
−8.5
26
vs
CCSU
W 61-59
−15.5
29
vs
FDU
W 58-57
−16.5
31
@
LEM
W 65-54
−21.5
5
@
FDU
L 58-74
+1.5
7
@
LIU
L 54-61
−17.5
12
@
CHST
L 55-68
−8.5
14
vs
WAG
L 57-68
−3.5
19
@
NHVN
L 51-64
−6.5
over 7under 19avg −6.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Le Moyne
13-14 overall · 9-6 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ C Connecticut77–78
- Wvs Chicago St81–63
- Wvs Mercyhurst58–57
- Wvs Saint Francis Red Wolves86–84
- L@ Wagner78–79
2 days since their last game.
Stonehill
7-19 overall · 6-9 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Haven51–64
- Lvs Wagner57–68
- L@ Chicago St55–68
- L@ Long Island54–61
- L@ FDU58–74
2 days since their last game.