Prudential Center · at Seton Hall
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HALL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HALL 80–59 · win probability HALL 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HALL has more of the edges
SIE 1, HALL 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SIE offense vs HALL defense
Offense 309th of 366 against a defense 28th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SIE has played the 320th-hardest schedule, HALL the 55th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: SIE 33.4, HALL 35.3. Allowed: SIE 27.5, HALL 42.1
HALL offense vs SIE defense
Offense 97th of 366 against a defense 194th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
HALL at home. This season: HALL 0-0 at home, SIE 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SIE 15.8%, HALL 16.6%. Forced: SIE 17.0%, HALL 21.5%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: SIE 50.4 and allows 48.5; HALL 47.6 and allows 47.3
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: SIE plays 64.4 a game (354th fastest), HALL 66.5 (296th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SIE 28%, HALL 18%. Transfers in: SIE 1, HALL 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SIE 31.8%, HALL 35.6%. Defensive: SIE 70.5%, HALL 68.1%
Even
Three-pointers
SIE hits 30.6% and allows 32.4%; HALL hits 30.5% and allows 32.4%. Threes are 32.2% and 26.8% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HALL -20.5 | — |
| Total | — | 138.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | SIE 59.1 · HALL 79.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HALL -12.1 | — |
| 1H total | 64.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | SIE 26.4 · HALL 38.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 1-9 10% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
SIE 1–0 HALLSIE leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · SIE 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2022-23 | SIE 60 vs HALL 55 | HALL -14.5 | SIE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Siena
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
21-14
60% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-24
31% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-66 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 62-46 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-75 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 17 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-63 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 73-69 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 70-63 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 59-55 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 64-60 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 83-54 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 129.5 | O 137 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-52 | -17.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 69-83 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 60-81 | +21.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 72-75 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 74-65 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 59-63 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 67-50 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 139.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 80-86 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 74-59 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 85-77 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-50 | -1.5 | W +17.5 | 133.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 82-79 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 128.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 79-72 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 62-74 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 67-63 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 72-63 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 58-72 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 76-61 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 63-58 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-61 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 64-54 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 128.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 65-71 | +28.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
+2.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
+12.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−9.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−0.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
−5.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
+1.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
+1.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−5.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+16.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
+4.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
−11.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
+0.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−4.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+0.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−9.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
+14.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
−14.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
+8.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+1.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
+17.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
−6.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+6.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
−1.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−6.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−15.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
+6.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
−4.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
+3.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−15.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
+0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
+2.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
+13.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
+12.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
+22.5
covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BRY
W 82-66
−0.5
7
@
BRWN
W 62-46
−34.5
12
@
SBU
L 66-75
+0.5
17
vs
COLG
L 69-72
−5.5
21
vs
UALB
W 73-63
−4.5
24
@
HC
W 73-69
+4.5
28
vs
LONG
W 70-63
−12.5
29
@
AMER
W 59-55
−23.5
30
vs
ME
W 64-60
−3.5
5
vs
NIA
W 83-54
+7.5
7
vs
CAN
W 74-52
−5.5
17
@
UVM
L 69-83
+17.5
22
@
IU
L 60-81
−4.5
2
@
IONA
L 72-75
−2.5
4
@
RID
W 74-65
+3.5
9
vs
MRMK
L 59-63
−10.5
11
@
MSM
W 67-50
−22.5
14
vs
SHU
L 80-86
+26.5
17
@
MAN
W 74-59
−11.5
19
vs
FAIR
W 85-77
+19.5
22
vs
MRST
W 69-50
−14.5
30
@
NIA
W 82-79
+32.5
1
@
CAN
W 78-63
+5.5
5
vs
IONA
W 79-72
+10.5
7
@
SPU
L 65-70
−0.5
13
vs
QUIN
L 62-74
−8.5
15
@
MRST
W 67-63
−3.5
20
@
MRMK
L 72-79
+17.5
22
vs
SPU
W 72-63
−0.5
27
@
FAIR
L 58-72
−12.5
1
vs
RID
W 76-61
−0.5
7
vs
MSM
W 63-58
−14.5
8
vs
FAIR
W 76-61
−1.5
10
vs
MRMK
W 64-54
−10.5
19
vs
DUKE
L 65-71
−1.5
over 11under 24avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Seton Hall
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-50 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 68-61 | -21.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 82-59 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 70-58 | -15.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-45 | -25.5 | L −2.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 85-74 | +7.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 81-83 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 75-61 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-61 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 128.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 78-67 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 81-59 | -13.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | @ | W 72-67 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 23 | vs | L 56-64 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 79-73 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 56-54 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 64-69 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-77 | -6.5 | L −17.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 60-65 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 60-67 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 86-68 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 60-72 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 134.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 68-69 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 87-80 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 63-56 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 57-69 | -7.5 | L −19.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 51-47 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | U 98 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-71 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | O 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 77-68 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 65-72 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 13 | @ | L 68-78 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SPU
W 77-50
+13.5
7
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−14.5
10
vs
FAIR
W 82-59
+8.5
13
vs
MONM
W 70-58
−3.5
18
vs
NHVN
W 68-45
−2.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 85-74
+18.5
25
vs
USC
L 81-83
+4.5
26
vs
WSU
W 75-61
+5.5
3
vs
CCSU
W 77-61
−2.5
6
@
KSU
W 78-67
+13.5
13
vs
RUTG
W 81-59
+8.5
19
@
PROV
W 72-67
+6.5
23
vs
VILL
L 56-64
−9.5
30
@
MARQ
W 79-73
+7.5
4
vs
CREI
W 56-54
−1.5
10
@
GTWN
W 76-67
+7.5
13
vs
CONN
L 64-69
+1.5
17
vs
BTLR
L 66-77
−17.5
20
@
SJU
L 60-65
+6.5
24
@
DEP
L 60-67
−9.5
28
vs
XAV
W 86-68
+12.5
31
vs
MARQ
W 69-64
−1.5
4
@
VILL
L 60-72
−6.5
7
@
CREI
L 68-69
+0.5
11
vs
PROV
W 87-80
+2.5
15
@
BTLR
W 63-56
+1.5
18
vs
DEP
L 57-69
−19.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 51-47
−2.5
28
@
CONN
L 67-71
+8.5
3
@
XAV
W 77-68
+7.5
6
vs
SJU
L 65-72
−1.5
12
vs
CREI
W 72-61
+8.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-78
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SPU
W 77-50
−2.5
7
vs
WAG
W 68-61
−5.5
10
vs
FAIR
W 82-59
+3.5
13
vs
MONM
W 70-58
−7.5
18
vs
NHVN
W 68-45
−16.5
24
vs
NCSU
W 85-74
+15.5
25
vs
USC
L 81-83
+18.5
26
vs
WSU
W 75-61
−11.5
3
vs
CCSU
W 77-61
+9.5
6
@
KSU
W 78-67
−3.5
13
vs
RUTG
W 81-59
+3.5
19
@
PROV
W 72-67
−13.5
23
vs
VILL
L 56-64
−15.5
30
@
MARQ
W 79-73
+6.5
4
vs
CREI
W 56-54
−33.5
10
@
GTWN
W 76-67
+5.5
13
vs
CONN
L 64-69
+0.5
17
vs
BTLR
L 66-77
−1.5
20
@
SJU
L 60-65
−20.5
24
@
DEP
L 60-67
−8.5
28
vs
XAV
W 86-68
+8.5
31
vs
MARQ
W 69-64
−10.5
4
@
VILL
L 60-72
−2.5
7
@
CREI
L 68-69
−3.5
11
vs
PROV
W 87-80
+16.5
15
@
BTLR
W 63-56
−19.5
18
vs
DEP
L 57-69
−3.5
21
vs
GTWN
W 51-47
−38.5
28
@
CONN
L 67-71
+7.5
3
@
XAV
W 77-68
+0.5
6
vs
SJU
L 65-72
−1.5
12
vs
CREI
W 72-61
−3.5
13
@
SJU
L 68-78
+10.5
over 13under 20avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Seton Hall has the better starters
Position by position: Siena 0, Seton Hall 3, even 2
SienaBetterSeton Hall
G T. Yildizoglu TR10.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 30
→HALLSmall
G R. Brown TR13.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 59
G B. Coyle8.7 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 17
→HALLBig
G D. Jones TR17.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 74
G I. Henderson3.8 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 12
→HALLBig
G K. Thomas TR15.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 71
G O. Schlager2.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Anderson TR10.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 81
G C. Torres0.5 pts · 0 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Williams TR7.5 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 71
SienaBetterSeton Hall
SIE offense309th of 366 · -9.6
→HALLBig
HALL defense28th of 366 · +3.7
SIE defense194th of 366 · -4.7
→HALLSmall
HALL offense97th of 366 · -0.8
Backcourt-7.7 · 5 players
→HALLBig
Backcourt+2.6 · 4 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+0.9 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSIE betterHALL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Yildizoglu32 min · TRB. Coyle31 minI. Henderson14 minO. Schlager10 minC. Torres3 minR. DucharmeNew
Guards
R. Brown33 min · TRD. Jones33 min · TRK. Thomas30 min · TRR. Anderson24 min · TRE. Fisher21 minS. Wilcher19 min · TR
Forwards
D. Williams24 min · TRM. Wol20 min · TRT. CopelandNewT. AirhienbuwaNewI. DolinskiNew
Centers
A. Fanta Kabba17 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.4 #276 | Points per game | 70.3 #278 |
| 1.09 #154 | Points per possession | 1.06 #238 |
| 64.4 #354 | Pace (possessions) | 66.5 #296 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #222 | Effective FG% | 47.6 #321 |
| 30.6 #330 | 3-point % | 30.5 #334 |
| 32.2 #327 | 3-point attempt rate | 26.8 #362 |
| 33.4 #226 | Free throw rate | 35.3 #168 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #126 | Turnover rate | 16.6 #173 |
| 31.8 #133 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.6 #33 |
| 13.5 #182 | Assists per game | 13.1 #206 |
| Defense | ||
| 65.8 #12 | Points allowed | 65.3 #8 |
| 1.02 #44 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #16 |
| 48.5 #48 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.3 #25 |
| 32.4 #82 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.4 #87 |
| 17.0 #154 | Turnovers forced | 21.5 #5 |
| 70.5 #133 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.1 #251 |
| 5.8 #262 | Steals per game | 9.2 #7 |
| 3.1 #205 | Blocks per game | 5.7 #7 |
Siena
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duke65–71
- Wvs Merrimack64–54
- Wvs Fairfield76–61
- Wvs Mount St Marys63–58
- Wvs Rider76–61
A week or more of rest.
Seton Hall
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-11 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's68–78
- Wvs Creighton72–61
- Lvs St John's65–72
- W@ Xavier77–68
- L@ UConn67–71
A week or more of rest.