Halton Arena · at Charlotte
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CLT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CLT 77–69 · win probability CLT 75%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CLT has more of the edges
GAST 1, CLT 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GAST 15.9%, CLT 18.1%. Forced: GAST 16.4%, CLT 13.6%
Shooting
Effective FG%: GAST 44.2 and allows 50.6; CLT 53.4 and allows 50.9
Context
Schedule so far
GAST has played the 232nd-hardest schedule, CLT the 113th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GAST 27.7%, CLT 33.9%. Defensive: GAST 66.4%, CLT 67.5%
Three-pointers
GAST hits 30.6% and allows 33.1%; CLT hits 35.2% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 42.4% and 45.4% of their shots
GAST offense vs CLT defense
Offense 214th of 366 against a defense 129th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: GAST plays 69.1 a game (176th fastest), CLT 65.5 (331st). Faster games mean more points
Home court
CLT at home. This season: CLT 0-0 at home, GAST 0-0 away
Even
CLT offense vs GAST defense
Offense 164th of 366 against a defense 205th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: GAST 37.2, CLT 36.4. Allowed: GAST 34.9, CLT 36.2
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GAST 4%, CLT 10%. Transfers in: GAST 10, CLT 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CLT -7.7 | — |
| Total | — | 145.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | GAST 68.8 · CLT 76.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CLT -4.5 | — |
| 1H total | 68.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | GAST 31.8 · CLT 36.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
GAST 0–2 CLTCLT leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · CLT has won the last 2 meetings · GAST 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2024-25 | CLT 77 @ GAST 63 | GAST -1.5 | CLT W |
| Nov 25, 2023-24 | GAST 57 @ CLT 65 | CLT -5.5 | CLT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Georgia St
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 49-71 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 64-74 | +29.5 | W +19.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 61-63 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 62-75 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 58-105 | +12.5 | L −34.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 63-78 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 58-77 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 67-78 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 69-92 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 67-90 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 70-63 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 80-84 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 89-71 | +6.5 | W +24.5 | 148.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 50-52 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-57 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-62 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-81 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-74 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 74-75 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 79-81 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 55-78 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 66-64 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-80 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 71-76 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 73-81 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 75-84 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
EMU
L 49-71
−18.5
7
@
CIN
L 64-74
+19.5
10
vs
PRES
L 61-63
−5.5
17
@
ASU
L 62-75
+5.5
21
@
SDST
L 58-105
−34.5
25
vs
SAM
L 63-78
−9.5
26
vs
NMSU
L 58-77
−6.5
2
@
MER
L 67-78
−0.5
6
@
KENN
L 69-92
−8.5
13
vs
JXST
W 77-73
+7.5
18
@
GASO
L 67-90
−13.5
20
@
APP
W 70-63
+14.5
31
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+9.5
3
@
CCU
W 89-71
+24.5
8
vs
APP
L 50-52
−0.5
10
vs
MRSH
W 81-73
+12.5
17
@
ULM
W 77-57
+13.5
22
vs
USM
W 69-62
+5.5
24
vs
ARST
W 82-81
+5.5
29
@
UL
L 72-82
−11.5
31
@
USA
L 67-69
+3.5
4
vs
TROY
L 63-74
−4.5
7
vs
NIU
L 74-75
−5.5
12
@
JMU
L 79-81
+3.5
14
@
ODU
L 55-78
−19.5
19
vs
GASO
W 66-64
+3.5
21
vs
JMU
L 65-80
−12.5
24
vs
CCU
L 71-76
−3.5
27
vs
ODU
L 73-81
−6.5
3
vs
UL
L 75-84
−10.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
EMU
L 49-71
−29.5
7
@
CIN
L 64-74
−13.5
10
vs
PRES
L 61-63
−17.5
17
@
ASU
L 62-75
−8.5
21
@
SDST
L 58-105
+19.5
25
vs
SAM
L 63-78
−5.5
26
vs
NMSU
L 58-77
−1.5
2
@
MER
L 67-78
−10.5
6
@
KENN
L 69-92
+2.5
13
vs
JXST
W 77-73
+10.5
18
@
GASO
L 67-90
−2.5
20
@
APP
W 70-63
−4.5
31
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+12.5
3
@
CCU
W 89-71
+11.5
8
vs
APP
L 50-52
−38.5
10
vs
MRSH
W 81-73
+0.5
17
@
ULM
W 77-57
−21.5
22
vs
USM
W 69-62
−13.5
24
vs
ARST
W 82-81
+5.5
29
@
UL
L 72-82
+24.5
31
@
USA
L 67-69
−4.5
4
vs
TROY
L 63-74
−7.5
7
vs
NIU
L 74-75
+5.5
12
@
JMU
L 79-81
+15.5
14
@
ODU
L 55-78
−14.5
19
vs
GASO
W 66-64
−24.5
21
vs
JMU
L 65-80
+2.5
24
vs
CCU
L 71-76
+5.5
27
vs
ODU
L 73-81
+4.5
3
vs
UL
L 75-84
+24.5
over 14under 16avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Charlotte
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +3.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 92-76 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 70-65 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 55-62 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 76-84 | +18.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 63-65 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 69-79 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 74-57 | -7.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 81-67 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 73-76 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 104-100 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 74-58 | -6.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 74-73 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 74-86 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 73-70 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 73-70 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 80-76 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 64-74 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 54-77 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 79-88 | -13.5 | L −22.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 74-79 | +12.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 68-56 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 80-79 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 76-77 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 74-80 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 60-83 | +17.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 74-60 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 83-78 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-86 | +15.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
INST
W 92-76
+11.5
7
vs
TNTC
W 70-65
−7.5
11
vs
DAV
L 55-62
−8.5
16
@
VT
L 76-84
+10.5
21
@
APP
L 63-65
−0.5
27
vs
ILST
L 69-79
−4.5
28
vs
RICH
L 66-71
+1.5
2
vs
NCAT
W 74-57
+9.5
7
vs
USU
L 53-79
−15.5
14
@
COFC
L 67-74
−1.5
18
vs
LAF
W 81-67
+2.5
21
vs
UIC
W 88-76
+10.5
30
vs
TEM
L 73-76
−4.5
3
vs
WICH
W 104-100
+9.5
7
@
UTSA
W 74-58
+9.5
11
@
RICE
W 74-73
−0.5
14
vs
TLSA
L 74-86
−8.5
18
@
ECU
W 73-70
+4.5
23
vs
TULN
W 73-70
+0.5
28
@
TEM
W 80-76
+8.5
30
vs
RICE
W 80-70
+5.5
4
@
WICH
L 64-74
−0.5
8
@
MEM
L 54-77
−12.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-88
−22.5
18
@
TLSA
L 74-79
+7.5
21
vs
ECU
W 68-56
+7.5
25
vs
UNT
W 80-79
+3.5
1
@
FAU
L 76-77
+5.5
4
vs
UAB
L 74-80
−3.5
8
@
USF
L 60-83
−5.5
12
vs
TULN
W 74-60
+12.5
13
vs
UAB
W 83-78
+10.5
14
vs
USF
L 64-86
−6.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
INST
W 92-76
+15.5
7
vs
TNTC
W 70-65
−11.5
11
vs
DAV
L 55-62
−26.5
16
@
VT
L 76-84
+14.5
21
@
APP
L 63-65
−4.5
27
vs
ILST
L 69-79
+8.5
28
vs
RICH
L 66-71
−4.5
2
vs
NCAT
W 74-57
−13.5
7
vs
USU
L 53-79
−7.5
14
@
COFC
L 67-74
+0.5
18
vs
LAF
W 81-67
+10.5
21
vs
UIC
W 88-76
+26.5
30
vs
TEM
L 73-76
+10.5
3
vs
WICH
W 104-100
+63.5
7
@
UTSA
W 74-58
−13.5
11
@
RICE
W 74-73
+9.5
14
vs
TLSA
L 74-86
+13.5
18
@
ECU
W 73-70
+3.5
23
vs
TULN
W 73-70
−0.5
28
@
TEM
W 80-76
+16.5
30
vs
RICE
W 80-70
+8.5
4
@
WICH
L 64-74
−5.5
8
@
MEM
L 54-77
−13.5
15
vs
UTSA
L 79-88
+18.5
18
@
TLSA
L 74-79
+1.5
21
vs
ECU
W 68-56
−21.5
25
vs
UNT
W 80-79
+25.5
1
@
FAU
L 76-77
+5.5
4
vs
UAB
L 74-80
+7.5
8
@
USF
L 60-83
−13.5
12
vs
TULN
W 74-60
−10.5
13
vs
UAB
W 83-78
+13.5
14
vs
USF
L 64-86
−3.5
over 19under 14avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Charlotte has the better starters
Position by position: Georgia St 1, Charlotte 2, even 2
Georgia StBetterCharlotte
G J. Jackson TR12.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 51
→CLTSmall
G D. Finister TR14.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 84
G J. Meyer TR12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 51
=Even
G K. Tillery TR3.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 63
G E. Parnell TR11 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 40
→CLTSmall
F D. Grant TR9.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 71
F T. Dixon TR9.3 pts · 4.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 75
←GASTBig
F A. Conyers7.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 37
F J. Sirtautas TR5.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
=Even
F J. Fort TR3.3 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 49
Georgia StBetterCharlotte
GAST offense214th of 366 · -6.5
→CLTSmall
CLT defense129th of 366 · -2.3
GAST defense205th of 366 · -5.0
=Even
CLT offense164th of 366 · -5.0
Backcourt-2.3 · 3 players
→CLTBig
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.3 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.1 · 3 players
Bench-3.7 · 5 players
→CLTSmall
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestGAST betterCLT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Jackson33 min · TRJ. Meyer29 min · TRE. Parnell26 min · TRZ. Wilburn17 min · TRA. Smith15 min · TRD. Thomas14 min · TR
Forwards
T. Dixon22 min · TRJ. Sirtautas20 min · TRJ. Fredson-Cole19 min · TRO. WilsonNewK. JacksonNew
Centers
M. Nicholson4 min · TR
Guards
D. Finister33 min · TRK. Tillery12 min · TRJ. Rodriguez-Stegemeijer8 min · TRR. EvansNewF. OgucheNewL. BarnesNew
Forwards
D. Grant24 min · TRA. Conyers20 minJ. Fort14 min · TRT. McKinley12 min · TRM. AllenNew
Centers
P. Marshall11 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.4 #307 | Points per game | 73.0 #225 |
| 0.99 #335 | Points per possession | 1.12 #105 |
| 69.1 #176 | Pace (possessions) | 65.5 #331 |
| Shooting | ||
| 44.2 #362 | Effective FG% | 53.4 #86 |
| 30.6 #329 | 3-point % | 35.2 #101 |
| 42.4 #129 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.4 #58 |
| 37.2 #124 | Free throw rate | 36.4 #140 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #132 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #278 |
| 27.7 #278 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.9 #71 |
| 11.1 #334 | Assists per game | 12.9 #217 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.4 #203 | Points allowed | 74.3 #164 |
| 1.09 #202 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #291 |
| 50.6 #135 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.9 #152 |
| 33.1 #132 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #153 |
| 16.4 #197 | Turnovers forced | 13.6 #345 |
| 66.4 #312 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.5 #283 |
| 6.7 #149 | Steals per game | 4.5 #353 |
| 3.0 #212 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #150 |
Georgia St
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana75–84
- Lvs Old Dominion73–81
- Lvs Coastal71–76
- Lvs James Madison65–80
- Wvs GA Southern66–64
A week or more of rest.
Charlotte
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs South Florida64–86
- Wvs UAB83–78
- Wvs Tulane74–60
- L@ South Florida60–83
- Lvs UAB74–80
A week or more of rest.