Save Mart Center · at Fresno St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FRES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FRES 77–70 · win probability FRES 74%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FRES has more of the edges
GAST 0, FRES 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
GAST has played the 232nd-hardest schedule, FRES the 103rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
GAST hits 30.6% and allows 33.1%; FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 42.4% and 40.9% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GAST 27.7%, FRES 27.9%. Defensive: GAST 66.4%, FRES 69.4%
Shooting
Effective FG%: GAST 44.2 and allows 50.6; FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5
Home court
FRES at home. This season: FRES 0-0 at home, GAST 0-0 away
Even
FRES offense vs GAST defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 205th, on the model’s ratings
Even
GAST offense vs FRES defense
Offense 214th of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: GAST 37.2, FRES 33.8. Allowed: GAST 34.9, FRES 28.6
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GAST 15.9%, FRES 18.1%. Forced: GAST 16.4%, FRES 18.2%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: GAST plays 69.1 a game (176th fastest), FRES 69.3 (156th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GAST 4%, FRES 0%. Transfers in: GAST 10, FRES 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FRES -7.2 | — |
| Total | — | 146.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | GAST 69.8 · FRES 77 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FRES -4.2 | — |
| 1H total | 68.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | GAST 32.2 · FRES 36.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Georgia St
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 49-71 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 149.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 64-74 | +29.5 | W +19.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 61-63 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 62-75 | +18.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 58-105 | +12.5 | L −34.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 63-78 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 58-77 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 67-78 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 69-92 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 67-90 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 70-63 | +7.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 80-84 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 89-71 | +6.5 | W +24.5 | 148.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 50-52 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 77-57 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 69-62 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-81 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-74 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 74-75 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 79-81 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 55-78 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 66-64 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 65-80 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 71-76 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 73-81 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 75-84 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
EMU
L 49-71
−18.5
7
@
CIN
L 64-74
+19.5
10
vs
PRES
L 61-63
−5.5
17
@
ASU
L 62-75
+5.5
21
@
SDST
L 58-105
−34.5
25
vs
SAM
L 63-78
−9.5
26
vs
NMSU
L 58-77
−6.5
2
@
MER
L 67-78
−0.5
6
@
KENN
L 69-92
−8.5
13
vs
JXST
W 77-73
+7.5
18
@
GASO
L 67-90
−13.5
20
@
APP
W 70-63
+14.5
31
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+9.5
3
@
CCU
W 89-71
+24.5
8
vs
APP
L 50-52
−0.5
10
vs
MRSH
W 81-73
+12.5
17
@
ULM
W 77-57
+13.5
22
vs
USM
W 69-62
+5.5
24
vs
ARST
W 82-81
+5.5
29
@
UL
L 72-82
−11.5
31
@
USA
L 67-69
+3.5
4
vs
TROY
L 63-74
−4.5
7
vs
NIU
L 74-75
−5.5
12
@
JMU
L 79-81
+3.5
14
@
ODU
L 55-78
−19.5
19
vs
GASO
W 66-64
+3.5
21
vs
JMU
L 65-80
−12.5
24
vs
CCU
L 71-76
−3.5
27
vs
ODU
L 73-81
−6.5
3
vs
UL
L 75-84
−10.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
EMU
L 49-71
−29.5
7
@
CIN
L 64-74
−13.5
10
vs
PRES
L 61-63
−17.5
17
@
ASU
L 62-75
−8.5
21
@
SDST
L 58-105
+19.5
25
vs
SAM
L 63-78
−5.5
26
vs
NMSU
L 58-77
−1.5
2
@
MER
L 67-78
−10.5
6
@
KENN
L 69-92
+2.5
13
vs
JXST
W 77-73
+10.5
18
@
GASO
L 67-90
−2.5
20
@
APP
W 70-63
−4.5
31
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+12.5
3
@
CCU
W 89-71
+11.5
8
vs
APP
L 50-52
−38.5
10
vs
MRSH
W 81-73
+0.5
17
@
ULM
W 77-57
−21.5
22
vs
USM
W 69-62
−13.5
24
vs
ARST
W 82-81
+5.5
29
@
UL
L 72-82
+24.5
31
@
USA
L 67-69
−4.5
4
vs
TROY
L 63-74
−7.5
7
vs
NIU
L 74-75
+5.5
12
@
JMU
L 79-81
+15.5
14
@
ODU
L 55-78
−14.5
19
vs
GASO
W 66-64
−24.5
21
vs
JMU
L 65-80
+2.5
24
vs
CCU
L 71-76
+5.5
27
vs
ODU
L 73-81
+4.5
3
vs
UL
L 75-84
+24.5
over 14under 16avg −2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Georgia St 1, Fresno St 1, even 3
Georgia StBetterFresno St
G J. Jackson TR12.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 51
=No call
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
G J. Meyer TR12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 51
→FRESSmall
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
G E. Parnell TR11 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 40
=Even
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
F T. Dixon TR9.3 pts · 4.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 75
←GASTBig
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
F J. Sirtautas TR5.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
=No call
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
Georgia StBetterFresno St
GAST offense214th of 366 · -6.5
=Even
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
GAST defense205th of 366 · -5.0
=Even
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
Backcourt-2.3 · 3 players
→FRESBig
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.3 · 2 players
←GASTSmall
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
Bench-3.7 · 5 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestGAST betterFRES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Jackson33 min · TRJ. Meyer29 min · TRE. Parnell26 min · TRZ. Wilburn17 min · TRA. Smith15 min · TRD. Thomas14 min · TR
Forwards
T. Dixon22 min · TRJ. Sirtautas20 min · TRJ. Fredson-Cole19 min · TRO. WilsonNewK. JacksonNew
Centers
M. Nicholson4 min · TR
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.4 #307 | Points per game | 72.3 #233 |
| 0.99 #335 | Points per possession | 1.04 #266 |
| 69.1 #176 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #156 |
| Shooting | ||
| 44.2 #362 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #206 |
| 30.6 #329 | 3-point % | 32.1 #274 |
| 42.4 #129 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #146 |
| 37.2 #124 | Free throw rate | 33.8 #218 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.9 #132 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #277 |
| 27.7 #278 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.9 #272 |
| 11.1 #334 | Assists per game | 12.6 #247 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.4 #203 | Points allowed | 73.5 #142 |
| 1.09 #202 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #110 |
| 50.6 #135 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #184 |
| 33.1 #132 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #30 |
| 16.4 #197 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #88 |
| 66.4 #312 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #183 |
| 6.7 #149 | Steals per game | 6.7 #154 |
| 3.0 #212 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #331 |
Georgia St
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana75–84
- Lvs Old Dominion73–81
- Lvs Coastal71–76
- Lvs James Madison65–80
- Wvs GA Southern66–64
A week or more of rest.
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.