Save Mart Center · at Fresno St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FRES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FRES 79–69 · win probability FRES 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FRES has more of the edges
UCR 0, FRES 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FRES offense vs UCR defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 296th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: UCR 35.0, FRES 33.8. Allowed: UCR 40.9, FRES 28.6
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UCR 19.0%, FRES 18.1%. Forced: UCR 15.5%, FRES 18.2%
Context
Schedule so far
UCR has played the 182nd-hardest schedule, FRES the 103rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
UCR hits 31.6% and allows 33.5%; FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%. Threes are 38.3% and 40.9% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: UCR 48.9 and allows 52.7; FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5
UCR offense vs FRES defense
Offense 265th of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
FRES at home. This season: FRES 0-0 at home, UCR 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UCR plays 71.0 a game (74th fastest), FRES 69.3 (156th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UCR 21%, FRES 0%. Transfers in: UCR 5, FRES 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UCR 27.8%, FRES 27.9%. Defensive: UCR 70.0%, FRES 69.4%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FRES -10.1 | — |
| Total | — | 148.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | UCR 69 · FRES 79.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FRES -5.9 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UCR 31.7 · FRES 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UC Riverside
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | W 74-70 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-82 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-80 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 85-71 | +7.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 83-74 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 69-77 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 60-73 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 53-100 | +33.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 78-92 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 65-97 | +24.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 45-88 | +8.5 | L −34.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 66-67 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 66-69 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 73-88 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 81-72 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 66-80 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-74 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 71-61 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 87-94 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 72-78 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-88 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-72 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 93-65 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-78 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-70 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 95-84 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 74-93 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
UND
W 74-70
+5.5
11
@
UNM
L 68-82
+5.5
15
vs
UND
L 74-76
−5.5
18
@
CBU
L 57-80
−10.5
21
@
USD
W 85-71
+21.5
24
vs
GRAM
W 83-74
+5.5
29
@
UTU
L 69-77
−2.5
4
@
UCI
L 60-73
+0.5
6
@
CP
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
BYU
L 53-100
−13.5
20
@
STMN
L 78-92
+0.5
23
@
UCLA
L 65-97
−7.5
1
vs
HAW
L 45-88
−34.5
8
@
CSUB
L 66-67
+2.5
10
vs
UCSD
L 66-69
+7.5
15
@
LBSU
L 73-88
−9.5
17
vs
CSUF
W 81-72
+12.5
22
vs
UCI
L 66-80
−5.5
24
@
UCD
L 66-74
+1.5
29
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
+11.5
31
vs
CP
L 87-94
−8.5
5
@
CSUF
L 72-78
−0.5
7
@
CSUN
L 74-88
−3.5
12
vs
UCSB
L 68-76
−1.5
14
@
UCSD
L 66-72
+5.5
19
vs
CSUB
W 93-65
+21.5
21
vs
UCD
L 73-78
−2.5
26
@
UCSB
L 59-70
−0.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 95-84
+15.5
5
@
HAW
L 74-93
−6.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
UND
W 74-70
−2.5
11
@
UNM
L 68-82
+8.5
15
vs
UND
L 74-76
+1.5
18
@
CBU
L 57-80
−5.5
21
@
USD
W 85-71
+3.5
24
vs
GRAM
W 83-74
+12.5
29
@
UTU
L 69-77
+0.5
4
@
UCI
L 60-73
−9.5
6
@
CP
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
BYU
L 53-100
−2.5
20
@
STMN
L 78-92
+17.5
23
@
UCLA
L 65-97
+13.5
1
vs
HAW
L 45-88
−16.5
8
@
CSUB
L 66-67
−14.5
10
vs
UCSD
L 66-69
−14.5
15
@
LBSU
L 73-88
+19.5
17
vs
CSUF
W 81-72
−4.5
22
vs
UCI
L 66-80
+3.5
24
@
UCD
L 66-74
−9.5
29
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
−12.5
31
vs
CP
L 87-94
+18.5
5
@
CSUF
L 72-78
−6.5
7
@
CSUN
L 74-88
+1.5
12
vs
UCSB
L 68-76
−1.5
14
@
UCSD
L 66-72
−9.5
19
vs
CSUB
W 93-65
+7.5
21
vs
UCD
L 73-78
+1.5
26
@
UCSB
L 59-70
−16.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 95-84
+20.5
5
@
HAW
L 74-93
+16.5
over 16under 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: UC Riverside 1, Fresno St 1, even 3
UC RiversideBetterFresno St
G D. Perteete6.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
=No call
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
G J. Evans TR5.8 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 25
→FRESBig
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
G B. Waller4.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
=Even
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
G D. Malcolm TR5.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 87
←UCRBig
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
F D. Washington TR2.7 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 0
=No call
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
UC RiversideBetterFresno St
UCR offense265th of 366 · -8.1
→FRESSmall
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
UCR defense296th of 366 · -7.4
→FRESSmall
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
Backcourt-2.7 · 4 players
→FRESBig
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
→FRESSmall
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
Bench+0.3 · 2 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestUCR betterFRES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Perteete28 minJ. Evans15 min · TRB. Waller14 minD. Malcolm14 min · TRT. Duckett7 min · TRE. ReaganNew
Forwards
D. Washington11 min · TRT. Parrish-TillmanNewA. McKinneyNewJ. MajokNew
Centers
A. Oyeadier2 min · TR
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.6 #258 | Points per game | 72.3 #233 |
| 1.01 #317 | Points per possession | 1.04 #266 |
| 71.0 #74 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #156 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.9 #291 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #206 |
| 31.6 #301 | 3-point % | 32.1 #274 |
| 38.3 #203 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.9 #146 |
| 35.0 #177 | Free throw rate | 33.8 #218 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.0 #321 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #277 |
| 27.8 #275 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.9 #272 |
| 12.3 #262 | Assists per game | 12.6 #247 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.1 #303 | Points allowed | 73.5 #142 |
| 1.11 #256 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #110 |
| 52.7 #252 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #184 |
| 33.5 #159 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.7 #30 |
| 15.5 #250 | Turnovers forced | 18.2 #88 |
| 70.0 #159 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #183 |
| 5.1 #325 | Steals per game | 6.7 #154 |
| 4.1 #67 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #331 |
UC Riverside
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-15 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Hawai'i74–93
- Wvs CSU Northridge95–84
- L@ Santa Barbara59–70
- Lvs UC Davis73–78
- Wvs Bakersfield93–65
A week or more of rest.
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.