Provident Credit Union Event Center · at San José St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SJSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SJSU 76–72 · win probability SJSU 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
FRES 4, SJSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5; SJSU 49.7 and allows 57.1
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FRES 18.1%, SJSU 15.1%. Forced: FRES 18.2%, SJSU 17.4%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: FRES plays 69.3 a game (156th fastest), SJSU 66.0 (315th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: FRES 33.8, SJSU 33.4. Allowed: FRES 28.6, SJSU 35.4
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FRES 27.9%, SJSU 29.3%. Defensive: FRES 69.4%, SJSU 63.5%
Home court
SJSU at home. This season: SJSU 0-0 at home, FRES 0-0 away
Three-pointers
FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%; SJSU hits 35.3% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 40.9% and 38.3% of their shots
SJSU offense vs FRES defense
Offense 141st of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FRES 0%, SJSU 24%. Transfers in: FRES 5, SJSU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
FRES offense vs SJSU defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 151st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
FRES has played the 103rd-hardest schedule, SJSU the 85th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SJSU -3.7 | — |
| Total | — | 148.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | FRES 72.1 · SJSU 75.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SJSU -2.1 | — |
| 1H total | 69.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | FRES 33.6 · SJSU 35.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 9-1 90% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
FRES 8–3 SJSUFRES leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · FRES has won the last 2 meetings · FRES 8-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2025-26 | SJSU 68 @ FRES 82 | FRES -7.5 | FRES W |
| Jan 6, 2025-26 | FRES 70 @ SJSU 55 | SJSU +1.5 | FRES W |
| Mar 8, 2024-25 | FRES 68 @ SJSU 92 | SJSU -6.5 | SJSU W |
| Feb 4, 2024-25 | SJSU 94 @ FRES 91 | FRES +3.5 | FRES W |
| Feb 6, 2023-24 | FRES 69 @ SJSU 57 | SJSU -2.5 | FRES W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
San José St
32 games played
Straight up
8-24
25% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-11
66% overs · avg +5.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 75-84 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 74-85 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 60-79 | +24.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-66 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 51-81 | +5.5 | L −24.5 | 149.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 63-51 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 86-69 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 89-83 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 82-86 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 65-88 | +16.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 68-81 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 78-96 | +22.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 55-70 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 58-76 | +16.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 70-62 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 62-76 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 54-87 | +16.5 | L −16.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 62-66 | +13.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 58-89 | +12.5 | L −18.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 80-90 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-65 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 75-82 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 79-94 | +11.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 87-71 | +10.5 | W +26.5 | 141.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 69-84 | +18.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 86-80 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 73-85 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 68-82 | +7.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 78-88 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 84-74 | +14.5 | W +24.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 77-93 | +16.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UTAH
L 75-84
+2.5
8
@
UCSB
L 74-85
−1.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-79
+5.5
21
vs
SOU
W 80-66
+8.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 51-81
−24.5
26
vs
LUC
W 63-51
+10.5
30
vs
UCI
L 63-72
−5.5
5
vs
USD
W 86-69
+10.5
9
vs
LBSU
W 89-83
−1.5
13
vs
STAN
L 82-86
+4.5
20
@
UNM
L 65-88
−6.5
30
vs
SDSU
L 68-81
−1.5
3
@
USU
L 78-96
+4.5
6
vs
FRES
L 55-70
−13.5
10
@
GCU
L 58-76
−1.5
13
vs
AF
W 70-62
+2.5
17
vs
UNLV
L 62-76
−6.5
20
@
NEV
L 54-87
−16.5
24
@
WYO
L 62-66
+9.5
27
vs
BOIS
L 58-89
−18.5
31
vs
UNM
L 80-90
+5.5
7
@
CSU
L 57-65
+7.5
10
@
UNLV
L 75-82
+5.5
14
vs
GCU
L 79-94
−3.5
17
vs
NEV
W 87-71
+26.5
21
@
BOIS
L 69-84
+3.5
24
@
AF
W 86-80
−0.5
28
vs
CSU
L 73-85
−7.5
3
@
FRES
L 68-82
−6.5
7
vs
WYO
L 78-88
−3.5
11
vs
BOIS
W 84-74
+24.5
12
vs
UNM
L 77-93
+0.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UTAH
L 75-84
+12.5
8
@
UCSB
L 74-85
+12.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-79
−4.5
21
vs
SOU
W 80-66
−4.5
25
vs
TLSA
L 51-81
−17.5
26
vs
LUC
W 63-51
−22.5
30
vs
UCI
L 63-72
−4.5
5
vs
USD
W 86-69
+10.5
9
vs
LBSU
W 89-83
+30.5
13
vs
STAN
L 82-86
+22.5
20
@
UNM
L 65-88
+0.5
30
vs
SDSU
L 68-81
+7.5
3
@
USU
L 78-96
+22.5
6
vs
FRES
L 55-70
−24.5
10
@
GCU
L 58-76
−7.5
13
vs
AF
W 70-62
+3.5
17
vs
UNLV
L 62-76
−8.5
20
@
NEV
L 54-87
+3.5
24
@
WYO
L 62-66
−13.5
27
vs
BOIS
L 58-89
+5.5
31
vs
UNM
L 80-90
+21.5
7
@
CSU
L 57-65
−16.5
10
@
UNLV
L 75-82
+7.5
14
vs
GCU
L 79-94
+33.5
17
vs
NEV
W 87-71
+16.5
21
@
BOIS
L 69-84
+6.5
24
@
AF
W 86-80
+20.5
28
vs
CSU
L 73-85
+6.5
3
@
FRES
L 68-82
−1.5
7
vs
WYO
L 78-88
+17.5
11
vs
BOIS
W 84-74
+11.5
12
vs
UNM
L 77-93
+15.5
over 21under 11avg +5.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Fresno St 0, San José St 0, even 5
Fresno StBetterSan José St
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G P. Goodarzi8.2 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 35
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
=No call
G J. Hannah7.5 pts · 1 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
=No call
F Z. Eddine Bedri TR12.8 pts · 7.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Not ranked
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
=No call
F R. Vaihola TR5 pts · 7.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Not ranked
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F M. Cook TR7.5 pts · 4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 61
Fresno StBetterSan José St
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
=Even
SJSU defense151st of 366 · -3.3
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
=Even
SJSU offense141st of 366 · -4.3
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
←FRESBig
Backcourt-1.8 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
→SJSUBig
Frontcourt+2.3 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench+1.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestFRES betterSJSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Guards
P. Goodarzi26 minJ. Hannah22 minM. Mason20 min · TRJ. Chammaa17 min · TRR. GreenNewC. KruegerNew
Forwards
Z. Eddine Bedri24 min · TRR. Vaihola21 min · TRM. Cook21 min · TRK. Martin8 min · TRL. HowardNew
Centers
M. Dau NyangolNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.3 #233 | Points per game | 70.8 #269 |
| 1.04 #266 | Points per possession | 1.07 #203 |
| 69.3 #156 | Pace (possessions) | 66.0 #315 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #206 | Effective FG% | 49.7 #255 |
| 32.1 #274 | 3-point % | 35.3 #97 |
| 40.9 #146 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #204 |
| 33.8 #218 | Free throw rate | 33.4 #225 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #277 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #77 |
| 27.9 #272 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.3 #225 |
| 12.6 #247 | Assists per game | 10.3 #353 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.5 #142 | Points allowed | 79.2 #305 |
| 1.06 #110 | Points allowed per possession | 1.20 #359 |
| 51.5 #184 | Opponent effective FG% | 57.1 #359 |
| 30.7 #30 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #305 |
| 18.2 #88 | Turnovers forced | 17.4 #123 |
| 69.4 #183 | Defensive rebound rate | 63.5 #354 |
| 6.7 #154 | Steals per game | 5.8 #259 |
| 2.2 #331 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #333 |
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.
San José St
8-24 in 2025-26 overall · 4-18 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs New Mexico77–93
- Wvs Boise St84–74
- Lvs Wyoming78–88
- L@ Fresno St68–82
- Lvs Colorado St73–85
A week or more of rest.