Bren Events Center · at UC Irvine · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCI 78–67 · win probability UCI 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UCI has more of the edges
UCR 0, UCI 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UCR 35.0, UCI 36.0. Allowed: UCR 40.9, UCI 26.7
UCR offense vs UCI defense
Offense 265th of 366 against a defense 126th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: UCR 48.9 and allows 52.7; UCI 49.5 and allows 45.9
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UCR 19.0%, UCI 17.8%. Forced: UCR 15.5%, UCI 18.8%
UCI offense vs UCR defense
Offense 187th of 366 against a defense 296th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UCI at home. This season: UCI 0-0 at home, UCR 0-0 away
Three-pointers
UCR hits 31.6% and allows 33.5%; UCI hits 33.6% and allows 33.7%. Threes are 38.3% and 28.0% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UCR 21%, UCI 44%. Transfers in: UCR 5, UCI 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
UCR has played the 182nd-hardest schedule, UCI the 215th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UCR 27.8%, UCI 30.9%. Defensive: UCR 70.0%, UCI 68.8%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: UCR plays 71.0 a game (74th fastest), UCI 71.5 (51st). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UCI -11.3 | — |
| Total | — | 145.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | UCR 67 · UCI 78.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UCI -6.6 | — |
| 1H total | 68.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | UCR 30.7 · UCI 37.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
UCR 2–8 UCIUCI leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · UCI has won the last 2 meetings · UCR 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2025-26 | UCI 80 @ UCR 66 | UCR +8.5 | UCI W |
| Dec 4, 2025-26 | UCR 60 @ UCI 73 | UCI -13.5 | UCR W |
| Jan 23, 2024-25 | UCI 80 @ UCR 84 | UCR +6.5 | UCR W |
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | UCR 57 @ UCI 81 | UCI -8.5 | UCI W |
| Feb 10, 2023-24 | UCI 78 @ UCR 88 | UCR +8.5 | UCR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UC Riverside
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | W 74-70 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-82 | +19.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-80 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 85-71 | +7.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 83-74 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 69-77 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 60-73 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 53-100 | +33.5 | L −13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 78-92 | +14.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 65-97 | +24.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 45-88 | +8.5 | L −34.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 66-67 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 66-69 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 73-88 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 81-72 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 66-80 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 66-74 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 71-61 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 87-94 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 72-78 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-88 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 160.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 68-76 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 66-72 | +11.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 93-65 | -6.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 73-78 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 59-70 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 95-84 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 74-93 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
UND
W 74-70
+5.5
11
@
UNM
L 68-82
+5.5
15
vs
UND
L 74-76
−5.5
18
@
CBU
L 57-80
−10.5
21
@
USD
W 85-71
+21.5
24
vs
GRAM
W 83-74
+5.5
29
@
UTU
L 69-77
−2.5
4
@
UCI
L 60-73
+0.5
6
@
CP
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
BYU
L 53-100
−13.5
20
@
STMN
L 78-92
+0.5
23
@
UCLA
L 65-97
−7.5
1
vs
HAW
L 45-88
−34.5
8
@
CSUB
L 66-67
+2.5
10
vs
UCSD
L 66-69
+7.5
15
@
LBSU
L 73-88
−9.5
17
vs
CSUF
W 81-72
+12.5
22
vs
UCI
L 66-80
−5.5
24
@
UCD
L 66-74
+1.5
29
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
+11.5
31
vs
CP
L 87-94
−8.5
5
@
CSUF
L 72-78
−0.5
7
@
CSUN
L 74-88
−3.5
12
vs
UCSB
L 68-76
−1.5
14
@
UCSD
L 66-72
+5.5
19
vs
CSUB
W 93-65
+21.5
21
vs
UCD
L 73-78
−2.5
26
@
UCSB
L 59-70
−0.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 95-84
+15.5
5
@
HAW
L 74-93
−6.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
UND
W 74-70
−2.5
11
@
UNM
L 68-82
+8.5
15
vs
UND
L 74-76
+1.5
18
@
CBU
L 57-80
−5.5
21
@
USD
W 85-71
+3.5
24
vs
GRAM
W 83-74
+12.5
29
@
UTU
L 69-77
+0.5
4
@
UCI
L 60-73
−9.5
6
@
CP
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
BYU
L 53-100
−2.5
20
@
STMN
L 78-92
+17.5
23
@
UCLA
L 65-97
+13.5
1
vs
HAW
L 45-88
−16.5
8
@
CSUB
L 66-67
−14.5
10
vs
UCSD
L 66-69
−14.5
15
@
LBSU
L 73-88
+19.5
17
vs
CSUF
W 81-72
−4.5
22
vs
UCI
L 66-80
+3.5
24
@
UCD
L 66-74
−9.5
29
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
−12.5
31
vs
CP
L 87-94
+18.5
5
@
CSUF
L 72-78
−6.5
7
@
CSUN
L 74-88
+1.5
12
vs
UCSB
L 68-76
−1.5
14
@
UCSD
L 66-72
−9.5
19
vs
CSUB
W 93-65
+7.5
21
vs
UCD
L 73-78
+1.5
26
@
UCSB
L 59-70
−16.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 95-84
+20.5
5
@
HAW
L 74-93
+16.5
over 16under 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
UC Irvine
33 games played
Straight up
21-12
64% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-21
36% overs · avg −3.1 pts vs the total
Against the spread
17-1652%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 61-69 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 79-70 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 69-70 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 45-57 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | U 102 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 64-52 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 72-63 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 73-60 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 85-71 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 58-84 | -1.5 | L −27.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-73 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 89-70 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 81-77 | -11.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 86-64 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 74-64 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 66-67 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-75 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 80-66 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 61-59 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 87-76 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-62 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 79-84 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 73-79 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 86-65 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 69-58 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 69-71 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 68-67 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 64-60 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 107-85 | -9.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | O 192 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 79-69 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 93-78 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-71 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 72-75 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
CBU
L 61-69
−16.5
15
vs
WEB
W 79-70
−2.5
19
@
UVU
L 72-79
−4.5
22
vs
UNI
L 69-70
−3.5
25
vs
NMSU
L 45-57
−14.5
26
vs
SDST
W 64-52
+9.5
30
@
SJSU
W 72-63
+5.5
4
vs
UCR
W 73-60
−0.5
6
vs
CSUN
W 85-71
+6.5
19
vs
BEL
L 58-84
−27.5
21
vs
NDSU
W 74-73
+2.5
22
vs
NORF
W 89-70
+7.5
1
@
CSUB
W 81-77
−7.5
3
@
CSUF
W 86-64
+18.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 74-64
−0.5
10
@
HAW
L 66-67
+3.5
17
@
UCD
L 72-75
−6.5
22
@
UCR
W 80-66
+5.5
24
@
UCSD
W 61-59
+4.5
29
vs
HAW
W 87-76
+9.5
5
vs
CSUB
W 78-62
−0.5
7
@
UCSB
L 79-84
−2.5
12
@
CP
L 73-79
−11.5
14
vs
CSUF
W 86-65
+13.5
19
@
LBSU
W 69-58
+5.5
21
vs
UCSD
L 69-71
−5.5
26
@
CSUN
W 68-67
+2.5
28
vs
UCSB
W 64-60
+0.5
5
vs
CP
W 107-85
+12.5
7
vs
UCD
W 79-69
+2.5
13
vs
CSUN
W 93-78
+11.5
14
vs
HAW
L 64-71
−8.5
17
vs
UNLV
L 72-75
−1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
CBU
L 61-69
−17.5
15
vs
WEB
W 79-70
−2.5
19
@
UVU
L 72-79
+1.5
22
vs
UNI
L 69-70
+0.5
25
vs
NMSU
L 45-57
−37.5
26
vs
SDST
W 64-52
−28.5
30
@
SJSU
W 72-63
−4.5
4
vs
UCR
W 73-60
−9.5
6
vs
CSUN
W 85-71
+3.5
19
vs
BEL
L 58-84
−8.5
21
vs
NDSU
W 74-73
+0.5
22
vs
NORF
W 89-70
+22.5
1
@
CSUB
W 81-77
+14.5
3
@
CSUF
W 86-64
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 74-64
−4.5
10
@
HAW
L 66-67
−7.5
17
@
UCD
L 72-75
−1.5
22
@
UCR
W 80-66
+3.5
24
@
UCSD
W 61-59
−26.5
29
vs
HAW
W 87-76
+18.5
5
vs
CSUB
W 78-62
−4.5
7
@
UCSB
L 79-84
+21.5
12
@
CP
L 73-79
−9.5
14
vs
CSUF
W 86-65
−3.5
19
@
LBSU
W 69-58
−17.5
21
vs
UCSD
L 69-71
−3.5
26
@
CSUN
W 68-67
−18.5
28
vs
UCSB
W 64-60
−14.5
5
vs
CP
W 107-85
+31.5
7
vs
UCD
W 79-69
+3.5
13
vs
CSUN
W 93-78
+18.5
14
vs
HAW
L 64-71
−6.5
17
vs
UNLV
L 72-75
−6.5
over 12under 21avg −3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UC Irvine has the better starters
Position by position: UC Riverside 0, UC Irvine 3, even 2
UC RiversideBetterUC Irvine
G D. Perteete6.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
=Even
G T. Isaac6 pts · 3.1 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 17
G J. Evans TR5.8 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 25
→UCIBig
G N. Cooper TR11.8 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 89
G B. Waller4.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 37
→UCISmall
G J. Jester6.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 63
G D. Malcolm TR5.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 87
=Even
F H. Carrington7.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 84
F D. Washington TR2.7 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 0
→UCISmall
F E. Chol4.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 28
UC RiversideBetterUC Irvine
UCR offense265th of 366 · -8.1
→UCIBig
UCI defense126th of 366 · -2.3
UCR defense296th of 366 · -7.4
→UCISmall
UCI offense187th of 366 · -5.8
Backcourt-2.7 · 4 players
→UCISmall
Backcourt-0.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
→UCISmall
Frontcourt+0.3 · 2 players
Bench+0.3 · 2 players
←UCRSmall
Bench-1.3 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestUCR betterUCI betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Perteete28 minJ. Evans15 min · TRB. Waller14 minD. Malcolm14 min · TRT. Duckett7 min · TRE. ReaganNew
Forwards
D. Washington11 min · TRT. Parrish-TillmanNewA. McKinneyNewJ. MajokNew
Centers
A. Oyeadier2 min · TR
Guards
T. Isaac27 minN. Cooper25 min · TRJ. Jester16 minB. Egbo4 minL. RedfieldNewT. LeeNew
Forwards
H. Carrington17 minE. Chol17 minM. HodgesNewP. SpeesNewD. BenthoNew
Centers
N. Emeneke8 minO. Rioux2 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71.6 #258 | Points per game | 74.2 #188 |
| 1.01 #317 | Points per possession | 1.04 #278 |
| 71.0 #74 | Pace (possessions) | 71.5 #51 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.9 #291 | Effective FG% | 49.5 #268 |
| 31.6 #301 | 3-point % | 33.6 #191 |
| 38.3 #203 | 3-point attempt rate | 28.0 #359 |
| 35.0 #177 | Free throw rate | 36.0 #152 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.0 #321 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #257 |
| 27.8 #275 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.9 #166 |
| 12.3 #262 | Assists per game | 14.8 #103 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.1 #303 | Points allowed | 69.4 #54 |
| 1.11 #256 | Points allowed per possession | 0.97 #7 |
| 52.7 #252 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.9 #9 |
| 33.5 #159 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.7 #167 |
| 15.5 #250 | Turnovers forced | 18.8 #56 |
| 70.0 #159 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.8 #213 |
| 5.1 #325 | Steals per game | 7.8 #51 |
| 4.1 #67 | Blocks per game | 5.8 #5 |
UC Riverside
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-15 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Hawai'i74–93
- Wvs CSU Northridge95–84
- L@ Santa Barbara59–70
- Lvs UC Davis73–78
- Wvs Bakersfield93–65
A week or more of rest.
UC Irvine
21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 16-6 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNLV72–75
- Lvs Hawai'i64–71
- Wvs CSU Northridge93–78
- Wvs UC Davis79–69
- Wvs Cal Poly107–85
A week or more of rest.