Haas Pavilion · at California
#268UTUUtah Tech
@
#92CALCalifornia
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Utah Tech and California
UTUThis seasonCAL
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects CAL 85–67 · win probability CAL 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: CAL has more of the edges

UTU 0, CAL 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
CALBig
CAL offense vs UTU defense
Offense 84th of 366 against a defense 295th, on the model’s ratings
CALBig
UTU offense vs CAL defense
Offense 251st of 366 against a defense 100th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UTU has played the 210th-hardest schedule, CAL the 77th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CALSmall
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTU 17.8%, CAL 15.1%. Forced: UTU 16.8%, CAL 16.1%
CALSmall
Home court
CAL at home. This season: CAL 0-0 at home, UTU 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTU 28.1%, CAL 26.0%. Defensive: UTU 65.5%, CAL 69.5%
Even
Three-pointers
UTU hits 35.0% and allows 30.7%; CAL hits 36.9% and allows 31.0%. Threes are 38.2% and 43.1% of their shots
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTU 30.6, CAL 36.2. Allowed: UTU 33.0, CAL 36.3
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTU 53.3 and allows 50.9; CAL 52.6 and allows 49.8
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTU 24%, CAL 29%. Transfers in: UTU 3, CAL 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UTU plays 69.9 a game (124th fastest), CAL 69.8 (126th). Faster games mean more points

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—CAL -17.2—
Total—151.9—
Projected score—UTU 67.3 · CAL 84.5

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadCAL -10.1—
1H total71.0—
1H projected scoreUTU 30.4 · CAL 40.6—

California has the better starters

Position by position: Utah Tech 1, California 4, even 0
Utah TechBetterCalifornia
G R. Sunderland TR4.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.2 ast Score 4
CALBig
G M. Cooper TR13.8 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast Score 74
G A. Dupre TR3 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.6 ast Score 1
CALBig
G N. Indrusaitis TR9.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.7 ast Score 76
G M. Brown TR3 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.2 ast Score 6
CALBig
G J. Ross TR6.7 pts · 2.5 reb · 2.3 ast Score 58
F E. Potter17.1 pts · 7.9 reb · 2 ast Score 94
UTUBig
G S. Carr3.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 2.2 ast Score 46
F S. Ariyibi2.4 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.5 ast Score 11
CALBig
F L. Dort8 pts · 7.8 reb · 0.9 ast Score 83
Utah TechBetterCalifornia
UTU offense251st of 366 · -7.6
CALBig
CAL defense100th of 366 · -0.7
UTU defense295th of 366 · -7.4
CALBig
CAL offense84th of 366 · +0.4
Backcourt-8.4 · 3 players
CALBig
Backcourt+1.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players
UTUSmall
Frontcourt+1.7 · 1 player
Bench-0.3 · 3 players
Even
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUTU betterCAL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Utah Tech
Guards
R. Sunderland27 min · TRA. Dupre16 min · TRM. Brown14 min · TRB. Harker3 minP. Vandermyde1 minP. RagkosNew
Forwards
E. Potter32 minS. Ariyibi10 minD. Grant2 minJ. ClarkNew
Centers
K. LemkeNew
California
Guards
M. Cooper27 min · TRN. Indrusaitis24 min · TRJ. Ross21 min · TRS. Carr17 minB. Fisher1 minL. Butler1 min
Forwards
L. Dort23 minJ. Wilkins10 min · TRA. Ali7 min · TRS. Yeanay5 minD. Manyiel Dut4 min
Centers
M. Kocanas7 minN. MitrovicNewD. DaubarisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
UTUCAL
Scoring
74.7 #171Points per game77.7 #99
1.08 #193Points per possession1.11 #118
69.9 #124Pace (possessions)69.8 #126
Shooting
53.3 #90Effective FG%52.6 #119
35.0 #1133-point %36.9 #30
38.2 #2073-point attempt rate43.1 #111
30.6 #290Free throw rate36.2 #146
Possessions
17.8 #256Turnover rate15.1 #74
28.1 #261Offensive rebound rate26.0 #322
14.4 #121Assists per game14.1 #142
Defense
77.0 #243Points allowed73.4 #140
1.09 #211Points allowed per possession1.05 #92
50.9 #151Opponent effective FG%49.8 #91
30.7 #29Opponent 3-point %31.0 #34
16.8 #166Turnovers forced16.1 #216
65.5 #326Defensive rebound rate69.5 #180
6.9 #135Steals per game5.9 #244
3.0 #216Blocks per game3.0 #217

Utah Tech

16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Big Sky Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs CA Baptist72–86
  • Wvs Abilene Chrstn80–74
  • Lvs Utah Valley101–104
  • L@ Southern Utah67–81
  • Wvs Abilene Chrstn85–81

A week or more of rest.

California

21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Saint Joseph's75–76
  • Wvs UIC91–73
  • Lvs Florida St89–95
  • L@ Wake Forest73–80
  • W@ Georgia Tech76–65

A week or more of rest.