Davey L. Whitney Complex · at Alcorn St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ALCN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HOW 78–68 · win probability HOW 80%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HOW has more of the edges
HOW 8, ALCN 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: HOW 50.9 and allows 48.7; ALCN 47.7 and allows 55.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HOW 35.8%, ALCN 26.9%. Defensive: HOW 68.6%, ALCN 64.5%
HOW offense vs ALCN defense
Offense 196th of 366 against a defense 354th, on the model’s ratings
ALCN offense vs HOW defense
Offense 350th of 366 against a defense 206th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: HOW 43.5, ALCN 31.8. Allowed: HOW 38.4, ALCN 39.4
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HOW 76%, ALCN 11%. Transfers in: HOW 2, ALCN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Three-pointers
HOW hits 35.8% and allows 31.4%; ALCN hits 33.3% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 34.7% and 33.7% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
HOW has played the 348th-hardest schedule, ALCN the 266th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
ALCN at home. This season: ALCN 0-0 at home, HOW 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HOW 19.3%, ALCN 19.6%. Forced: HOW 20.7%, ALCN 18.1%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: HOW plays 69.5 a game (144th fastest), ALCN 69.7 (138th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HOW -9.6 | — |
| Total | — | 146.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | HOW 77.9 · ALCN 68.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HOW -5.8 | — |
| 1H total | 68.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | HOW 37.1 · ALCN 31.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 9-1 90% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
HOW 1–0 ALCNHOW leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · HOW 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2025-26 | ALCN 64 @ HOW 72 | HOW -6.5 | HOW W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Howard
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
22-9
71% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 70-73 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 72-64 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-64 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 56-93 | +43.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 75-79 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-69 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 61-57 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 74-66 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 67-66 | +15.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-58 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 57-69 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-58 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 77-78 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-60 | -7.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-53 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-57 | -14.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 81-87 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 91-59 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 100-67 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-59 | -8.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-70 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 84-76 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-61 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-63 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 80-101 | +30.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−0.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−7.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
+1.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−5.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+5.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
+6.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
−1.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
+6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
+6.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+14.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
+16.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−0.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−9.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−14.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+17.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+11.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
−15.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+20.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
+4.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+13.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+0.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
+15.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+20.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+20.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
+16.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+0.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+1.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
+1.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−4.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+1.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+9.5
covered 22didn’t cover 9avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−9.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
−18.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−25.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+11.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
−5.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
+7.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
−7.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
−24.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+1.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
−8.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−8.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−29.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−4.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+12.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+10.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
+6.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+1.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
−21.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+0.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+20.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
−0.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+18.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+23.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
−15.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+19.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+10.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
−6.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−9.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+25.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+29.5
over 15under 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Alcorn St
32 games played
Straight up
9-23
28% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 76-108 | +27.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 70-76 | +18.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 50-95 | +31.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 64-84 | +29.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 64-72 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 81-107 | +32.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 53-72 | +31.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-74 | +12.5 | W +19.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 58-83 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-132 | +42.5 | L −21.5 | 151.5 | O 200 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 56-113 | +35.5 | L −21.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 43-79 | +28.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 86-89 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 64-62 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 66-81 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 71-72 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-66 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 26 | @ | L 73-82 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-73 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 50-74 | +5.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-84 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 74-66 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 57-55 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 16 | vs | L 78-86 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-65 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 87-92 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 67-64 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 48-83 | +1.5 | L −33.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 77-65 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 56-65 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
−4.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+12.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−13.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+9.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−1.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+6.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
+12.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+19.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
−8.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
−21.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
−21.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−7.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+2.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
+11.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−5.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
+0.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
+3.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
+0.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+4.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+12.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−18.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+0.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
+2.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
+10.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
−5.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
+19.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+0.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−16.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−6.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−33.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+19.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−2.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
FSU
L 76-108
+27.5
6
@
USA
L 70-76
+4.5
8
@
MINN
L 50-95
−7.5
11
@
MD
L 64-84
+1.5
13
@
HOW
L 64-72
−18.5
18
@
LSU
L 81-107
+32.5
23
@
OU
L 53-72
−35.5
28
vs
INST
W 81-74
+2.5
29
@
LT
L 58-83
+3.5
3
@
ISU
L 68-132
+48.5
19
@
BAY
L 56-113
+8.5
29
@
MISS
L 43-79
−26.5
3
@
JKST
L 86-89
+29.5
10
@
AAMU
W 64-62
−14.5
12
@
ALST
L 66-81
−4.5
17
vs
TXSO
L 71-72
−3.5
19
vs
PV
W 76-75
−1.5
24
@
FAMU
L 58-66
−17.5
26
@
BCU
L 73-82
+7.5
31
vs
SOU
W 78-73
+3.5
2
vs
GRAM
L 50-74
−19.5
7
@
UAPB
L 77-84
+15.5
9
@
MVSU
W 74-66
−0.5
14
vs
BCU
W 57-55
−32.5
16
vs
FAMU
L 78-86
+26.5
21
vs
JKST
W 83-65
−1.5
26
@
TXSO
L 87-92
+33.5
28
@
PV
L 51-72
−27.5
3
vs
MVSU
W 67-64
−8.5
5
vs
UAPB
L 48-83
−14.5
9
vs
ALST
W 77-65
+0.5
10
vs
PV
L 56-65
−21.5
over 15under 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Howard has the better starters
Position by position: Howard 1, Alcorn St 0, even 4
HowardBetterAlcorn St
G C. Gillus10.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 52
=No call
G T. Thomas9 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
G C. Taylor17.2 pts · 6.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 89
=No call
G J. Felton TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
G A. Cotton8.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 15
=No call
G B. Thomas TR3 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
G O. Okojie10.3 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 61
←HOWBig
F M. Taylor TR3.3 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 4
C G. Kocevar TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
=Even
C C. Richardson TR6.5 pts · 2.4 reb · 0 ast
Score 45
HowardBetterAlcorn St
HOW offense196th of 366 · -6.1
←HOWBig
ALCN defense354th of 366 · -9.9
HOW defense206th of 366 · -5.2
←HOWBig
ALCN offense350th of 366 · -12.5
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
←HOWSmall
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
Bench-3.1 · 5 players
→ALCNSmall
Bench-0.6 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestHOW betterALCN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Gillus34 minC. Taylor32 minA. Cotton27 minO. Okojie26 minI. Brown10 minJ. Johnson6 min
Forwards
C. Robins6 minJ. Johnson3 minJ. LawsonNewD. HarrisNew
Centers
G. Kocevar13 min · TRJ. Brown6 min · TR
Guards
T. Thomas22 minJ. Felton14 min · TRB. Thomas7 min · TRS. SunderlandNewJ. PowellNewJ. CraineNew
Forwards
M. Taylor14 min · TRJ. Walker5 min · TRB. CannonNewN. ThomasNew
Centers
C. Richardson15 min · TRA. TokpahNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.5 #155 | Points per game | 66.9 #335 |
| 1.09 #162 | Points per possession | 0.96 #352 |
| 69.5 #144 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #138 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.9 #198 | Effective FG% | 47.7 #320 |
| 35.8 #68 | 3-point % | 33.3 #209 |
| 34.7 #283 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.7 #303 |
| 43.5 #17 | Free throw rate | 31.8 #259 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.3 #331 | Turnover rate | 19.6 #340 |
| 35.8 #28 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #297 |
| 15.2 #78 | Assists per game | 11.1 #333 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.3 #51 | Points allowed | 80.2 #322 |
| 1.00 #24 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #324 |
| 48.7 #53 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.0 #330 |
| 31.4 #41 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #120 |
| 20.7 #13 | Turnovers forced | 18.1 #92 |
| 68.6 #223 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.5 #347 |
| 8.3 #29 | Steals per game | 7.7 #63 |
| 3.7 #113 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #162 |
Howard
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-3 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan80–101
- Wvs UMBC86–83
- Wvs NC Central70–63
- Wvs SC State78–61
- W@ Norfolk St84–76
A week or more of rest.
Alcorn St
9-23 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View56–65
- Wvs Alabama St77–65
- Lvs AR-Pine Bluff48–83
- Wvs Miss Valley St67–64
- L@ Prairie View51–72
A week or more of rest.