John M. Belk Arena · at Davidson
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DAV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DAV 77–67 · win probability DAV 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAV has more of the edges
HOW 3, DAV 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
HOW has played the 348th-hardest schedule, DAV the 91st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: HOW 43.5, DAV 31.0. Allowed: HOW 38.4, DAV 37.1
HOW offense vs DAV defense
Offense 196th of 366 against a defense 84th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: HOW plays 69.5 a game (144th fastest), DAV 65.0 (347th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HOW 35.8%, DAV 28.1%. Defensive: HOW 68.6%, DAV 70.0%
DAV offense vs HOW defense
Offense 149th of 366 against a defense 206th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
DAV at home. This season: DAV 0-0 at home, HOW 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HOW 19.3%, DAV 15.8%. Forced: HOW 20.7%, DAV 17.5%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HOW 76%, DAV 49%. Transfers in: HOW 2, DAV 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
HOW hits 35.8% and allows 31.4%; DAV hits 35.4% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 34.7% and 44.5% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: HOW 50.9 and allows 48.7; DAV 52.6 and allows 50.6
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DAV -10.4 | — |
| Total | — | 143.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | HOW 66.6 · DAV 77 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DAV -6.0 | — |
| 1H total | 67.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | HOW 30.6 · DAV 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 9-1 90% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Howard
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
22-9
71% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 70-73 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 72-64 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-64 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 56-93 | +43.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 75-79 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-69 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 61-57 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 74-66 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 67-66 | +15.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-58 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 57-69 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-58 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 77-78 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-60 | -7.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-53 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-57 | -14.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 81-87 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 91-59 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 100-67 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-59 | -8.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-70 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 84-76 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-61 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-63 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 80-101 | +30.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−0.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−7.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
+1.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−5.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+5.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
+6.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
−1.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
+6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
+6.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+14.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
+16.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−0.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−9.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−14.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+17.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+11.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
−15.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+20.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
+4.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+13.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+0.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
+15.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+20.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+20.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
+16.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+0.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+1.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
+1.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−4.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+1.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+9.5
covered 22didn’t cover 9avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−9.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
−18.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−25.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+11.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
−5.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
+7.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
−7.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
−24.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+1.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
−8.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−8.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−29.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−4.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+12.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+10.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
+6.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+1.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
−21.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+0.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+20.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
−0.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+18.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+23.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
−15.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+19.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+10.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
−6.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−9.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+25.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+29.5
over 15under 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Davidson
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 85-69 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 62-55 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-87 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 59-49 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 60-94 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 79-63 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 61-70 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-47 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 63-68 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-90 | +14.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 83-89 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-56 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-64 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 45-70 | -2.5 | L −27.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-79 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 69-75 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 52-60 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-54 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 82-91 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 84-64 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 59-70 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 65-63 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 59-63 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 67-56 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 71-64 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 67-70 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 64-59 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 132.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 58-70 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 80-84 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+11.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
+8.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
−0.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
+11.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
−24.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+2.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
−2.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−0.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
+21.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
−14.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
−8.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
+4.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+13.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−27.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+14.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
+0.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−0.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−1.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
+26.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
−0.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+10.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−5.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−3.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−5.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
+14.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
−3.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
−4.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
+9.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−0.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−9.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+2.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+0.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
−26.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
+33.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
−32.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
+6.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+18.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
+4.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−6.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
−5.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
+11.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
+21.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
−21.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+6.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−19.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+12.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
−4.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−4.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−22.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
−7.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
+21.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+7.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−11.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−13.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−9.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
−19.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
+1.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
+0.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−9.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−5.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+9.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Davidson has the better starters
Position by position: Howard 1, Davidson 3, even 1
HowardBetterDavidson
G C. Gillus10.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 52
→DAVSmall
G N. Janowski TR16.7 pts · 5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
G C. Taylor17.2 pts · 6.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 89
←HOWBig
G S. Brown7.9 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 33
G A. Cotton8.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 15
→DAVSmall
G N. Coval6.2 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 49
G O. Okojie10.3 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 61
→DAVSmall
F J. Scovens11.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
C G. Kocevar TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
=Even
C I. Platteeuw3.9 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 43
HowardBetterDavidson
HOW offense196th of 366 · -6.1
→DAVSmall
DAV defense84th of 366 · +0.0
HOW defense206th of 366 · -5.2
→DAVSmall
DAV offense149th of 366 · -4.5
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→DAVSmall
Frontcourt+2.2 · 2 players
Bench-3.1 · 5 players
→DAVSmall
Bench-0.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestHOW betterDAV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Gillus34 minC. Taylor32 minA. Cotton27 minO. Okojie26 minI. Brown10 minJ. Johnson6 min
Forwards
C. Robins6 minJ. Johnson3 minJ. LawsonNewD. HarrisNew
Centers
G. Kocevar13 min · TRJ. Brown6 min · TR
Guards
N. Janowski32 min · TRS. Brown24 minN. Coval19 minP. Kavu1 minJ. CarterNewE. HeinonenNew
Forwards
J. Scovens25 minJ. Roberts12 minJ. Keith9 min · TRJ. Nowland1 minQ. BashiruNewT. StoiberNew
Centers
I. Platteeuw15 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.5 #155 | Points per game | 69.9 #289 |
| 1.09 #162 | Points per possession | 1.08 #189 |
| 69.5 #144 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #347 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.9 #198 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #121 |
| 35.8 #68 | 3-point % | 35.4 #92 |
| 34.7 #283 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.5 #79 |
| 43.5 #17 | Free throw rate | 31.0 #283 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.3 #331 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #124 |
| 35.8 #28 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.1 #265 |
| 15.2 #78 | Assists per game | 13.4 #184 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.3 #51 | Points allowed | 68.5 #40 |
| 1.00 #24 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #94 |
| 48.7 #53 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #132 |
| 31.4 #41 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #92 |
| 20.7 #13 | Turnovers forced | 17.5 #121 |
| 68.6 #223 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #157 |
| 8.3 #29 | Steals per game | 6.4 #189 |
| 3.7 #113 | Blocks per game | 4.1 #66 |
Howard
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-3 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan80–101
- Wvs UMBC86–83
- Wvs NC Central70–63
- Wvs SC State78–61
- W@ Norfolk St84–76
A week or more of rest.
Davidson
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Oklahoma St80–84
- Lvs Saint Joseph's58–70
- Wvs Loyola Chicago64–59
- W@ St Bonaventure68–63
- Lvs Saint Joseph's67–70
A week or more of rest.