CareFirst Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HOW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HAMP 74–72 · win probability HAMP 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HOW has more of the edges
HAMP 0, HOW 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: HAMP 45.7 and allows 52.0; HOW 50.9 and allows 48.7
Three-pointers
HAMP hits 28.8% and allows 32.1%; HOW hits 35.8% and allows 31.4%. Threes are 37.0% and 34.7% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
HAMP has played the 217th-hardest schedule, HOW the 348th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HAMP 18%, HOW 76%. Transfers in: HAMP 6, HOW 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: HAMP plays 66.5 a game (295th fastest), HOW 69.5 (144th). Faster games mean more points
Free throws
Free throw rate: HAMP 39.2, HOW 43.5. Allowed: HAMP 46.5, HOW 38.4
Even
HOW offense vs HAMP defense
Offense 196th of 366 against a defense 153rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
HAMP offense vs HOW defense
Offense 186th of 366 against a defense 206th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HAMP 32.9%, HOW 35.8%. Defensive: HAMP 70.0%, HOW 68.6%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HAMP 17.1%, HOW 19.3%. Forced: HAMP 17.2%, HOW 20.7%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HAMP -1.5 | — |
| Total | — | 146.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | HAMP 73.8 · HOW 72.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HAMP -1.0 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | HAMP 34.7 · HOW 33.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 9-1 90% | 9-1 90% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
HAMP 4–2 HOWHAMP leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · HAMP 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2025-26 | HAMP 57 vs HOW 61 | HOW +2.5 | HOW W |
| Feb 1, 2024-25 | HOW 79 vs HAMP 80 | HAMP -2.5 | HOW W |
| Dec 28, 2024-25 | HOW 67 @ HAMP 83 | HAMP -3.5 | HAMP W |
| Feb 3, 2023-24 | HAMP 63 vs HOW 61 | HOW -7.5 | HAMP W |
| Nov 6, 2023-24 | HAMP 80 @ HOW 92 | HOW -7.5 | HOW W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Hampton
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 86-90 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 53-91 | +24.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 72-63 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 61-67 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 52-63 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 60-62 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 74-68 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-71 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 57-61 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 84-77 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 72-81 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 62-59 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-62 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 45-49 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 82-61 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 65-63 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-75 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 51-58 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 50-82 | +8.5 | L −23.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 87-79 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-74 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 70-71 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 43-79 | +11.5 | L −24.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-79 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-85 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 85-94 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 68-74 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+1.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−13.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
+10.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−10.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
+1.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
+0.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
−0.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+15.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−6.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
−1.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
−10.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
+0.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
+7.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
+8.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
−7.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
+5.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
+14.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
+0.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
−3.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−4.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
−23.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+9.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
+8.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
−4.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−24.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
−1.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
−8.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
+7.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+2.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+29.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−4.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
−4.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−20.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
−20.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
−11.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
+17.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+21.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−24.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
+25.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
+15.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
−19.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
−11.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
−46.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
+12.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
−1.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
−0.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
−7.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
+5.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−18.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
+0.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+23.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
−1.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
+3.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−11.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
+15.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
+16.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
−4.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+15.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+9.5
over 14under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Howard
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
22-9
71% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 70-73 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 72-64 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-64 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 56-93 | +43.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 75-79 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-69 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 61-57 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 74-66 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 67-66 | +15.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-58 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 57-69 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-58 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 77-78 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-60 | -7.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-53 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-57 | -14.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 81-87 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 91-59 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 100-67 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-59 | -8.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-70 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 84-76 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-61 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-63 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 80-101 | +30.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−0.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−7.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
+1.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−5.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+5.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
+6.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
−1.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
+6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
+6.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+14.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
+16.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−0.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−9.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−14.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+17.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+11.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
−15.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+20.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
+4.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+13.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+0.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
+15.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+20.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+20.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
+16.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+0.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+1.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
+1.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−4.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+1.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+9.5
covered 22didn’t cover 9avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−9.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
−18.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−25.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+11.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
−5.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
+7.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
−7.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
−24.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+1.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
−8.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−8.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−29.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−4.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+12.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+10.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
+6.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+1.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
−21.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+0.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+20.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
−0.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+18.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+23.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
−15.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+19.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+10.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
−6.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−9.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+25.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+29.5
over 15under 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Hampton has the better starters
Position by position: Hampton 2, Howard 1, even 2
HamptonBetterHoward
G J. Mitchell TR14.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 56
=Even
G C. Gillus10.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 52
G S. Hubbard TR16.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 70
→HOWSmall
G C. Taylor17.2 pts · 6.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 89
G A. Davis TR9.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
←HAMPBig
G A. Cotton8.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 15
F M. Frazier TR12 pts · 7.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 77
←HAMPSmall
G O. Okojie10.3 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 61
F C. Robinson TR8.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 25
=Even
C G. Kocevar TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
HamptonBetterHoward
HAMP offense186th of 366 · -5.7
=Even
HOW defense206th of 366 · -5.2
HAMP defense153rd of 366 · -3.4
=Even
HOW offense196th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt+0.1 · 3 players
←HAMPSmall
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
Bench-2.1 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-3.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestHAMP betterHOW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Mitchell33 min · TRS. Hubbard31 min · TRA. Davis24 min · TRE. Strothers19 minT. Jackson17 min · TRA. Haskins10 min
Forwards
M. Frazier29 min · TRC. Robinson26 min · TRP. Da CruzNewW. PrestonNewZ. IbekweNewS. TabeNew
Guards
C. Gillus34 minC. Taylor32 minA. Cotton27 minO. Okojie26 minI. Brown10 minJ. Johnson6 min
Forwards
C. Robins6 minJ. Johnson3 minJ. LawsonNewD. HarrisNew
Centers
G. Kocevar13 min · TRJ. Brown6 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.0 #312 | Points per game | 75.5 #155 |
| 1.02 #301 | Points per possession | 1.09 #162 |
| 66.5 #295 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #144 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.7 #356 | Effective FG% | 50.9 #198 |
| 28.8 #357 | 3-point % | 35.8 #68 |
| 37.0 #229 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.7 #283 |
| 39.2 #73 | Free throw rate | 43.5 #17 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #205 | Turnover rate | 19.3 #331 |
| 32.9 #90 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.8 #28 |
| 11.2 #329 | Assists per game | 15.2 #78 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.1 #108 | Points allowed | 69.3 #51 |
| 1.08 #176 | Points allowed per possession | 1.00 #24 |
| 52.0 #212 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.7 #53 |
| 32.1 #65 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.4 #41 |
| 17.2 #137 | Turnovers forced | 20.7 #13 |
| 70.0 #165 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.6 #223 |
| 6.3 #207 | Steals per game | 8.3 #29 |
| 3.0 #232 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #113 |
Hampton
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Towson68–74
- L@ William & Mary85–94
- Wvs Northeastern76–65
- Lvs Charleston71–85
- L@ Stony Brook72–79
A week or more of rest.
Howard
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-3 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan80–101
- Wvs UMBC86–83
- Wvs NC Central70–63
- Wvs SC State78–61
- W@ Norfolk St84–76
A week or more of rest.