Burr Gymnasium · at Howard
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HOW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HOW 71–70 · win probability HOW 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HOW has more of the edges
TOW 2, HOW 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
TOW has played the 140th-hardest schedule, HOW the 348th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
TOW hits 29.4% and allows 30.9%; HOW hits 35.8% and allows 31.4%. Threes are 34.9% and 34.7% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: TOW plays 64.0 a game (360th fastest), HOW 69.5 (144th). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TOW 27%, HOW 76%. Transfers in: TOW 3, HOW 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
HOW offense vs TOW defense
Offense 196th of 366 against a defense 113th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: TOW 46.5 and allows 48.5; HOW 50.9 and allows 48.7
TOW offense vs HOW defense
Offense 266th of 366 against a defense 206th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TOW 36.0%, HOW 35.8%. Defensive: TOW 70.9%, HOW 68.6%
Home court
HOW at home. This season: HOW 0-0 at home, TOW 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: TOW 30.4, HOW 43.5. Allowed: TOW 29.3, HOW 38.4
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TOW 15.8%, HOW 19.3%. Forced: TOW 15.1%, HOW 20.7%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HOW -1.7 | — |
| Total | — | 140.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | TOW 69.6 · HOW 71.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HOW -0.9 | — |
| 1H total | 65.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | TOW 32.5 · HOW 33.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 9-1 90% | 9-1 90% | 6-4 60% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Towson
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-20
38% overs · avg −5.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-56 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 141.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 48-65 | +26.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | U 113 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 51-41 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 75-81 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 62-55 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 73-87 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-80 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 61-86 | +9.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 49-73 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 72-47 | -13.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 70-84 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 62-63 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 48-62 | -8.5 | L −22.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 67-78 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 87-78 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 61-52 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 59-58 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 124.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 72-59 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 73-80 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 73-82 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 82-50 | -8.5 | W +23.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 49-71 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 69-57 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 71-72 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 62-68 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 58-56 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-67 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 69-57 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 74-68 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 81-56 | +3.5 | W +28.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 65-68 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
L-MD
W 67-56
+2.5
8
@
HOU
L 48-65
+9.5
14
vs
NORF
W 51-41
−3.5
18
@
JMU
L 75-81
−9.5
24
vs
URI
W 62-55
+9.5
25
vs
LIB
W 72-69
+9.5
26
vs
UCSD
L 73-87
−12.5
3
vs
COR
W 93-80
+6.5
7
@
UCF
L 61-86
−15.5
16
@
KU
L 49-73
−9.5
22
vs
SHU
W 72-47
+11.5
29
@
W&M
L 70-84
−12.5
31
@
HAMP
L 62-63
−7.5
3
vs
MONM
L 48-62
−22.5
8
vs
HOF
L 67-78
−12.5
10
@
NE
W 87-78
+6.5
15
vs
COFC
W 61-52
+5.5
19
vs
DREX
W 59-58
−6.5
22
@
ELON
W 72-59
+14.5
24
@
NCAT
L 73-80
−14.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 73-82
−10.5
31
vs
HAMP
W 82-50
+23.5
7
@
HOF
L 49-71
−17.5
12
vs
STBK
W 69-57
+4.5
15
@
MONM
L 71-72
+0.5
22
@
DREX
L 62-68
−8.5
26
vs
ELON
W 58-56
−3.5
28
vs
CAM
W 71-67
−0.5
3
@
STBK
W 69-57
+10.5
7
vs
HAMP
W 74-68
−1.5
8
vs
COFC
W 81-56
+28.5
9
vs
HOF
L 65-68
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
L-MD
W 67-56
−18.5
8
@
HOU
L 48-65
−17.5
14
vs
NORF
W 51-41
−46.5
18
@
JMU
L 75-81
+15.5
24
vs
URI
W 62-55
−23.5
25
vs
LIB
W 72-69
+3.5
26
vs
UCSD
L 73-87
+21.5
3
vs
COR
W 93-80
+18.5
7
@
UCF
L 61-86
−1.5
16
@
KU
L 49-73
−15.5
22
vs
SHU
W 72-47
−26.5
29
@
W&M
L 70-84
−3.5
31
@
HAMP
L 62-63
−11.5
3
vs
MONM
L 48-62
−26.5
8
vs
HOF
L 67-78
+10.5
10
@
NE
W 87-78
+21.5
15
vs
COFC
W 61-52
−30.5
19
vs
DREX
W 59-58
−7.5
22
@
ELON
W 72-59
−14.5
24
@
NCAT
L 73-80
+13.5
29
vs
UNCW
L 73-82
+19.5
31
vs
HAMP
W 82-50
+0.5
7
@
HOF
L 49-71
−17.5
12
vs
STBK
W 69-57
−9.5
15
@
MONM
L 71-72
+4.5
22
@
DREX
L 62-68
−0.5
26
vs
ELON
W 58-56
−30.5
28
vs
CAM
W 71-67
−4.5
3
@
STBK
W 69-57
−11.5
7
vs
HAMP
W 74-68
+9.5
8
vs
COFC
W 81-56
−1.5
9
vs
HOF
L 65-68
+0.5
over 12under 20avg −5.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Howard
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
22-9
71% covers · avg +5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 67-88 | +20.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 70-73 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 72-64 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 60-64 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 56-93 | +43.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 75-79 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 73-69 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 61-57 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 74-66 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 67-66 | +15.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 57-58 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 57-69 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 84-58 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 129.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-69 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 77-78 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 88-60 | -7.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-53 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-57 | -14.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 81-87 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-53 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 91-59 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 131.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 100-67 | -12.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 84-59 | -8.5 | W +16.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 90-70 | -19.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 84-76 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-61 | -15.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 70-63 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 80-101 | +30.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−0.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−7.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
+1.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−5.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+5.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
+6.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
−1.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
+6.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
+6.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+14.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
+16.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−0.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−9.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−14.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+17.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+11.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
−15.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+20.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
+4.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+13.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+0.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
+15.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+20.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+20.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
+16.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+0.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+1.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
+1.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−4.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+1.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+9.5
covered 22didn’t cover 9avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MIZ
L 67-88
−3.5
9
vs
GRAM
L 70-73
−9.5
13
vs
ALCN
W 72-64
−18.5
19
@
STET
L 60-64
−25.5
22
vs
NIA
W 80-70
+11.5
23
@
DUKE
L 56-93
−5.5
29
@
MSM
L 75-79
+7.5
9
vs
NCAT
W 73-69
−7.5
13
vs
HAMP
W 61-57
−24.5
16
@
DREX
W 74-66
+1.5
20
@
UNCW
W 67-66
−8.5
30
@
NU
L 60-80
−8.5
3
@
SCST
L 57-58
−29.5
10
@
UMES
L 57-69
−4.5
12
vs
DSU
W 84-58
+12.5
17
@
NCCU
W 83-69
+10.5
24
vs
MORG
L 77-78
+6.5
31
vs
NORF
W 88-60
+1.5
2
@
COPP
W 72-53
−21.5
7
vs
SCST
W 85-57
+0.5
9
vs
YALE
L 81-87
+20.5
14
vs
UMES
W 79-53
−0.5
16
@
DSU
W 91-59
+18.5
21
vs
NCCU
W 100-67
+23.5
28
@
MORG
W 84-59
−15.5
2
vs
COPP
W 90-70
+19.5
5
@
NORF
W 84-76
+10.5
13
vs
SCST
W 78-61
−6.5
14
vs
NCCU
W 70-63
−9.5
17
vs
UMBC
W 86-83
+25.5
19
vs
MICH
L 80-101
+29.5
over 15under 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Howard has the better starters
Position by position: Towson 1, Howard 2, even 2
TowsonBetterHoward
G B. Roseborough TR11.7 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 50
=Even
G C. Gillus10.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 4.7 ast
Score 52
G J. Womack6.8 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 61
→HOWSmall
G C. Taylor17.2 pts · 6.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 89
G C. Ndefo2.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 32
←TOWSmall
G A. Cotton8.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 15
F C. Embeya3.5 pts · 5.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 37
→HOWSmall
G O. Okojie10.3 pts · 4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 61
F D. Badalau TR3.1 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
=Even
C G. Kocevar TR3.2 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
TowsonBetterHoward
TOW offense266th of 366 · -8.1
→HOWSmall
HOW defense206th of 366 · -5.2
TOW defense113th of 366 · -1.4
←TOWSmall
HOW offense196th of 366 · -6.1
Backcourt-1.4 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
←TOWSmall
Bench-3.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestTOW betterHOW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Roseborough28 min · TRJ. Womack19 minC. Ndefo12 minZ. Stanford5 min · TRR. Skerry2 minC. DoerrNew
Forwards
C. Embeya21 minD. Badalau13 min · TRA. AtkinsonNewB. HolmesNewD. KirkNew
Guards
C. Gillus34 minC. Taylor32 minA. Cotton27 minO. Okojie26 minI. Brown10 minJ. Johnson6 min
Forwards
C. Robins6 minJ. Johnson3 minJ. LawsonNewD. HarrisNew
Centers
G. Kocevar13 min · TRJ. Brown6 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.1 #332 | Points per game | 75.5 #155 |
| 1.05 #256 | Points per possession | 1.09 #162 |
| 64.0 #360 | Pace (possessions) | 69.5 #144 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.5 #345 | Effective FG% | 50.9 #198 |
| 29.4 #349 | 3-point % | 35.8 #68 |
| 34.9 #277 | 3-point attempt rate | 34.7 #283 |
| 30.4 #299 | Free throw rate | 43.5 #17 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #128 | Turnover rate | 19.3 #331 |
| 36.0 #24 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.8 #28 |
| 9.5 #364 | Assists per game | 15.2 #78 |
| Defense | ||
| 66.4 #18 | Points allowed | 69.3 #51 |
| 1.04 #73 | Points allowed per possession | 1.00 #24 |
| 48.5 #49 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.7 #53 |
| 30.9 #33 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.4 #41 |
| 15.1 #271 | Turnovers forced | 20.7 #13 |
| 70.9 #117 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.6 #223 |
| 5.8 #253 | Steals per game | 8.3 #29 |
| 3.3 #175 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #113 |
Towson
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra65–68
- Wvs Charleston81–56
- Wvs Hampton74–68
- W@ Stony Brook69–57
- Wvs Campbell71–67
A week or more of rest.
Howard
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-3 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan80–101
- Wvs UMBC86–83
- Wvs NC Central70–63
- Wvs SC State78–61
- W@ Norfolk St84–76
A week or more of rest.