Trask Coliseum · at UNC Wilmington
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNCW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNCW 76–65 · win probability UNCW 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCW has more of the edges
UL 1, UNCW 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UL 28.7, UNCW 40.4. Allowed: UL 45.8, UNCW 31.7
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UL 28.4%, UNCW 35.3%. Defensive: UL 67.7%, UNCW 72.4%
UL offense vs UNCW defense
Offense 292nd of 366 against a defense 119th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UL hits 33.6% and allows 35.6%; UNCW hits 35.0% and allows 29.7%. Threes are 40.5% and 38.8% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: UL 47.1 and allows 52.6; UNCW 50.4 and allows 47.5
Home court
UNCW at home. This season: UNCW 0-0 at home, UL 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UL 59%, UNCW 35%. Transfers in: UL 3, UNCW 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UL 16.8%, UNCW 14.9%. Forced: UL 18.3%, UNCW 14.9%
Even
UNCW offense vs UL defense
Offense 131st of 366 against a defense 157th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: UL plays 64.1 a game (359th fastest), UNCW 66.1 (310th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
UL has played the 226th-hardest schedule, UNCW the 228th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNCW -10.5 | — |
| Total | — | 140.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | UL 65.1 · UNCW 75.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNCW -6.1 | — |
| 1H total | 65.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | UL 29.8 · UNCW 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UL 0–1 UNCWUNCW leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UL 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | UNCW 70 @ UL 63 | UL +12.5 | UL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Louisiana
33 games played
Straight up
11-22
33% wins
Against the spread
15-18
45% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-18
45% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 64-75 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 58-52 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 62-66 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 62-88 | +15.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-93 | +20.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 43-80 | +19.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 56-77 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 45-51 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 136.5 | U 96 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 55-65 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 129.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 63-70 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 44-65 | +9.5 | L −11.5 | 126.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 54-62 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 132.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 76-62 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 136.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 63-54 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 126.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 58-63 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 127.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-74 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 129.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 85-79 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 54-59 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 59-56 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 129.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 58-72 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 124.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 129.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-60 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 64-61 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 85-80 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 65-69 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | O 134 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 72-83 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 62-79 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 67-54 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 59-78 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 134.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 58-81 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 84-75 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 72-87 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BALL
L 64-75
−6.5
7
vs
SELA
W 58-52
+2.5
11
vs
TULN
L 62-66
+1.5
14
@
MCN
L 62-88
−10.5
18
@
STAN
L 66-93
−6.5
21
@
SCU
L 43-80
−17.5
24
@
UCD
L 56-77
−11.5
28
vs
JKST
L 45-51
−11.5
3
@
LAM
L 55-65
+0.5
6
vs
UNCW
L 63-70
+5.5
13
@
LT
L 44-65
−11.5
18
@
USM
L 54-62
+3.5
20
@
ULM
W 76-62
+12.5
28
vs
NORF
W 63-54
+5.5
31
vs
USA
L 58-63
−1.5
3
vs
USM
L 67-74
−3.5
8
vs
ULM
W 85-79
−1.5
10
vs
TROY
L 70-90
−10.5
14
@
TXST
L 54-59
+3.5
17
@
USA
W 59-56
+12.5
22
@
APP
L 58-72
−4.5
29
vs
GAST
W 82-72
+11.5
31
vs
GASO
W 69-60
+11.5
4
@
JMU
W 64-61
+12.5
7
vs
CMU
W 85-80
+2.5
12
vs
CCU
L 65-69
−2.5
16
@
ODU
L 72-83
−4.5
19
vs
ARST
L 62-79
−8.5
21
vs
TXST
W 67-54
+16.5
24
@
TROY
L 59-78
−7.5
27
@
ARST
L 58-81
−9.5
3
vs
GAST
W 84-75
+10.5
4
vs
JMU
L 72-87
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 18avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BALL
L 64-75
−2.5
7
vs
SELA
W 58-52
−25.5
11
vs
TULN
L 62-66
−7.5
14
@
MCN
L 62-88
+15.5
18
@
STAN
L 66-93
+19.5
21
@
SCU
L 43-80
−17.5
24
@
UCD
L 56-77
−3.5
28
vs
JKST
L 45-51
−40.5
3
@
LAM
L 55-65
−9.5
6
vs
UNCW
L 63-70
+2.5
13
@
LT
L 44-65
−17.5
18
@
USM
L 54-62
−16.5
20
@
ULM
W 76-62
+1.5
28
vs
NORF
W 63-54
−9.5
31
vs
USA
L 58-63
−6.5
3
vs
USM
L 67-74
+11.5
8
vs
ULM
W 85-79
+24.5
10
vs
TROY
L 70-90
+23.5
14
@
TXST
L 54-59
−20.5
17
@
USA
W 59-56
−14.5
22
@
APP
L 58-72
+5.5
29
vs
GAST
W 82-72
+24.5
31
vs
GASO
W 69-60
−15.5
4
@
JMU
W 64-61
−7.5
7
vs
CMU
W 85-80
+30.5
12
vs
CCU
L 65-69
+1.5
16
@
ODU
L 72-83
+19.5
19
vs
ARST
L 62-79
−3.5
21
vs
TXST
W 67-54
−13.5
24
@
TROY
L 59-78
+2.5
27
@
ARST
L 58-81
−7.5
3
vs
GAST
W 84-75
+24.5
4
vs
JMU
L 72-87
+24.5
over 15under 18avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
UNC Wilmington
32 games played
Straight up
25-7
78% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 77-86 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 73-60 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 85-60 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 81-73 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-57 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 87-57 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 138.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 88-62 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 70-69 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 70-63 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 73-70 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-67 | -15.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 87-78 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 65-53 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 49-45 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 87-78 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-71 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-75 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-77 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 82-73 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 78-85 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 76-64 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 65-54 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-66 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 79-69 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 88-65 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 76-79 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 76-57 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 70-85 | -6.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | @ | W 68-67 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 61-80 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
−5.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−1.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
+18.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+3.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
+1.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+21.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+7.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−7.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
−5.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
−1.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−16.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
−1.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−0.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−8.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+4.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
−2.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
−3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−4.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+3.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+10.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
−11.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
+13.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
+2.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
+1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+2.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
+1.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+9.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
−8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
+14.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
−21.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
+5.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
−15.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
+6.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−22.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
−0.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+2.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
−10.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+5.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+2.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−11.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
+2.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
+6.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−8.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
+18.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−19.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−46.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+22.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
+12.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
+3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−12.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+5.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+19.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
+3.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
−8.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
−30.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
−1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+3.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
−9.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+6.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
+8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
−12.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
+5.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
−13.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
+2.5
over 18under 14avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UNC Wilmington has the better starters
Position by position: Louisiana 0, UNC Wilmington 3, even 2
LouisianaBetterUNC Wilmington
G D. Lavergne9.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 40
→UNCWBig
G W. Kermoury TR13.1 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 75
G M. Cooper5.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 1
→UNCWBig
G T. Pettway TR8.8 pts · 2.1 reb · 2 ast
Score 64
G T. Middleton TR12.4 pts · 3.5 reb · 3 ast
Score 49
=Even
F G. Walsh9.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 57
G J. Keller17 pts · 2 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F S. Elliott TR4.1 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 23
F J. Harris TR9.3 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 34
→UNCWBig
C P. Wessler13.5 pts · 9.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 87
LouisianaBetterUNC Wilmington
UL offense292nd of 366 · -9.0
→UNCWBig
UNCW defense119th of 366 · -1.8
UL defense157th of 366 · -3.4
=Even
UNCW offense131st of 366 · -3.7
Backcourt-6.4 · 4 players
→UNCWBig
Backcourt+1.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.2 · 1 player
→UNCWBig
Frontcourt+2.5 · 3 players
Bench-0.5 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestUL betterUNCW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Lavergne30 minM. Cooper30 minT. Middleton30 min · TRJ. Keller30 minL. Myers2 minD. WareNew
Forwards
J. Harris27 min · TRD. Pounds18 min · TRT. Jones17 minJ. Evans11 minR. OlajuwonNewT. DuncanNew
Guards
W. Kermoury27 min · TRT. Pettway22 min · TRJ. Lamothe15 minX. Brown12 min · TRM. Smith3 minC. LusterNew
Forwards
G. Walsh26 minS. Elliott17 min · TRT. NelsonNewM. ProdanovicNewW. SewardNew
Centers
P. Wessler27 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.7 #354 | Points per game | 74.6 #174 |
| 0.99 #333 | Points per possession | 1.13 #84 |
| 64.1 #359 | Pace (possessions) | 66.1 #310 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.1 #334 | Effective FG% | 50.4 #220 |
| 33.6 #189 | 3-point % | 35.0 #124 |
| 40.5 #160 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.8 #194 |
| 28.7 #334 | Free throw rate | 40.4 #54 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #185 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #57 |
| 28.4 #251 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.3 #40 |
| 10.3 #354 | Assists per game | 13.1 #204 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.7 #69 | Points allowed | 68.1 #32 |
| 1.10 #227 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #56 |
| 52.6 #247 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.5 #30 |
| 35.6 #286 | Opponent 3-point % | 29.7 #6 |
| 18.3 #85 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #297 |
| 67.7 #272 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.4 #51 |
| 5.8 #257 | Steals per game | 5.1 #330 |
| 3.5 #141 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #312 |
Louisiana
11-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs James Madison72–87
- Wvs Georgia St84–75
- L@ Arkansas St58–81
- L@ Troy59–78
- Wvs Texas St67–54
A week or more of rest.
UNC Wilmington
25-7 in 2025-26 overall · 15-4 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton61–80
- W@ Yale68–67
- Lvs Campbell70–85
- W@ Elon76–57
- Lvs Charleston76–79
A week or more of rest.