Michael J. Hagan '85 Arena · at Saint Joseph's
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | JOES | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects JOES 76–70 · win probability JOES 69%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
PENN 4, JOES 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
PENN hits 38.3% and allows 32.2%; JOES hits 30.8% and allows 31.7%. Threes are 35.4% and 45.1% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PENN 15.4%, JOES 16.8%. Forced: PENN 17.3%, JOES 15.0%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PENN 83%, JOES 40%. Transfers in: PENN 1, JOES 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: PENN 50.4 and allows 52.1; JOES 49.2 and allows 47.6
Home court
JOES at home. This season: JOES 0-0 at home, PENN 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: PENN 33.9, JOES 29.7. Allowed: PENN 27.5, JOES 26.9
PENN offense vs JOES defense
Offense 138th of 366 against a defense 91st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PENN 30.0%, JOES 31.4%. Defensive: PENN 68.7%, JOES 69.4%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: PENN plays 69.3 a game (158th fastest), JOES 68.4 (208th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
PENN has played the 126th-hardest schedule, JOES the 102nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
JOES offense vs PENN defense
Offense 134th of 366 against a defense 142nd, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | JOES -5.8 | — |
| Total | — | 145.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | PENN 69.9 · JOES 75.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | JOES -3.3 | — |
| 1H total | 68.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | PENN 32.4 · JOES 35.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 2-8 20% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PENN 1–4 JOESJOES leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · PENN 1-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025-26 | JOES 74 @ PENN 83 | PENN +5.5 | PENN W |
| Nov 15, 2024-25 | JOES 86 @ PENN 69 | PENN +7.5 | JOES W |
| Nov 10, 2023-24 | PENN 61 @ JOES 69 | JOES -6.5 | JOES W |
| Nov 30, 2022-23 | JOES 85 @ PENN 80 | PENN -5.5 | JOES W |
| Dec 8, 2021-22 | PENN 71 @ JOES 78 | JOES -4.5 | JOES W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Penn
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
20-9
69% covers · avg +3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-21
28% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 81-106 | +19.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 83-74 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 77-65 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-77 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-90 | +18.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 74-72 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 69-70 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 79-83 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 80-61 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-74 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 63-64 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 60-77 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 67-72 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-81 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 61-60 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-76 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-71 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 82-61 | +1.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 62-60 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 88-84 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 70-105 | +25.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
−7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
−5.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
+14.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
+20.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
+9.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
+0.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−15.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
−8.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−5.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
+10.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+12.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
+4.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+1.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+2.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
+12.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
+4.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−10.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−0.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
+17.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−2.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
+7.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
+8.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
+5.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
+2.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
+1.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
+22.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
+5.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+13.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
−9.5
covered 20didn’t cover 9avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
+7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
+14.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
−6.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
−0.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
−10.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
−5.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−12.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
+2.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−4.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
−11.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+15.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
−10.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+8.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+8.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
−5.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
−23.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−20.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−14.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
−1.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−23.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
−5.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
−11.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
−6.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
−3.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
−13.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
−3.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
−17.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+27.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
+24.5
over 8under 21avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Joseph's
34 games played
Straight up
22-12
65% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-23
32% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-76 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 76-65 | -9.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 59-94 | +12.5 | L −22.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 74-83 | -5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 85-99 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 60-58 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 70-69 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 87-65 | -22.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 63-71 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 67-51 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 62-68 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 79-102 | +19.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 56-62 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 97-90 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 67-65 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 68-64 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 72-79 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-74 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 85-64 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 67-58 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-73 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 52-60 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 64-68 | -3.5 | L −7.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 71-65 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 75-61 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 81-63 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 61-55 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 70-67 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 88-76 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 70-58 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 64-77 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 69-64 | +5.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 76-75 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 24 | @ | L 69-84 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
LAF
W 85-76
−4.5
8
vs
DREX
W 76-65
+1.5
12
@
VT
L 59-94
−22.5
17
@
PENN
L 74-83
−14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 85-99
−3.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 60-58
−3.5
6
vs
TEM
W 70-69
+2.5
9
vs
COPP
W 87-65
−0.5
11
@
SYR
L 63-71
+3.5
18
vs
DSU
W 67-51
−1.5
22
vs
CCU
L 62-68
−13.5
31
@
SLU
L 79-102
−3.5
3
vs
DAV
L 56-62
−4.5
7
vs
DUQ
W 97-90
+8.5
11
@
RICH
W 67-65
+9.5
14
vs
SBU
W 68-64
+5.5
19
@
VCU
L 72-79
+7.5
24
vs
DAY
W 81-74
+13.5
27
@
LUC
W 85-64
+19.5
31
@
LAS
W 67-58
+6.5
4
vs
GW
W 76-73
+4.5
7
@
GMU
L 52-60
−1.5
10
vs
FOR
L 64-68
−7.5
18
@
SBU
W 71-65
+11.5
21
vs
LUC
W 75-61
+4.5
25
vs
GMU
W 81-63
+19.5
28
@
URI
W 61-55
+8.5
4
@
DAV
W 70-67
+4.5
7
vs
LAS
W 88-76
+0.5
13
vs
DAV
W 70-58
+9.5
14
vs
VCU
L 64-77
−6.5
18
@
CSU
W 69-64
+10.5
22
@
CAL
W 76-75
+6.5
24
@
UNM
L 69-84
−4.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
LAF
W 85-76
+22.5
8
vs
DREX
W 76-65
+1.5
12
@
VT
L 59-94
−5.5
17
@
PENN
L 74-83
−6.5
20
@
UNLV
L 85-99
+22.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 60-58
−28.5
6
vs
TEM
W 70-69
−8.5
9
vs
COPP
W 87-65
+5.5
11
@
SYR
L 63-71
−12.5
18
vs
DSU
W 67-51
−19.5
22
vs
CCU
L 62-68
−14.5
31
@
SLU
L 79-102
+19.5
3
vs
DAV
L 56-62
−21.5
7
vs
DUQ
W 97-90
+37.5
11
@
RICH
W 67-65
−18.5
14
vs
SBU
W 68-64
−15.5
19
@
VCU
L 72-79
−0.5
24
vs
DAY
W 81-74
+15.5
27
@
LUC
W 85-64
+5.5
31
@
LAS
W 67-58
−17.5
4
vs
GW
W 76-73
−6.5
7
@
GMU
L 52-60
−27.5
10
vs
FOR
L 64-68
−3.5
18
@
SBU
W 71-65
−11.5
21
vs
LUC
W 75-61
−6.5
25
vs
GMU
W 81-63
+7.5
28
@
URI
W 61-55
−25.5
4
@
DAV
W 70-67
+0.5
7
vs
LAS
W 88-76
+21.5
13
vs
DAV
W 70-58
−5.5
14
vs
VCU
L 64-77
−4.5
18
@
CSU
W 69-64
−11.5
22
@
CAL
W 76-75
−1.5
24
@
UNM
L 69-84
−2.5
over 11under 23avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Saint Joseph's has the better starters
Position by position: Penn 2, Saint Joseph's 3, even 0
PennBetterSaint Joseph's
G M. Zanoni12.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 48
→JOESSmall
G J. Glover-Toscano15.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 80
G A. Levine8.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 61
←PENNSmall
G A. Williford7.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 46
F T. Power16.8 pts · 7.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 81
←PENNSmall
G L. Carey TR9.1 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 60
F A. Gerhart5.2 pts · 4.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 36
→JOESSmall
G K. Myers4.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 59
F L. Lueth3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
→JOESBig
F S. Logan TR3.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 58
PennBetterSaint Joseph's
PENN offense138th of 366 · -4.1
=Even
JOES defense91st of 366 · -0.3
PENN defense142nd of 366 · -3.1
=Even
JOES offense134th of 366 · -3.9
Backcourt-0.8 · 2 players
→JOESSmall
Backcourt+0.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.4 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt+0.0 · 1 player
Bench-1.5 · 5 players
→JOESSmall
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestPENN betterJOES betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Zanoni29 minA. Levine25 minS. Mohammed16 min · TRJ. Jones14 minN. Polonowski6 minP. Kamin3 min
Forwards
T. Power36 minA. Gerhart20 minL. Lueth17 minD. Scantlebury15 minW. Kruse3 minF. BillyNew
Centers
M. PereiraNew
Guards
J. Glover-Toscano32 minA. Williford26 minL. Carey26 min · TRK. Myers15 minM. Johnson4 minB. Rayer1 min
Forwards
S. Logan16 min · TRW. Lange1 minG. MarrsNewL. NonfonNewD. FlamerNewK. SaccoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #181 | Points per game | 71.9 #245 |
| 1.08 #196 | Points per possession | 1.05 #244 |
| 69.3 #158 | Pace (possessions) | 68.4 #208 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #223 | Effective FG% | 49.2 #284 |
| 38.3 #13 | 3-point % | 30.8 #325 |
| 35.4 #264 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.1 #65 |
| 33.9 #212 | Free throw rate | 29.7 #318 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #93 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #187 |
| 30.0 #200 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.4 #147 |
| 13.7 #171 | Assists per game | 15.1 #84 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #173 | Points allowed | 70.6 #68 |
| 1.07 #137 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #59 |
| 52.1 #218 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.6 #34 |
| 32.2 #73 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.7 #51 |
| 17.3 #132 | Turnovers forced | 15.0 #286 |
| 68.7 #220 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #185 |
| 6.5 #184 | Steals per game | 5.5 #290 |
| 3.1 #199 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #30 |
Penn
17-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-5 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois70–105
- Wvs Yale88–84
- Wvs Harvard62–60
- W@ Brown82–61
- Wvs Harvard64–61
A week or more of rest.
Saint Joseph's
22-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico69–84
- W@ California76–75
- W@ Colorado St69–64
- Lvs VCU64–77
- Wvs Davidson70–58
A week or more of rest.