Amica Mutual Pavilion · at Providence
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PROV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PROV 83–79 · win probability PROV 66%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 161.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PROV has more of the edges
COLO 2, PROV 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COLO 14.7%, PROV 16.7%. Forced: COLO 15.2%, PROV 13.1%
Shooting
Effective FG%: COLO 52.9 and allows 52.6; PROV 55.0 and allows 51.4
Three-pointers
COLO hits 35.1% and allows 36.3%; PROV hits 36.4% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 35.2% and 40.5% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: COLO 36.6, PROV 36.7. Allowed: COLO 36.6, PROV 32.7
Home court
PROV at home. This season: PROV 0-0 at home, COLO 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COLO 40%, PROV 13%. Transfers in: COLO 4, PROV 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
PROV offense vs COLO defense
Offense 35th of 366 against a defense 80th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: COLO plays 71.0 a game (76th fastest), PROV 74.2 (10th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
COLO has played the 58th-hardest schedule, PROV the 31st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
COLO offense vs PROV defense
Offense 54th of 366 against a defense 81st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COLO 29.0%, PROV 31.7%. Defensive: COLO 70.4%, PROV 69.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PROV -4.6 | — |
| Total | — | 161.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | COLO 78.6 · PROV 83.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PROV -2.6 | — |
| 1H total | 75.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | COLO 36.5 · PROV 39.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COLO 1–0 PROVCOLO leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · COLO 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025-26 | PROV 88 @ COLO 97 | COLO -1.5 | COLO W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Colorado
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-16
52% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 102-97 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | O 199 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 97-88 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 94-66 | -22.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 95-79 | -14.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 81-68 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 1 | vs | W 78-70 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 86-91 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 88-64 | -22.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 84-73 | -16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 81-86 | -15.5 | L −20.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 95-89 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 85-73 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-73 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-77 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 61-72 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 86-95 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 67-97 | +17.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 87-61 | +1.5 | W +27.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 67-86 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-70 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 44-78 | +13.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 86-90 | +15.5 | W +11.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-69 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 79-70 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-102 | +20.5 | L −19.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 92-78 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 79-89 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 83-92 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | O 175 |
| Apr 1 | vs | L 86-90 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
−5.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
−11.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+7.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+5.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+1.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
+11.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
+15.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−5.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
−3.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
+1.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
−5.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−11.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
−20.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+7.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
+2.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
+3.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−4.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−1.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
−12.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
−12.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
+27.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−11.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
+4.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−20.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+11.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
+10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
+3.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
−19.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+12.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+3.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
−10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MTST
W 84-78
+13.5
8
vs
EWU
W 102-97
+46.5
14
vs
PROV
W 97-88
+21.5
17
vs
ALST
W 94-66
+3.5
21
vs
UCD
W 95-79
+21.5
27
vs
SF
W 79-69
−2.5
28
vs
WASH
W 81-68
−2.5
1
vs
CBU
W 78-70
−2.5
6
@
CSU
L 86-91
+27.5
13
vs
UTSA
W 88-64
−2.5
17
vs
PRST
W 84-73
+6.5
20
vs
STAN
L 68-77
−9.5
28
vs
UNCO
L 81-86
+8.5
3
@
ASU
W 95-89
+27.5
7
vs
UTAH
W 85-73
−4.5
10
vs
TTU
L 71-73
−17.5
14
@
CIN
L 68-77
−0.5
17
@
WVU
L 61-72
−8.5
20
vs
KU
L 69-75
−11.5
24
vs
UCF
L 86-95
+21.5
29
@
ISU
L 67-97
+11.5
1
vs
TCU
W 87-61
−5.5
4
@
BAY
L 67-86
−2.5
7
vs
ASU
W 78-70
−10.5
11
@
TTU
L 44-78
−33.5
14
@
BYU
L 86-90
+14.5
21
vs
OKST
W 83-69
−10.5
25
vs
KSU
W 79-70
−14.5
28
@
HOU
L 62-102
+24.5
3
@
UTAH
W 92-78
+21.5
7
vs
ARIZ
L 79-89
+11.5
10
vs
OKST
L 83-92
+10.5
1
vs
OU
L 86-90
+13.5
over 17under 16avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Providence
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-11
67% overs · avg +8.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 89-79 | -23.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 101-107 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 106-81 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 98-66 | -29.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-65 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 83-104 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 166.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 78-90 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 94-64 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-71 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 86-79 | -19.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 110-113 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 223 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 67-72 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 77-71 | +14.5 | W +20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 98-103 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-97 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 165.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 82-88 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 93-88 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 104-105 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 209 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-81 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-87 | +15.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 73-87 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 97-87 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 168.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 90-72 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-79 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-68 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 94-84 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-76 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 56-78 | -3.5 | L −25.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 79-80 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 91-81 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 12 | @ | L 72-85 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
−13.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
−8.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+5.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
−7.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
+8.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
−14.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
+0.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
+3.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+11.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
−12.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+0.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−6.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
+20.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+4.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
−14.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
−3.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+7.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+1.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−8.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+9.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
−5.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+7.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+13.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
−2.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−3.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
+5.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+4.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
+6.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−25.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+8.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
+15.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
+50.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+14.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
+21.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
−23.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
+20.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
−1.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
−4.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+1.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
+19.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+58.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−13.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
−18.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+48.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
+15.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
+13.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+19.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+41.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−0.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+15.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
+2.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+15.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+8.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
+16.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−19.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
−13.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+7.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
−11.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−27.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+9.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
over 22under 11avg +8.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Colorado 2, Providence 2, even 1
ColoradoBetterProvidence
G B. Hargress14.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 93
←COLOSmall
G R. Sabol TR18.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
F J. Neely TR17.7 pts · 11.4 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 96
←COLOSmall
G M. Mack TR13.6 pts · 3 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 80
F I. Niagu TR4.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 42
→PROVBig
G D. Vanterpool TR15.2 pts · 6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 89
F D. Gomez TR5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Byrd TR10.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 90
C N. Feddersen TR9 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 59
→PROVSmall
G R. Mela9.9 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 81
ColoradoBetterProvidence
COLO offense54th of 366 · +3.2
=Even
PROV defense81st of 366 · +0.3
COLO defense80th of 366 · +0.3
=Even
PROV offense35th of 366 · +5.2
Backcourt+3.6 · 1 player
→PROVBig
Backcourt+8.2 · 5 players
Frontcourt+5.3 · 4 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-2.7 · 4 players
→PROVBig
Bench+4.2 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCOLO betterPROV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Hargress33 minJ. Sanders18 minJ. Holland18 minI. Inman10 minA. JonesNewR. PortelaNew
Forwards
J. Neely33 min · TRI. Niagu21 min · TRD. Gomez20 min · TRN. Randall1 minG. MalualNewC. HillNew
Centers
N. Feddersen21 min · TRE. JacobsenNew
Guards
R. Sabol37 min · TRM. Mack32 min · TRD. Vanterpool32 min · TRM. Byrd28 min · TRR. Mela26 minG. Hightower10 min · TR
Forwards
A. Page23 min · TRJ. Bannarbie16 min · TRJ. BardwellNewC. WaltersNewL. MarangonNew
Centers
S. Aletan26 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.2 #63 | Points per game | 85.3 #15 |
| 1.13 #80 | Points per possession | 1.15 #58 |
| 71.0 #76 | Pace (possessions) | 74.2 #10 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #108 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #37 |
| 35.1 #104 | 3-point % | 36.4 #45 |
| 35.2 #267 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.5 #157 |
| 36.6 #139 | Free throw rate | 36.7 #138 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #46 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #174 |
| 29.0 #235 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.7 #135 |
| 15.4 #67 | Assists per game | 14.0 #146 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.8 #313 | Points allowed | 84.0 #356 |
| 1.12 #272 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #292 |
| 52.6 #243 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.4 #179 |
| 36.3 #319 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #265 |
| 15.2 #267 | Turnovers forced | 13.1 #352 |
| 70.4 #144 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.2 #195 |
| 6.3 #196 | Steals per game | 5.4 #313 |
| 3.3 #170 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #86 |
Colorado
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oklahoma86–90
- Lvs Oklahoma St83–92
- Lvs Arizona79–89
- W@ Utah92–78
- L@ Houston62–102
A week or more of rest.
Providence
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's72–85
- Wvs Butler91–81
- L@ Georgetown79–80
- Lvs Marquette56–78
- W@ Creighton79–76
A week or more of rest.