The Palestra · at Penn
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PENN 76–66 · win probability PENN 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PENN has more of the edges
DREX 1, PENN 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
DREX offense vs PENN defense
Offense 323rd of 366 against a defense 142nd, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DREX 19.1%, PENN 15.4%. Forced: DREX 16.4%, PENN 17.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: DREX 31.6, PENN 33.9. Allowed: DREX 35.4, PENN 27.5
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DREX 24%, PENN 83%. Transfers in: DREX 2, PENN 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: DREX 50.6 and allows 47.1; PENN 50.4 and allows 52.1
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: DREX plays 65.2 a game (341st fastest), PENN 69.3 (158th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
DREX has played the 199th-hardest schedule, PENN the 126th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
PENN at home. This season: PENN 0-0 at home, DREX 0-0 away
Even
PENN offense vs DREX defense
Offense 138th of 366 against a defense 175th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DREX 31.2%, PENN 30.0%. Defensive: DREX 69.0%, PENN 68.7%
Even
Three-pointers
DREX hits 35.5% and allows 30.3%; PENN hits 38.3% and allows 32.2%. Threes are 40.0% and 35.4% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PENN -10.3 | — |
| Total | — | 141.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | DREX 65.6 · PENN 75.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PENN -6.0 | — |
| 1H total | 66.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | DREX 30.1 · PENN 36.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 2-8 20% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
DREX 1–2 PENNPENN leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · DREX 1-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025-26 | PENN 84 @ DREX 68 | DREX -4.5 | PENN W |
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | PENN 47 vs DREX 60 | DREX -2.5 | DREX W |
| Nov 15, 2022-23 | PENN 64 @ DREX 59 | DREX +2.5 | PENN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Drexel
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 65-76 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 83-90 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 50-80 | +11.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 75-43 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -4.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-71 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 71-66 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-75 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-69 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 66-74 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-56 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 53-65 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 56-37 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | U 93 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 64-58 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 73-51 | +5.5 | W +27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 58-59 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 58-51 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 61-60 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 60-81 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-77 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 73-93 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 69-72 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 70-61 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 68-62 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 65-60 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 51-62 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 84-77 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 57-65 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
−1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
−3.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−18.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
+18.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−20.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+0.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−0.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+2.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
−6.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
−14.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+3.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+7.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
+0.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
+0.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+1.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
+13.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
+9.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
+27.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
+6.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+0.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
+4.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−6.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−16.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+9.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
−21.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
−0.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
+10.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
+8.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
+3.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−2.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+2.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
+1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
+29.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−13.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
−20.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−0.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+3.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−6.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+10.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
+3.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
+1.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+4.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+0.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
−7.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
−19.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+5.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
−39.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
−28.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
−3.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
−7.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+21.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
−18.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−17.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−0.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+22.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
+32.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
+5.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
−12.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
−0.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
−18.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−20.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+22.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−14.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Penn
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
20-9
69% covers · avg +3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-21
28% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 81-106 | +19.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 83-74 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 77-65 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-77 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-90 | +18.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 74-72 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 69-70 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 79-83 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 80-61 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-74 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 63-64 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 60-77 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 67-72 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-81 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 61-60 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-76 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-71 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 82-61 | +1.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 62-60 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 88-84 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 70-105 | +25.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
−7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
−5.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
+14.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
+20.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
+9.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
+0.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−15.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
−8.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−5.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
+10.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+12.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
+4.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+1.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+2.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
+12.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
+4.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−10.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−0.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
+17.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−2.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
+7.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
+8.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
+5.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
+2.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
+1.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
+22.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
+5.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+13.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
−9.5
covered 20didn’t cover 9avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
+7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
+14.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
−6.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
−0.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
−10.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
−5.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−12.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
+2.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−4.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
−11.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+15.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
−10.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+8.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+8.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
−5.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
−23.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−20.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−14.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
−1.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−23.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
−5.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
−11.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
−6.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
−3.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
−13.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
−3.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
−17.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+27.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
+24.5
over 8under 21avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Penn has the better starters
Position by position: Drexel 1, Penn 2, even 2
DrexelBetterPenn
G J. Reed7.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 44
=Even
G M. Zanoni12.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 48
G A. Abram TR3.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 80
←DREXSmall
G A. Levine8.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 61
G D. Tingler3.4 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 59
→PENNSmall
F T. Power16.8 pts · 7.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 81
F P. Pagonis TR4.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 6
→PENNSmall
F A. Gerhart5.2 pts · 4.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 36
F M. de LaPorterie2.9 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 12
=Even
F L. Lueth3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
DrexelBetterPenn
DREX offense323rd of 366 · -10.5
→PENNBig
PENN defense142nd of 366 · -3.1
DREX defense175th of 366 · -3.9
=Even
PENN offense138th of 366 · -4.1
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-0.8 · 2 players
Frontcourt-3.5 · 2 players
→PENNBig
Frontcourt-0.4 · 3 players
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
←DREXSmall
Bench-1.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestDREX betterPENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Reed19 minA. Abram11 min · TRD. Tingler10 minM. Davis2 minL. PittmanNewM. HippsNew
Forwards
P. Pagonis18 min · TRM. de LaPorterie13 minR. Akuta5 minC. EdomwonyinNewD. SimonovicNew
Guards
M. Zanoni29 minA. Levine25 minS. Mohammed16 min · TRJ. Jones14 minN. Polonowski6 minP. Kamin3 min
Forwards
T. Power36 minA. Gerhart20 minL. Lueth17 minD. Scantlebury15 minW. Kruse3 minF. BillyNew
Centers
M. PereiraNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.3 #328 | Points per game | 74.4 #181 |
| 1.03 #282 | Points per possession | 1.08 #196 |
| 65.2 #341 | Pace (possessions) | 69.3 #158 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #204 | Effective FG% | 50.4 #223 |
| 35.5 #90 | 3-point % | 38.3 #13 |
| 40.0 #171 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.4 #264 |
| 31.6 #265 | Free throw rate | 33.9 #212 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.1 #322 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #93 |
| 31.2 #156 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.0 #200 |
| 12.8 #226 | Assists per game | 13.7 #171 |
| Defense | ||
| 67.6 #26 | Points allowed | 74.5 #173 |
| 1.04 #64 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #137 |
| 47.1 #22 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.1 #218 |
| 30.3 #15 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.2 #73 |
| 16.4 #195 | Turnovers forced | 17.3 #132 |
| 69.0 #202 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #220 |
| 5.8 #254 | Steals per game | 6.5 #184 |
| 3.5 #144 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #199 |
Drexel
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth57–65
- Wvs Northeastern84–77
- L@ Hofstra51–62
- Wvs Campbell65–60
- Wvs Towson68–62
A week or more of rest.
Penn
17-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-5 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois70–105
- Wvs Yale88–84
- Wvs Harvard62–60
- W@ Brown82–61
- Wvs Harvard64–61
A week or more of rest.