Joseph G. Echols Hall · at Norfolk St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NORF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNCW 79–67 · win probability UNCW 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCW has more of the edges
UNCW 7, NORF 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NORF offense vs UNCW defense
Offense 314th of 366 against a defense 119th, on the model’s ratings
UNCW offense vs NORF defense
Offense 131st of 366 against a defense 301st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCW 35.3%, NORF 32.5%. Defensive: UNCW 72.4%, NORF 67.7%
Context
Schedule so far
UNCW has played the 228th-hardest schedule, NORF the 343rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCW 50.4 and allows 47.5; NORF 49.3 and allows 51.7
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCW 40.4, NORF 43.5. Allowed: UNCW 31.7, NORF 45.3
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: UNCW plays 66.1 a game (310th fastest), NORF 69.1 (172nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
NORF at home. This season: NORF 0-0 at home, UNCW 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCW 35%, NORF 8%. Transfers in: UNCW 4, NORF 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Three-pointers
UNCW hits 35.0% and allows 29.7%; NORF hits 34.2% and allows 32.0%. Threes are 38.8% and 30.6% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCW 14.9%, NORF 18.7%. Forced: UNCW 14.9%, NORF 18.8%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNCW -11.4 | — |
| Total | — | 145.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCW 78.6 · NORF 67.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNCW -6.9 | — |
| 1H total | 68.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCW 37.6 · NORF 30.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNCW 0–1 NORFNORF leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UNCW 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2021-22 | NORF 74 @ UNCW 69 | UNCW -5 | NORF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Wilmington
32 games played
Straight up
25-7
78% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 77-86 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 73-60 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 85-60 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 81-73 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-57 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 87-57 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 138.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 88-62 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 70-69 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 70-63 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 73-70 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-67 | -15.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 87-78 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 65-53 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 49-45 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 87-78 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-71 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-75 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-77 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 82-73 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 78-85 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 76-64 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 65-54 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-66 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 79-69 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 88-65 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 76-79 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 76-57 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 70-85 | -6.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | @ | W 68-67 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 61-80 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
−5.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−1.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
+18.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+3.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
+1.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+21.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+7.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−7.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
−5.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
−1.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−16.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
−1.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−0.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−8.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+4.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
−2.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
−3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−4.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+3.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+10.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
−11.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
+13.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
+2.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
+1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+2.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
+1.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+9.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
−8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
+14.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
−21.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
+5.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
−15.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
+6.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−22.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
−0.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+2.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
−10.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+5.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+2.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−11.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
+2.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
+6.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−8.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
+18.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−19.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−46.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+22.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
+12.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
+3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−12.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+5.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+19.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
+3.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
−8.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
−30.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
−1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+3.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
−9.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+6.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
+8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
−12.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
+5.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
−13.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
+2.5
over 18under 14avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Norfolk St
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-10
64% overs · avg +4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | L 78-81 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 57-60 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 41-51 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 62-60 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 67-75 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-98 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-68 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 67-97 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-80 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-71 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 70-89 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-63 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 126.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-69 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 70-74 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-82 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 103-76 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 78-79 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-88 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-58 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 90-71 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 84-90 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 76-84 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 82-88 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
−0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
+5.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
+3.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−0.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+7.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
−1.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
+9.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
−3.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
−13.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+4.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+11.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
−7.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−5.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−3.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
−9.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+1.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+13.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
−8.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
−20.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
+2.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
+7.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
+2.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+8.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+0.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
−9.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
−1.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
−13.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
+0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
−32.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
−46.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−11.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+0.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
+12.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
−3.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
+15.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
+12.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+13.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+6.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
+22.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−9.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−5.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
+11.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+31.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+35.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
+4.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
+1.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
−5.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
−1.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
−0.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+20.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+3.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
+17.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
+10.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
+25.5
over 18under 10avg +4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UNC Wilmington has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Wilmington 5, Norfolk St 0, even 0
UNC WilmingtonBetterNorfolk St
G W. Kermoury TR13.1 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 75
←UNCWSmall
G B. Laster TR6.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 51
G T. Pettway TR8.8 pts · 2.1 reb · 2 ast
Score 64
←UNCWBig
G A. Newton3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
F G. Walsh9.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 57
←UNCWBig
F J. Gupton TR7.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 22
F S. Elliott TR4.1 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 23
←UNCWSmall
F B. Gardner TR3.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
C P. Wessler13.5 pts · 9.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 87
←UNCWSmall
F J. Riley TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 56
UNC WilmingtonBetterNorfolk St
UNCW offense131st of 366 · -3.7
←UNCWBig
NORF defense301st of 366 · -7.7
UNCW defense119th of 366 · -1.8
←UNCWBig
NORF offense314th of 366 · -10.1
Backcourt+1.0 · 2 players
←UNCWBig
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt+2.5 · 3 players
←UNCWBig
Frontcourt-4.2 · 3 players
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
→NORFSmall
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestUNCW betterNORF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
W. Kermoury27 min · TRT. Pettway22 min · TRJ. Lamothe15 minX. Brown12 min · TRM. Smith3 minC. LusterNew
Forwards
G. Walsh26 minS. Elliott17 min · TRT. NelsonNewM. ProdanovicNewW. SewardNew
Centers
P. Wessler27 min
Guards
B. Laster19 min · TRA. Newton16 minA. Torrence1 minC. WalkerNewD. CamaraNewJ. SkyersNew
Forwards
J. Gupton25 min · TRB. Gardner16 min · TRJ. Riley11 min · TRM. MitchellNew
Centers
J. JordanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.6 #174 | Points per game | 71.6 #257 |
| 1.13 #84 | Points per possession | 1.04 #274 |
| 66.1 #310 | Pace (possessions) | 69.1 #172 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #220 | Effective FG% | 49.3 #277 |
| 35.0 #124 | 3-point % | 34.2 #157 |
| 38.8 #194 | 3-point attempt rate | 30.6 #347 |
| 40.4 #54 | Free throw rate | 43.5 #13 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.9 #57 | Turnover rate | 18.7 #311 |
| 35.3 #40 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #108 |
| 13.1 #204 | Assists per game | 11.3 #326 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.1 #32 | Points allowed | 74.7 #181 |
| 1.03 #56 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #160 |
| 47.5 #30 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.7 #196 |
| 29.7 #6 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.0 #61 |
| 14.9 #297 | Turnovers forced | 18.8 #58 |
| 72.4 #51 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.7 #270 |
| 5.1 #330 | Steals per game | 6.5 #180 |
| 2.4 #312 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #264 |
UNC Wilmington
25-7 in 2025-26 overall · 15-4 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton61–80
- W@ Yale68–67
- Lvs Campbell70–85
- W@ Elon76–57
- Lvs Charleston76–79
A week or more of rest.
Norfolk St
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SC State82–88
- Lvs Howard76–84
- L@ Morgan St84–90
- W@ Coppin St75–69
- Wvs SC State90–71
A week or more of rest.